Post: #1

https://twitter.com/YourAnonNews/status/...5944889344

All the tweets we got from that are 99% pro-feminist.

It's in response to this article, which I thought was pretty reasonable:

http://www.returnofkings.com/26385/when-...-means-yes

I'm pretty convinced that people who believe in a literal "no means no" simply don't get laid ever.

Post: #2

Yep, they are betas (possibly even omegas).

They are mostly sexless geeks who never get laid, so they want nobody else to get laid as well.

Post: #3

They take that shit out of context. It sounds worse when you just repeat that one line "When her no means yes." When you read the whole thing its not about holding someone down and raping them as most people would like others to believe.

I wouldn't really wanna piss of Anyonmous.... They or he or whatever can shut things down and wreck havoc on websites.

Post: #4

Possibly two viral articles over a week?

Post: #5

Interesting comments:

"Maybe @ReturnOfKings deserves some attention from you guys. Even though they might say no, they really do want to be hacked."

Post: #6

When i think of the men/kids behind Anonymous

Post: #7

People clearly are not reading the article.

Post: #8

I hope you guys have a solid backup/DR system in place. Anonymous can be ruthless.

Post: #9

I better add some special characters to my password.

.

Post: #10

It's annoying that for this internet that claims that censorship is the worst thing ever, we have to have some legitimate fear that because of the way we think, we could be harassed by this "anonymous" thing, and no one would have any sympathy for us.

Post: #11

We'll see how much anon believes in freedom of speech. I'm guessing not very much.

Post: #12

Let's face it, Anon are a bunch of computer weirdos. While I don't doubt their ability behind a screen, there's a reason they're relegated to a life behind a screen. This article would make absolutely no sense to me either if I didn't get laid.

Post: #13

Anonymous rails against NSA surveillance and then makes us wonder if it'll use a cudgel of its own to promote...censorship?

Let's watch and see what happens next. I'm sure Roosh has everything in order in case of the worst.

Agreed that they are a bunch of geeks on computers trying to make themselves appear more powerful and significant than they really are.

And by the way Anons, Guy Fawkes masks are lame now. That movie was seven years ago.

Post: #14

Wait. I thought we guys were part of Anonymous.



Obligatory:

Post: #15

The strong and independent feminists have finally got the white knights to do their dirty work for them. I hope you know, anon, they hate your guts and will happily stab you in the back over their idiology.

Post: #16

Anonymous popped up on the chatroom:

Quote:*** YourAnonyNews has joined the room
<Woozy> AnonyBosch?
<YourAnonyNews> The ROK article has pissed us off...
<2_Wycked> us?
<Woozy> Can't be Emech
<Woozy> Grammar is decent
<Woozy> Englishman?
<Woozy> Maybe Candian RVF troll?
<Woozy> Definitely not American
<YourAnonyNews> twitter.com/youranonnews
<Woozy> You're pissed off about short-haired chicks?
<Ocelot> I see nothing about ROK there
<Ocelot> also /b/ is raiding feminist and MRA sites atm with a fake "stop virgin shaming" campaign
<YourAnonyNews> http://www.returnofkings.com/26385/when-...-means-yes
<Ocelot> mildly amusing
<Woozy> ?
<Woozy> Virgin shaming?
<Woozy> Anonymous, I suggest you take it up with Roosh and Tuth and Vincent
<Ocelot> http://boards.4chan.org/b/res/529419623
<Woozy> You can hang out here if you want some red-pill wisdom
<Woozy> Beats being behind a keyboard 24/7
<YourAnonyNews> Make your decision
<Ocelot> AnonyNews, you're not alone
<Rosca> i just since a troll
<Rosca> sense
<Woozy> It is a troll
<Ocelot> sometimes the plight of middle class white people gets a bit too much for all of us to bear
<Woozy> LOL
*** YourAnonyNews has quit

Post: #17

(01-27-2014 07:37 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

https://twitter.com/YourAnonNews/status/...5944889344

All the tweets we got from that are 99% pro-feminist.

It's in response to this article, which I thought was pretty reasonable:

http://www.returnofkings.com/26385/when-...-means-yes

I'm pretty convinced that people who believe in a literal "no means no" simply don't get laid ever.

Just "Wow.."? Not "Wow, just wow..."?
I guess the article is not offensive enough to them

Post: #18

To be honest the article wasn't written in the clearest manner.

I think people reading it might get confused.

Any article like that has to be crystal clear about real resistance vs token resistance. I.e real resistance being a girl giving a serious no. And the correct way to deal with that would be get her hornier and try again later.

But I guess someone scanning the article might think the author actually advocates ignoring serious resistance to keep going(which he doesn't).

Feminists and white knights are gonna misinterpret it. Heck even any normal guy with no knowledge of LMR would.

Post: #19

(01-27-2014 08:05 PM)MaleDefined Wrote:  Let's face it, Anon are a bunch of computer weirdos. While I don't doubt their ability behind a screen, there's a reason they're relegated to a life behind a screen. This article would make absolutely no sense to me either if I didn't get laid.

On top of that, anonymous activists (for the most part) have swallowed the "womyn are oppressed paragons of virtue"" leftist blue pill.

Lets not forget which political ideology have corrupted them.

Post: #20

It's not just that people who believe this don't get laid. I am sure at some point some sorry soul has given them some mediocre play.

My problem is with these people's hypocrisy. You know that of this group those that are not asexual or "omegas" are desperate fucks, and given the chance are very willing to hook up with drunk girls, and maybe take a few liberties. I have seen this first hand where fucking loser dudes I have been acquainted with have taken some advantage of blacked out chicks the one chance they got to make out, but constantly spreading "this guy is a creepy rapist" rumors about guys who consistently get play without having to resort to such tactics. Jealousy is the most vile and pathetic emotion, and really is more of a female emotion. It makes sense then to come from people such as "Anonymous"

Post: #21

(01-27-2014 08:21 PM)torontokid Wrote:  To be honest the article wasn't written in the clearest manner.

I think people reading it might get confused.

Any article like that has to be crystal clear about real resistance vs token resistance. I.e real resistance being a girl giving a serious no. And the correct way to deal with that would be get her hornier and try again.

But I guess someone scanning the article might think the author actually advocates ignoring serious resistance to keep going(which he doesn't).

Feminists and white knights are gonna misinterpret it. Heck even any normal guy with no knowledge of LMR would.

Agreed.

One thing that might be learned from this is that while political correctness has absolutely no place at ROK, the meaning of these kinds of controversial articles that can easily be misinterpreted into a raging inferno of hysteria must be made absolutely clear for the average idiot on the street to understand.

Some might call it an appeasement of sorts, but I call it an insurance option.

Will it do much? Not sure, but it will serve as a disclaimer of sorts.

Post: #22

Nature always wins. A group of grounded Alphas whom routinely get laid will ways trump a crew of disheveled omegas with deep tech skills 100% of the time.

Anonymous has zero credibility. It has been compromised by intelligence long fuking time ago. You really think a bunch of nerds have that much power? Intelligence scrubbed that along time ago just like they did Wiki-Leaks before they blew up. Nothing that is on the mainstream is there unless it is for a reason. True threats (Like us and ROK) are never given the balanced mainstream platform. It's a lesson in the "red pill" real men are always the enemy. Anonymous can go suck a dick, they have no power aside from appeasing establishment ideals.

Post: #23

I don't see why the writers should have to change just because some illiterate feminists who can't read and their mangina lackies may be offended.

If anon attack, they should be exposed as the anti freedom of speech terrorists that they are.

Post: #24

Screw it.

Those of us who are geographically close already have each other's contact information (phone number, email addresses, etc). An DOS attack wouldn't do anything. It would be only a matter of time before ROK and RVF was up and running again.

Outing members wouldn't do anything other than inspire the membership to gain sustainable location-independent employment or move abroad.

Really, the only thing that could make this forum more convenient would be a special internal means of communication that only forum members with 200+ posts or more could access.

Ultimately, we have lifestyles worth living. You can't take that away by shutting down a website.

Post: #25

The thing to worry about with Anonymous is that they might try to out the identities of RoK writers who want to remain anonymous themselves. They're hackers and they're good at what they do. So I'll repeat my admonition to Tuth and others -- make sure you have your internet shit locked down tight. Tuth, I sent you some tips in a PM back when the eating disorder article was blowing up, and I'm happy to resend anytime.