Post: #1

Damn, even Adrian Peterson gets stung by scandalous ho's.

Poor kid

So, she has a kid with Peterson (5 minutes of Alpha), hooks up with a fuck up. Leaves toddler with fuck up, who damn near beats the kid to death.

Best comment.

Todd DeLa Bucca at 9:14 AM October 11, 2013
arrest the mother.
these women are so desperate for pony rides they sacrifice their children

Exactly.

Post: #2

Son apparently died from his injuries

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl...n/2966015/

Post: #3

(10-11-2013 04:47 PM)NYJ Wrote:  Son, apparently died from his injuries

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl...n/2966015/

Damn. They need to arrest the mother, too. What dumb bitch hooks up with a dude that has a history of doing this. Oh wait, he's a bad boy.

Post: #4

There is no more despicable person than one who would a child - a toddler, no less.

I hope he enjoys the lengthy prison he most certainly deserves.

Post: #5

Of course the new guy killed the kid and not her when he went into his beta-rage. He knew the kid was her meal ticket, dudes vindictive as fuck.

I guarantee the guy was raised by a single mom, that's the only thing besides estrogen that makes a person act this way.

Post: #6

I in no way condone what this guy did, and he won't make it two weeks in prison. However, what he did makes sense from a biological perspective. My first thought when I heard about it around 2pm was they need to arrest the mother. The blood is on her hands just as much as this scumbag's.

Post: #7

Another case of women picking men with impeccable character.

Post: #8

Post: #9

(10-11-2013 06:39 PM)teh_skeeze Wrote:  I in no way condone what this guy did, and he won't make it two weeks in prison. However, what he did makes sense from a biological perspective. My first thought when I heard about it around 2pm was they need to arrest the mother. The blood is on her hands just as much as this scumbag's.

So by that biological perspective, if we are together with a single mother, our best line of action is to kill the child? Why don't we start acting like lowest common denominator animals then? "Oh, this child is not mine? Well, i'll killl him!!"
SMH... "Well gee golly willickers, i don't want to be no provider to a child who is not mine. No siree bob."

Jesus, i don't even know where to start.

This BIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE is the most worthless excuse for an act of extreme evil.
This "man" is not a human being, he's a worthless animal. To go so low as to beat an innocent child to death... Geez...
The woman is not innocent either, she should be subjected to the law. But who knows what will happen.
But seriously man, if the preventable death of this child does not strike a chord with you, i don't want to know what does...

Post: #10

It is true that among a lot of mammals - including our most close relatives, the chimpanzees - males coming in and taking over a female will kill her offspring by other males.

If you follow your local news, "boyfriends" killing the babies of a woman's previous "boyfriends" is a standing headline.

Post: #11

All due respect, I just don't see this as a gender issue.

A maniac did something unthinkable. It's a tragedy, but these things have always and will always happen. The sensationalist need to drag politics and agendas into these things is a primary reason America is coming apart at the seams. Everyone wants to use every opportunity to drive their agenda, regardless of any real world relevance.

Please fellas, let this issue be about itself and not about us.

Post: #12

I think the epidemic of child abuse stems from single mothers casting out the childs bio father and bringing around drug addict scumbags and psycho's to be daddy #2.

Try telling anybody this and there will be a lynch mob at your door. Gotta love political correctness.

Post: #13

I will also precondition this post by saying I am drunk.

I hope that after peterson mourns and buries his son that he has a short celebration that he is now fully disconnected from this parasite of a woman.

Post: #14

(10-12-2013 12:57 AM)wiscanada Wrote:  I will also precondition this post by saying I am drunk.

I hope that after peterson mourns and buries his son that he has a short celebration that he is now fully disconnected from this parasite of a woman.

Awesome post! I couldn't agree more.

Post: #15

(10-11-2013 11:16 PM)Agent 47 Wrote:  

(10-11-2013 06:39 PM)teh_skeeze Wrote:  I in no way condone what this guy did, and he won't make it two weeks in prison. However, what he did makes sense from a biological perspective. My first thought when I heard about it around 2pm was they need to arrest the mother. The blood is on her hands just as much as this scumbag's.

So by that biological perspective, if we are together with a single mother, our best line of action is to kill the child? Why don't we start acting like lowest common denominator animals then? "Oh, this child is not mine? Well, i'll killl him!!"
SMH... "Well gee golly willickers, i don't want to be no provider to a child who is not mine. No siree bob."

Jesus, i don't even know where to start.

This BIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE is the most worthless excuse for an act of extreme evil.
This "man" is not a human being, he's a worthless animal. To go so low as to beat an innocent child to death... Geez...
The woman is not innocent either, she should be subjected to the law. But who knows what will happen.
But seriously man, if the preventable death of this child does not strike a chord with you, i don't want to know what does...

You should think about the distinction between describing what is, and prescribing what ought to be. teh_skeeze is doing the former.

Your diatribe is Jezebellian.

The naturalistic fallacy is well-acknowledged, but ignoring biological realities--or trying to suppress them--is not without cost.

Post: #16

What i pointed out in my post was the use of "a biological perspective" to give this "man" a free pass. Teh skeeze oddly does not condone this man for his actions. From this biological truth, does that mean we should be no better than the lion who kills the prior lions cubs?
This "man" just started this relationship with these "woman". What reason does this man have for killing an innocent child? "It makes sense from a biological perspective..."
Pfftt.. Please.
If i came across as "Jezzbellian" it is because i have a large family. I have 8 nephews and nieces. One of them is two years old. This nephew in particular has been through alot of shit, sadly. His mother is a whore who i just found out is pregnant with baby #6. Obviously, he and his 6 month old brother are with a man who is not their father. By this "biological perspective" should this man kill my two nephews??
I really don't want to know how callous men can be to their fellow man. If what happened to this child, happened to ANY of my nephews...
I would not sleep until i put this fucker six feet deep.

Post: #17

(10-12-2013 05:47 AM)Agent 47 Wrote:  What i pointed out in my post was the use of "a biological perspective" to give this "man" a free pass. Teh skeeze oddly does not condone this man for his actions. From this biological truth, does that mean we should be no better than the lion who kills the prior lions cubs?
This "man" just started this relationship with these "woman". What reason does this man have for killing an innocent child? "It makes sense from a biological perspective..."
Pfftt.. Please.
If i came across as "Jezzbellian" it is because i have a large family. I have 8 nephews and nieces. One of them is two years old. This nephew in particular has been through alot of shit, sadly. His mother is a whore who i just found out is pregnant with baby #6. Obviously, he and his 6 month old brother are with a man who is not their father. By this "biological perspective" should this man kill my two nephews??
I really don't want to know how callous men can be to their fellow man. If what happened to this child, happened to ANY of my nephews...
I would not sleep until i put this fucker six feet deep.

Point is that if a super jacked millionaire athlete can't protect his son from the piss poor dating choices of his baby's momma then what chance do the rest of us have?

Post: #18

(10-12-2013 05:47 AM)Agent 47 Wrote:  What i pointed out in my post was the use of "a biological perspective" to give this "man" a free pass. Teh skeeze oddly does not condone this man for his actions. From this biological truth, does that mean we should be no better than the lion who kills the prior lions cubs?
This "man" just started this relationship with these "woman". What reason does this man have for killing an innocent child? "It makes sense from a biological perspective..."
Pfftt.. Please.
If i came across as "Jezzbellian" it is because i have a large family. I have 8 nephews and nieces. One of them is two years old. This nephew in particular has been through alot of shit, sadly. His mother is a whore who i just found out is pregnant with baby #6. Obviously, he and his 6 month old brother are with a man who is not their father. By this "biological perspective" should this man kill my two nephews??
I really don't want to know how callous men can be to their fellow man. If what happened to this child, happened to ANY of my nephews...
I would not sleep until i put this fucker six feet deep.

You're getting all worked up over nothing. Trying to understand why something happens isn't the same as justifying it.

Post: #19

no more child support? (I am just curious what happens with that law)

Post: #20

Killing others kids is alpha as fuck. If you believe in evolution/Darwinism this is the only way to go. Stomp toddlers while having your own kids to decrease competition, and if they are born fucked up, stomp them too. Survival of the fittest.*

*I study the bible and Jesus Christ is my savior and don't believe any of that. But the people that don't should embrace their scientific beliefs and follow the pecking order of nature.

Post: #21

I had a talk once with a girl.

If i ever found out that my "child" wasn't mine after it was born from the woman i married, i wouldn't have a problem eliminating the "child" and the former wife.

The thought of having to face that makes me sick. I would rot in prison first than be in that position..

Post: #22

(10-12-2013 05:47 AM)Agent 47 Wrote:  Teh skeeze oddly does not condone this man for his actions.

Maybe I'm reading this wrong, I just woke up, but it sounds like you're confused about what condone means.

Post: #23

Summary execution. Bill the parents for the bullet.

Post: #24

(10-12-2013 07:49 AM)Aliblahba Wrote:  Killing others kids is alpha as fuck. If you believe in evolution/Darwinism this is the only way to go. Stomp toddlers while having your own kids to decrease competition, and if they are born fucked up, stomp them too. Survival of the fittest.*

*I study the bible and Jesus Christ is my savior and don't believe any of that. But the people that don't should embrace their scientific beliefs and follow the pecking order of nature.

As an atheist, I was always on the fence about slaughtering children, but your post moved me.

brb, going to make a toddler and kitten smoothie for science.

Post: #25

Just to clarify, the two year old son who was killed was a secret love child, and Peterson had just found out that he was the father a week or two ago (according to reports). His two year old son (shown in the training camp pictures with the helmet on and kissing Peterson) is his son who lives with him.

The news reports of when this first came out were a shit show of confusion. Everything was only clarified yesterday afternoon. Rest in peace to the child. Sterilize the mom. Put the killer in the chair.