Post: #1

A Voice for Men just linked to a HuffPo article about feminists attacking one another, centered around a male feminist website called Equality for Women. The guy who ran it, Charles Clymer, apparently had an aggressive ban policy for comments he didn't like, resulting in some feuds with feminist commenters.

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/darlena-cun...42276.html

What's interesting to me is this part:

I had several women try to tell me that Charles Clymer was a sexual predator. [...]

What's interesting about this is when I told the women that I would not be labeling him as such, they were outraged. What about the overwhelming evidence, they asked. What about such and such screenshot? But the truth was there were two women who had actual screen shots of conversations that were completely consensual and in which these women were enthusiastic participants. The other complaints were either fabricated, hearsay or blind anger. [...]

Charles Clymer did not embezzle donation funds, and he did not prey on women.

He did ask for donations, and he did flirt with some of the women. End.

I am amazed at how feminists can keep asserting that women never lie about rape (after all, why would they put themselves through that kind of embarrassment?), that only 2% of rape accusations are false, etc., when not only do fake accusations come up all the time in the news, but feminists themselves are making them.*

Post: #2

Meet Charles Clymer.



Charles had the cunning idea of becoming a professional feminist. Unfortunately for Charles, he (allegedly) has a penis, and is doubly handicapped* by also being a white heterosexual person, which basically means he is a filthy untouchable in Social Justice Warrior land.

(*Not the good kind of handicapped, like being a Siamese Twin or something, because that would elevate his SJW status.)

Naturally, feminists and SJW's started to get annoyed when this "cis white dude" started taking up valuable attention space that should rightly have gone to genderqueer otherkin feminists, hambeasts, and womyn with dicks. And what's worse - he Facebook blocked SJW's who criticised him. Which is, like, actually and literally a microaggression.

Butts were hurt. Fee-fees were triggered. What-the-actuals were fucked.

What does any good SJW do when they're outraged?


To Twitter!

https://storify.com/AstrokidNJ/feminist-...-feminists

Here's Charlie-boy femming it up on Twitter like a soggy queef, and a sample from the epic beat-down that followed:



What was Clymer's response?

He came out as "genderfluid".

Post: #3

I'm speechless.

Post: #4

Okay, I'm a reasonable guy, I can maybe, somewhat, to some degree, understand that hustle he tried to pull, being a feminist leader and cashing in on that. But claiming that your own mother raped you, just to sound more sympathetic and be more popular? Trashing the woman who gave birth to you and raised you, just to appeal to a brainless crowd of feminists? This guy is a spineless scum. He is worse than any of those fucktards tweeting against him. Seriously, it takes a lack of spine, of character and of principles to sell your mother for popularity. I do hope that he spends the rest of his live behind bars due to a false rape allegation.

Post: #5

I can't tell if he's intentionally trolling them or not.

Post: #6

(01-17-2015 10:11 AM)SteveMcMahon Wrote:  He came out as "genderfluid".

Not sure what this means, but it sounds messy and disgusting.

Post: #7

(01-17-2015 10:11 AM)SteveMcMahon Wrote:  What-the-actuals were fucked.

Post: #8

(01-17-2015 01:14 PM)kmhour Wrote:  

(01-17-2015 10:11 AM)SteveMcMahon Wrote:  What-the-actuals were fucked.

Best line so far for months.

Post: #9

(01-17-2015 11:11 AM)turkishcandy Wrote:  Okay, I'm a reasonable guy, I can maybe, somewhat, to some degree, understand that hustle he tried to pull, being a feminist leader and cashing in on that. But claiming that your own mother raped you, just to sound more sympathetic and be more popular? Trashing the woman who gave birth to you and raised you, just to appeal to a brainless crowd of feminists? This guy is a spineless scum. He is worse than any of those fucktards tweeting against him. Seriously, it takes a lack of spine, of character and of principles to sell your mother for popularity. I do hope that he spends the rest of his live behind bars due to a false rape allegation.

Question, from someone who is ignorant about twitter and most of the mechanics of making money online: is there really money in being a feminist who tweets and has 10K followers? What are the economics/business model here?

Btw, while I agree with you that it would be vile to falsely accuse your mother (anyone, but especially your mother or father) of sexual abuse, I have no evidence or information one way or the other about whether he is lying. Do you? Sexual abuse does happen, and it happens to men. I hate false accusations as much as the next guy, but we should be careful about labeling every accusation false out of hand.

Whether Clymer is a lying scumbag is a matter of objective fact: did or did not his mother sexually abuse him? (Sexually abuse, btw, not rape. Sexual abuse could be something like shaming, sexually-humiliating punishments when he wet the bed or touched his penis as a child. Shit like that could mess a guy up even if not done for sexual gratification of the mother.)

Post: #10

(01-17-2015 02:03 PM)Ryre Wrote:  

(01-17-2015 11:11 AM)turkishcandy Wrote:  Okay, I'm a reasonable guy, I can maybe, somewhat, to some degree, understand that hustle he tried to pull, being a feminist leader and cashing in on that. But claiming that your own mother raped you, just to sound more sympathetic and be more popular? Trashing the woman who gave birth to you and raised you, just to appeal to a brainless crowd of feminists? This guy is a spineless scum. He is worse than any of those fucktards tweeting against him. Seriously, it takes a lack of spine, of character and of principles to sell your mother for popularity. I do hope that he spends the rest of his live behind bars due to a false rape allegation.

Question, from someone who is ignorant about twitter and most of the mechanics of making money online: is there really money in being a feminist who tweets and has 10K followers? What are the economics/business model here?

Btw, while I agree with you that it would be vile to falsely accuse your mother (anyone, but especially your mother or father) of sexual abuse, I have no evidence or information one way or the other about whether he is lying. Do you? Sexual abuse does happen, and it happens to men. I hate false accusations as much as the next guy, but we should be careful about labeling every accusation false out of hand.

Whether Clymer is a lying scumbag is a matter of objective fact: did or did not his mother sexually abuse him? (Sexually abuse, btw, not rape. Sexual abuse could be something like shaming, sexually-humiliating punishments when he wet the bed or touched his penis as a child. Shit like that could mess a guy up even if not done for sexual gratification of the mother.)

How does any feminist make money? You start writing for free, get enough audience, and then start writing for cash. When this guy has enough followers, he will start writing for a column at some point, probably at a Gawker site, or start writing his own books.

First of all, you don't need any evidence but common sense to know that a male feminist who believes in rape culture, eye rape, written consent and 1-in-5 rape ratio, can very well lie about being sexually abused in order to appeal to the feminists. In fact, the chances are he is lying.

As for evidence, I find it hard to believe that a mother would sexually abuse her son. A father, maybe, yeah. But a mother? That's a rare, rare case, perhaps 1 in a million. And if this is that 1 specific case out of million cases, is it a coincidence that the abused guy happens to be a feminist who publicly accuses instead of filing charges? A little too convenient maybe?

You can also do a smell test. If he had been sexually abused by his mother, he would turn out a quiet pervert, not a public defender of women rights.

Post: #11

"First they came for the male feminists, and no one spoke out—because no one likes them, not even the female feminists."

Clymer blocked me on Twitter as well. I probably deserved it though because I kept calling him a faggot.

Seriously though, he is a huge faggot. It's hilarious watching all the women and POCs rip him apart. Male feminists have play no role in the feminist movement and they have made that abundantly clear. Yet these whimpering simps ascribe themselves the label of male feminist. His sign should read, "this is what a pegging bottom looks like." Same thing really.

Post: #12

If one of those RooshV fire teams were to copy this and turn feminism on itself it would be really funny.

Look at how easy it is to get the crowds in.