Post: #1

Ha.

Harvard kids. As smart as they are, they never learn a valuable lesson we learn on the street:

Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Quote:No one is immune from the occasional privacy snafu on Facebook, not even Mark Zuckerberg's sister.

On Christmas day, Callie Schweitzer, director of marketing and projects at Vox Media, tweeted out a photo of the Zuckerberg family gathered around a kitchen island freaking out while using the new Facebook "Poke" app.

It's an adorable, humanizing family photo. It was also supposed to be a private photo.

Schweitzer subscribes to Randi Zuckerberg's public feed on Facebook. She therefore assumed the photo came from Randi and assumed it was meant for public consumption. Randi previously ran marketing for Facebook, and is now a producer of a reality TV show about Silicon Valley, so it's not unreasonable to think this is a public pic.

When Randi saw the photo was tweeted, she blasted Schweitzer on Twitter: "not sure where you got this photo. I posted it to friends only on FB. You reposting it to Twitter is way uncool."

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/randi-zuc...z2GBhCIKM5

Anyone else see the Hypocrisy here?

Post: #2

If you were the figurehead of one of the most recognizable companies in the world, wouldn't you want the world to see the human side of you and your family?

Post: #3

My first two questions are: 1) what the fuck am I even looking at here? 2) why would someone even want to retweet/repost this lame ass photo?

Post: #4

Yes it was way uncool to expose her privacy, but she believes that everyone else should give up theirs:

Quote:“I think anonymity on the Internet has to go away,” she said during a panel discussion on social media hosted Tuesday evening by Marie Claire magazine. “People behave a lot better when they have their real names down. … I think people hide behind anonymity and they feel like they can say whatever they want behind closed doors.”

Except when it's her own family's closed doors.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/27...10892.html

Post: #5

Too bad there's no nudity or scandalous behavior. I predict this is the beginning of more deliberate violations of their so-called privacy.

How sweet it is!

Post: #6

(12-26-2012 02:33 PM)HiFlo Wrote:  My first two questions are: 1) what the fuck am I even looking at here? 2) why would someone even want to retweet/repost this lame ass photo?

Yeah, really. What a lame spread.

If I had that kind of dough, I would hire Thomas Keller to cook for my MOM for holiday meals.

Post: #7

I have lots of questions.

Who are the people in the photo? Is that his dad? Is the obese female Santa Claus his mom or his sister? Is Randy the brunette? Who is the girl on the left? Are Mark's billions not enough to get his own mother/sister to slim down? Why does this woman have such an elaborate kitchen if she can't feed herself properly? Is the family trying to get back at Mark for not marrying a Jew by excluding his Asian shiksa from the photo?

If Randi were a man, this probably never would have happened - she'd realize the colossal hypocrisy (that Roosh profiled), and pipe the fuck down. What a dumb t**t.

Maybe one of our wealthier forum members can arrange a 'hit' on this chick, where we get someone to bang her, record it, and release it to the public. And share the links over Facebook. Maybe then she'll shut up.

Post: #8

(12-26-2012 02:49 PM)basilransom Wrote:  Who is the girl on the left?

I was wondering the same thing. I got a "possibly bangable" alert. The yawn throws everything off, though.

Post: #9

Between the near-ten billion he's worth, Mark Zuckerberg can't step up his family's kitchen game to something crazy (You can see the same kitchen in thousands of McMansions across the USA and Canada...My former employer had the exact same one, with the creme-colored cabinets, stainless-steel appliances and black marble island), can't afford a stomach-staple for that whale, can't get a new beak for that bird on the left (she has a horn like a Black Rhinoceros) and most of all, can't just say 'I would appreciate it if nothing you took a picture of here ended up online...behold, my army of attorneys'?

'It was way uncool of you to violate my internet privacy...but I demand the proles give up their internet privacy, because if they do maybe less than 1 in 10,000 spineless pussies won't off themselves because of internet bullying...While I siphon money off of my brother who made billions selling off others' internet privacy...'

Post: #10

By far the most attractive thing in that pic is the cute shaggy dog, bottom left.

Post: #11

Bigger picture:

Post: #12

They all look like goof balls. This is supposed to be a "scandal"?

Post: #13

Well, I don't know about their Christmas lunch, but mine has just appeared all over my keyboard.

Post: #14

I guess nerds get the same sort of kick out of stupid technology games as washed up jocks get a kick out of their team scoring a touchdown. Am I the only one who just can't get that emotionally enthused about anything?

Post: #15

Is the woman on the right pregnant?

Post: #16

Four out of five people at a family holiday event on their "smart phones". Billions of dollars still can't make you fun, interesting, stylish, or even remotely attractive. Fuck the Zuckerbergs.

Post: #17

(12-26-2012 04:26 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Is the woman on the right pregnant?

Oh shit that's a woman?

Post: #18

Why do I want to slap everyone in the picture?

Post: #19

(12-26-2012 04:33 PM)kenny_powers Wrote:  Four out of five people at a family holiday event on their "smart phones". Billions of dollars still can't make you fun, interesting, stylish, or even remotely attractive. Fuck the Zuckerbergs.

Lol. Once a lame, always lame.

Post: #20

(12-26-2012 02:25 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  Anyone else see the Hypocrisy here?

Demanding different sets of rules for people of different stations in life is nothing new for the landed gentry. It's happened since the dawn of civilization.

To me, the hypocrisy is that she chose to handle this dispute in public. I would think that if you're so concerned abut your privacy, you'd choose to handle your disputes in private, not via twitter.

This bullshit was staged. Look at that photo. Staged I tell you.

Post: #21

She gets taken down pretty good here: http://readwrite.com/2012/12/26/yes-rand...an-decency

It's on the front page of reddit. Nerds mad now.

Post: #22

check out the shaggy dog, lower left corner. he's probably thinking : "Damn... and I AM THE ONE WHO GOT STERILIZED."

Post: #23

Quote:The Zuckerbergs even went so far, at times, as to join in on the trendy characterization of anyone online who doesn't spam their identity being suspicious and probably a terrorist.

Is this true?

Post: #24

Part 4 around 3:00... the mandingo is railing the girl as she tells her white boyfriend, "You're only half the size!!"

Man I thought my sexual behavior was deviant.

Post: #25

Oops wrong thread