Post: #1

Someone posted the article Cockblocked by Redistribution: A Pick-up Artist in Denmark on Haker News and it's currently on the second page.

There are influential people that follow hacker news. Ycombinator funds and have funded important tech companies (e.g. Reddit) but unfortunately there are a lot of social justice warriors and feminists on that site. Some of the most voted stuff are women in tech related.

Although HN community seems to be generally pro individual and freedom of speech, ada initiative and the geek feminism culture are spreading.

Post: #2

What did I just read?

It reads like a rant. The only part I understood is that Roosh is trying to bang EE.

Post: #3

Free advertisement.

Post: #4

Ever notice all the very angry articles written about Roosh are mostly by women and they fail to recognize what Roosh means when he talks about femininity in women?

Post: #5

Please vote for redistribution or we have to accommodate ourselves to the idea of accepting a man who falls below the top 10% in looks, height, build, income, and alpha psychological traits. When we swallow this pill our better nature comes out and we build a good life where we have to accept another person's foibles and they have to accept ours. Please, please, please don't make us do this. We want to maintain our fantasies of landing an Alpha and then marry a cat if that fails. Note that our preferred strategy results in the production of 0 offspring (taxpayers) by most of us thus destroying the system we want in place. Yes, we are that selfish. We want to build a self destructive system that cannot benefit future generations because they won't exist.

If you don't vote for redistribution you are a misogynist hatemonger who wants to build a sustainable society that can weather war, famine, plague, pestilence, climate change, and other natural disasters. How dare you?

Post: #6

(10-05-2013 02:45 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  Free advertisement.

Good point and I hate to see that article getting more hits. Should I copy and paste the article to my first post or just remove the link?

It's not really an interesting article but I figured you guys wanted to know about its existence. I'm more interested in a discussion on how to minimize feminist influence on tech.

Post: #7

No its good for Roosh. Nobody really listens to those Jizzabel harpies, but they keep putting his name out there.

Post: #8

I welcome attention to my work, though it's unfortunate that they don't really want to have a conversation about it. I would have agreed to an interview with the Dissent writer. Instead, she just took quotes out of context to prove her existing agenda. The only way for my work to appear in the mainstream is if it's attacked without me being able to state my views. I've long accepted that.

Post: #9

First thought: this reads like a book report by a disinterested college student. If she wanted to pick Roosh and his ideas apart, she lacked either the passion or the intellectual firepower to do so. As much as we hate the Manboobs/Hugo crowd, at least they show some pizazz in their writing, as off-the-mark as it may be. This is drier than the Arizona desert in July.

Second thought: Breaking through to the mainstream is a HUGE deal for a self-published author. There are literally thousands upon thousands of people putting out books themselves and they don't make it into arts journals. It will take a while before the significance of this is felt in the widespread sense.

Final thought: all attention is positive although it might not seem that way at first when you get criticized. For everyone saying "Bad Roosh! Evil! Sinner!" There will be more people saying "Wait, that sounds pretty cool." I experienced this a few time firsthand and although criticism is never fun to take, the end result is generally good. Congrats, Roosh.

Post: #10

From Annie Hall:

Alvy Singer (Woody Allen): I'm so tired of spending evenings making fake insights with people who work for "Dysentery."

Robin: "Commentary."

Alvy Singer: Oh really? I had heard that "Commentary" and "Dissent" had merged and formed "Dysentery."

Post: #11

(10-05-2013 03:04 PM)Roosh Wrote:  I welcome attention to my work, though it's unfortunate that they don't really want to have a conversation about it. I would have agreed to an interview with the Dissent writer. Instead, she just took quotes out of context to prove her existing agenda. The only way for my work to appear in the mainstream is if it's attacked without me being able to state my views. I've long accepted that.

"...to prove her existing agenda." You see it Roosh. This is their weakness.

I haven't posted my piece on Post-Industrialisation yet because I think it's part of a larger, more important salvo. I just have to get my ideas together in an easier-to-read style. My basic train of thought:

- In a post-industrial society, thought is considered to have monetary value above production.

- The ability to think untraditionally and creatively is what leads to innovation.

- The Universities are producing teaching uncreative thinkers, who parrot, not question, often with the added negative of destructive psychological issues that have been normalised via the victimhood championing of that enviroment.

- This style of thought is, therefore, has little to no monetary value in the workplace.

You don't take them down by proving they're racist, or using Twitter Drama.

You infuse business culture with the realisation there is little to no money to be made by these arrogant, uncreative thinkers, and you normalise the concept that mental fragility is destructive to the very process of successful business by roadblocking the unrestricted discussion of ideas without fear of censorship.

It's this girl writing an article on Roosh without bothering to get quotes from the man himself because she's already reduced the issue to Black and White and believes she is morally-superior.

It's the Beta Guy who writes an article for Business Insider on The Red Pill, who does a long interview with the moderator of r/theredpill then doesn't use any of it, because he's already reduced the issue to Black and White and believes he is morally-superior.

It's the Indian Writer who got Pax fired for his tweets, who then agrees to meet him, then follows it up with a snarky, supercilious post celebrating himself and learning nothing from the experience, because he's already reduced the issue to Black and White and believes he is morally-superior.

They've gone through University to emerge, flooded with arrogance that they believe they know exactly how the world works and that solipsism that the world change to match their worldview. This means they are fatally-blinkered to anything that challenges it, due to the fragility of their ego. They can't remotely entertain the possibility that they might not be right.

An healthy mind is one that can investigate ideas it finds uncomfortable without its ego being driven into emotional turmoil.

An intelligent mind can see multiple shade of grey between the extreme positions, and doesn't reduce an issue to one or the other.

A innovate mind is constantly questioning and re-adapting its own belief system.

All else is stagnation. You want to hire Steve Jobs, not a herd thinker. Hence, the army of Gawker drones producing nothing but low quality-content that is designed to help Office Workers pass a couple of minutes in their day. Most of it can be produced by an uncurious girl sitting on her arse in front of a I-Mac browsing the internet, by either doing a story that basically just links to something she read on the net without building creatively on it, or spouted 'feelings' about what she 'knows' is right. All of this takes no effort or investigation whatsoever.

Their thought is utterly-worthless, except as turning over incrimental ad revenue through page views, but not interesting enough to *really* bring in the cash.

Who has more value to, say, the field of advertising. A feminist who says what women want whilst using cognitive dissonance to protect her ego from uncomfortable truths? Or Roosh, who could tell a client "They'll say they want this. They'll actually respond positively to this."

Am I rambling? Can you guys understand what I'm getting at?

Post: #12

Also, the feminists are celebrating over this article saying "game doesn't work!!", but they conveniently leave out the part that I got a one-night stand from a suspected VIRGIN, and a couple other easy scores as well that I describe in clear detail. The only difficulty in Denmark was adapting to the "nodding" game where you tone down the alphaness. But once you got that nailed, you can kill it there as easily as in America. To think that game as a whole is ineffective in a socialist country is nothing more than feminist wishful thinking ("I'll be stronger over men with socialism!")

Post: #13

I hate how these feminists pretend they're appealing to morality, reason, commonsense, and what's best for society. Ultimately she can only speak for herself and those within her feminist camp, not for the majority of women in this world.

If feminists studied science and biology, if they took their heads out of their dry smelly, unwanted and undesirable vaginas, maybe they would learn how to be real women and attract the alpha males they secretly desire.

They need to stop rationalizing their bitterness, rationality is for men.

Post: #14

Feminists will NEVER recognise Game, because they have a broken understanding of human social interaction that borders on autism, and, since their unfeminine looks and behaviour never attracts High Value Men, they're never exposed to Good Game.

Post: #15

You know, I read the whole article, and I gotta say I wouldn't deem it a hit piece at all, certainly not the unreadable garbage normally spewed all over jizzabel.

Sure she makes the typical sweeping generalizations and intonations of disgust and contempt, but she makes a really solid case for learning game, whether that was her intent or not.

Post: #16

(10-05-2013 06:26 PM)Roosh Wrote:  but they conveniently leave out the part that I got a one-night stand from a suspected VIRGIN

The writer acted like it was some sort of cop out like it does not count if it's a virgin. She is clueless as to how sexual interaction truly works.

Post: #17

It would be better if everyone would just copy and paste the articles so we don't give them extra hits. I don't want to support their bullshit with one penny extra if I can help it.


Edit: Just read the article. It seems to me she actually took the book seriously and read it. Obviously it was through the prism of "dumbass feminist" but it seemed to me she understands a lot about the underpinnings of game.

Post: #18

Forgot to add: their arrogance relates to that Need To Be Taken Seriously / Unique Snowflake post I wrote the other day.

They broadcast every thought they have via Social Media, assuming there is nothing wrong with it, because they are Educated, Intelligent and A Good Person.

They never stop to consider they are naively broadcasting every psychological flaw they have and identifying themselves as insufferable tone policers to potential employers.

I believe the universities encourage them to see these physical and psychological flaws as evidence of moral superiority. Obviously, it's a lazy way of expecting achievement than effort. Since they have been trained to see power, not shame, they overshare.

It's public. Why can't it be aggregated? Could someone seriously researching this analyse the data the point out that attendence to particular universities correlate with flawed reseasoning and unhealthy cognitive dissonance?

Could you find evidence of fallicious thinking in their posts, and knowing that these types of errors occur within certain IQ ranges and in certain personality types, then offer this information to potential employers - instead of illegal IQ testing - to filter out the unproductive dross in this new thought economy?

Hell, if you want Creative Thinking: if we're dealing in a thought economy, could some knowledgable, savvy men monetise this process and offer it to businesses, and make Human Resources irrelevant? How is it any different to Don'tDateHimGirl.com?

Galaxy Face on Twitter pointed out to Roosh the other day that she 'chooses to believe in equality'. Fallacious thinking: when it means she advances or feelings aren't hurt, then she's for it. When she's sexually-selecting male or female suitors, she filters via personalised prejudices against weight, height, hair, style, attractiveness etc.

If you hire her, expect flawed logic to possibly arise in any task she's given, and her to be more concerned with protecting feelings than getting the task done correctly.

Post: #19

what i found interesting was no mention of the women's physical appearance in denmark. that to me is the most interesting part from a male point of view: are the girls there hot?

she doesn't even address this.

Post: #20

it's on Longform too

http://longform.org/

WIA

Post: #21

It got 6 replies, nobody's taking that piece seriously and most of the handful who are are posting pro-manosphere stuff.

Pretty cool that Roosh got a long form article written about him.

Post: #22

(10-05-2013 07:52 PM)thedude3737 Wrote:  You know, I read the whole article, and I gotta say I wouldn't deem it a hit piece at all, certainly not the unreadable garbage normally spewed all over jizzabel.

Sure she makes the typical sweeping generalizations and intonations of disgust and contempt, but she makes a really solid case for learning game, whether that was her intent or not.

Agreed. I read it when Roosh tweeted it last week, and I was actually mildly impressed that it wasn't filled with snarky nastiness. The author isn't ugly or fat, so it probably makes her feminism a bit more palatable.You'd never get a fairly reasonable article on this subject from Lindy West for example.

Post: #23

(10-05-2013 06:26 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Also, the feminists are celebrating over this article saying "game doesn't work!!", but they conveniently leave out the part that I got a one-night stand from a suspected VIRGIN, and a couple other easy scores as well that I describe in clear detail. The only difficulty in Denmark was adapting to the "nodding" game where you tone down the alphaness. But once you got that nailed, you can kill it there as easily as in America. To think that game as a whole is ineffective in a socialist country is nothing more than feminist wishful thinking ("I'll be stronger over men with socialism!")

Theres a few Danish forum members who are indeed killing it in Denmark.
(BoyToyStory with 150 slays)

Also the site that is hosting the article might be possible malware, got a notification warning! Just a heads up