Post: #1

http://gma.yahoo.com/ga-man-must-pay-50-...34233.html


I almost couldn't believe the title of this article when I saw it.. so now in America you man get financially raped for his free will of breaking off an engagement..

A lot of men out there already know not to get married.

New lesson learned: don't ever even get engaged, you can still get ass raped by our messed up courts

Post: #2

Quote:Smith said he believes the trial judge's monetary award was derived from about half the value of the home that Kelley purchased, which was worth around $86,000.

She got half the house. Regardless, never let a girl move in.

edit-quote tags.

Post: #3

Post: #4

wow....lawsuits for breaking an engagement, gays marrying and divorcing, divorce rates above 50% of marriages...I should have been a divorce attorney.

Post: #5

^ I saw an article this afternoon involving a guy owning a bakery being taken to court for refusing to sell a wedding cake to a couple of queers. Judge said he'll fine the owner until he capitulates.

Post: #6

(12-07-2013 08:01 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

Quote:Smith said he believes the trial judge's monetary award was derived from about half the value of the home that Kelley purchased, which was worth around $86,000.

She got half the house. Regardless, never let a girl move in.

edit-quote tags.

I agree, she gets half the house even though they were never married and the mortgage WAS IN HIS FUCKING NAME, and only his name.. That's scary.. I have a nice house that I bought myself and have already invested about 40,000 into..

If I ever had a long term live in girlfriend and we broke up and she got half of that from some bullshit court, I don't know how I could keep myself from strangling the bitch

Post: #7

This is some scary ass legal shit.

The irony of feminism is that it's mainly going to cause "all the good ones" to leave the country and never look back.

The feminist bullshit agenda is only going to unfortunately backfire in women's faces, when men refuse to marry, etc.

Post: #8

(12-07-2013 08:10 PM)MSW2007 Wrote:  ^ I saw an article this afternoon involving a guy owning a bakery being taken to court for refusing to sell a wedding cake to a couple of queers. Judge said he'll fine the owner until he capitulates.

One of my friends brought up an interesting point relating to this: if you went into a bakery and requested a cake with a swastika and they refused, would you also have a discrimination suit? How about a cake that said "Blacks and Jews Die Now!!"

And would the ACLU or a judge defend that and fine the bakery owner for refusing?

Post: #9

(12-07-2013 08:01 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

Quote:Smith said he believes the trial judge's monetary award was derived from about half the value of the home that Kelley purchased, which was worth around $86,000.

She got half the house. Regardless, never let a girl move in.

Yup. Even if you want to play the LTR game. Always keep separate places. The move-in is the first attempt by a women to get her claws into you.

Plus, if you live with her--it dramatically lowers your chances of seeing other women on the side.

Very informative and alarming article.

Post: #10

Wow, fucking insane. Capital flight like a mofo, but thanks to the govt, they are making it nearly impossible to move $ and yourselves out of this clusterfuck of a country.

Post: #11

(12-07-2013 08:33 PM)Flavius Aetius Wrote:  

(12-07-2013 08:01 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

Quote:Smith said he believes the trial judge's monetary award was derived from about half the value of the home that Kelley purchased, which was worth around $86,000.

She got half the house. Regardless, never let a girl move in.

Yup. Even if you want to play the LTR game. Always keep separate places. The move-in is the first attempt by a women to get her claws into you.

Plus, if you live with her--it dramatically lowers your chances of seeing other women on the side.

Very informative and alarming article.

hmm i never realized that.

Post: #12

I think the issue is they had a kid...

Post: #13

(12-07-2013 09:01 PM)yb13 Wrote:  I think the issue is they had a kid...

No, that would be a separate issue, child support. This falls under "alimony/palimony."

The reason I know this is that back in the pre-manosphere days, Tom Leykis would lecture guys incessantly about never letting a woman live under their roof because of things like this.

The guy in this story was apparently not a Leykis 101 student -- what with the $10 grand engagement ring and now this big payout.

Post: #14

(12-07-2013 08:20 PM)McQueensPlayboyRules Wrote:  The feminist bullshit agenda is only going to unfortunately backfire in women's faces, when men refuse to marry, etc.

That'll be about the time a bachelor tax is imposed.

Post: #15

(12-07-2013 09:27 PM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(12-07-2013 08:20 PM)McQueensPlayboyRules Wrote:  The feminist bullshit agenda is only going to unfortunately backfire in women's faces, when men refuse to marry, etc.

That'll be about the time a bachelor tax is imposed.

if that happens, i guarantee that the vast majority of men that have a brain would just leave.

Post: #16

Have a hard time reading shit like this. There is so much info on the Internet.

Never let the girl move in
Never get legally married

It's not that difficult gents.

More hardcore version, have some cash far away, not in the USA and get a dual citizenship. Off the grid.

Post: #17

(12-07-2013 09:29 PM)pheonix500000 Wrote:  

(12-07-2013 09:27 PM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(12-07-2013 08:20 PM)McQueensPlayboyRules Wrote:  The feminist bullshit agenda is only going to unfortunately backfire in women's faces, when men refuse to marry, etc.

That'll be about the time a bachelor tax is imposed.

if that happens, i guarantee that the vast majority of men that have a brain would just leave.

The powers that be are busy restricting the ability to move oneself and one's assets overseas. Some men will get through, but most won't.

Post: #18

(12-07-2013 09:36 PM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(12-07-2013 09:29 PM)pheonix500000 Wrote:  

(12-07-2013 09:27 PM)MSW2007 Wrote:  

(12-07-2013 08:20 PM)McQueensPlayboyRules Wrote:  The feminist bullshit agenda is only going to unfortunately backfire in women's faces, when men refuse to marry, etc.

That'll be about the time a bachelor tax is imposed.

if that happens, i guarantee that the vast majority of men that have a brain would just leave.

The powers that be are busy restricting the ability to move oneself and one's assets overseas. Some men will get through, but most won't.

i know why they are doing it but how exactly? what are some current examples?

Post: #19

I wanted to post a link to this book, written by a lawyer, which discusses the legal ramifications of relationships and pick-up:

"How to Avoid 'Getting Screwed' When Getting Laid'"

http://www.amazon.com/Avoid-Getting-Scre...id+screwed


But then I saw this title:

"The Girl's Guide to Depravity: How to Get Laid Without Getting Screwed"

http://www.amazon.com/Girls-Guide-Deprav...id+screwed


Sounds like tit for tat. Or perhaps tat for tit.

Post: #20

Now that she owns half the house will she have to pay mortgage or would that be too much to ask a wronged woman like her?

Post: #21

This is the guvmints way of keeping another single mother off their books. They don't want to feed another mouth, so once you commit to taking care of her, Uncle Sam will do whatever it takes for you to continue doing so.

If you ltr up, at least make sure she is without baggage and has a good career.

Post: #22

First it was "don't get married without a prenup".
Then it became "don't marry at all".
Then it become "don't live with a girlfriend for 3 years".
Now it becomes "don't even enter an engagement with her".

Where does it end???

Post: #23

My father used to have to move his LTR out for a month every couple of years to avoid falling into common law marrage which is kind of like a default marrage from living together for so long. This guy fucked up by breeding with the fattie and living with her for so long. If this case is recent then about 13 years. This was in GA and I was from AL I can't imagine the common law statute differs that much between the states but I'm no lawyer either so don't quote me. It's similar to sqaters rights. If you sqat somewhere long enough and nobody bothers you then you can petition for legal ownership of the property. I'm certain this right varries from state to state as well. All that said I'm glad that for the time being I live in a different country. Some of the recent BS I'm hearing coming from the states is making me want to make the overseas tour a bit more perminate. I certainly get paid better over here.