Post: #1

Surprise, surprise Amanda Mancunt had to weigh in about women getting payed less than men. This bitch and none of her ilk complains that men pay more for auto insurance though.

"For years, women have had to pay higher health care premiums because insurance companies have used gender rating — a practice that, as of 2014, will be outlawed by the Affordable Care Act. The provision is one of the least controversial of the health care overhaul. But "Fox & Friends" still couldn't resist debating the issue Tuesday in a gender-baiting exchange (see video below) that's caused a controversy of its own.

“We only have the prostate,” noted Fox News medical contributor Dr. David Samadi, who fanned the flames by arguing that women actually should pay more than men. "Women have the breasts, they have the ovaries, they have the uterus, they get checked in every part."



"Slate's Amanda Marcotte noted, "This newfound enthusiasm for strict economic fairness between men and women sadly did not lead Fox to also advocate that men stop getting paid more than women for their work." Marcotte also took Samadi to task for his vague response to Carlson's suggestion that maternity costs be shared since a pregnancy is created with two people, to which he said, "Not always."

"Was he suggesting that the ridiculously small number of pregnancies created in single or lesbian women by sperm donors was justification enough to spare men the responsibility of sharing childbirth costs?" Marcotte asked. "

   

http://shine.yahoo.com/healthy-living/fo...14267.html

Post: #2

Typical. Bitch brings up something that has nothing to do with the topic of conversation and acts like she's a good debater.

Post: #3

Warren Farrell once observed that men are treated as less than property as they exist to create property for women.

Notice at the end, it says that the problem is men like the doctor don't view women as equal partners. Really, what about divorce, child support and alimony?

Yes, it stupid as the erudite DailyKos observes. It is stupid that man has yet to understand that becoming equal with women involves more and more privileges and cash flowing into women's worlds.

I find it amusing that Marcotte is trotted out as an expert on women's issues. The reason she is brought out is because she zero understanding of power.

Post: #4

(08-28-2013 06:49 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  The reason she is brought out is because she zero understanding of power.

To be honest, I think it's because she's attractive for a feminist.



Yeah, none of us WB, and she looks like a man in bad drag, but pickings are slim.

Post: #5

(08-28-2013 09:02 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  To be honest, I think it's because she's attractive for a feminist.

Divorco, you're back?

Post: #6

^^

Post: #7

(08-28-2013 09:02 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(08-28-2013 06:49 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  The reason she is brought out is because she zero understanding of power.

To be honest, I think it's because she's attractive for a feminist.



Yeah, none of us WB, and she looks like a man in bad drag, but pickings are slim.

   

Post: #8

(08-28-2013 06:49 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  Warren Farrell once observed that men are treated as less than property as they exist to create property for women.

Notice at the end, it says that the problem is men like the doctor don't view women as equal partners. Really, what about divorce, child support and alimony?

Yes, it stupid as the erudite DailyKos observes. It is stupid that man has yet to understand that becoming equal with women involves more and more privileges and cash flowing into women's worlds.

I find it amusing that Marcotte is trotted out as an expert on women's issues. The reason she is brought out is because she zero understanding of power.

While I thought "Myth of Male Power" for the most part was accurate, he also has a huge problem with boys wanting to play football or any sport besides badminton.

Post: #9

I looked up this guy's contact and sent him a note of encouragement. He was thankful for it. When someone is bearing the wrath of the lemmings it is refreshing for them to receive support.

In his mind he was just advocating fairness, which is supposedly an ideal held dear in politically correct society, and had no idea he would incur the wrath of the feminists.

The man treats men with prostate cancer, and does quite well apparently .

After all of his service to men with cancer and the people who rely on them (for sure a lot of feminists), he makes one statement on television and the cretins want to digitally lynch him.

Contact Samadi here:

http://www.roboticoncology.com/contact/

Post: #10

(08-28-2013 11:25 PM)la_mode Wrote:  

(08-28-2013 06:49 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  Warren Farrell once observed that men are treated as less than property as they exist to create property for women.

Notice at the end, it says that the problem is men like the doctor don't view women as equal partners. Really, what about divorce, child support and alimony?

Yes, it stupid as the erudite DailyKos observes. It is stupid that man has yet to understand that becoming equal with women involves more and more privileges and cash flowing into women's worlds.

I find it amusing that Marcotte is trotted out as an expert on women's issues. The reason she is brought out is because she zero understanding of power.

While I thought "Myth of Male Power" for the most part was accurate, he also has a huge problem with boys wanting to play football or any sport besides badminton.

I can get football. It's starting to slowly emerge just how damaging to the brain the sport can be. As a doctor, he might've seen or read enough to warrant some doubt about a lot of sports.

Post: #11

I just sent him a note showing support.