Post: #1

Would you?

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/07/...ostpopular

Post: #2

Isn't "plus size model" is an oxymoron, how can you be fat and can still be a model ?

Post: #3

Whatever...
I still only going to check out the thin girls.

One of the comment is just too funny, a thin girl complains that she feels shit because she is not "curvy".

Hooray for calling a perfectly healthy, normal looking woman 'plus size'. Hooray for making millions of women feel like shit. Hooray for all those commenters saying 'real women haz curvz', because those 'sticks' aren't real women, right? They're thin, so they don't have feelings. Hooray for insulting everyone whose body isn't exactly as you think it should be! Hooray for fat shaming, skinny shaming, all kinds of body shaming!

Hooray for making everyone miserable and self conscious!

She is kinda right...

Post: #4

She's a little too Monica Lewinsky for me. Here's a picture and the HuffPost article (which should have been both pasted in the original post).

******

Candice Huffine Will Be The First Plus Size Model To Feature In The Pirelli Calendar - Isn't She Gorgeous?
The Huffington Post UK | By Rachel Moss

The Pirelli Calendar will be back in November with its 2015 edition - 'why should we care?' we hear you ask.

Well, dear reader, this year's Pirelli Calendar is particularly special. (I really can't stand this prissy female tone.)

The famous calendar, put out by Italian tyre company Pirelli and starring the fashion world's top models, turns 50 this year and for the first time ever it will include a plus size model.

About bloody time. (Why? The whole point of models is to be hotter than average not average. Should it include a blown tire too?)

The gorgeous (says who?) Candice Huffine will (dis)grace the covers alongside the likes of Joan Smalls and Karen Elson, proving that women and while some may groan that it's yet another token gesture, we hope this will contribute to the fight to use plus size models and it not be an extraordinary thing. (Emphasis added because this sentence makes no sense, proving HuffPost is a dumping ground for poorly-edited crap.)

Soapbox politics aside, what else do we know about Candice?

She has rubbed elbows with Robyn Lawley and Tara Lynn for Vogue Italia's Curvy issue (WTF?!?! Is Italy becoming America?!) in 2011, and walked in Lane Bryant (of course! hahaha) and Isabel Toledo's runway show. (Seriously, if Lane Bryant has "runway shows," I hope it's an airport runway they're using.)

She's also smoking hot (matter of opinion -- men will decide, not female "writers," thank you), a fabulous cook (who likes drive-thru as well, apparently) and she loves a good pair of shoes (even though she has been known to cause heels to become flats)- just check out the pics from her Instagram feed (wrong word to use, sad to say).

Hello, girl crush... (What was that I said about prissy women's writing?)


^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Hand over your Chef-Boy-R-Dee, Days of Broken Arrows! NOW!!"

Post: #5

"Plus size model" = Professional SIF

Post: #6

^ should she be in a car calendar? no. WB yes.

Post: #7

If you scroll her picture slowly from the face it's quite funny...starts of high on the points scale and then...boom! Gets worse the lower you go.

Post: #8

There is to much delusion with "plus size". The average fatty unless she does a ton of work in tricking people and using garments to hold in her rolls will never look like that broad posted. The reality is some broads are just more built out, "husky", "big boned" - whatever you want to call it. That broad will never be skinny, but she likely works hard to not pork up either but it is what it is. She is a minority and isn't cut from the same cloth as your garden variety fatty whom is packing tons of Crisco under her skin. Using this broad is just as unrealistic as using a overly skinny broad as both are minorities compared to average normal healthy women.

I remember I used to fuck around with this curved out Dutch broad with a massive unworldly PAWG/Whooty ass. Her booty defied logic and she was built out with curves to handle it all. She was no small girl but she was still toned and didn't have any rolls or typical fatty shit like gross loose skin. She did "plus size" modeling too for wedding dresses since her curves forced her into bigger sizes but I would never call this broad fat. She just didn't eat junk food or drink much and it was all she needed (so far) to no explode into a whale. Fattys would be delusional to think they could look like her on their wedding days but the don't get the simple fact that their body types were never designed to carry any weight like that and thus why they look like corn bloated pigs.

The model in question is good enough for fucking. But she is as rare as any other model. Even "plus size" models sizes are way smaller then the typical American fatties. The media will never tell women this as they continue to eat cupcakes thinking they look like this broad in a bikini. It's just keeping the extremes that women love. Either thy are fat as whales or throat burned thin from barging up meals. Try to get them to be normal and healthy for eating healthy with some exercise and they scream for you to jump off a bridge.

Post: #9

(07-31-2014 07:47 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  ^ should she be in a car calendar? no. WB yes.

More like a semi-truck calendar.

Post: #10

Notice she's wearing the high-waisted panties to tuck in the flabby belly. They ALL do this.

WNB with anyone's dick

Post: #11

7/10 WHR

Hilarious how it's always "some find bigger women attractive"...yeah, if they have a 7/10 WHR. I need to draw another graph showing size and WHR and the effect on attractiveness.

Post: #12

oh ffs....

whats next? Is Hustler or Playboy going to cater to the fat acceptance movement now?

Post: #13

how many tire changes will she need, she certainly has a few spare

Post: #14

Why do these plus sized fat models insist on wearing 1980s wrestling trunks?



Well, I take that back. I'm glad they don't wear less material.

Post: #15

I think Michelin already tried this.

Post: #16

(07-31-2014 04:20 PM)richler Wrote:  I think Michelin already tried this.

Post: #17

(07-31-2014 04:17 PM)Kickb Wrote:  

Post: #18

Post: #19

Why do plus size models never have a fat ass, hourglass, big thighs, and hips. Just stomach and a cute/attractive face. Fucking up the word curvy is a damn shame.

Post: #20

At least they still have hot bitches in the chainsaw calendar!

Post: #21

If she wasn't fat she would have zero chance of making the calendar. Her face is cute, but she isn't that cute.

Post: #22

Honestly? WB raw.

I regret nothing.

Post: #23

Standard shit. They are going to get huge points from the feminist and liberal camp for promoting women who are comfortable and secure with their special bodies that are just son unique and beautiful in their own special way. Good marketing is all. Sure it is perpetuating the onoing "progressve" ideals of the west, but honestly who isn't.

Post: #24

Lol put a bunch of fatties in SI Swimsuit Edition and that shit'll tank faster than you can say 'cellulite'.

Post: #25

(08-01-2014 03:39 PM)germanico Wrote:  Honestly? WB raw.

I regret nothing.

How about this?