Post: #1

If you were to glory hole an anal, would you be able to tell if it were a girl, guy, or an animal? It's just another tube of mucous.

This points to a possible problem with physical as the be all end all. We here tend to base everything on evo-psych stuff, which is all physical.

Maybe sex boils down to a binary system of domination and submission. The antithesis of androgynous feminism.

There is a time for anal. The following movie represents the most fail safe way to secure a woman- the desert island approach, and one of the two best anal sex scenes I've seen in video.

Edit: I've never had anal sex with a man, so I don't know if it feels different from anal with a girl. I'm guessing that it's not all that different (on some kind of blind trial). Maybe I'm wrong. Anal seems to boil down to some kind of symbolic/kink gesture.. it's only good with girls who are totally against it but they give it to you because your game is so good.

Post: #2

That reaction is all I will say about the substance of the post. Still....

The only thing I will say is I am sure that the movie soup linked to I saw in 7th grade on late night AMC.

Poor deckhand of a cruise ship and a rich female socialite get stranded on an island. She doesn't like him and resents having to depend on him for food and shelter. Sensing his power the dude, at one point, says to the rich white woman, "Show me your melons." She says no and he chases her down and fucked her hard in the sand.

They fall in love.

It was viciously attacked by feminists despite being directed by a woman -- who identified as a feminist, no less -- and that criticism seems to be contemporary.

Still, I don't understand soup's post or it's point, but I am eager to re-watch the movie and do an ROK writeup on it. Fascinating shit.

Also, we are awaiting Roosh's next book: "Bang: Desert Island."

Post: #3

Look at prisons:

The biggest alphas in prisons fuck other men up their ass. That includes black men as well.

Look at pornos:

The jackest dudes gang-banging tag-teaming coked up sluts while "accidentally" cross-spraying each other with cum, and thinking nothing of it.

Look at ancient/modern Greeks/Arabs:

Some of the most masculine-looking men on earth love them some little boys.

Apparently there's such thing as too much T, too much Alpha. The bigger alpha you are, the closest to pure animal you are.

For my money the best have it those who are lower alphas. Good enough to be the man in most situations, not fucked up enough to be an animal.

Post: #4

I was thinking about anal sex once when I was fucking a girl in the ass.

I thought "Is this what all asses feel like?"

It made me shudder because if that's true, then a gay guy's ass might, in too many ways, feel the same as a woman's. I'm not an expert in these matters, so I don't know if it's easy or not to tell the difference, but maybe there's a good chance that it's obvious if you do a blind test whether or not the ass you are fucking is a girls or a guy's.

That's why I think sex is more than just some physical thing, and that's why we need to win the minds of women and betas.

Maybe one day technology will move us past the passed, but for now, all those thousands of years of evolution of our minds is going to be hard to change, I'd bet.

Post: #5

(01-31-2014 05:20 AM)soup Wrote:  a gay guy's ass might, in too many ways, feel the same as a woman's.

After 8,000 posts the OP turns out to be a fruit troll?

Post: #6

Do guys in prison really fuck other guys in the ass that much, though? That 'fact' has always struck me as something the feminist/LGBT types push as an example of the so called fluidity of gender/sexuality/blah blah/word salad.

Post: #7

(01-31-2014 05:32 AM)rhino Wrote:  

(01-31-2014 05:20 AM)soup Wrote:  a gay guy's ass might, in too many ways, feel the same as a woman's.

After 8,000 posts the OP turns out to be a fruit troll?

In soup's defense, I don't think that male anuses or female anuses are all that different in structure. With no other data than than experiencing your dick in their ass, I am not sure a man could tell the difference.

Post: #8

Soup, have you been drinking?

Post: #9

(01-31-2014 05:36 AM)2Wycked Wrote:  In soup's defense, I don't think that male anuses or female anuses are all that different in structure. With no other data than than experiencing your dick in their ass, I am not sure a man could tell the difference.

What he and you are describing is physical infrastructure of a local site. But that's irrelevant because for all practical purposes sex is entirely mental. It resides in one's mind. That's why you never go into somebody's hole sight unseen (as you would on a blind date.) Before you have sex you always need to gather enough intel, signifiers and goalposts to know it's 'safe' to proceed.

We love fucking women not because they are (just any) humans with holes, but because they are particular kinds of humans (women) with holes. It makes all the sense from an evolutionary standpoint.

Similarly, we enjoy fucking women's assess because we know that these assess belong specifically to them. Women's assess are therefore greenlit from that perspective alone.

Whichever man finds no difference between a woman's ass and a man's ass (they even look different) has its own biology screwed. No pun intended.

Post: #10

I was just thinking that at a very base level, how are we different from junkies looking for heroin chasing the next bang.. its all fucking chemical. All this testosterone making us do what.. with all this evolutionary shit, with all this fuckung space ship capable building intelligence. Making us being slaves to what? Fucking some other poor creature in a hole? Some with syrup, some with jelly.. I prefer jelly...

TLDR I'm not crazy about anal either. It requires extra lubricant, isn't anywhere as tight when you reach deeper and then you still got shit molecules all over your junk

Post: #11

(01-31-2014 05:32 AM)Ziltoid Wrote:  Do guys in prison really fuck other guys in the ass that much, though? That 'fact' has always struck me as something the feminist/LGBT types push as an example of the so called fluidity of gender/sexuality/blah blah/word salad.

I dunno, maybe those who have reliable intel from the inside sources can say a few words on that. But there's definitely a lot of dick sucking going on. Which is the same difference.

Post: #12

(01-31-2014 05:51 AM)calihunter Wrote:  It requires extra lubricant

Not necessarily if you start off in the poon. Gf doesn't complain; quite the opposite.

Post: #13

Yes @ziltod prison "rape" is a huge problem. It's has morphed from being a pure pleasure/sexual thing into a old style dominance and power play. It's something the femenist camps downplay as a means to prop up their own agendas.

Physical domination is the only way to truly kill the soul and will of a man. A man is built too resilient to let emotional issues effect him in ill but you can completely destroy a man physically in moments with sodomy.

Soup is just having dissonance on anal. It's a trap pushed by the femenists and queers since anatomy wise why would there be a difference? A dude might have a stronger sphincter that would be the only difference.

The androgynous future they push is that they don't want you to ever think of the difference. They want you to not think if fuking Sally or Simon up the rear end is different.

That is why it's not wise to promote anal sex as being something normal for Hetero-dudes to do with chicks. It has always hard a dark history especially against men. It your choice if your partake, but then don't get angry at yourself when you have a brain fart like soup just did on the subject.

It's a bear trap so dudes need to learn that and partake accordingly. I don't myself because there is always a tighter pussy some place else. Why stick my dick in a filthy hole? Makes no sense...

Post: #14

(01-31-2014 06:03 AM)kosko Wrote:  Yes @ziltod prison "rape" is a huge problem. It's has morphed from being a pure pleasure/sexual thing into a old style dominance and power play. It's something the femenist camps downplay as a means to prop up their own agendas.

Physical domination is the only way to truly kill the soul and will of a man. A man is built too resilient to let emotional issues effect him in ill but you can completely destroy a man physically in moments with sodomy.

Soup is just having dissonance on anal. It's a trap pushed by the femenists and queers since anatomy wise why would there be a difference? A dude might have a stronger sphincter that would be the only difference.

The androgynous future they push is that they don't want you to ever think of the difference. They want you to not think if fuking Sally or Simon up the rear end is different.

That is why it's not wise to promote anal sex as being something normal for Hetero-dudes to do with chicks. It has always hard a dark history especially against men. It your choice if your partake, but then don't get angry at yourself when you have a brain fart like soup just did on the subject.

It's a bear trap so dudes need to learn that and partake accordingly. I don't myself because there is always a tighter pussy some place else. Why stick my dick in a filthy hole? Makes no sense...

Good post.

kosko Wrote:Makes no sense...

I'd say for dominant reasons as well. Nothing puts a woman in her place faster than being fucked up the ass hard while at the same time getting harshly face slapped, firmly tit-pinched, deeply back-scratched, and strongly hair-pulled back. Followed by ass-to-mouth deep throat. And capped by swallowing.

Post: #15

Mouths are the same as well. Both oral and anal sex are classified as "sodomy" by religious and conservative laws.
So if you decide to avoid anal due to political reasons, you should refuse blowjobs as well.

No doggy style either, it can cause some anal sex accidentally. Only missionary position and only for procreation. This way we will show the feminists and the queers.

Post: #16

Girls have different size pussies and assholes. So no not every ass feels the same when you're fucking it. As far as oral goes ...how good it feel depends on the girl's dick sucking skills.

Post: #17

I think you're over thinking this Soup.

What's got you think about all this?

Wald

Post: #18

Sounds like you're focused on anatomy, rather than what you want.

Then, why say no to getting pegged, it might feel good?

I'm attracted to penetrating, anatomy says my sphincter may enjoyed being penetrated.. but I'm not for it.

I got a dick, it penetrates, it projects, and I do it to women. That is why is female ass is different to a male ass.

That is where I project, where I penetrate.

I won't be convinced otherwise.

Post: #19

(01-31-2014 06:03 AM)kosko Wrote:  That is why it's not wise to promote anal sex as being something normal for Hetero-dudes to do with chicks. It has always hard a dark history especially against men. It your choice if your partake, but then don't get angry at yourself when you have a brain fart like soup just did on the subject.

It's a bear trap so dudes need to learn that and partake accordingly. I don't myself because there is always a tighter pussy some place else. Why stick my dick in a filthy hole? Makes no sense...

Yes, this needs to be repeated. Anal sex is a perversion in the true sense of the word. C'mon....it's the end portion of the digestive track. It has one function: ejecting shit from the body. Unlike the vagina, which is thick-walled, muscular, and self-lubricating, the ass really isn't "meant" to be penetrated. The walls of the rectum are like only one cell thick or something. It's very hard to have anal without ripping and tearing the skin, even with lube. That's largely why it's such an effective vector for the spread of disease, much more effective than any other relatively common sex act.

On a biological level, it's like you're trying to impregnate her colon. It doesn't make sense. I realize a similar argument could be made against oral. However, oral isn't physically destructive, carries a lower risk of disease than vaginal sex, and doesn't have the same dark psychological ramifications. So, you could conceivably say that it's also a perversion, but it's definitely less bad than anal.

The perception of anal as something normal that everyone does will result in significantly blurring sex roles and promoting an androgynous society. There's a clear, unambiguous polarity between male and female, penis and vagina. They're complimentary opposites. yin and yang. Everyone has an ass, though.

Post: #20