Post: #26

These is wht these threads are pointless. Everyone thinks your 9 is a 6 when their 10 is really a 5

Post: #27

I put atleast 80% of the girls I encounter into the 4-7 category which means there's A LOT of variety, but I think these girls could be objective 7's. There's nothing wrong with any of them besides minor flaws, could sleep with any and all of them, but nothing about them really catches my eye.



   
   
   

Post: #28

I'll throw in my 2 cents for the entire scale:

1- Cartoonishly ugly, extreme flaw that you can't ignore:


2- Very ugly, but not to the extreme of a 1:


3- Normal ugly:


4- Below average, not out of the question if you're desperate:


5- Mediocre. Unexciting but not gross:


6- Somewhat cute, sexually visible to non-desperate men:


7- Solidly cute:


8- Hot. The girl that would stand out in a club:


9- Model. As close to flawless as you could hope for:


10- I've never see guys agree on a universal 10. A 10 has to not only be smokin' hot, but also tailored to the viewer's own preferences.

If anything, this is probably a bit harsh.

Post: #29

As always, these threads become about the differentiating factors in the 1-10 scale, which has been covered numerous times, with little or no gain from each effort.

This particular thread was supposed to be interesting because it focuses in on the AMERICAN SEVEN. I chose the girl from The Office (American edition) because she is quite possibly the most plain, but not completely unattractive girl that I see frequently around the United States who always has a boyfriend. To me, that's a seven, because they are common, and they are typically taken. They are the average dateable girl, in other words.

A seven is attractive enough for most guys, but not attractive enough to make other women feel like they have to compete with her to win a man's heart. Usually, a seven has to have a great personality to make up for her otherwise relative plainness. A 7.5 and above have to use their personality less and less.

If you're with anything less than a 7, unless your whole objective is to rack up notches, you're doing it wrong. I personally don't even bother with anything less than a 7 unless she throws herself at me and I am in a sahara-like dry-spell. That's not to even boost my own ego. I'd much rather go out and talk to as many 7+s that I can in order to get a decent bang than take the easy 6-.

Post: #30

(11-24-2014 12:11 AM)DrewP Wrote:  I'll throw in my 2 cents for the entire scale:

1- Cartoonishly ugly, extreme flaw that you can't ignore:


2- Very ugly, but not to the extreme of a 1:


3- Normal ugly:


4- Below average, not out of the question if you're desperate:


5- Mediocre. Unexciting but not gross:


6- Somewhat cute, sexually visible to non-desperate men:


7- Solidly cute:


8- Hot. The girl that would stand out in a club:


9- Model. As close to flawless as you could hope for:


10- I've never see guys agree on a universal 10. A 10 has to not only be smokin' hot, but also tailored to the viewer's own preferences.

If anything, this is probably a bit harsh.

Agree mostly with this, but don't you think your 3 is better looking than your 4s? Your 4s seem kind of unrealistically/cartoonish whereas your 3 is a more common girl. I see plenty of those girls around.. fat but the face isn't awful, horrible hair though
Your 6 is pretty hot
The 7 looks like she has a disease, something is soooo wrong with her face. She could be a 3 to me.
Your 9 is a huge jump from that 8. Candace in that picture certainly would be a 9 or above, however usually candace looks around 8.5 to me. She's not the prettiest of the victorias secret models to me although I know she appeals to many. Your 8 is a 7 or even a high 6 to me.

Post: #31

(11-23-2014 10:39 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

The second last picture, with the striped bikini, was born male if it is 'Jenna Talackova'.

Post: #32

(11-24-2014 01:50 AM)Cheetah Wrote:  The second last picture, with the striped bikini, was born male if it is 'Jenna Talackova'.

Post: #33

Drew, that sucked. Let me show you how we do

1/10



2/10



3/10


4/10

5/10


6/10


7/10


8/10


9/10


10/10

Post: #34

(11-24-2014 01:53 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(11-24-2014 01:50 AM)Cheetah Wrote:  The second last picture, with the striped bikini, was born male if it is 'Jenna Talackova'.

oh my fucking god!!! I got that shit off of google! Don't look at me

Post: #35

^Re Aenema's comments:

The 4's are thin, that's why they get the nod above the 3. Alternatively, I could have chosen a chubby girl with a decent face as a 4.
You're right, 6 may actually be hot, but that particular photo lacks any sexuality whatsoever, so when you look at it you don't think "hot." It's really hard to tell.
I think 7 was just caught with a weird facial expression.
Not sure what you see that would drop the 8 any lower... thin, nice sized tits, pretty face. Look around in real life--there are VERY few girls with this complete package.

Post: #36

(11-24-2014 01:56 AM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

No need to be ashamed. Acceptance is the place to start. There's no way I'd ever give a tranny anything higher than a 0 (nevermind a 7), but everyone's entitled to their opinion:



I'll start building your new playlist:

Post: #37

Fashion models aren't always the most "fuckable" type. Don't get me wrong, their complete package place them in the top percentile for sure but keep in mind that models are chosen to best fit most clothes line thus doesn't necessarily mean that they're the most fertile or sexually attractive.

The most fuckable are swimsuit models. Below is the example.

[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaWvdJBVBSc
[/video]

Almost all of the models not only have more "meat" but their hips are also wider than average VS models.

Post: #38

(11-23-2014 11:15 PM)edtf Wrote:  

(11-23-2014 11:02 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  ^She's okay. 6/10, judging her solely off of her face because the body is ridiculous

edit: that is an ugly wardrobe to the right

really? she's like a 9 or 10 to me man.

Post: #39

Quote:

(11-24-2014 02:14 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  [quote='L M McCoy' pid='888225' dateline='1416812180']

No need to be ashamed. Acceptance is the place to start. There's no way I'd ever give a tranny anything higher than a 0 (nevermind a 7), but everyone's entitled to their opinion:

That meme wasn't taken in the direction I was hoping for

Good thing this isn't a very popular thread or else I'd be getting PMs with pics such as:

Post: #40

(11-24-2014 01:54 AM)L M McCoy Wrote:  Drew, that sucked. Let me show you how we do

1/10



2/10



3/10


4/10

5/10


6/10


7/10


8/10


9/10


10/10

I just don't agree at all.
Your 7 is a 10 and the only really hot girl that you posted.
Your 6 is close to your 10, prettier than average faces
Your 8 and 9 have strange faces to me, especially the 8. But the 9 is too white.
Your 3 is a 5 woman who aged and is in a bad photo.. not a good choice.
Your 5 has a decent face but the body is horrible. I can't even rate women like that.. too mismatched.. Only thing I can say is 7/10 face 2/10 body.

Post: #41

(11-24-2014 01:57 AM)DrewP Wrote:  ^Re Aenema's comments:

The 4's are thin, that's why they get the nod above the 3. Alternatively, I could have chosen a chubby girl with a decent face as a 4.
You're right, 6 may actually be hot, but that particular photo lacks any sexuality whatsoever, so when you look at it you don't think "hot." It's really hard to tell.
I think 7 was just caught with a weird facial expression.
Not sure what you see that would drop the 8 any lower... thin, nice sized tits, pretty face. Look around in real life--there are VERY few girls with this complete package.

I see where you're coming from. In theory it makes sense yet, while there's nothing explicitly wrong about her face, there's nothing right about it either. She has none of the features I find enticing even though nothings bad. I don't know, maybe its just personal taste but her face isn't appealing to me. Her breasts look white and vein-y but I obviously wb
Wouldn't you consider your 3 to be a chubby girl with a decent face? Certainly no grotesque features. Eyes are a little beady but they tend to be on fat people.
Those 4's just scare me completely. I get it that theyre thin but still that hair and gums.. they look deranged and birdlike.

Post: #42

Every time someone completely unnecessarily quotes giant posts of ranked images and all of us who thought we had scrolled past the gross chicks have to see them again:



Have some forum etiquette guys.

Post: #43

(11-24-2014 03:08 AM)Aenema Wrote:  Wouldn't you consider your 3 to be a chubby girl with a decent face? Certainly no grotesque features. Eyes are a little beady but they tend to be on fat people.

Chubby? Look again:



Chubby is a very, VERY generous euphemism for someone that size. Let's not give obese chicks any more justification to self-report as "average" on dating sites.

Post: #44

(11-24-2014 12:06 PM)DrewP Wrote:  

(11-24-2014 03:08 AM)Aenema Wrote:  Wouldn't you consider your 3 to be a chubby girl with a decent face? Certainly no grotesque features. Eyes are a little beady but they tend to be on fat people.

Chubby? Look again:



Chubby is a very, VERY generous euphemism for someone that size. Let's not give obese chicks any more justification to self-report as "average" on dating sites.

Looking closer I suppose she is fatter than what I first realized. But it amazes me that someone her size would have a fairly defined jaw/not a double chin. But judging by the origin of the photo I guess it could be retouched....... (but why bother?)

Post: #45

Tuth's girl is an 8. Praying I am not being Tranny Trolled by Tuth.

@LM

Her wardrobe is ugly? Get the fuck out lol. Is this Queer Eye for the Hot Chick?

Post: #46

The rating/comments of the girl that ended up being a tranny was way too awesome. hahahh

Post: #47

I believe a seven is the springboard for hot. Well preportioned, no flaws and able to wear hot clothes, accessories and makeup when needed. Now... The question should be, if you found a 9 and she had huuuuggeeeee beef curtains, like an arby's sandwich between her legs, would you drop her down to a 5? I hate huge bush or pendulous beef curtains.

Post: #48

(11-24-2014 04:32 PM)Travesty444 Wrote:  Tuth's girl is an 8. Praying I am not being Tranny Trolled by Tuth.

I wouldn't "tranny troll," which not only goes against my personal beliefs, but against the spirit of the forum.

That said, most guys were putting that girl in 9-10 territory in every other thread--hence my assertion that the 1-to-10 is pretty much useless.

Post: #49

Guys please stop fucking requote the ugly girls images.

Tuth's girl is a solid 8 but not more. Then again so many 7s here are 9s and so many 9s are 7s in my book. Come down to taste it seems.

But in order to get to the 7+ category you need to at least have a bangable body, means no fat and nice ass/boob. Face is subjective. A lot of 10s have faces that some would say are ugly.

Post: #50

American women are on average 4... the hot american girls are often 6's everywhere else...