Post: #76

(07-16-2014 03:54 PM)JJ Roberts Wrote:  Has anyone on this thread even met the dude?

Don't really know much about him other than he wrote a bunch of funny stories that I enjoyed 10 years ago or whenever the fuck they came out.

People have met you:

Well tonight was interesting, it would have been a lot better if 20nation and THC had joined me, but those guys decided to take it easy, which I can understand as they're traveling long term and can't come out every night, which I'm doing. I did however meet the biggest dickhead from RVF I've met so far tonight, you know who you are, under normal circumstances I wouldn't call you out bro, but you were such an ignorant cunt tonight that I have to do this.

I've met a lot of RVF members during my travels, 90% of which have been cool, surely some of the most highly repped members here will vouch for me, I don't make this statement lightley but you're a fucking goof, I tried to engage you in positive conversation but your arrogant ass wouldn't have it. Finally I called you out, outside of the night club that wouldn't let you in because you refused to take off your stupid hat, I told you straight up man-to-man that you have a negative attitude and you were acting like a fucking prick. What did you do at that point? You walked away from me like the little bitch that you are!

Have fun on your upcoming trip to Jamaica and Cuba, I could have given you some solid intel on the former if you hadn't been such an insufferable wanker.

I may elaborate on this later but its after 2, I' drunk and I have an early bus to catch, come at me brah!

Peace, Scotian.

Post: #77

(07-16-2014 03:54 PM)JJ Roberts Wrote:  Has anyone on this thread even met the dude?

Don't really know much about him other than he wrote a bunch of funny stories that I enjoyed 10 years ago or whenever the fuck they came out.

Wouldn't it behoove you to go and find out why he is a problem rather than asking the same questions over and over again, continuously raising the ire of everyone? Doing what you are doing made you look incompetent, which gave everyone else a reason to dig into you to find out more about you. They found some terrible things about you which caused you to backpedal, deflect, and avoid questions. You should hit up the search button and give it a good workout and quickly catch up with everyone else so that you can have an informed opinion on the matter, without further lending yourself to increased scrutiny.

Post: #78

Dude, why do you insist on trying to de-rail the thread and embarrass scotian? What have you got against him?

I have read the thread that you copied and pasted that from and the dude got socially rejected by a fellow forum member, wrote a drunk rant about it, later apologised to roosh and the forum member he ranted about for causing forum drama and refused to ID who he was talking about.

Respect the guy's wishes and stop causing shit.

Post: #79

(07-16-2014 04:08 PM)JJ Roberts Wrote:  Dude, why do you insist on trying to de-rail the thread and embarrass scotian? What have you got against him?

I have read the thread that you copied and pasted that from and the dude got socially rejected by a fellow forum member, wrote a drunk rant about it, later apologised to roosh and the forum member he ranted about for causing forum drama and refused to ID who he was talking about.

Respect the guy's wishes and stop causing shit.

Is that thread about you? Yes or no. You wouldn't answer a simple question.

Look at what a weasel you are. You are using the third person. "Forum member."

As if that's clever.

Again, you are a slime ball with no integrity as a man. You won't even answer a simple, direct question.

Now everyone knows about Tucker and about you.

Maybe you and Tucker can team up. Good luck with that.

Post: #80

(07-16-2014 04:08 PM)JJ Roberts Wrote:  Dude, why do you insist on trying to de-rail the thread and embarrass scotian? What have you got against him?

I have read the thread that you copied and pasted that from and the dude got socially rejected by a fellow forum member, wrote a drunk rant about it, later apologised to roosh and the forum member he ranted about for causing forum drama and refused to ID who he was talking about.

Respect the guy's wishes and stop causing shit.

Ive meet Scotian more then thirty times. Hes a highly intelligent guy and he has a great insight into peoples charachter. Look at his oil sands thread which has LITERALLY helped close to a hundred people. The guy always writes detailed responses and has meet up with a lot of people who come out here to Alberta.

If thats his verdict of you then I believe him. Id prefer if you didnt talk shit about him and Mike cause you are only embarrassing yourself.

Post: #81

Not 100% certain. But I believe that my neighbor knows Tuker Max. I'm going to have to drop by and ask him about the dude sometime.

Post: #82

(07-16-2014 03:15 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  I noticed you because you defended Tucker. I would have spotted you sooner or later, though.

I will be honest. I do not like people like you. You are parasites.

If you've been around, you notice that I'm not bashful about calling people like you out.

The mods can even attest that I regularly "report spam" when guys like you show up; where as I have never reported a post when guys went after me personally.

I really am about the community, which is something you as a parasite will never understand.

As far as your other stuff, well, was that link I posted (three times now, I believe) about you?

Other men have met me. At least 50. Some have been random spottings. That is, they recognized my pic and said hi.

They rather than I can evaluate my character.

But, why are you always so angry?

Post: #83

(07-17-2014 09:57 AM)ManAbout Wrote:  But, why are you always so angry?

You misspelled "intense"

Post: #84

As fucked up as this sounds

We should be thanking him.

Post: #85

(07-17-2014 10:05 AM)Baldwin81 Wrote:  

(07-17-2014 09:57 AM)ManAbout Wrote:  But, why are you always so angry?

You misspelled "intense"

Indeed. In the case of JJ Roberts, I had righteous indignation, which is an appropriate response to such a scoundrel.

We live in a world where "men" stand for nothing.

I have values and principles. I articulate those values in a clear, concise, and a direct manner.

It seems like anger to "men" who are too afraid to speak their minds.

I seem especially angry to those "men" who stand for nothing other than, "Keep your head down. Go along and get along."

Post: #86

I never got into Tucker Max because it struck me like so many other slackers get-rich-quick schemes. I already had a career up and running on a human work week when 4HWW came out. Is there anything in it that's still relevant today?

Post: #87

(07-17-2014 01:27 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  ....
I have values and principles. I articulate those values in a clear, concise, and a direct manner.

It seems like anger to "men" who are too afraid to speak their minds.

I seem especially angry to those "men" who stand for nothing other than, "Keep your head down. Go along and get along."

Men nowadays are too much steeped in the PC-feminized-culture.

Men sometimes may word things a bit strong, but usually guys who mean something don't say really aggressive things lightly. Manginas and women are far easier to use really violent language - killing someone, beating up someone, etc.

Plus you also have to realize that men sometimes get into fights and then drink a beer a mere 30 minutes later, if the quarrel was based on some misunderstanding or some minor matter. That is how men are and in our feminized society it seems to have been forgotten - pop in a Ritalin and behave like a girl.

Post: #88

(07-17-2014 01:27 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(07-17-2014 10:05 AM)Baldwin81 Wrote:  

(07-17-2014 09:57 AM)ManAbout Wrote:  But, why are you always so angry?

You misspelled "intense"

Indeed. In the case of JJ Roberts, I had righteous indignation, which is an appropriate response to such a scoundrel.

We live in a world where "men" stand for nothing.

I have values and principles. I articulate those values in a clear, concise, and a direct manner.

It seems like anger to "men" who are too afraid to speak their minds.

I seem especially angry to those "men" who stand for nothing other than, "Keep your head down. Go along and get along."

Calling someone "angry" is usually the tactic our enemies use against us. Black men in corporate have to speak like mice in order to never appear "angry". White guys in corporate have to use "white man guilt and PC" phrases and self deprecate themselves with jokes, in order to not be seen as "angry" or "crazy".

Don't ever change Mike. Real men are always assertive and provide leadership for others. You always do both as a leader of men. While lurking I always pulled up my seat a little closer when I saw a Mike post.

People will always try to read more into a message than what is just plainly written. Just like how women in a corporate office report guys for having a mean attitude to HR over something plainly written in an email....

Most people probably wont agree with Mike 100% on everything. That does not mean we cannot appreciate his dedication and the conviction on which he conveys it with.

Post: #89

I recently watched - or fast-forwarded mostly - Tucker's movie:






The good part was that it actually included some good Game approaches that the Tucker-character used in the movie.

For example:
Telling the White Knight Cockblocker barkeeper:
" You know, you are right. Make sure and tell your cute waitress collegue that I am an asshole and that she should stay away from me. Will you do that for me?" Heh - that line is actually not bad if you visit the bar again. Blue Bill Knight will lubricate the waitress for you.

But apart from the not so bad negging, banter and natural Game spitting - the movie is pretty much Blue Pill and of course too boring to sit through in the cinema.

- single motherhood is praised via the good-hearted stripper
- marriage and great weddings are taken for granted as wonderful institutions
- there are a multitude of feminist references and statements which make you wonder what Tucker's real thoughts are nowadays

Of course the movie itself looks cheap, the cast is wrong, the stories of his book picked for the movie are not that convincing.
Frankly the movie OLD SCHOOL is way more Red Pill than Tucker's movie - also of course way more funny.

Post: #90

BUMP

Just listened to something like 20-25 episodes.

Truth be told, I don't think it's that bad. Especially for most "normal" men, the general strategies advised aren't too shabby. Another thing I noticed is that TM has a good sense of humor. I was laughing pretty hard during several of the "Helping Joe" episodes.

The other stuff about hating and disrespecting various manosphere communities I have pitiful little insight into, so I'll just have to take your word for it he's a scheming narcissist.

Post: #91

NOT OUR TUCKER

Post: #92

Well, this thread's been resurrected, so I guess it doesn't hurt to reply - I had this series recommended to me by a blue pill roommate a few years back. He was a pretty awkward dork, but kept in stunningly good shape, had a good job, and had figured how to be relatively successful with women - usually sixes and sevens. (Back then, I knew of Roosh V and Return of Kings and generally approved, but hadn't discovered this forum quite yet.)

Initially, the podcast seemed OK, but not really anything innovative or hugely insightful. Immediately, I took the podcast less seriously when he started consulting women for tips (and the pro-faggot and anti-religion comments were too frequent for me to just ignore...I was less set in my beliefs a few years back, but I've never compromised on either of those things). I continued to listen to it on and off to pass the time when I didn't want to listen to music or political podcasts - he did have some guests on there that I loved, like the 48 Laws of Power's Robert Greene. Many of the comments on human nature growing out of the hunter-gatherer period were pretty spot on, sure - but isn't it sort of self-evident that we react to people in certain ways because we've been doing that for millions of years? HOW has that not occurred to the average person?

The only person this podcast really appealed to were either completely clueless social rejects, or blue-pill white knights who just wanted their opinions confirmed by famous people and pretty girls.

Post: #93

Fuck Tucker Max he's just a faggot opportunist with a very punchable face.

Post: #94

(03-23-2017 09:45 PM)LastKing Wrote:  Fuck Tucker Max he's just a faggot opportunist with a very punchable face.

I hadn't heard of the guy for nearly three years until this thread popped up again.

Once we had a good laugh an roasted his new website "The Mating Grounds", he disappeared from the limelight.

G

Post: #95

Lol I looked into what he does now. He is the cofounder and chairman of book in a box.





Who is gonna pay the $25k for someone to write a book for you? How many books even make that kind of money?

Post: #96

(03-24-2017 02:45 AM)bacon Wrote:  Lol I looked into what he does now. He is the cofounder and chairman of book in a box.





Who is gonna pay the $25k for someone to write a book for you? How many books even make that kind of money?

I liked it better when it was called ghostwriting.

Post: #97

Well if that isn't the most retarded shit I've ever seen.

Post: #98