(02-12-2013 11:32 PM)stilicho Wrote:  

(02-08-2013 09:08 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I've said it before and I'll repeat it here: the US would have some of the world's hottest chicks if a massive famine were to strike. The sheer diversity has created a massive pool of ingredients and potential permutations. If dudes stopped putting up with all the bullshit overnight--and lay down the necessary regulations and correctives--we could revamp them from the inside too.

Will it happen? No.

balls. best women in the world are swedes and slavic ones (russia, ukraine, check republic, croatia etc). least amount of mixing. pure, beautiful races.

american women are stocky and kind of masculine, even the fit ones.

Yeah, no evidence that diversity = good looking. One of the most blue pill, Disneyland, feel good comments people have thrown around. Good ingredients=good looking. There are good looking mixed races (Italian, Spanish) and good looking races without a lot of mixing (N. Euros, Japanese) and vice versa. The US will never leave the bottom of the barrel as far as looks because we have the biggest slums with a lot of lazy poor uneducated slobs who will never have the resources required to develop the mental and cultural powers needed to restrict what they shovel into their gaping holes. And there are already huge mixed populations in the US (blacks, Mexicans) and stats show that, rather than creating some master mixed race as giddily dreamed of above, they are disproportionately deformed through massive fat deposits. And I don't get the impression many of them have Beyonce buried deep in there even if they were to lose the weight. USA=poverty+cheap food+low quality ingredients=fat and ugly.

I don't think Tuth's predicted chain of events is likely... maybe in a vacuum, ceterus paribus. But any amount of feminist influence or other demographic or cultural (enabling sluts) factor would easily overwhelm it. I don't know. Maybe I'm biased, but here in Croatia girls are very hot and obesity rates are small (if growing) and simultaneously americanized, with surging divorce rates and singlče motherhood, and requiring asshole game. For men with game like us, it's vastly better than the USA, but it still means the destruction of the society in the long run.

Here's a girl who went the other way.

She started from this:



And ended up this:

(02-17-2013 11:07 PM)augen sehen Wrote:  Here's a girl who went the other way.

She started from this:

She went from chubby in a dress to chubby in a beanie with glasses?

Hilarious that she refers to her 'before' self as a "Barbie".

The sad part about this is you can't fix ugly. Theres this chick on my facebook who's lost TONS of weight. She has. BAngin body but it's still busted. If all girls got fit though everyone would be happy. Some ugly beta would get that girl, but he'd still be banging a girl with a hotter body than most people today.

This is as great idea for a thread.

It's proof to all feminists that we aren't just hating on women. We have both the carrot and the stick.

I personally know a girl who ballooned up and lost it all to become a slender hot mess. I banged her right when she was on the cusp of getting fatter. Now she's got a skinny hipster body. You go girl!

I hit up a chick on a dating site last night thinking she looked cute and it turns out i know her and she has lost so much weight i did not recognize her

her nsfw picture http://i.imgur.com/B5aIhyq.jpg

(02-12-2013 10:53 AM)Dulceácido Wrote:  

(02-09-2013 09:48 PM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

(02-09-2013 11:22 AM)A CLOCKWORK TRADER Wrote:  

Since she doesn't sport a clearly defined vag gap loads of guys here will consider her still fat.

Hotwheels would smash.

Jajaja. I guess I'm busted. Call me a dick, but I was going to say, when I saw this on page 1 of the thread: "she's still fucking fat."

Would bang, but that's not saying much for her nor me. But, I do not consider her "date-able." The first photo is preposterous, the second: she's a moped. Would not bring around friends...

Forget, for a moment, the miraculous conversion in body type, and look at her... She's ugly as fuck. Look at her face. She looks like shit. Couple that with the fact that her body emerged onto this (substandard scale, solely because she was unfuckable before) level and she's STILL fat as fuck in the bottom half--not to mention her ugly face... BLECH! Quit looking at the "before" and "after." She's low-hanging fruit that would be swooped as a last resort to spending th night alone...

Enough with the 2/10 WNB BS. That's a very pretty girl on the right there by any objective measure.

(01-25-2014 03:57 PM)aphelion Wrote:  

(02-12-2013 10:53 AM)Dulceácido Wrote:  

(02-09-2013 09:48 PM)Hotwheels Wrote:  

(02-09-2013 11:22 AM)A CLOCKWORK TRADER Wrote:  

Since she doesn't sport a clearly defined vag gap loads of guys here will consider her still fat.

Hotwheels would smash.

Jajaja. I guess I'm busted. Call me a dick, but I was going to say, when I saw this on page 1 of the thread: "she's still fucking fat."

Would bang, but that's not saying much for her nor me. But, I do not consider her "date-able." The first photo is preposterous, the second: she's a moped. Would not bring around friends...

Forget, for a moment, the miraculous conversion in body type, and look at her... She's ugly as fuck. Look at her face. She looks like shit. Couple that with the fact that her body emerged onto this (substandard scale, solely because she was unfuckable before) level and she's STILL fat as fuck in the bottom half--not to mention her ugly face... BLECH! Quit looking at the "before" and "after." She's low-hanging fruit that would be swooped as a last resort to spending th night alone...

Enough with the 2/10 WNB BS. That's a very pretty girl on the right there by any objective measure.

Ya, I've got very little tolerance for any fat and I'd still hit that girl, post-weight loss, of course.

(02-09-2013 11:22 AM)A CLOCKWORK TRADER Wrote:  

Shes still self conscious about her weight. Covering her stomach in the latter picture...

All though there are some very pretty women buried under all those layers of fat, weight loss alone won't make them suddenly desirable.Most of them would need to add some muscle to their frame other wise you get chicks that are "skinny fat",which a lot of times to me looks worse than if they would have just kept the weight on.

(01-25-2014 03:45 PM)Sourcecode Wrote:  

Would be nice if it weren't for the nasty ass tats on that one, still.... 5/10 WB.

7/10 without tats

There's some good pussy under there. ~Chris Rock

Seriously though, I was going to start a similar thread. So I'm asking the question here.

Has anyone dated a former fatty? What are the not so obvious negatives that you've encountered?

(01-25-2014 08:25 PM)Parlay44 Wrote:  There's some good pussy under there. ~Chris Rock

Seriously though, I was going to start a similar thread. So I'm asking the question here.

Has anyone dated a former fatty? What are the not so obvious negatives that you've encountered?

Didn't date but banged one off online once that had a fake belly button.

Had so much skin removed she lost the original.

New one looked TIGHT but felt weird....

She didnt become skinny...but she she still lost 100 pounds..we should be proud of her for getting this far
If all that gut fat wasnt there...and she just had the big ass..I would smash

http://imgur.com/gallery/Ur9nM
F/23/5'7" 273 down to 173
in 50 pounds..and some surgery to get that extra skin off...This girl will probably be bangin

(02-12-2013 10:34 AM)bojangles Wrote:  

(02-12-2013 10:31 AM)Mekorig Wrote:  Blame the USA food industry that have made fried things and greasy chips and Cola drinks part of the food pyramid.

that's what feminists want you to think, no one wants to take responsibility for what they eat.

I partially agree, about the responsibility part.

However, I've been reading recently about the sugar diet thing. How people aren't fat from eating fat, but from eating sugar and that the average person is addicted to it. Anyway, I thought I'd put something to the test. It was in the DM actually, it said to check the labels of stuff. So I did, and was astounded at the fact that nearly EVERYTHING has sugar added to it. I think it's similar to the U.S where everything has that fructose syrup in it.

Hovis wholemeal bread? Sugar. Heinz Vegetable Soup? Sugar. Tesco Finest Sausages? Sugar. So-called healthy option breakfast cereals? Sugar.

You get the point. I like to cook things from scratch, but sometimes I do like the odd can of soup, but didn't have any idea that things I thought were healthy actually aren't particularly. I mean, vegetable soup and brown bread? Crazy.

I suppose everything is OK in moderation though, and I'm not making excuses for fatties - you know I hate them!

I weighed 230 before I wised up and got on the right track. Coasted far too long on my metabolism which wore off long before I ate right.

That being said, I weigh 185 now (6 feet tall) on my way down to 160 or so, and have worked out enough to show some muscles already!

That Crissfit chick, she's posted somewhere in this thread, makes my dick feel funny.

Especially the bikini pic with heels.

Never would have guessed that was under all that lard.

(01-26-2014 02:46 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

(02-12-2013 10:34 AM)bojangles Wrote:  

(02-12-2013 10:31 AM)Mekorig Wrote:  Blame the USA food industry that have made fried things and greasy chips and Cola drinks part of the food pyramid.

that's what feminists want you to think, no one wants to take responsibility for what they eat.

I partially agree, about the responsibility part.

However, I've been reading recently about the sugar diet thing. How people aren't fat from eating fat, but from eating sugar and that the average person is addicted to it. Anyway, I thought I'd put something to the test. It was in the DM actually, it said to check the labels of stuff. So I did, and was astounded at the fact that nearly EVERYTHING has sugar added to it. I think it's similar to the U.S where everything has that fructose syrup in it.

Hovis wholemeal bread? Sugar. Heinz Vegetable Soup? Sugar. Tesco Finest Sausages? Sugar. So-called healthy option breakfast cereals? Sugar.

You get the point. I like to cook things from scratch, but sometimes I do like the odd can of soup, but didn't have any idea that things I thought were healthy actually aren't particularly. I mean, vegetable soup and brown bread? Crazy.

I suppose everything is OK in moderation though, and I'm not making excuses for fatties - you know I hate them!

of course there's sugar in bread, any yeast risen product will have it.

(01-25-2014 03:48 PM)Sourcecode Wrote:  

Reminds me a little of Laura Flynn Boyle in her younger days. I would want to bang this chick, but to know that she was that fat is sort of sickening.

Nice tits.

This is a great compilation. Wow!

http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/view/83842050/

(01-27-2014 12:04 AM)commiejoe Wrote:  of course there's sugar in bread, any yeast risen product will have it.

Added sugar?