Post: #51

Rocco81,

"Why is it that after he is now gone some of you guys are stepping up and talking shit about him? "

Let me make sure everyone gets the chronology on here correct:

1. The dork “bigmalebootyluvr” unwarrently attacked me on I think my Riga, Latvia thread.

2. I had no idea who the half-man was, other than he wrote and used terminology like someone from a weak place; not near the beach. If I would have to guess, it would be a sh*t hole like inland, north florida. So I basically told him to "settle down" and dismissed him.

3. I then proceeded to notice him bully other members of the forum. I then pegged him as an older, non-athletic steroid user, basically the same that Fisto nailed in his description earlier on here.

4. He then wrote two extremely weak and pathetic negative posts on Colombia. I tried to give him constructive advice. Then he made a weak attempt to insult me.

5. I judged him correctly as a no heart bully, so I knew if I went at him, he would implode. So I “ethered” this sissy here: /thread-3613-p...l#pid42617

6. He implodes right away here: /thread-3638-p...l#pid42768

7. I then bury him here: /thread-3638-p...l#pid42795

8. Finally, Roosh clips him here: /thread-3638-p...l#pid42802

So everyone is clear, this is the only post I have written about this queer since he was gone.

My guess is right now he has a gun in his mouth in some crap hostel somewhere in Medellin.

I want to apologize to everyone on here for some of the language I used, but I had to destroy this guy.

And again, the lesson to learn here is, if you go after a bully, he will fold every time.

Post: #52

(02-10-2011 11:07 AM)MiXX Wrote:  I would like to agree with you, but again, I have the exact same vibe in RIO and I do not do well in Rio, or Sao Paulo or any southern Brazilian states.

I'd love to hit up Sao Paulo, but if even Mixx is doing bad there(and I'm way darker than him), it gives me second thoughts.

Post: #53

(02-12-2011 02:48 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(02-10-2011 11:07 AM)MiXX Wrote:  I would like to agree with you, but again, I have the exact same vibe in RIO and I do not do well in Rio, or Sao Paulo or any southern Brazilian states.

I'd love to hit up Sao Paulo, but if even Mixx is doing bad there(and I'm way darker than him), it gives me second thoughts.

speakeasy Mixx is not a super hero when comes to women, if you get a lot of women in other cities, you may do really well in sao paulo. Matterfact, i find sao paulo to have some of the easiest chicks in Brazil, they are very very friendly, if you hit the right spots you probably do well there, remembering that Sao Paulo has many blacks and mullatos so being dark shouldnt be a problem.

Post: #54

(02-12-2011 02:56 PM)lottery Wrote:  speakeasy Mixx is not a super hero when comes to women

Maybe....but I sure as hell come close.

It's not black/dark skin men that don't do well, its latinos that may not do well in Southern Brazil. This may be because you will be confused as either Argentinean (which they despise), or some other surrounding spanish country (which they feel superior to). My other latin friends have the same issues.

NOW, with that said, this ONLY happens to me in SOUTHERN parts of brazil. It is not the case in Northern Brazil or Inner States of Brazil: Brasilia, Pernambuco, Fortaleza, Mato Grosso, Goias....these girls LOVE my looks.

So Speakeasy, you and I are totally different. If you look like Usher/Ja-Rule, then you will do really well. However, if you look like Daddy Yankee, Sao Paolo girls could care less, but Brasilia will feel you style.

Mixx

Post: #55

(02-12-2011 02:42 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  Rocco81,

"Why is it that after he is now gone some of you guys are stepping up and talking shit about him? "

Let me make sure everyone gets the chronology on here correct:

1. The dork “bigmalebootyluvr” unwarrently attacked me on I think my Riga, Latvia thread.

2. I had no idea who the half-man was, other than he wrote and used terminology like someone from a weak place; not near the beach. If I would have to guess, it would be a sh*t hole like inland, north florida. So I basically told him to "settle down" and dismissed him.

3. I then proceeded to notice him bully other members of the forum. I then pegged him as an older, non-athletic steroid user, basically the same that Fisto nailed in his description earlier on here.

4. He then wrote two extremely weak and pathetic negative posts on Colombia. I tried to give him constructive advice. Then he made a weak attempt to insult me.

5. I judged him correctly as a no heart bully, so I knew if I went at him, he would implode. So I “ethered” this sissy here: /thread-3613-p...l#pid42617

6. He implodes right away here: /thread-3638-p...l#pid42768

7. I then bury him here: /thread-3638-p...l#pid42795

8. Finally, Roosh clips him here: /thread-3638-p...l#pid42802

So everyone is clear, this is the only post I have written about this queer since he was gone.

My guess is right now he has a gun in his mouth in some crap hostel somewhere in Medellin.

I want to apologize to everyone on here for some of the language I used, but I had to destroy this guy.

And again, the lesson to learn here is, if you go after a bully, he will fold every time.

I was expecting something very dramatic when you described it as bbl imploding... so I was a little let down when I read it.

Not that it matters much, but it actually looks like by your links that 8 (Roosh gives warning and bbl's pointless threat response to Roosh the forum moderator) probably straddles or precedes 6 (bbl "implodes"). But I'll give you props for your creative use of narrative.

Post: #56

To close out this drama...

It's my fault for not banning BBL sooner. I've warned him nicely in the past but he would revert back to the roid rage attitude. I've learned that once a guy shows undue aggression or hate, it's best to send them elsewhere before they'll continue disrupt the threads here like he did. Warnings themselves are flawed because once you do it (even in a respectful way), the guys with too much pride take offense and then go on a rampage. There are too many respectful members to give those few anti-social guys multiple chances.

It's not in my nature to be heavy-handed, but for the forum to continue to be a great resource, I have to be a a little strict. It's great if you're an alpha, but when you're in the same "room" as hundreds of other guys, showing those alpha traits will just lead to people getting rubbed the wrong way or flat-out insulted. Unless you can be humble here, be open-minded, and have a goal to share information instead of attitude, it'll be impossible for you to fit in. This is a community, not one's man means to show off or "be the man." And that applies to me as well.

That said, if you have a problem with a member message him in and fight it out in private. There's no need to bring out personal disagreements in public, something that's in the realm of women.