porscheguy
True Player
    
Posts: 2,357
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 23
|
RE: "She confessed that she stopped taking the pill"
On a 28-day cycle, you've got a 3-4 day window where the girl can get knocked up. The whole thing about pre-cum or residual semen left in the pipes from a previous fuck are nice and all, but unless you're blowing your load balls deep on her cervix, I'd say the odds of knocking her up are still reduced.
If this dude honestly pulled out each and every time, he should tell her flat out that he wants a paternity test at the first available opportunity, and that he wants to be present when all samples are collected. And he needs to make it clear that he will not discuss anything else regarding this pregnancy until a test is done.
Even if the kid turns out to be his, he's well within in his right to treat her like complete dog shit for what she did, and he ought to kick her ass to the curb right away. She did fuck him over after all.
He's under no obligation to her whatsoever. She can go on medicaid and get help from the state. But he can't be liable for anything until the paternity is determined. And considering how the courts are now holding men responsible despite paternity testing that proves otherwise, he would be wise to avoid doing anything that could be interpreted as "fatherly" until the test results arrive.
|
|
| 02-18-2013 08:13 PM |
|
The following 2 users Like porscheguy's post:2 users Like porscheguy's post
rudebwoy, speakeasy
|
tmason
Banned
Posts: 170
Joined: Sep 2012
|
RE: "She confessed that she stopped taking the pill"
(02-18-2013 08:25 PM)flyfreshandyoung Wrote: I'd be incredibly suspicious if I was this dude. Can't find the study now (at work) but it was definitively proven pre cum does not at all contain sperm. So if you're pulling out you should be good unless you get lazy. Anecdotally I've raw dogged no pill chicks (I know, I know) enough to have back this up. Dude needs to paternity test, badly.
Not true, that study was incomplete:
Quote:A noted limitation to these previous studies' findings is that pre-ejaculate samples were analyzed after the critical two-minute point. That is, looking for motile sperm in small amounts of pre-ejaculate via microscope after two minutes – when the sample has most likely dried – makes examination and evaluation "extremely difficult."[5] Thus, in March 2011 a team of researchers assembled 27 male volunteers and analyzed their pre-ejaculate samples within two minutes after producing them. The researchers found that 11 of the 27 men (41%) produced pre-ejaculatory samples that contained sperm, and 10 of these samples (37%) contained a "fair amount" of motile sperm (i.e. as little as 1 million to as many as 35 million).[5] As a point of reference, a study showed that, of couples who conceived within a year of trying, only 2.5% included a male partner with a total sperm count (per ejaculate) of 23 million sperm or less.[13] However, across a wide range of observed values, total sperm count (as with other identified semen and sperm characteristics) has weak power to predict which couples are at risk of pregnancy.[14]
|
|
| 02-18-2013 08:35 PM |
|
|