Post: #1

Says J.K. Rowling.

http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2014/...one-regret

Sounds like Harry was supposed to get the bang. Lol.

Post: #2

Relevant-

From this:



To this:

Post: #3

That aside, although she is no longer wifeable material, if she's back to this now:



Fukin Amen.

Post: #4

I saw her in McDonalds in Oxford a few years ago. Completely unremarkable in the flesh. A few people double-taked, but obviously only because they were trying to figure out whether this completely average looking woman was indeed that movie star from Harry Potter!

Post: #5

What??? What has she done to herself? I want to cry

Post: #6

The Harry/Hermoine pairing is way more popular in the fan fiction than Ron/Hermoine anyway. That and the actress who plays Ginny in the movies is WAY too unattractive compared to Emma Watson.

Post: #7

(02-02-2014 05:01 AM)roberto Wrote:  Relevant-

From this:



To this:

genuinely thought that was a 14 year old boy. Can't believe she has pretty much gone from a strong 7.5/10 to a 2/10. Could not get a boner for that.

I hope ROK writes and article tiled "women who cut their hair short are teaching men to become pedophiles" or "women who cut their hair short are wanna me 13 year old boys" just to piss feminist/short haired women off, haha.

Post: #8

(02-02-2014 05:35 AM)Tytalus Wrote:  The Harry/Hermoine pairing is way more popular in the fan fiction than Ron/Hermoine anyway. That and the actress who plays Ginny in the movies is WAY too unattractive compared to Emma Watson.

WYB?

Post: #9

Still love this one though

Post: #10

That just makes the short hair photo so much worse.

Post: #11

(02-01-2014 10:20 PM)not_dead_yet Wrote:  Says J.K. Rowling.

http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2014/...one-regret

Sounds like Harry was supposed to get the bang. Lol.

If it were real life then Voldermort would be the one getting the bang.

Post: #12

Why oh why do attractive women cut off their hair?!?!?!?! Sure, she can 'pull it off'. However as someone else pointed out previously, 'pulling it off' is phrase on par with "tolerate".

Post: #13

Ron Weasley isn't beta in one of the books he gets a girlfriend which makes Hermione jealous. Shes called lavender brown and she's totally besotted by him. GAME recognised haha. Heres some pics of them/her.


And heres a picture of her now

By the way I would bang.

Post: #14

(02-01-2014 10:20 PM)not_dead_yet Wrote:  Says J.K. Rowling.

http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2014/...one-regret

Sounds like Harry was supposed to get the bang. Lol.

A lifetime of locker rooms has taught me one thing:

Weird-looking awkward guys often have unholy massive hogs. Like it's God's apology.

Harry may be the chosen one. But prophecy be damned: Hermione is hooked on Ron's cuntsplitting donkey dick.

Post: #15

The one part of Harry Potter series that often was very weak is the social interaction aspect of the series.

Also Emma Watson is a massive slut, she was her town's bicycle

Post: #16

IMO is just more troll bait.
JKR hasn't been on the headlines for a while, so she throws some troll bait to enrage a couple thousand virgins, she gets again on the news and people start analyzing her work trying to see how "it totally matches". In the meanwhile, she is paid a couple thousand more to do some crappy interviews and staying on the headlines.
Game recognized.

Post: #17

(02-02-2014 04:37 PM)Wreckingball Wrote:  IMO is just more troll bait.
JKR hasn't been on the headlines for a while, so she throws some troll bait to enrage a couple thousand virgins, she gets again on the news and people start analyzing her work trying to see how "it totally matches". In the meanwhile, she is paid a couple thousand more to do some crappy interviews and staying on the headlines.
Game recognized.

Pretty much. Same thing with "Dumbledore was gay". Next up: McGonagall used to be a man.

Post: #18

This guy has an interesting analysis - the 'Ron' of the Films was different from the 'Ron' of the books because his cool moments were stripped from him and given to Hermione:

"During The Prisoner of Azkaban, Sirius Black is trying to get to Peter Pettigrew (currently disguised as Scabbers the Rat), but Ron and Hermione are convinced he’s after Harry. In the book, Ron stares up defiantly from his mangled, broken leg and tells Sirius Black that if he wants Harry, he’ll have to get through his friends first.

And in the film, it’s Hermione who boldly steps in the line of fire while Ron sobs in pain and babbles incoherently.

These rewrites not only depict Ron as an idiot coward—they also make him an outright jerk."

http://www.tor.com/blogs/2014/01/erased-...on-weasley

Post: #19

A very similar thing is done with the Stannis and Danaerys characters from book to TV. Stannis is very boss, while Dany is a spoiled cunt.

Post: #20

(02-10-2014 06:24 AM)Nolecbo Wrote:  This guy has an interesting analysis - the 'Ron' of the Films was different from the 'Ron' of the books because his cool moments were stripped from him and given to Hermione:

"During The Prisoner of Azkaban, Sirius Black is trying to get to Peter Pettigrew (currently disguised as Scabbers the Rat), but Ron and Hermione are convinced he’s after Harry. In the book, Ron stares up defiantly from his mangled, broken leg and tells Sirius Black that if he wants Harry, he’ll have to get through his friends first.

And in the film, it’s Hermione who boldly steps in the line of fire while Ron sobs in pain and babbles incoherently.

These rewrites not only depict Ron as an idiot coward—they also make him an outright jerk."

http://www.tor.com/blogs/2014/01/erased-...on-weasley

Having not read the books or seen any movies in ages... This analysis was refreshing and helpful.