Post: #51

(06-08-2014 12:04 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(06-08-2014 11:26 AM)agentaika Wrote:  2) Hillary Clinton. I think there's a lot going on behind the scenes that we aren't seeing.

I speculated that that was what "Ban Bossy" was all about. Hillary.

Yah, I think you're right particularly with the Ban Bossy thing. The Rape thing might be too strong in that it's producing resentment and a reaction, but it's a base mobilizer.

It would be naive to think that "memes" are not launched towards targets indirectly, obliquely.

There are now petabytes of data on what people are saying and thinking pouring into Cray supercomputers and their equivalent. The data can be purchased and distilled into a picture of the mass consciousness.

Marketing experts, psychologists, graphic designers and writers can work together using this data to create coordinated campaigns which can be launched on websites, social media, TV, radio and print.

It all goes back to Edward Bernays.

The best writers about this kind of thing are the novelists Don DeLillo and a guy named Leonard Lewin. His books Report from Iron Mountain and Triage are classics about covert agendas of TPTB.

Of course, there will be (is?) a counter-narrative that will appropriate many of our themes here in the service of Jeb Bush. It does not mean that there is going to be any sincere belief in change. Wedge issues - abortion, race, feminism, gays, religion - are too useful in the mobilization of parties' bases to ever be resolved. The real issues are about power and money.

Post: #52

(06-08-2014 01:37 PM)Private Man Wrote:  Logic and reason are tools of the patriarchy.

You laugh , but here are some creepy mangina's apologizing to women "on behalf of the male gender" and at 3:50 apologize for men relying too much on data and logic and not enough on "feelings" like women do.

Post: #53

Ewwww. Wow, just wow.
47 year old women find 40 year old men the best. And 46 Y.O. women look at 38 y.o men.. Now, that is sick.

I just passed those ages and there is NO WAY I would entertain being with a 47 y.o. woman. None.

I hate having to talk to women over 40 anywhere. They are a waste of time. Exceptions, my mom and the truly elderly, because I'm no ageist.

When I read some 52 y.o. broad is looking for love it makes my skin crawl. Yuck.

Post: #54

Im disturbed all right.

Just why would you do a graph like that, writing out all the numbers by hand, when you can do a simple line graph and fit both of those into one?

On that note, if there is a software to do graphs like that, I would like to know. It seems interesting.

Post: #55

(06-08-2014 12:48 PM)dog Wrote:  The reason why there has been a gigantic push for the feminist LGTBQ progressive anti-male agenda (whatever the term is for The Agenda of The Movement) on all fronts is because it sets the tone and discourse for potential legislation.

Shit... I think you're right. That's their end game.

Quote:I'm not conspiratorially minded, so I don't think there is some dark room where people make these decisions. And that's what makes it scarier. The culture has been so thoroughly corrupted that the puppets dance to the music without anyone pulling the strings.

Clinton has to be aware of this though, and I can't see her not using this Feminist momentum for her benefit. A similar strategy worked for Obama. Many people who criticized his policies were called racists. It's hard to stay on topic when you have to defend yourself against such claims. And I bet a fair number of those who will inevitably criticize Clinton will be called sexists, or misogynists. These attacks won't come from Clinton's staff, but from the feminist ground troopers who support her, working through college campuses, the media and online.

So how do we stop this? Or can it be stopped? Or should those of us who still live in America, and still have our balls, just pack up and leave because dealing with this bullshit is a waste of time?

Post: #56

While we're talking about "disturbing" thoughts, who wants to bet that if it weren't for social conditioning, the age guys like best would go LOWER instead of higher?
I know back when I was in church, we were taught that Mary was like 13 or 14 when she married Joseph (Who, we were told, was around 28), and I know Shakespeare's Juliet was about the same age. My understanding is that for most of human history, girls have been getting married and having children shortly past puberty, and boys have been assuming positions of importance before the age where they'd be in high school today.

It's interesting to think about how this kind of social conditioning alters what you like and don't like. Personally, I prefer girls between 25 and 28, because I hate immature, vapid chicks. But if I lived 100 years ago, would I be considering them unmarriagable old hags? I probably would.

Post: #57

Nature 1, Feminism 0.

Post: #58

Of course what this survey fails to consider is that what a woman says and what she really thinks are often not related. Because in choosing a mate, women don't often think, they feel. It's how a guy makes her feel. A rich guy makes her feel secure, a guy with game makes her feel sexy.

First and foremost, we'll admit that a woman has to pass the boner test. Women want to appear altruistic, hence why they always want you to date their fat friends and get angry if you won't, yet they'd never do the same. Just look at how much contempt they have for nerdy or awkward guys, but want to force fatness to be the preferable beauty aesthetic. It's not a surprise that their contradictions and hypocrisy are borne out in a survey.

On the flip side, again, men will go after what they want. At least red pill men will.

Post: #59

All I have to say to this is "no shit we're men."

Post: #60

I don't really understand anything it says under the pic. I don't speak that language. I think its saying people are wrong for finding that girls ass hot cause "she only 17 fam"
If any of you pigs on this forum that are older then 17 find this pic arousing your sick!!!

Post: #61

(06-08-2014 07:55 PM)Cr33pin Wrote:  I don't really understand anything it says under the pic. I don't speak that language. I think its saying people are wrong for finding that girls ass hot cause "she only 17 fam"
If any of you pigs on this forum that are older then 17 find this pic arousing your sick!!!

I'm waiting for the...ass too big WNB

Post: #62

The latest from Andrew Kaczynski (@BuzzFeedAndrew):

   

Post: #63

10101/01

Post: #64

(06-08-2014 08:09 PM)Mentavious Wrote:  I'm waiting for the...ass too big WNB

Ass just right 8/10 WB

Post: #65

(06-08-2014 11:26 AM)agentaika Wrote:  Something bigger than the universities is fueling and funding this beast. And what better way to get a woman in the White House than to create an environment where men look like freaks, and women can't be criticized.

First and ONLY rule of public media:

Nothing, nothing on public media is accidental. Everything you hear on the news, radio, television, printed news or official internet channels is there because someone wants you to think that way.

"The best way to control someones mind is to tell them that they have free will, and then feeding them the exact information you want them to believe" - Jung, though I cant find the source to properly quote it.

Post: #66

On the wife beating article: doesnt the bible regulates how thick the cane you beat your wife with should be? I know its somewhere in there...

Post: #67

I'm pretty sure that it's not. You might be thinking of "Rule of Thumb", which feminists want you to believe comes from a rule that you couldn't beat your wife with a cane thicker than your thumb.
There was never any such rule, though. It's just another lie they like to tell.

Post: #68

(06-08-2014 11:56 AM)TheFinalEpic Wrote:  In other news.... the sky is blue!

I guess that little quip about women "aging like a fine wine" couldn't be further from the truth.

I saw someone post this on the forums quite a while ago:

Men age like wine. Women age like bread.

Post: #69

This is the same kind of faggots that "like" the Facebook page "I Fucking Love Science", no doubt, when it pisses off their enemies the religious conservatives.

No love when science turns around and fucks their ideology in the arse though.

Post: #70

(06-08-2014 08:11 PM)agentaika Wrote:  The latest from Andrew Kaczynski (@BuzzFeedAndrew):

[url=https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedAndrew/status/475774389351223296][/url]

This sets off my fake radar. These types love to separate us from our ancestors and history by painting the past as a time of unrestrained bigotry, and are not above wholesale fakery in order to do it.

Post: #71

dupe

Post: #72

The article is not fake. It's from the Dakota County Herald, August 07, 1913. Some people were rather red pill back then: "Women love best the men that are somewhat cruel to them...A woman who fears the wrath of her husband loves him better than one who has no fear of him at all".

Post: #73

Disturbing?! I'm perplexed. Like, totally shocked out of my mind. This chart will haunt me for years.

Post: #74

^ I'm so disturbed that I want to go fuck some 20 year olds.

Hell, I might even aim a year or two lower.

Not that I was losing sleep over it, but this chart only validates my desires and reminds me other men want the same.

Beyond All Seas

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe.
To be your own man is a hard business. If you try it, you'll be lonely often, and sometimes
frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." - Kipling

Post: #75

I have a couple 19 year olds after my nuts.

Guess they are fucked up too, eh?