Post: #1

story here:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-06-20...rica-today

There are some pretty intersting and even chilling factoids in there, including the following:

#2 Back in 1950, more than 80 percent of all men in the United States had jobs. Today, less than 65 percent of all men in the United States have jobs. (the 'recovery' is just a media-controlled feelgood joke IMO - real unemployment levels are really in the mid-teens now with many people underemployed or in dead-end service jobs)
#3 During the last recession, men lost twice as many jobs as women did. (including yours truly
#5 According to the Economic Policy Institute, the "real entry-level hourly wage for men who recently graduated from high school" has declined from $15.64 in 1979 to $11.68 today. WOW
#9 According to one very surprising study, "young, urban, childless women" make more money in America today than young, urban, childless men do. ("Wage Gap" anyone?)
#21 According to the New York Times, approximately 57 percent of all young people enrolled at U.S. colleges are women. That means that only 43 percent are men. (Guess who's getting the few plumb corporate jobs left in the States going forward?)
#30 The United States produces more pornography than any other nation in the world. Men consume far more of that pornography than women do. (hello no fapping rule!)

etc. etc.

Meanwhile, in spite of all of the above, the Feminist and mainstream media are talking about "The War on Women" during the US elections last year. Huh??

I still like the USofA, but at this point I sure am glad I got out of the hellish situation facing most American dudes back home. Finding a job and supporting a family is a nightmarish endeavor for many people back home now I think.

Game over!!??

Post: #2

USA already is in point of no return... USA will never be greatest country in the world, right now its about damage control and hoping they end up like GB not like Rome.

Post: #3

It's an article that needed to be written, but here is where he goes wrong:

Society has told them that it is okay to be a "slacker". Today, far too many of our young men are far more interested in their various addictions (beer, drugs, sex, video games, gambling, etc.) than they are in starting a family. But the truth is that men are far more happy when they have a purpose. When men are raising families, starting businesses or doing something to transform society they feel fulfilled.

Instead he should be saying that society and government policies have provided no incentive for a lot of men to "have a purpose." The exact behaviors that would have earned you a house, wife, and steady job in the Mad Men era, will get you deemed a loser chump today. There is little point in dedicating yourself to employers who are indifferent at best and/or women who can divorce you and take everything.

Also, he leaves out the fact that by merely appearing to be responsible, you've already knocked yourself out of the running with a lot of today's women who chase bad boys, although they deny that (hence our hamster wheel analogy).

He seems to see that feminist has caused men to be displaced in jobs. What he fails to see is that its unintended consequences has had a ripple effect on society. As for me, I'll just make like Capt. Capitalism and enjoy the decline. The straight life sure as hell didn't pay off for me.

Post: #4

Let's remove the social hammock that used safety and see what happens.

Post: #5

This article pretty much sums up everything that I have preached.

Things change for better or for worse.

The change that has occurred in the US is beneficial so some (women) and detrimental to others (men).

This has turned into something bigger than a crisis.

Quote:A crisis (from the Greek κρίσις - krisis;[1] plural: "crises"; adjectival form: "critical") is any event that is, or expected to lead to, an unstable and dangerous situation affecting an individual, group, community, or whole society. Crises are deemed to be negative changes in the security, economic, political, societal, or environmental affairs, especially when they occur abruptly, with little or no warning. More loosely, it is a term meaning 'a testing time' or an 'emergency event'.

I fear that it is too late for society.

I could write an extensive post about this subject, but my words will be written in vain.

I will do as Broken Arrows has stated, sit back and enjoy the decline.

Since I am immune to this social pledge who has engulfed the US, I will be one of the few living a fascinating life by ORIGINAL MEN STANDARDS.

Most men in the US don't care about things like this because they have been psychologically programmed not to care.

Women are better at diluting emotions. They control the brain of weaker minds at a higher success rate than men.

Why do men propose to women instead of women to men? Who has the last saying on getting to marry?

It doesn't matter what happens, only what appears to happen. In proposals, it appears that a man in love is making an attempt to be the rest of his life among the women he loves. What actually happens is that a man in love is now given all the power away to a person that has waited all of their entire relationships for this moment, the moment when that said man becomes so powerless waiting for a yes or no answer.

Trust me, this article is very important but it means crap now. The author is about 4363 years late.

My goal is to be able to travel the world and live in places that haven't been exposed to this invisible virus. Being an international playboy is not just about going to other countries to get laid but also going to other countries to get away from this ridiculous "modern" system.

Post: #6

I find it difficult to truly believe that men are being "systematically" emasculated, as if it were intentional. At most I would assume this is a rather unfortunate(for men), incidental by-product of current U.S. culture.

Post: #7

Sounds like a pity part to me. Stop feeling sorry for yourselves and pull it together.

Post: #8

(06-21-2013 07:56 PM)RCP Wrote:  I find it difficult to truly believe that men are being "systematically" emasculated, as if it were intentional. At most I would assume this is a rather unfortunate(for men), incidental by-product of current U.S. culture.

I used to think what you just wrote but I'm not too sure that this is unintentional anymore. Let's be serious, the ascendency of women should have an asterisk next to it b/c their success is entirely subsidized by men.

Women are more risk-averse and have a deep-seated desire to submit to something greater than themselves(traditionally a man but now society encourages them to submit to careers and consumerism).

If you were a person in a position of authority would rather have subordinates that you can easily cow into submission and follow unquestioningly(women) or group that will challenge you legitimately?

This is why advertisers, politicians, teachers, and even parents favor girls: it's easier to raise them. You don't need logos to convince women just pathos which is easy to manufacture.

Easier doesn't necessarily mean better but most people are lazy. Women aren't stupid but most are largely inept and require constant supervision. The promotion of mediocrity offends my sensibilities and I'm working getting some online stuff set-up so I ship out of here.

Tl;dr: Fuck the West, it's getting just what is asked for, let it burn and do you.

Post: #9

(06-21-2013 08:41 PM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  

(06-21-2013 07:56 PM)RCP Wrote:  I find it difficult to truly believe that men are being "systematically" emasculated, as if it were intentional. At most I would assume this is a rather unfortunate(for men), incidental by-product of current U.S. culture.

I used to think what you just wrote but I'm not too sure that this is unintentional anymore. Let's be serious, the ascendency of women should have an asterisk next to it b/c their success is entirely subsidized by men.

Women are more risk-averse and have a deep-seated desire to submit to something greater than themselves(traditionally a man but now society encourages them to submit to careers and consumerism).

If you were a person in a position of authority would rather have subordinates that you can easily cow into submission and follow unquestioningly(women) or group that will challenge you legitimately?

This is why advertisers, politicians, teachers, and even parents favor girls: it's easier to raise them. You don't need logos to convince women just pathos which is easy to manufacture.

Easier doesn't necessarily mean better but most people are lazy. Women aren't stupid but most are largely inept and require constant supervision. The promotion of mediocrity offends my sensibilities and I'm working getting some online stuff set-up so I ship out of here.

Tl;dr: Fuck the West, it's getting just what is asked for, let it burn and do you.

Well with the way you have stated it, I understand where you're coming from. I just find it difficult to grasp the concept of this being the legitimate mindset/actions of Western society as a whole. But those ideas coupled with the apparent promotion, and seemingly even advertisement, of feminism and women in Western society, I realize that this may very well be the case.

However, this cannot be directly proven, so it just leaves us with speculation.

All I know is that you are right about the West. In 10-20 years it is not going to be a place capable of providing me with the liberties, prosperity, and overall happiness in life that I intend to live as a man.

Post: #10

(06-21-2013 07:56 PM)RCP Wrote:  I find it difficult to truly believe that men are being "systematically" emasculated, as if it were intentional. At most I would assume this is a rather unfortunate(for men), incidental by-product of current U.S. culture.

"Intentional" is the important word in your sentence. Have you ever sat through a women's studies class or lecture? Or read Jezebel? Or Feministing? Or anything by Lindy West? Do you know what they say about men, men's rights, and freedom of speech concerning men? Have you read anything by Susan Brownmiller, Andrea Dworkin or Catherine McKinnon? Gloria Steinem? Do you know the quotes that these feminist leaders are famous for?

Do you think any of those ideas, most of which come from textbooks that are assigned in college courses, are not "intentional?"

Have you noticed that although black men fill prisons and have the highest chance of dying young the president convened a White House Council on Women and Girls?

Have you read Dr. Helen's Smith's new book, "Men on Strike" or wondered why women vastly outnumber men in college? Or wondered what would happen if you reversed that 60/40 statistic?

Have you read Glenn Sacks' work, where he discusses how men are systematically removed from their houses and kids in family courts? What about the Web site called Community of the Wrongly Accused, that looks at false rape charges and how colleges have altered their judicial system so that "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" is no longer the standard?

Here is the deal: very little in life is "accidental." The statistics in the linked article here didn't come about by chance. What you see in society was planned -- maybe not "engineered" to the letter, but planned nonetheless. People have said feminism was pushed to 1). Weaken the family so citizens would rely more on gov't (which gives the powerful more power) and 2). To double the labor pool so the 1 percent could pay workers less.

I just wrote all this off the top of my head. Other could come up with more stuff. If you feel like exploring what I've written and linked, maybe afterwards you can peruse the writing of F. Roger Devlin, whose philosophies under-gird a lot of what we write about here. His classic essays can be found here (click on his name in the left column).

Post: #11

(06-21-2013 07:34 AM)Akula Wrote:  #21 According to the New York Times, approximately 57 percent of all young people enrolled at U.S. colleges are women. That means that only 43 percent are men. (Guess who's getting the few plumb corporate jobs left in the States going forward

if i had to guess, it would be men, despite lopsided college enrollment rates.

is that the answer you were looking for?

Post: #12

(06-21-2013 10:59 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(06-21-2013 07:56 PM)RCP Wrote:  I find it difficult to truly believe that men are being "systematically" emasculated, as if it were intentional. At most I would assume this is a rather unfortunate(for men), incidental by-product of current U.S. culture.

"Intentional" is the important word in your sentence. Have you ever sat through a women's studies class or lecture? Or read Jezebel? Or Feministing? Or anything by Lindy West? Do you know what they say about men, men's rights, and freedom of speech concerning men? Have you read anything by Susan Brownmiller, Andrea Dworkin or Catherine McKinnon? Gloria Steinem? Do you know the quotes that these feminist leaders are famous for?

Do you think any of those ideas, most of which come from textbooks that are assigned in college courses, are not "intentional?"

Have you noticed that although black men fill prisons and have the highest chance of dying young the president convened a White House Council on Women and Girls?

Have you read Dr. Helen's Smith's new book, "Men on Strike" or wondered why women vastly outnumber men in college? Or wondered what would happen if you reversed that 60/40 statistic?

Have you read Glenn Sacks' work, where he discusses how men are systematically removed from their houses and kids in family courts? What about the Web site called Community of the Wrongly Accused, that looks at false rape charges and how colleges have altered their judicial system so that "guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" is no longer the standard?

Here is the deal: very little in life is "accidental." The statistics in the linked article here didn't come about by chance. What you see in society was planned -- maybe not "engineered" to the letter, but planned nonetheless. People have said feminism was pushed to 1). Weaken the family so citizens would rely more on gov't (which gives the powerful more power) and 2). To double the labor pool so the 1 percent could pay workers less.

I just wrote all this off the top of my head. Other could come up with more stuff. If you feel like exploring what I've written and linked, maybe afterwards you can peruse the writing of F. Roger Devlin, whose philosophies under-gird a lot of what we write about here. His classic essays can be found here (click on his name in the left column).

I appreciate the insight, I will definitely look more into the material you've provided when I have the time.

Post: #13

(06-21-2013 06:44 PM)Doulos2Game Wrote:  This article pretty much sums up everything that I have preached.

Things change for better or for worse.

The change that has occurred in the US is beneficial so some (women) and detrimental to others (men).

This has turned into something bigger than a crisis.

Quote:A crisis (from the Greek κρίσις - krisis;[1] plural: "crises"; adjectival form: "critical") is any event that is, or expected to lead to, an unstable and dangerous situation affecting an individual, group, community, or whole society. Crises are deemed to be negative changes in the security, economic, political, societal, or environmental affairs, especially when they occur abruptly, with little or no warning. More loosely, it is a term meaning 'a testing time' or an 'emergency event'.

I fear that it is too late for society.

I could write an extensive post about this subject, but my words will be written in vain.

I will do as Broken Arrows has stated, sit back and enjoy the decline.

Since I am immune to this social pledge who has engulfed the US, I will be one of the few living a fascinating life by ORIGINAL MEN STANDARDS.

Most men in the US don't care about things like this because they have been psychologically programmed not to care.

Women are better at diluting emotions. They control the brain of weaker minds at a higher success rate than men.

Why do men propose to women instead of women to men? Who has the last saying on getting to marry?

It doesn't matter what happens, only what appears to happen. In proposals, it appears that a man in love is making an attempt to be the rest of his life among the women he loves. What actually happens is that a man in love is now given all the power away to a person that has waited all of their entire relationships for this moment, the moment when that said man becomes so powerless waiting for a yes or no answer.

Trust me, this article is very important but it means crap now. The author is about 4363 years late.

My goal is to be able to travel the world and live in places that haven't been exposed to this invisible virus. Being an international playboy is not just about going to other countries to get laid but also going to other countries to get away from this ridiculous "modern" system.

yeah I feel this way pretty much as well. The decline is inevitable. It's like the frog in boiling water and how it doesn't know its slowly getting boiled to death. Except many of us do know. Enjoy the decline bro!

Post: #14

(06-21-2013 07:58 PM)Gmac Wrote:  Sounds like a pity part to me. Stop feeling sorry for yourselves and pull it together.

I did - I left!!

Post: #15

When you follow the money it's easy to see its intentional. Western Society created the largest sums of pure wealth in history and it is/was largely held (in trust) by men. You emmasulate men and they have no ability to protect thier wealth. The trillions banks and wall street steal whom do you think that wealth is mostly from?

It's 100% intentional.

Post: #16

Jump to 2:20.

Post: #17

Less than 65% of men in the US have jobs? I call bs on that.

Post: #18

(06-22-2013 03:32 PM)InternationPlayboy Wrote:  Less than 65% of men in the US have jobs? I call bs on that.

Average US life expectancy for a male is about 78 years. Retirement age is 67. Many men under age 25 or so are at school/university/college, and not working. Many men are also in jail. It all adds up - quite possibly to 1/3 of all men in the US..

Post: #19

(06-23-2013 02:21 AM)Architekt Wrote:  

(06-22-2013 03:32 PM)InternationPlayboy Wrote:  Less than 65% of men in the US have jobs? I call bs on that.

Average US life expectancy for a male is about 78 years. Retirement age is 67. Many men under age 25 or so are at school/university/college, and not working. Many men are also in jail. It all adds up - quite possibly to 1/3 of all men in the US..

Yup it's not that hard to see if you look at it big picture. When I travel to the States I see first hand that during day time hours, aka traditional work goes I see a lot of dudes just chilling and hanging out. The stats are mostly for " working age people" so it's pretty much ages 15-65, with 'young' labour being grouped in 15-25(30?) where you see pretty much a 50% +\- unemployment rate. Let's not forget the many that are underemployed working shit jobs they are overqualified for.

Post: #20

To me it's is as if another country came in and invaded us burned everything in sight and spread salt on all over the fields so nothing would grow for decades to come. No point in even looking back. We lost the war here. Whatever is here is here and I don't have an interest in reclaiming anything in the US so I'm out.

There are other places where I will be respected, where laws will be in my favor, have opportunities for cash will be available and where I'll get much more pleasure from girls.

Post: #21

(06-23-2013 06:56 PM)Hammer Wrote:  To me it's is as if another country came in and invaded us burned everything in sight and spread salt on all over the fields so nothing would grow for decades to come. No point in even looking back. We lost the war here. Whatever is here is here and I don't have an interest in reclaiming anything in the US so I'm out.

There are other places where I will be respected, where laws will be in my favor, have opportunities for cash will be available and where I'll get much more pleasure from girls.

Just remember they greatest opportunities are when things are in ruins. If America has to take a break massive amounts of wealth will be made during that time. Some stick around for that gamble, others don't but don't forget it. During the great depression obscene amounts of wealth we're made while the country sat in despair. Its humbling but a reality also - Many Men will stick around to hustle in the wild west atmosphere of it all.

Basically since Women have basically via the State taken a large chunk of wealth when they start to loose that wealth it will be fair game to take it back into your rightful hands. Its your fathers and your grandfathers wealth they (State & Elites) are stealing, don't discount that opportunity to get it back.

Post: #22

(06-23-2013 09:09 PM)kosko Wrote:  Just remember they greatest opportunities are when things are in ruins. If America has to take a break massive amounts of wealth will be made during that time. Some stick around for that gamble, others don't but don't forget it. During the great depression obscene amounts of wealth we're made while the country sat in despair. Its humbling but a reality also - Many Men will stick around to hustle in the wild west atmosphere of it all.

Basically since Women have basically via the State taken a large chunk of wealth when they start to loose that wealth it will be fair game to take it back into your rightful hands. Its your fathers and your grandfathers wealth they (State & Elites) are stealing, don't discount that opportunity to get it back.

There is nothing that I want that can be taken from me. That means no house, land, cars, boats, professional licenses, I don't want it. When you can make cash anywhere you have internet, no matter what sector of the economy is down who cares about stuff? I can lose all my cash today and I'll make it back within a month in an internet cafe and no one can stop me from doing so. I can find a nice place to live in a heartbeat in the heart of any major city, rent boats, cars anything I could need.

I care about:

1. Nice pretty women that spend time with me
2. My health
3. My e-books
4. My hobbies
5. My ability to make cash
6. My ability fly to somewhere new at anytime.

Fuck the rest.

http://www.returnofkings.com/12534/mans-...possession

Post: #23

Quote:As for me, I'll just make like Capt. Capitalism and enjoy the decline. The straight life sure as hell didn't pay off for me.

I'm with you on this. Not playing by the mold anymore in any aspect of my life. That decision was made when I was released from my last job. My male boss (VP) was almost like working directly for a woman with feminist views.

I was a threat for doing "too good," and thus, eliminated by the new boys club of the organization, while completely unproductive women were given projects they fumbled with and did poorly yet given accolades for every minor accomplishment they made.

The clincher, is it was a major construction company at its core.... very sad, a male dominated field being run like this. I wonder if it also had anything to do with the double minority status of the female HR Director?!! hmmm.

Post: #24

(06-23-2013 10:22 PM)Ingocnito Wrote:  

Quote:As for me, I'll just make like Capt. Capitalism and enjoy the decline. The straight life sure as hell didn't pay off for me.

I'm with you on this. Not playing by the mold anymore in any aspect of my life. That decision was made when I was released from my last job. My male boss (VP) was almost like working directly for a woman with feminist views.

I was a threat for doing "too good," and thus, eliminated by the new boys club of the organization, while completely unproductive women were given projects they fumbled with and did poorly yet given accolades for every minor accomplishment they made.

The clincher, is it was a major construction company at its core.... very sad, a male dominated field being run like this. I wonder if it also had anything to do with the double minority status of the female HR Director?!! hmmm.

Not sure what it's like in other countries, but government labourers literally work on the principle of "we need to make every project go for as long as we can, or the workers will be unemployed!" I'm not sure if they're pulling the piss, or if our government is literally that stupid, but it seems to be a very toxic, very ingrained mindset. Meanwhile, on projects like the freeway, the citizens that need to use it are going to be constantly burdened by the roadworks, that will inevitably continue for at least 20 years or so now. We have a woman prime minister, too.

Seems like the idea of doing anything properly, and as best as you possibly can started dying a long time ago, with the decline of man.

Post: #25

   

...and this is what's being pushed on men as fashion.