Post: #1

Okay. I can't imagine what it would be like to sex a woman that have got some massive "forest" down there...Or a woman that doesn't shave her legs(my view)... Even I myself always shave my "down"(pubic area) .
Apparently, this article on theguardian.com is advising women not to shave their pubic area and legs...
I know men are not be obligated to shave but I personally think it's every woman's responsibility to shave her stuff...Therefore advising women not to do so; is just trying to make em seem and look equal to men...Off course; a true man should not be attracted to another man anyways-(my view)

Post: #2

(01-19-2014 04:13 PM)vannigoc Wrote:  Okay. I can't imagine what it would be like to s*x a woman that have got some massive "forest" down there...Or a woman that doesn't shave her legs(my view)... Even I myself always shave my "down"(p***c area) .
Apparently, this article is advising women not to shave their p***c area and legs...
I know men are not be obligated to shave but I personally think it's every woman's responsibility to shave her stuff...Therefore advising em not to do so; is just trying to make em seem and look equal to men...(off course; a true man is not attracted to a man-my view pls)

Nothing new; there was this type of article back in November over at Jizzebel.

Easy way to pick this apart; when women don't have their shit groomed and are taking their panties off just look down at it and then frown in disgust.

Don't say any words. If she tries to say something just say "Oh, a thought came to mind. Whatever, you ready?"

Post: #3

(01-19-2014 04:18 PM)tmason Wrote:  

(01-19-2014 04:13 PM)vannigoc Wrote:  Okay. I can't imagine what it would be like to s*x a woman that have got some massive "forest" down there...Or a woman that doesn't shave her legs(my view)... Even I myself always shave my "down"(p***c area) .
Apparently, this article is advising women not to shave their p***c area and legs...
I know men are not be obligated to shave but I personally think it's every woman's responsibility to shave her stuff...Therefore advising em not to do so; is just trying to make em seem and look equal to men...(off course; a true man is not attracted to a man-my view pls)

Nothing new; there was this type of article back in November over at Jizzebel.
Lol.. Haha..
Easy way to pick this apart; when women don't have their shit groomed and are taking their panties off just look down at it and then frown in disgust.

Don't say any words. If she tries to say something just say "Oh, a thought came to mind. Whatever, you ready?"

Post: #4

(01-19-2014 04:13 PM)vannigoc Wrote:  Okay. I can't imagine what it would be like to s*x a woman that have got some massive "forest" down there...Or a woman that doesn't shave her legs(my view)... Even I myself always shave my "down"(p***c area) .
Apparently, this article on theguardian.com is advising women not to shave their p***c area and legs...
I know men are not be obligated to shave but I personally think it's every woman's responsibility to shave her stuff...Therefore advising women not to do so; is just trying to make em seem and look equal to men...Off course; a true man should not be attracted to another man anyways-(my view)

You know, you can just write the words "sex" and "pubic" out normally. There are no women here.

Post: #5

the fuck you doing censoring pubic and sex?

Post: #6

(01-19-2014 04:27 PM)Kimber Wrote:  the fuck you doing censoring pubic and sex?

Okay.. Correction noted

Post: #7

(01-19-2014 04:13 PM)vannigoc Wrote:  Okay. I can't imagine what it would be like to sex a woman that have got some massive "forest" down there...Or a woman that doesn't shave her legs(my view)... Even I myself always shave my "down"(pubic area) .
Apparently, this article on theguardian.com is advising women not to shave their pubic area and legs...
I know men are not be obligated to shave but I personally think it's every woman's responsibility to shave her stuff...Therefore advising women not to do so; is just trying to make em seem and look equal to men...Off course; a true man should not be attracted to another man anyways-(my view)

God women are so lazy.

Don't want to work hard to lose weight? Just be fat and tell everyone that fat is beautiful.

Don't want to take care of long hair? Chop that shit right off. Pixie time!

Don't feel like shaving your legs? Stop! Guys probably won't notice.


Shit is ridiculous. Everything feminism tries to push seems to revolve around enabling sloth and laziness.

Post: #8

As I've said in this thread... I really hope this is actually true.

Part of me knows it isn't, though. A couple of fringe fatty feminists I'd never want to fuck anyway may quit shaving, but this trend will hardly make a dent on the masses.

Post: #9

I banged a chick that had a 70s bush over the summer. I'm pretty sure she kept it thickly forested to hide her massive pussy lips. She was pretty decent looking (mid 6) but getting her underwear off for the first time was a surprise and a half. She was also the most fucked up chick I've ever hooked up with, and that's saying something.

Post: #10

About time. Enough of this shaved mannequin madness.

Post: #11

Camron Diaz has a book out or has one coming out with a chapter devoted to this " not shaving my bush" shit. not really sure if she talks about going all gorilla on everyone but ewww. I wonder if the curtains match the carpet?

Another thing if a chick wants a dude to go down on them they better loose the pubes because that shit taste like piss if they don't. I won't even try a girl with pubes any more.

Post: #12

Was Cameron Diaz ever really that beautiful, outside of her "fame game" so to speak?

I remember the big hoopla over Something About Mary but honestly there were so many better looking actresses at the time her age and even older too.

Post: #13

Quote:Was Cameron Diaz ever really that beautiful, outside of her "fame game" so to speak?

No, what she is is the prototypical cute, all-American girl. Not that cute, really, but very American, and no one ever went broke because they overestimated the bad taste of the American people.

Post: #14

I like bush personally.It's like any other hair it does require maintenance though.This whole shaving thing is a fairly new trend.Shaving only really became popular when internet porn took off in the late 90's early 2000's.Before that most chicks didnt shave at all.In the summer months they'd get a bikini wax and that was that.I'll take it whichever way I can get it but if a chick becomes a regular I will point out that she aint shaving for me.Also it's a great indicator on if Im the only guy a chick is banging or not.Most men prefer it bald so if all of a sudden a chick Im seeing starts shaving again I can be just about certain she's looking to entertain some new dick if she hasnt already.

Post: #15

If you can pull the hair it's to long.

Post: #16

*COUGH* The Mask *COUGH*

Post: #17

(01-20-2014 10:01 AM)TheMachinist Wrote:  if a chick becomes a regular I will point out that she aint shaving for me.Also it's a great indicator on if Im the only guy a chick is banging or not.Most men prefer it bald so if all of a sudden a chick Im seeing starts shaving again I can be just about certain she's looking to entertain some new dick if she hasnt already.

I've always kind of subconsciously put this into practice, but I never realized it until now... Fucking brilliant dude.

Most girls, especially younger ones, are utterly mortified by the idea of any dude seeing them with a hairy twat. Perfect indicator.

Post: #18

Fuck unshaved?


That kind of sex is like velcro.

Post: #19

Trends that build slowly tend to last a long time, and if anything, they never die. It took decades for it to become widespread practice for women to shave their legs. It took 20+ years for snatch grooming to really take off. These things aren't going anywhere anytime soon.

Post: #20

Uggh...not this shit.

I will still bang a chick with a hairy pussy, but I will not go down on a hairy pussy and I will let her know that I don't like it.

Another reason to hate lazy, worthless, disgusting American chicks who can't bother trimming/shaving their cooters and legs.

Post: #21

Two different issues, really. Girls not trimming their legs and underarms is pretty gross. But a bush, if neatly maintained, can be a turn on. Look at those old Playboy centerfolds from the 70s and early 80s. It doesn't take much for her to trim the scraggly "underbrush" around her ass and thighs, leaving just a neat pubic (or, as Vannigoc would say, p****) goatee.

I would go so far as to say that a well-groomed bush is far, far preferable to the pedophilic bald eagle look that most women sport today. I much prefer a little carpet. Not a fan of pubic hard-wood floors.

Post: #22

2 people with fuck all posts, both censoring unnecessarily.. I smell a future

If a woman has pubes, she at least has to trim them nicely.. Any woman that expects a man to be prudent in his grooming habits should be setting an example with her own

Post: #23

Agree with the trimming nicely part. In order of preference, I'd go with 1) some bush, nicely groomed, 2) shaved as clean as a whistle, and 3) overgrown forest. Lately 2) always leaves me a little disappointed but 1) really turns me on. Don't see much 3) these days, except in classic 70's porn.

Post: #24

If you do go down on that situation ease your way into it. Last thing you want is some rug burn on your nose from an unkept bush. Stay safe.

Post: #25

(03-30-2014 06:13 PM)The Father Wrote:  Agree with the trimming nicely part. In order of preference, I'd go with 1) some bush, nicely groomed, 2) shaved as clean as a whistle, and 3) overgrown forest. Lately 2) always leaves me a little disappointed but 1) really turns me on. Don't see much 3) these days, except in classic 70's porn.

This is my preference as well, with 1 way ahead of 2