Post: #1

Will he be forced to grovel and apologize?

"They're more pervert in a sense. To me, the show would be too strong, too hard to watch on TV," said the reality star."

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-fe...vis-672100

We can track the response in real time:

- https://twitter.com/search?q=http%3A%2F%...f=realtime
- Google results past 24 hours

There doesn't seem to be much anger at him. Buzzfeed and Huffingtonpost are basically just reporting the story instead of adding their snark. Maybe because he's not white?

Post: #2

Who says it's conservatives that are living in the past?

Post: #3

Imagine the outrage if someone had said "Straight men are perverts"! The internet would be a smoldering pile of ruin at this point.

I only scrolled down a bit, but it seems to me like I'm seeing a lot of retweets of the original article, minus any commentary. It's like people aren't really sure how they're supposed to react to it, because no one else really is. At least the reaction pieces to this non-story will be entertaining.

Also, I'm sure most gay people are all:

Post: #4

All the SWPLs are gun shy since A&E lost the Duck Dynasty battle. We need to find ways to kick them into the mud right now while they are obviously back on their heels.

Post: #5

Is the proposal a gay Bachelor with straight women contestants? A bi bachelor with straight women contestants? A gay bachelor with gay contestants? It is all so muddled.

Could it be that we have somehow idealized gay men in America, so that we think of them outside of the gay sexual relation or act. Are they just a kind of person, like people of a certain race?

Reality check. Gay men fuck each other. They statistically have hundreds if not thousands of partners. They statistically fuck strangers. That is what they do, with impunity. In bath house and in clubs. They are promiscuous as hell. They the players on this site seem almost chaste in comparison.

I am a bit of a libertarian. God speed to them.

I think America deserves a realistic reality program that truly explores and represents the gay lifestyle and culture, including the reality of gay sexual practices. What the hell. We should make children watch it. Set a real good example for Russia on how to do things right.

Post: #6

I admire Mr. Galavis for voicing his opinion, but its not the wisest thing to do in an unfree nation.

I have nothing about homosexuality in particular - it almost always takes 2 stylish, good looking men and 2 ugly women out of the market (GSElevator). However, I do have something against faggots prancing around, making everyone feel sick to the stomach and embarrassing their families.

That being said though, it isn't the wisest decision to voice these opinions under your own name, particularly in a nation where these degenerates have taken control of public policy and when the majority of your viewers aren't masculine men. I hope he survives this mess, but if I could I would bet money on him being fired.

Post: #7

Post: #8

A homosexual version of the Bachelor would actually do a lot of damage to the homosexual agenda of public acceptance. They want people to think that homosexual men are just like heterosexuals in terms of their sexual mores (i.e. they just want to get married). The reality of what would happen with a houseful of homosexual men would be shocking and absolutely disgusting to the average American, and would undo a lot of the propaganda gains homosexuals have won in recent years. This is probably the reason behind the lack of outrage - the cultural Marxists know that they can't sell homosexuality to middle America by portraying it honestly (as massively promiscuous). They can only sell the fake, heterosexual flavored homosexuality you see in their propaganda, which mostly features monogamous homosexual men who just want to get married and live happily ever after (the vast minority).

Post: #9

(01-18-2014 06:26 PM)scorpion Wrote:  A homosexual version of the Bachelor would actually do a lot of damage to the homosexual agenda of public acceptance. They want people to think that homosexual men are just like heterosexuals in terms of their sexual mores (i.e. they just want to get married). The reality of what would happen with a houseful of homosexual men would be shocking and absolutely disgusting to the average American, and would undo a lot of the propaganda gains homosexuals have won in recent years. This is probably the reason behind the lack of outrage - the cultural Marxists know that they can't sell homosexuality to middle America by portraying it honestly (as massively promiscuous). They can only sell the fake, heterosexual flavored homosexuality you see in their propaganda, which mostly features monogamous homosexual men who just want to get married and live happily ever after (the vast minority).

This is why I want them to do one. Look at the terrible image "Bad Girls" has spread about young girls and what "Jersey Shore" did.

The "Gay Bachelor" would pale in comparison.

Post: #10

(01-18-2014 06:44 PM)tmason Wrote:  

(01-18-2014 06:26 PM)scorpion Wrote:  A homosexual version of the Bachelor would actually do a lot of damage to the homosexual agenda of public acceptance. They want people to think that homosexual men are just like heterosexuals in terms of their sexual mores (i.e. they just want to get married). The reality of what would happen with a houseful of homosexual men would be shocking and absolutely disgusting to the average American, and would undo a lot of the propaganda gains homosexuals have won in recent years. This is probably the reason behind the lack of outrage - the cultural Marxists know that they can't sell homosexuality to middle America by portraying it honestly (as massively promiscuous). They can only sell the fake, heterosexual flavored homosexuality you see in their propaganda, which mostly features monogamous homosexual men who just want to get married and live happily ever after (the vast minority).

This is why I want them to do one. Look at the terrible image "Bad Girls" has spread about young girls and what "Jersey Shore" did.

The "Gay Bachelor" would pale in comparison.

Man I love me some bad girls

Post: #11

Color me surprised. Searching his name through twitter, nobody's called for his castration or execution. The PC crowd needs to step its game up.

Post: #12

Yeah Roosh, I think the PC crowd doesn't know what to do when a minority says something non PC. Their worst nightmare is being called a backwards bigot so they keep their mouth shut.

Post: #13

(01-18-2014 06:44 PM)tmason Wrote:  

(01-18-2014 06:26 PM)scorpion Wrote:  A homosexual version of the Bachelor would actually do a lot of damage to the homosexual agenda of public acceptance. They want people to think that homosexual men are just like heterosexuals in terms of their sexual mores (i.e. they just want to get married). The reality of what would happen with a houseful of homosexual men would be shocking and absolutely disgusting to the average American, and would undo a lot of the propaganda gains homosexuals have won in recent years. This is probably the reason behind the lack of outrage - the cultural Marxists know that they can't sell homosexuality to middle America by portraying it honestly (as massively promiscuous). They can only sell the fake, heterosexual flavored homosexuality you see in their propaganda, which mostly features monogamous homosexual men who just want to get married and live happily ever after (the vast minority).

This is why I want them to do one. Look at the terrible image "Bad Girls" has spread about young girls and what "Jersey Shore" did.

The "Gay Bachelor" would pale in comparison.

+1

I would actually watch it.

Post: #14

(01-18-2014 10:37 PM)houston Wrote:  Yeah Roosh, I think the PC crowd doesn't know what to do when a minority says something non PC. Their worst nightmare is being called a backwards bigot so they keep their mouth shut.

No, it's when someone who is a *well-liked* minority that says something anti-gay they get the pass.

Tracy Morgan suffered at the hands of the PC crowd.

Post: #15

Related but a slight tangent is HBO has a new show about 3 gay men.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/...z2qoSjVirR

HBO's 'Looking' an authentic glimpse inside lives of gay men

Post: #16

(01-18-2014 10:51 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  Related but a slight tangent is HBO has a new show about 3 gay men.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/...z2qoSjVirR

HBO's 'Looking' an authentic glimpse inside lives of gay men

Looks like it is another puff show for gays reading the article. Gays typically don't have "one" boyfriend; they do "group" relationships, etc.

Post: #17

(01-18-2014 05:54 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  However, I do have something against faggots prancing around, making everyone feel sick to the stomach and embarrassing their families.

I've known gay men who are normal people. I've known other gay men, however, who seemed to be desperate to incorporate the worst female characteristics into their personalities.

Mainly attention whoring. This includes always being outlandishly dressed up, having an extremely low tolerance to any point of views that don't fit their own narrow perspective on the world and constant bitching and gossiping about matters and circumstances that have no relevance to anything important.

Post: #18

Hmm, maybe it's slow but the PC attack is starting to trick in....

Post: #19

It's too bad that everybody is still looking towards marriage. It's clearly over. Government shouldn't have anything to do with it.

It should have as much significance in our society as getting Bar-Mitzvah'd.. nothing legal.

Post: #20

His comment was first publicized on a weekend. Just wait until after MLK, Jr. Day. Although the tide of outrage will have somewhat dampened, most people won't tune in until next week. Then you'll see a lot more attention being paid to this.

Post: #21

(01-18-2014 06:26 PM)scorpion Wrote:  A homosexual version of the Bachelor would actually do a lot of damage to the homosexual agenda of public acceptance. They want people to think that homosexual men are just like heterosexuals in terms of their sexual mores (i.e. they just want to get married). The reality of what would happen with a houseful of homosexual men would be shocking and absolutely disgusting to the average American, and would undo a lot of the propaganda gains homosexuals have won in recent years. This is probably the reason behind the lack of outrage - the cultural Marxists know that they can't sell homosexuality to middle America by portraying it honestly (as massively promiscuous). They can only sell the fake, heterosexual flavored homosexuality you see in their propaganda, which mostly features monogamous homosexual men who just want to get married and live happily ever after (the vast minority).

That reminds me a hilarious Onion article on exactly that point:

Quote:Gay-Pride Parade Sets Mainstream Acceptance Of Gays Back 50 Years
News • patriotism • trends • gay & lesbian • parties • ISSUE 44•26 ISSUE 37•15 • Apr 25, 2001

Facebook23.4K
Twitter617
Google Plus25



WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA–The mainstream acceptance of gays and lesbians, a hard-won civil-rights victory gained through decades of struggle against prejudice and discrimination, was set back at least 50 years Saturday in the wake of the annual Los Angeles Gay Pride Parade.

Participants in Saturday's Los Angeles Gay Pride Parade, which helped change straight people's tolerant attitudes toward gays.

"I'd always thought gays were regular people, just like you and me, and that the stereotype of homosexuals as hedonistic, sex-crazed deviants was just a destructive myth," said mother of four Hannah Jarrett, 41, mortified at the sight of 17 tanned and oiled boys cavorting in jock straps to a throbbing techno beat on a float shaped like an enormous phallus. "Boy, oh, boy, was I wrong."

The parade, organized by the Los Angeles Gay And Lesbian And Bisexual And Transvestite And Transgender Alliance (LAGALABATATA), was intended to "promote acceptance, tolerance, and equality for the city's gay community." Just the opposite, however, was accomplished, as the event confirmed the worst fears of thousands of non-gay spectators, cementing in their minds a debauched and distorted image of gay life straight out of the most virulent right-wing hate literature.

Among the parade sights and sounds that did inestimable harm to the gay-rights cause: a group of obese women in leather biker outfits passing out clitoris-shaped lollipops to horrified onlookers; a man in military uniform leading a submissive masochist, clad in diapers and a baby bonnet, around on a dog leash; several Hispanic dancers in rainbow wigs and miniskirts performing "humping" motions on a mannequin dressed as the Pope; and a dozen gyrating drag queens in see-through dresses holding penis-shaped beer bottles that appeared to spurt ejaculation-like foam when shaken and poured onto passersby.

Timothy Orosco, 51, a local Walgreens manager whose store is on the parade route, changed his attitude toward gays as a result of the event.

"They kept chanting things like, 'We're here, we're queer, get used to it!' and 'Hey, hey, we're gay, we're not going to go away!'" Orosco said. "All I can say is, I was used to it, but now, although I'd never felt this way before, I wish they would go away."

Worth reading the whole article http://www.theonion.com/articles/gayprid...-gays,351/