Post: #1

Did a search of my username and found the first reference to my nom-de-plume by anybody:

http://femme-o-nomics.com/2013/05/warren...o-so-well/

Remember my post about Buffet the other day, well, it was important enough to be quoted by a blog calling itself "Femme-O-Nomics"

Quote:But not all, however, view the billionaire’s opinion in the same light. In the Roosh V Forum, the thread about the said piece showed varying negative reactions. Exactaking thinks that the whole essay “basically supports the whole feminism=cheap labor theory.” Hades agrees, writing: “Like a lot of people he does not give much of a shit about laborers, only that by increasing the labor pool it makes labor cheaper. Spot on.” Meanwhile, n0000 mentions five downsides of “employing 100% of people as worker drones….1. Massive healthcare costs due to lower quality of food because the mom isn’t home to cook for the family. 2. Lower iq due to poor nutrition means less innovation, more crime. 3. Single parent families cause increased crime, poverty. 4. Weaker families due to kids spending less time around parents. 5. A culture focused on instant consumption instead of saving for the future.”

Any advice on how to get quoted by Marcunt or Fucktrelle? Maybe Hugs will love my posts on pegging!

Post: #2

Looks like you guys were used as the token disagreement.

Post: #3

The fucked up thing about this is, the hamster can't/won't contemplate the logic behind the RVF comments. It will just hamsterbate about women haters, hate speech, blah, blah, squeak, squeak.

Post: #4

Props.

Post: #5

They're probably a lurker here.