(07-30-2016 08:22 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote: (07-30-2016 07:39 PM)BelyyTigr Wrote: Its a huge topic:-
My post pertains more to muscle women than fitness women.
1)The fitness industry is obsessed with creating fads. Its easy for women to get lean and look good- even if they eat a bit. But it doesn't net them lots of money in supplement sales etc. Solution? Market a muscle body for females.
2)It looks weird. Its not sexy. In pinups we're seeing far less of women in sexy underwear. Its all androgynous shit, sports wear. I mean whats sexy about that? Lacey suspender belts against huge abdominals. It looks tranny-ish.
3)There's something unnatural about it. Serious muscle growth requires testosterone. Now women and testosterone in substantial levels? VERY weird.
4)Super fit women lose their tits. Thats why amateur girls often have far nicer tits than pro models.
The pros are overexercising. But the dodgy part of the fitness industry LOVES that.
5)Fitness and muscle women have weird tits even if they are big. They look like silicone when they ain't. OR they buy gross silicone.
6)I believe we are being "groomed" as males into an "androgyny is sexy" routine. Look at these "action females" on TV. In mannerism and verbally they are very aggressive and unfeminine. They dress like men and act like psychos and we're told "this is sexy". Remember Jennifer Garner in Alias with that huge chin. Likewise all these "streetfighting" women on TV. Or "macho" women cops?
Currently its muscle legs, muscle abs thats really being promoted. But we're gonna see more "muscle arms and back" too.
Whats interesting is how far the blue pill puppet masters will promote effeminacy in males alongside this. We have the "rocker look", the modern day "boyband" look, the "heroin chic" male etc. Perhaps its too much to do a full role reversal at once. So we still have muscle guy looks being promoted. But.. I wonder what will happen in the future.
7)What I object to us women doing things that are unnatural in terms of their physiology and their NATURAL psychological makeup. I hate the way fringe silly sports are promoted for women. I mean do we want our women all playing football and trying to get muscled like soccer player Hulk? Or a female Mike Tyson?
8)We're certainly seeing a promotion of "female domination" in porn. And thats where "muscle women" are coming in. I believe it is part of a long term blue pill agenda. To weaken men and have women dominating them in various aspects of life.
Endocrine disruptors ie environmental pollution are a key part of it all. Perhaps over several generations it will cause women to be as big as men, MAYBE some even bigger. As happens in other species. We could witness the gross situation of women being dominant in work AND physically.
Its all a pretty disturbing prospect IMO.
Don't google Abby Stockton, 1930s fitness chick then, it will derail your narrative
![[Image: 1446182415033]](http://static1.squarespace.com/static/5500f6a4e4b08be9068f09b6/t/5632fe0ee4b0aacba1403bd4/1446182415033/)
definitely not marilyn monroe either
![[Image: marilyn.jpg]](http://www.fitover50training.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/marilyn.jpg)
The science and supplements of exercise is what has progressed nowadays, not some sort of gender/amazons dominating the world conspiracy.
Barbell sluts are just a new niche for chicks that aren't feminine enough to compete with regular sluts, but are too narcissistic to play sports and not have all of the attention on them.
Thats whats new about the 'current year' whores can specialize. You've got regular/classic sluts, phat booty sluts, fitness sluts, gamer sluts. Its a slut smorgasboard.
How could a pic of a 1930s fitness model derail my assessment? Anyway MM, looks terrific in her pic. Using weights is fine. Using low reps is disturbing.
The question remains, how could a "woman" want to look more muscular than an athletic man of the 1970s? Its because endocrine disruptors take more of an effect with each generation. Then add on the poison in the media with "strong, independent women" as the feminutters call it.
I don't have a problem with a "fitness look". Altho letting an industry dupe women into massive overtraining, taking dodgy supplements and getting them obsessed with developing bulk is just bizarre. That 30s woman was pretty much an anomaly. Much like Boudicea and Valkyries etc, altho she was clearly far more feminine than those.
Muscularity wasn't even that big a thing for men before prob the 1980s. Check out old pics of soccer and tennis players etc. Yes fitness science has improved in some ways, but its gone backward in others. Today, its merciless in selling shit to people including gross looks for women. Because THATS how they make extra money.
The blue pill agenda, IMO, is about chipping away normal values in all areas. Obvious testosterone, steroid jabbing dykes is the extreme end. But there is a line between sexy and trying to look like a jnr male bodybuilder.
Anyway, we agree. Barbell sluts aren't feminine. I mean many hardcore male weight trainers don't even need barbells.
The girl in the top pic (pink top) is pretty in some ways. But she looks really narcisistic, has too much time on her hands, just a gym addict who doesn't understand sport in any way. Its ruined her tits. Her abs are really OTT - does she want to them for when her les friend punches her? I kind of feel part of her wants to be a bodybuilding man. But she loves attention whoring too much for that. To me, the best female bodies are models, dancers, skaters, or even ballerinas etc. Feminine.