Post: #1

http://mobile.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/...ctive.html

The whole article is a gold-mine of insight into the common SWPL hamster, but that last paragraph is really the clincher. We should flip our whole economic model so women can ride the cock carousel and have ¡fun! and ignore their biological imperative for longer.

I'd pull quotes but I'm on my phone. It's worth a read just to see the blatant selfishness that defines the American/Western hamster.

Post: #2

Solipsism and narcissism defined... if reality does not fit their desires, reality must be wrong/ unreal. Fortunately the ultimate alpha female is just as solipsistic and self-centered with her rules: her name is mother nature and she will put all this in check sooner or later.

Post: #3

(02-08-2013 07:47 AM)Wool Suit Wrote:  http://mobile.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/...ctive.html

The whole article is a gold-mine of insight into the common SWPL hamster, but that last paragraph is really the clincher. We should flip our whole economic model so women can ride the cock carousel and have ¡fun! and ignore their biological imperative for longer.

I'd pull quotes but I'm on my phone. It's worth a read just to see the blatant selfishness that defines the American/Western hamster.

Hey, she can't be expected to preserve society. She is doing important stuff, like scraping the bottom of her little brain to put together 5 paragraphs of barely organized or coherent mental diarrhea for an online publication. Let's get our priorities straight.

Post: #4

American women aren't having enough babies, the solution to this is

CHANGE REALITY!

Fuck. Give this girl a professorship in something.

Post: #5

Amanda Marcotte, what a fucking surprise, when will she kill herself the stupid cunt.

Post: #6

Non mobile link: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/201...ctive.html

Post: #7

The woman who blogs as JudgyBitch completely tore Marcotte and this piece apart:

"There are two kinds of dumb in this world: bag of hammers dumb, and Amanda Marcotte. She’s a blogger at Slate Magazine’s Double XX feature, and she has really outdone herself this time.

Look at the title of that piece: America’s declining fertility rate: it is not up to the female reproductive (nice grammar!).

Hmm. Really? That’s interesting. I know we can blame men for ALMOST EVERYTHING, but declining fertility, too? For fuck’s sake, men, would you please start having babies? What, you think women should do everything? Sorry lads, we’re too busy working on oil rigs and flunking out of STEM courses to have babies."

More here: http://judgybitch.com/2013/02/07/babies-...tte-again/

Post: #8

Damn, the last paragraph of her femcunt drivel is almost too painful to read. I think we're going to have to invent a new name for the hamsters that 'elite' feminazis have residing in their hind brains, because they truly put the regular woman's hamster to shame. 'Funnel Web Hamster' is my suggestion, because these bitches are pure venom to society.

And check out this bitch ass comment from a fellow hamster.

Quote:We don't need more soldiers, prisoners, and low wage workers. We need womens' creative and intellectual ideas to be part of the national conversation. Making the choice to NOT have children was the only option we couldn't make...until recently, until birth control, until equal working rights. Women can do what they want.

When's the last time a woman intellectually created anything???? Damn, even the wheel that their hamsters run on was invented by a man lol.

Post: #9

It's probably same old "Men need to man up."

*checks article* Was I right?

Surprisingly, no. Instead, I was flabbergasted to see her arguing that we don't need replacement level-births for the society to continue functioning, because it's there to serve us rather than the other way around. I'd usually accept a milder form of that argument if it came from someone other than an ugly feminist.

Post: #10

This is a great example of the self-loathing that most feminists feel, which manifests with delusional thinking. Amanda Marcotte knows, deep down, that what she's advocating makes no sense. But she does it anyway, because she simply can't come to terms with biological reality. She hates the fact that she is a woman and that her greatest contribution to the world will be her children rather than her work. She feels this is somehow demeaning, and that men are privileged because they get to go to work every day and accomplish great things. She's jealous of all the important jobs men are doing and wants women to be able to do them too. But of course, just like the female mind is hypergamous with its attraction to men, it's also hypergamous with its perspective toward work.

Are women lining up for the chance to work in coal mines?

Are women lining up to install roofing in the middle of summer in 100 degree heat?

Are women lining up to clean out sewer systems?

Are women lining up to climb high voltage power lines?

No, they aren't. Women don't want the hard and dirty jobs that men do. They want the easy and prestigious ones, and they want them at the expense of men, and the expense of the family and society.

Apparently, the fact that women are the only sex that can have babies somehow escapes her. It's just a minor detail in her mind, and one that should not interfere with her desire to drink, party, ride the cock carousel and work a white collar job with no heavy lifting involved and equally no real importance to society. She wants every woman to work a magical job in an air conditioned building that provides total self-fulfillment along with zero accountability to anyone else, most especially any man.

But perhaps her most galling statement is that she doesn't want to feel pressured by society to have children because, "individuals do not exist to serve society."

Really? Is that a fact?

So what the fuck are all these men doing then? Why are millions of men working to build and maintain the infrastructure of modern civilization so that fat, entitled feminists can sit around in the air conditioning writing blogs? Why are men compelled by law to provide monetary support for their wives and children? Why do men allow their wages to be taxed and redistributed into a social welfare system that exists primarily to serve women and their children?

Apparently what Amanda Marcotte meant to say, is that women do not exist to serve society, but that men do.

The myopic selfishness and incredible delusion goes even further when she suggests that the entire economic system be reworked simply to allow women to behave in a socially irresponsible manner. This is perhaps the most infantile position possible. It's like a child throwing a temper tantrum because she doesn't like waking up early for school, so she argues that the school should start later to accommodate her. But only her. Not men. Men should never be accommodated by society, because remember: men exist to serve society, but society exists to serve women.

In the end it returns to self loathing and the delusion that results as a consequence. Amanda Marcotte doesn't want to be a woman. She hates the fact that being a woman entails certain expectations from society, such as having children. Of course, she seems completely unaware of the fact that men also have obligations and expectations from society. But she doesn't want those. Like a spoiled child who wants to eat cookies for every meal, stay up late and not have anyone tell her what to do, she wants all of the rights and none of the responsibilities of being a man.

And that is basically feminism in a nutshell, isn't it?

Post: #11

(02-08-2013 09:14 AM)IRTdenialist Wrote:  Damn, the last paragraph of her femcunt drivel is almost too painful to read. I think we're going to have to invent a new name for the hamsters that 'elite' feminazis have residing in their hind brains, because they truly put the regular woman's hamster to shame. 'Funnel Web Hamster' is my suggestion, because these bitches are pure venom to society.

And check out this bitch ass comment from a fellow hamster.

Quote:We don't need more soldiers, prisoners, and low wage workers. We need womens' creative and intellectual ideas to be part of the national conversation. Making the choice to NOT have children was the only option we couldn't make...until recently, until birth control, until equal working rights. Women can do what they want.

When's the last time a woman intellectually created anything???? Damn, even the wheel that their hamsters run on was invented by a man lol.

Off the top of my head recell spray, but other than that I'm sort of at a loss. Women don't really innovate they just buy stuff. It's sort of hilarious that even with feminism women aren't drawn to technical jobs.

Post: #12

You know, the more I try to boil feminism down to the bare basics, I always come to the same conclusion

Feminism = penis envy

Post: #13

(02-08-2013 07:56 AM)Asaxon Wrote:  Solipsism and narcissism defined... if reality does not fit their desires, reality must be wrong/ unreal. Fortunately the ultimate alpha female is just as solipsistic and self-centered with her rules: her name is mother nature and she will put all this in check sooner or later.

there's no such thing as 'alpha female'

Post: #14

FTA:

Quote:If women don't want to have more children, then instead of abandoning women's equality as a goal, we should rework our economic system so it doesn't rely on a steadily growing population to function. After all, the point of society is to serve the people in it, not to reduce us to cogs in a machine that serves no one at all.

Wow. This is perhaps the stupidest thing I have ever read. This just goes to show that we are dealing with more of a religious mindset than a logic one.

Post: #15

Is it possible that an article like this was written to basically troll the red-pill 'osphere and generate traffic the way Roosh did with his 9 Ugliest Feminists piece?