Post: #1

"Couples in which men participate more in housework typically done by women report having sex less frequently. Similarly, couples in which men participate more in traditionally masculine tasks -- such as yard work, paying bills, and auto maintenance -- report higher sexual frequency."

Post: #2

Sounds about right.

Edit: Notice how the authors avoid taking this finding the last [obvious] step to its conclusion, by stating:

'However, the study's authors stop short of arguing that house husbands should hang up their aprons.
"Men who refuse to help around the house could increase conflict in their marriage and lower their wives' marital satisfaction," Kornrich said.'

No doubt motivated at least in part to keep blood thirsty feminists of their back.

Post: #3

(01-30-2013 02:50 PM)Technics Wrote:  Sounds about right.

Edit: Notice how the authors avoid taking this finding the last [obvious] step to its conclusion

Haha, the other obvious conclusion would be: 'Women married to kitchen bitches: Put out more.' But for a feminist, telling women to fuck their husbands is equivalent to endorsing rape.

Post: #4

(01-30-2013 02:12 PM)stilicho Wrote:  "Couples in which men participate more in housework typically done by women report having sex less frequently. Similarly, couples in which men participate more in traditionally masculine tasks -- such as yard work, paying bills, and auto maintenance -- report higher sexual frequency."

Beta bois (they don't deserve to be called men) will never learn. We should compile a list of red-pill truths and present them whenever a troll claims that game is not real.

Post: #5

Ugly feminist/amateur Ms. Piggy impersonator Lindy West has taken the same study and spun it to meet her gender equality worldview.

http://jezebel.com/5980298/cleanliness-i...a-guy-laid

Quote:Not getting intercoursed enough, lads? It's probably because you're too fucking helpful around the house. A new sociological study has the gender traditionalists a-buzzing, because it says exactly that—it seems that couples who stick to gender segregated housework have more sex than couples who don't. Slightly more. Like, 1.6 times more. In other words, if my boyfriend cooks dinner every night while I work on the car, and we have sex 7 nights per week; and YOUR boyfriend, uh, plows fields all day while you embroider your trousseau, then you guys will be having sex a totally weird and excessive 11.2 times per week. Congrats! Personally, I'll hang on to my egalitarianism and this braised pork shoulder.

Careful Lindy. You eating pork might be considered cannibalism. Also there's no way this bitch is fucking anybody 7x per week on the regular. All the sex would work off a layer of blubber and deprive her of valuable ice cream sandwich time. That is, unless she's stuffing her face while getting plowed, which is a distinct possibility.

This article is the equivalent of plugging your ears and saying, "Na na na na. I'm not listening." There's no use arguing with someone who won't listen and whose language is snark. The appropriate response is from the Cam'ron school of argumentation





You mad!

Post: #6

(01-30-2013 10:33 PM)Bacchus Wrote:  Ugly feminist/amateur Ms. Piggy impersonator Lindy West has taken the same study and spun it to meet her gender equality worldview.

http://jezebel.com/5980298/cleanliness-i...a-guy-laid

Quote:Not getting intercoursed enough, lads? It's probably because you're too fucking helpful around the house. A new sociological study has the gender traditionalists a-buzzing, because it says exactly that—it seems that couples who stick to gender segregated housework have more sex than couples who don't. Slightly more. Like, 1.6 times more. In other words, if my boyfriend cooks dinner every night while I work on the car, and we have sex 7 nights per week; and YOUR boyfriend, uh, plows fields all day while you embroider your trousseau, then you guys will be having sex a totally weird and excessive 11.2 times per week. Congrats! Personally, I'll hang on to my egalitarianism and this braised pork shoulder.

Careful Lindy. You eating pork might be considered cannibalism. Also there's no way this bitch is fucking anybody 7x per week on the regular. All the sex would work off a layer of blubber and deprive her of valuable ice cream sandwich time. That is, unless she's stuffing her face while getting plowed, which is a distinct possibility.

This article is the equivalent of plugging your ears and saying, "Na na na na. I'm not listening." There's no use arguing with someone who won't listen and whose language is snark. The appropriate response is from the Cam'ron school of argumentation





You mad!

If somebody can post up an article from jezebel in which a female author doesn't use profanity, I will give said person a rep point.

Post: #7

(01-30-2013 11:11 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  If somebody can post up an article from jezebel in which a female author doesn't use profanity, I will give said person a rep point.

http://jezebel.com/5980268/well-all-be-a...al-go-down

Post: #8

(01-31-2013 12:37 AM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(01-30-2013 11:11 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  If somebody can post up an article from jezebel in which a female author doesn't use profanity, I will give said person a rep point.

http://jezebel.com/5980268/well-all-be-a...al-go-down

Nice. Should have added the stipulation of no annoying words as well ie "eek". But you stepped up to the challenge and delivered. Hats off to you, sir.