Post: #1

http://www.humansofnewyork.com/post/6071...-your-life



"What was the happiest moment of your life?"
“Europe in the summer of 1959.”
“What happened there?”
“I was nineteen. I’d just lost 100 pounds and had a whole new set of clothes. I toured Paris and Rome and everyone was paying me so much attention. They were even asking for my photograph! Of course inside I still felt like an awkward, overweight girl. It was all so overwhelming and wonderful!”
“Why’d you go to Europe?”
“To have sex, of course. And I did! I was the first in my whole group of friends. I came home and told everyone that I’d done it with a charming Frenchman. In reality it was some creepy dude from Chicago.”

Post: #2

Girls in the 50s were also uglier. Show me a pin-up girl from the 50s worth fapping over.

Post: #3

Roissy wrote a blog post about this (referencing another blog). Tastes have changed. Today, guys prefer a slightly more masculine face:

http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2009/06/1...te-female/

Post: #4

(09-11-2013 09:02 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  Girls in the 50s were also uglier. Show me a pin-up girl from the 50s worth fapping over.

Shelley Fabares, Annette Funicello, Mamie Van Doren, Jayne Mansfield, Rita Heyworth...

Post: #5

(09-11-2013 11:12 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(09-11-2013 09:02 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  Girls in the 50s were also uglier. Show me a pin-up girl from the 50s worth fapping over.

Shelley Fabares, Annette Funicello, Mamie Van Doren, Jayne Mansfield, Rita Heyworth...

Days slacking on the pics, lolz.

Post: #6

(09-11-2013 09:02 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  Girls in the 50s were also uglier. Show me a pin-up girl from the 50s worth fapping over.

American women were smoking between 1920 and 1980. Try watching some classic Hollywood of the 1940's sometime and tell me if you don't get a boner. They don't even need to show your their tits to get a reaction.

Post: #7

(09-11-2013 11:34 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Try watching some classic Hollywood of the 1940's sometime and tell me if you don't get a boner. They don't even need to show your their tits to get a reaction.

Exactly. But, the 50's were also a great age for tits:

Post: #8

(09-11-2013 11:12 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(09-11-2013 09:02 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  Girls in the 50s were also uglier. Show me a pin-up girl from the 50s worth fapping over.

Shelley Fabares, Annette Funicello, Mamie Van Doren, Jayne Mansfield, Rita Heyworth...

Obviously not a fan of older movies. Actresses were more feminine in the 50's. Now they have to be rabid, masculinized chicks like Megan Fox to get anywhere in Hollywood.

Post: #9

While I agree that chicks are (if we exclude obesity, tatoos, skrillex and other forms of willful self-destruction) prettier today, I think it has to do with their easier life, more and better cosmetics, and introduction of exercise for exercise's sake. It produces more toned bodies and better (sleek?) skin than in the past, I'd say. Faces might have slightly improved due to evolutionary pressures and racial mixing too. Plus there is also the factor of most clothes being tighter nowadays.... yes, there can be said to be a small but significant difference.

However, it certainly can't be said that girls were ugly in the past. Most of these are also hot, and once they're naked no one cares if their clothing and makeup are more conservative. When you consider with how little baggage they came compared to today's women, it's a no brainer.

Post: #10

I love the older lady actresses, it was the clothes they wore and how they went about their business

Post: #11

   

Post: #12

LOL at all of the people missing the point.

Still hearkening back to the days prior to feminism when women were chaste and submissive.

EXPOSE THE LIES!

WIA

Post: #13

This is a little bit of an extreme situation. The girl lost 100 lbs. It was very rare for a girl to have 100 lbs to lose in 1950. She spent her teenage years without receiving any any male attention whatsoever. The same psychology applies today, fat chicks will sleep with larger numbers of guys to make themselves feel good. These guys who have sex with fat chicks will under no circumstances commit, but the girls can lie to themselves that they are desired because some guy is willing to have sex with them.

We really should'nt draw any conclusions based on this one extreme case other than that human nature really doesn't change. Girls want attention and will do what is necessary to get it. There has always been and will always be promiscuity but in the 50s it was quite a bit less than it is now.

Quote:I was the first in my whole group of friends.

Out of all her friends(all around 19 years old presumably) she was the only one desperate enough for male attention that she slept with some guy, probably in the 1950s version of a hostel. The rest of the girls were skinny and most of them were the subject of at least some male attention, enough to keep them from slutting it up.

Post: #14

Younger women were prettier in the 50s, but women are prettier for much longer today.

One word: sunscreen.

Those black and white film ladies would not hold up well under the lights. They had so many wrinkles and sun damage.

Post: #15

I'm still not seeing it. So I'm supposed to get a boner because these 1950s girls can clean the house right? Not happening.

There's 3 in this thread that are actually hot. Two look like trannies. The rest are average as fuck.

Post: #16

(09-12-2013 09:46 AM)Que enspastic Wrote:  I'm still not seeing it. So I'm supposed to get a boner because these 1950s girls can clean the house right? Not happening.

There's 3 in this thread that are actually hot. Two look like trannies. The rest are average as fuck.

Could you educate us and post some pics of the modern hotties that surpass them? If the young Brigitte Bardot was average somewhere I want to find that world

Post: #17

(09-12-2013 09:46 AM)Que enspastic Wrote:  I'm still not seeing it. So I'm supposed to get a boner because these 1950s girls can clean the house right? Not happening.

There's 3 in this thread that are actually hot. Two look like trannies. The rest are average as fuck.

I'm not surprised by your aesthetic preference.

Due to cultural conditioning and lower testosterone levels, men are increasingly attracted to androgynous "women."

There have been many times when I was walking behind a couple and couldn't tell from behind who was the man or woman.

Post: #18

Post: #19

(09-12-2013 09:52 AM)iknowexactly Wrote:  

(09-12-2013 09:46 AM)Que enspastic Wrote:  I'm still not seeing it. So I'm supposed to get a boner because these 1950s girls can clean the house right? Not happening.

There's 3 in this thread that are actually hot. Two look like trannies. The rest are average as fuck.

Could you educate us and post some pics of the modern hotties that surpass them? If the young Brigitte Bardot was average somewhere I want to find that world

Certainly.

Here they are.

Post: #20

^ I agree that make-up, photoshop, and Instagram filters make women appear to be more attractive.

But as someone who has actually met women in real life, I know that those are tricks.

I have been texted pics of almost dime pieces only to meet a girl who made me want to throw up in my mouth.

If you get out more, you'll see that the images on the TV screen don't quite hold up.

Post: #21

I actually went out last night. Not surprisingly I saw hotter girls than the ones in this thread. Maybe these 1950s chicks look better in videos.

Post: #22

(09-12-2013 10:25 AM)Que enspastic Wrote:  I actually went out last night. Not surprisingly I saw hotter girls than the ones in this thread. Maybe these 1950s chicks look better in videos.