Post: #51

its normal out there. just call their bluff, they just want the cash, they actually don't care about the video, probably don't even have the video lol

Block and delete and they just move on to the next fella who falls for the tarp

Post: #52

This is a hilarious thread. Classic.

God, I love this place. How I do love it so....

Post: #53

Damn, that's a close scare. I'm going to make sure there is no overlap of pictures from dating sites with LinkedIn or Facebook.

Post: #54

(07-29-2014 08:54 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  Even if he was doing some crazy shit on video, who cares? It's not illegal.

You can't blackmail someone who doesn't care.

Never back down from this type of thing. Once you fall for that, it never ends.

Exactly!! I happened to be a victim of the exact same scam a year ago when I was pipelining the Philippines.
I told her I'm already a pornstar on internet, I don't have any money, wished her good luck, blocked her and forgot about it. Still didn't anyone of my facebook contacts get anything(from witch I know anyway). She asked for my facebook though I never accepted the request she couldn't see any of my contacts.

And even if she were to send it to anyone, so what?? I'm a man and she got me horny.. Nothing to be a shamed of.

Post: #55

Thanks for sharing. Yeah pretty crazy scam.

Be careful out there with Facebook.. I've had girls send messages to girls through Facebook before.. Had to shut it down practically..

I might start using a fake name soon too. scary stuff

Post: #56

(07-29-2014 06:10 PM)Vacancier Permanent Wrote:  Bojangles,
I'm not in the EU. Can you really delete all your info from their searches? That's HUGE! Thanks for the tip man! Didn't know that!

(07-29-2014 04:44 PM)bojangles Wrote:  Google image search your pics and delete those profiles where they are held. If you used linked-in, make sure it's private.

Unfortunately you're in the EU, because I used google's removal service to remove all my information from their searches.

Google only removes information from its European sites (.co.uk, .it, .fr, etc.). If someone uses the Google site for another country (Russia, google.com, google.ca, etc.) the info will still appear in the search.

Post: #57

(07-30-2014 04:08 PM)DaveR Wrote:  

(07-29-2014 06:10 PM)Vacancier Permanent Wrote:  Bojangles,
I'm not in the EU. Can you really delete all your info from their searches? That's HUGE! Thanks for the tip man! Didn't know that!

(07-29-2014 04:44 PM)bojangles Wrote:  Google image search your pics and delete those profiles where they are held. If you used linked-in, make sure it's private.

Unfortunately you're in the EU, because I used google's removal service to remove all my information from their searches.

Google only removes information from its European sites (.co.uk, .it, .fr, etc.). If someone uses the Google site for another country (Russia, google.com, google.ca, etc.) the info will still appear in the search.

Not true. As I already explained, Google will remove personal information from its U.S. search engine -- although it may take awhile (two or three months).

I have personal experience actually doing it, unless there is a new policy in place. I would tend to doubt that is the case, considering all the heat that Google takes regarding the loss of personal privacy.

Post: #58

(07-30-2014 04:15 PM)Tail Gunner Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 04:08 PM)DaveR Wrote:  Google only removes information from its European sites (.co.uk, .it, .fr, etc.). If someone uses the Google site for another country (Russia, google.com, google.ca, etc.) the info will still appear in the search.

Not true. As I already explained, Google will remove personal information from its U.S. search engine -- although it may take awhile (two or three months).

I have personal experience actually doing it, unless there is a new policy in place. I would tend to doubt that is the case, considering all the heat that Google takes regarding the loss of personal privacy.

What they will remove from their global index is very limited, and they won't help you with photos or videos:

https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/2744324

https://support.google.com/websearch/tro...er/3111061

Post: #59

(07-30-2014 11:04 AM)berserk Wrote:  Damn, that's a close scare. I'm going to make sure there is no overlap of pictures from dating sites with LinkedIn or Facebook.

I don't view that as a good long-term strategy. Facebook and Google already have facial recognition technology, which they have, for the time being, chosen to limit it due to privacy concerns. However, you can be sure that as time goes on it will become more pervasive.

I don't use Facebook, but from what I've read, if you have a Facebook profile, an adversary only needs to upload your photo and then your face will automatically scanned and tagged.

Post: #60

(07-30-2014 04:25 PM)DaveR Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 04:15 PM)Tail Gunner Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 04:08 PM)DaveR Wrote:  Google only removes information from its European sites (.co.uk, .it, .fr, etc.). If someone uses the Google site for another country (Russia, google.com, google.ca, etc.) the info will still appear in the search.

Not true. As I already explained, Google will remove personal information from its U.S. search engine -- although it may take awhile (two or three months).

I have personal experience actually doing it, unless there is a new policy in place. I would tend to doubt that is the case, considering all the heat that Google takes regarding the loss of personal privacy.

What they will remove from their global index is very limited, and they won't help you with photos or videos:

I agree that Google U.S. has fairly tight restrictions on its criteria for removal. Then again, Goggle U.S. does remove some photographs and videos, which could come in handy considering what some of the guys on this forum are doing.

Quote:We may remove images or videos, or prevent them from showing in search results if the content contains:

Pornography, including search queries with multiple meanings and search queries that are not offensive but could have offensive results

Bodily functions or bodily fluids

Post: #61

I bet those Canadian incel oil workers fall into this all the time. I can't even imagine their less intelligent counterparts in Texas. Those guys pull goose eggs on the steady! Those girls should target them.

Post: #62

edit

Post: #63

(07-30-2014 07:29 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  I bet those Canadian incel oil workers fall into this all the time. I can't even imagine their less intelligent counterparts in Texas. Those guys pull goose eggs on the steady! Those girls should target them.

So true I liked it twice.

Post: #64

Atlantic,
How did you manage to like a post twice? LOL

Post: #65

For those unaware, your built-in computer webcam is one of the easiest things to remotely hack

As in, someone could hack in, disable the LED signaling it's "ON", then activate the lens and watch/record at will. There will be no difference in the appearance of the computer, but the camera will be feeding to the remote monitor.

Black electrical tape over the lens when not in use for me.

Two biggest ways to avoid this are to not use wi-fi spots and NEVER use bluetooth...it's a wonder bluetooth is still relevant it's been a field day for crime since its inception

Post: #66

There are scammers on ALL the dating sites. This is a big reason to stay away from them.

Post: #67

(07-30-2014 11:49 PM)Santoro Wrote:  Black electrical tape over the lens when not in use for me.

lol. Black electrical tape leaves a residue that is very difficult to remove when you must use the web cam. I learned my lesson. I just use a post-it.

Post: #68

IF you want to delete your Facebook account. In what way should you do it to leave as little traces of you as possible?

Post: #69

(07-30-2014 11:09 PM)Vacancier Permanent Wrote:  Atlantic,
How did you manage to like a post twice? LOL

If I try to "like" a post a second time, my computer will say, "you have already 'liked' this post", or something similar to that. Most of the time, there is NO option available to "like" a post a second time. Must have just been a glitch of timing or something? Maybe simultaneously liking from two different devices or browsers?

Post: #70

(07-31-2014 02:04 AM)JayJuanGee Wrote:  

(07-30-2014 11:09 PM)Vacancier Permanent Wrote:  Atlantic,
How did you manage to like a post twice? LOL

If I try to "like" a post a second time, my computer will say, "you have already 'liked' this post", or something similar to that. Most of the time, there is NO option available to "like" a post a second time. Must have just been a glitch of timing or something? Maybe simultaneously liking from two different devices or browsers?

[attachment=20387]



Two, Two likes. Muhaha

Post: #71

^^^^

(07-31-2014 08:14 AM)Atlantic Wrote:  Two, Two likes. Muhaha

Not so fast, Atlantic! You have the power of 2 "likes"....that is bloody impressive, no doubt. But there are others with the power of 2 "reps"....

Sammy and Hooligan Harry had you beat.





.

Post: #72

Back in the day you could give multiple reps to the same person I think.

Youngglobalmobile is going to come after ya when he loses three rep points later today!

Post: #73

(07-31-2014 02:06 PM)Atlantic Wrote:  Back in the day you could give multiple reps to the same person I think.

Youngglobalmobile is going to come after ya when he loses three rep points later today!

Ya I think you could up until the great rep point fiasco of 2012 when former member Mixx quit the forum over it, rep points were temporarily suspended. VP I almost spit my coffee out when I read this thread, fucking classic man!

Post: #74

Ya this is one of my favourite threads of late.

I have a feeling that more went down though then VP is telling us.

I mean if she was trying to blackmail you she would want as incriminating evidence as possible.

Come on VP tell us what really happened....

Post: #75

(07-31-2014 09:51 PM)Atlantic Wrote:  Ya this is one of my favourite threads of late.

I have a feeling that more went down though then VP is telling us.

I mean if she was trying to blackmail you she would want as incriminating evidence as possible.

Come on VP tell us what really happened....

Meanwhile, inside VP's hotel room . . . .