Post: #1

Popped onto my facebook feed:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/beth-leyba...mg00000046

"I ended up quitting college soon thereafter and staying home with my daughter and the daughter to come, and even though I am now finally working towards finishing my degree after a 12 year hiatus, I don't regret giving up the entire decade of my 20s to motherhood."

Dumb girl gets knocked up in her teens and tries to justify it. Women these days. Then again its the HuffPost.

Look like she's hit the wall too. Life is cruel.

Her other post got me laughing as well:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/beth-leyba...61892.html

So many quotes its like a gold mine. White knight is strong there too.

"I will continue ranting and raving about female empowerment and equality while personally feeling far from either. "

Post: #2

I don't see the issue people have with girls having babies younger. It's better than having them at 40. A generation or two ago it was the norm to marry young and make babies. Hell my mom was married at 18 and had me at 21. An old female boss I used to work for was married at 18. She was also the youngest of 13 kids. Marrying young and popping out babies was what you did back then. Why is it such a bad stigma? It's not like all women want or will end up as CEOs.

Post: #3

Am I the only one who doesn't hate on her (based on the facts in the article)? Don't get me wrong, it's sad. It's a horrible state of our society where these moms get divorced after 10-20 years of marriage with kids. But it may be a harsh reality for them financially or whatever. I guess I don't know. Let's be honest, if you're value as a person (SMV) was dropping like a rock with 40+ years left on this planet with nothing you could do about it, wouldn't you backwards justify. Our brains simply weren't meant to accept such terrible realities. She sounds like a woman knowing her reality but looking on the bright side. Can't hate that.

"I don't regret giving up the entire decade of my 20s to motherhood." - I believe her. And her situation is nowhere near as sad as the 30 something woman who wants kids but was too stupid to have them.

"It's the year you get married and have a baby, and not necessarily in that order." - I'm torn on this, but I think it's simply my traditional background. She had a guy she could depend on for 15 years of raising a kid, so she locked him down with a baby. Tough to hate on.

"If costumes are optional, wear one." - Ha, yeah because you're 35

Post: #4

I think its the 2nd article that did it for me, the first one I admit is a bit more reasonable. After reading the 2nd article, had to make a thread about it. So many irrational decisions that only a real emotional person would do.

Post: #5

Yep, humorous. To me the humor is so well disguised...you could summarize such a lengthy article with the line warning to women who want a divorce

Post: #6

Did she write why her relationship with her babydaddy dissolved? Did she even marry him?

Post: #7

1. No consequences for women

2. At least she had a kid, and has done infinitely more to support civilization than any of her spinster feminist "allies"

Post: #8

WNB, femmie fattie

Post: #9

(05-14-2014 08:50 AM)Samseau Wrote:  1. No consequences for women

2. At least she had a kid, and has done infinitely more to support civilization than any of her spinster feminist "allies"

She's an aging single mother. There are no consequences? Until the betas who run our government start forcing single men to marry useless cunts like these, it'll still continue to be Less Consequences. Not No Consequences. And even so, if she had gotten pregnant during the 50's, the young man would have most likely married her. But in this age of "no consequences" she has a marriage market value of about 3. The primary guys she'll attract are going to be shiftless, asperger losers and/or pederasts who want a piece of her young daughters hairless puss.

Post: #10

(05-14-2014 09:39 AM)Mormon Nailer Wrote:  

(05-14-2014 08:50 AM)Samseau Wrote:  1. No consequences for women

2. At least she had a kid, and has done infinitely more to support civilization than any of her spinster feminist "allies"

She's an aging single mother. There are no consequences? Until the betas who run our government start forcing single men to marry useless cunts like these, it'll still continue to be Less Consequences. Not No Consequences. And even so, if she had gotten pregnant during the 50's, the young man would have most likely married her. But in this age of "no consequences" she has a marriage market value of about 3. The primary guys she'll attract are going to be shiftless, asperger losers and/or pederasts who want a piece of her young daughters hairless puss.

She could easily find a man to take care and pay for her, you don't know what you're talking about. The only reason she is single is because of insane standards and she's a bitch.

1000% guarantee her daughter will be a massive slut.

Post: #11

Single mom = you were so repulsive the man didn't even want to raise his own child.

Why don't people think of single moms in terms of being rejects? And is there any way we can get that out as a meme or am I way offbase with this.

Post: #12

(05-14-2014 12:25 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(05-14-2014 09:39 AM)Mormon Nailer Wrote:  

(05-14-2014 08:50 AM)Samseau Wrote:  1. No consequences for women

2. At least she had a kid, and has done infinitely more to support civilization than any of her spinster feminist "allies"

She's an aging single mother. There are no consequences? Until the betas who run our government start forcing single men to marry useless cunts like these, it'll still continue to be Less Consequences. Not No Consequences. And even so, if she had gotten pregnant during the 50's, the young man would have most likely married her. But in this age of "no consequences" she has a marriage market value of about 3. The primary guys she'll attract are going to be shiftless, asperger losers and/or pederasts who want a piece of her young daughters hairless puss.

She could easily find a man to take care and pay for her, you don't know what you're talking about. The only reason she is single is because of insane standards and she's a bitch.

1000% guarantee her daughter will be a massive slut.

She's been a single for almost a decade. Where's that Knight in shining armor she's been waiting for?

Her insane standards are bullshit, she's spread for a bunch of guys who she thought would stick around. None did.

Post: #13

the knight in shining armor is silver plated and vibrates under her covers every night.

Post: #14

C'mon, it's like watching PMSNBC around here. SHE WAS MARRIED:
"I am basically starting over at almost the midpoint of my life due to a divorce after 15 years of marriage"

I'm all for the making fun of her specifically and the general discussion and analysis of how this reflects the downfall of our society, but at least have an understanding of the story. And yes, she looks annoying as fuck in those pictures.

Post: #15

(05-14-2014 08:49 AM)Mormon Nailer Wrote:  Did she write why her relationship with her babydaddy dissolved? Did she even marry him?

She did marry him. Split after a 15 year marriage last year, and she has a boyfriend now.

Dollars to donuts that the reason they split was because she was unhaaaaaapy and she was already banging the current bf before.

Post: #16

(05-14-2014 02:40 PM)heavy Wrote:  C'mon, it's like watching PMSNBC around here. SHE WAS MARRIED:
"I am basically starting over at almost the midpoint of my life due to a divorce after 15 years of marriage"

PMSNBC:

Post: #17

(05-14-2014 02:34 PM)Mormon Nailer Wrote:  

(05-14-2014 12:25 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(05-14-2014 09:39 AM)Mormon Nailer Wrote:  

(05-14-2014 08:50 AM)Samseau Wrote:  1. No consequences for women

2. At least she had a kid, and has done infinitely more to support civilization than any of her spinster feminist "allies"

She's an aging single mother. There are no consequences? Until the betas who run our government start forcing single men to marry useless cunts like these, it'll still continue to be Less Consequences. Not No Consequences. And even so, if she had gotten pregnant during the 50's, the young man would have most likely married her. But in this age of "no consequences" she has a marriage market value of about 3. The primary guys she'll attract are going to be shiftless, asperger losers and/or pederasts who want a piece of her young daughters hairless puss.

She could easily find a man to take care and pay for her, you don't know what you're talking about. The only reason she is single is because of insane standards and she's a bitch.

1000% guarantee her daughter will be a massive slut.

She's been a single for almost a decade. Where's that Knight in shining armor she's been waiting for?

Her insane standards are bullshit, she's spread for a bunch of guys who she thought would stick around. None did.

So tons of guys have stepped up to the plate and none of stayed. This means either, or all, of the following:

1. She's an unbearable cunt.
2. She's only attracted to alphas which means shes gonna get pump and dumped.
3. She doesn't care about holding onto a man because she knows she can get a new one.

Notice here, the problem isn't the men. Notice, no matter how many guys she blows through, there is still another lined up for her. In what way is she suffering for her actions?

200 years ago she'd be begging on the street, whoring herself out just to feed her child.