(03-28-2013 03:38 AM)Captain Ahab Wrote: I know for a fact that in going out on a limb to speak out against gay marriage (or feminine men in general) will leave me marginalized so I'll accept the system and keep my mouth shut.
Politics is one thing Biology is another.
Good strategy: "Appear dumb but be smart"
Or as Sun Tzu put it, " Appear weak when you are strong."
Don't confront the status quo directly, just look good!!
Arguing with emotional liberals on this topic will leave you literally exasperated. Right now I was just browsing my facebook wall. When your friends comment on a public post it shows up on your wall. One of my best friends commented on this pro gay photo. The photo showed two pics side by side, the left pic was of two men making out and the right pic of impoverished kids in Africa. The caption was(paraphrased) "If you are more shocked by the pic on the left than the one on the right, you need to question your morals". I clicked on the pic to see what my friend commented. I was reading through some of the comments and it's just full of the most sappy, muddled, lazy-thinking liberal bullshit. If I wanted, I go in there and absolutely slaughter every one of them to pieces, but why even fucking bother. It's not going to change their minds. And they seem to enjoy reveling in the drama of it anyway.
For example, one girl in response to someone who was repulsed by the gay photo said, "How can you be for banning gay relationships, love is love and all love is valid!". My thoughts were: Who the fuck is banning gay people from relationships? There is nothing on the books that says two gays cannot have a relationship. There are no laws on the books telling ANY people the terms of what they can enter a relationship with another person. What you actually mean to refer to is marriage. And even then there is nothing saying gays cannot get married. There are gay men married to women. What the law says is that two people of the opposite sex despite their sexual preference cannot legally marry. Nothing in our laws makes any mention of sexual-orientation or defines any rights to people based on their orientation. Secondly, nobody really believes the bullshit that ALL love is valid. If a brother fell in love with his sister, we would consider that a sickness(most of us anyway), even though in their minds their love might be valid.
The person she was responding too didn't even say gays can't have relationships, that person simply said that the image of two men making out was gross to him. But that's all it took for liberals to just pile up on the guy. Forget being opposed to same-sex marriage, if you simply think it's gross to see two men making out, you are a morally twisted person, a bigot, a homophobe. This is another one of those Rip Van Winkle moments. I don't even recognize the society I live in anymore.
There are reasonable people who make the case for gay marriage based on intellectual or legal reasons, but I find that in normal life, the pro gay marriage people are like the woman I referenced above, just the most sappy, inane, emotional bullshit. They seem to get off on asserting their moral superiority over anyone with an opposing belief. These are the same people filling up facebook with that red equal sign. The same tools that one year ago were barking about "Kony" all over their wall, even though the day prior they'd never even heard of the guy.
(03-27-2013 07:27 PM)MSW2007 Wrote: It's all about destroying the nuclear family by normalizing homosexuality and demonizing heterosexual procreation as "oppressive" to gays, transgendered, and all women.
The kicker is going to be when the transgender/lesbian/feminist lobby throws gay men under the bus.
I agree, there is a sustained attempt to lambaste the nuclear traditional family, but I am unsure as to who is behind this and why this is done. I mean, the people 'in charge' are capitalist globalists and surely they would favor high birth rates all round to support consumerism, right?
Regarding Gay people, like I said in another post, I think it is abnormal, but natural. However, I know of a few cases where it seems more of a choice than a biological urge. Furthermore, I echo Jack Donovan, who is gay himself (I only found this out a few days ago, AFTER reading the most macho book ever, his 'The Way of Men'), that the whole 'camp' thing is a feminist invention to demonize masculinity by emasculating sections of it.
P.S The O.P's post and speakeasy's contributions were excellent breakdowns and analyses.
P.P.S A distant relative of mine who I am friends with on FB, she's 16 and has that equal sign as her profile pic. Utterly infuriating, but I won't bring it up as I can't be bothered with the shit storm that would come my way from a bunch of teenage SWPL utopians who know no better.
I thought about changing my facebook avatar to Gomer Pyle, but the SSM crowd probably wouldn't get the joke.
Always did wonder why Sgt Carter always wanted him in his office.
(03-28-2013 04:12 PM)InternationPlayboy Wrote: Is this a pro gay marriage deal? I thought it had something to do with the "save the animals" cause.
Yeah everyone on facebook is setting it as their profile picture to show how much they support gay marriage (without the hands of course).
Well that's pretty gay. I have a bunch of friends with this as their profile picture. Even straight dudes. I have no problem with gay marriage, as it's bound to happen. But I think as a straight dude to set that as your profile picture makes you a pussy. They are most likely white knights as well, I'm sure.
(03-28-2013 04:12 PM)InternationPlayboy Wrote: Is this a pro gay marriage deal? I thought it had something to do with the "save the animals" cause.
Yeah everyone on facebook is setting it as their profile picture to show how much they support gay marriage (without the hands of course).
Well that's pretty gay. I have a bunch of friends with this as their profile picture. Even straight dudes. I have no problem with gay marriage, as it's bound to happen. But I think as a straight dude to set that as your profile picture makes you a pussy. They are most likely white knights as well, I'm sure.
But they're going to get all the girls by being so supportive and accepting of others...
(03-28-2013 04:12 PM)InternationPlayboy Wrote: Is this a pro gay marriage deal? I thought it had something to do with the "save the animals" cause.
Yeah everyone on facebook is setting it as their profile picture to show how much they support gay marriage (without the hands of course).
Well that's pretty gay. I have a bunch of friends with this as their profile picture. Even straight dudes. I have no problem with gay marriage, as it's bound to happen. But I think as a straight dude to set that as your profile picture makes you a pussy. They are most likely white knights as well, I'm sure.
But they're going to get all the girls by being so supportive and accepting of others...
That's right, I forgot, only gentlemen get the ladies