Post: #26

(01-06-2013 04:03 PM)IRTdenialist Wrote:  Here's Mark Rudov laying down some smack, watch how he nukes the bitches hamster right at the end hahaha.

Women care more about getting material gifts and showing them off because they re-enforce a sense of security. This ingrained in her DNA just s much as I want a piece of arm candy to walk around with.

Post: #27

Mark Rudov v. Random Ugly Lawyere is a case study of Rational Male's NAWALT syndrome (Not all Women are Like that).

For further sighs, fastforward to 4.20 and watch hamster implode and almost cry at the fact that she doesn't have kids yet.

Its a crazy most men dont see in their lives, and I believe Tucker Max said, "This is a crazy many men joke about, but the ones who have seen it firsthand and stared into abyss of crazy are shell-shocked and glad to have lived through it" ----Not exact quote, but his gist.

5.15- See how she nods then shakes her head at quote "women's bad behavior". This women is not even an opponent worthy of fighting. I feel pity for her...

Ending interview- The same theme- NAWALT, then dont blame the kids!!!! no not the kids!

Post: #28

(01-06-2013 07:18 PM)Parlay44 Wrote:  If you're cool and man enough women will drop the good girl act in front of you. You wouldn't believe half the shit women have told me in private.

One girl I was fucking told me I was cool because I didn't care that she had a boyfriend. She still calls me crying and looking for a sympathy fuck once in a while.

Another girl said ...Lets go out to this bar because a guy I know will buy us drinks. It's unbelievable. I'm far from being shocked anymore. I've seen and done it all.

This mindset has helped me a lot. Before I go on a date I imagine that the girl I'm meeting up with just blew some dude on the way over. Helps me not put the pussy on the pedestal.

Post: #29

O'Reilly admitted from jump that he needs to preserve his female audience, and he keeps spinning it by saying he doesn't feel sympathy for these guys, which was never the point. The whole "it takes two" is a tautological argument. Of course it takes two to make a baby, but if a woman doesn't want to get pregnant, she can insist on a condom, or say NO. As men, yes, we must assume risk for rawdogging, but again, we don't get pregnant. Bill did make one good comment, in that unmarried women should only have children if THEY can support them on their own, and not use the baby as a source of income so they can live well without working.

Oh...and did you notice how quick she was to drop the misogyny bomb?

Post: #30

The dude is right. All woman use their body to "catch" men. If it was just about love there wouldn't be a concept called "dating". The very existence of dating is the proof that woman expect something in return.