Post: #1

Disrupted the man's life? - check
Put him and his family through undue strife [during a time when he was already grieving no less]? - check
Dragged an innocent man's name name through the mud for no other reason than hamster games? - check

lying bitch goes unpunnished and protected despite being responsible for the above, wasting taxpayers money, making fun of the English legal system all in one go? - double check

Post: #2

Post: #3

(12-14-2012 02:09 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

Correction. Just saw you linked it at the bottom.

Post: #4

(12-14-2012 02:12 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(12-14-2012 02:09 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

Correction. Just saw you linked it at the bottom.

No prob

Post: #5

"'What is unbelievable is that if we hadn't found them coming out of the club on that CCTV, which the police had totally failed to identify, there was a real risk of a miscarriage of justice.'"

Soo I guess the moral is: be rich enough to hire good lawyers, private investigators, goons, etc. to prove your own innocence, because the police aren't going to do jack shit to help you as a man...

Post: #6

Not all hope is lost. It was just in the UK a month ago or so that a woman who accused 3 men of rape was sent to jail after it was found out she had consenual sex with them. I am sure after this she will be charged with multiple felonies and see prison time.

Post: #7

Yes, the Daily Mail newspaper withheld her name. Video evidence proves perjury, but she still remains anonymous.

Post: #8

He was quoted elsewhere as saying that he wasn't mad but that he felt sorry for her.

...reminds me of the old "stalker girl" DHV routine

Post: #9

(12-14-2012 05:56 PM)Divorco Wrote:  Yes, the Daily Mail newspaper withheld her name. Video evidence proves perjury, but she still remains anonymous.

Yet his name is ruined????? If I was him I would take her to court and ruin her name, or write a tell all book. Quid pro quo.

Post: #10

(12-15-2012 03:21 AM)tomtud Wrote:  

(12-14-2012 05:56 PM)Divorco Wrote:  Yes, the Daily Mail newspaper withheld her name. Video evidence proves perjury, but she still remains anonymous.

Yet his name is ruined????? If I was him I would take her to court and ruin her name, or write a tell all book. Quid pro quo.

Yeah, but those with a bigger reputation shouldn't [directly] attack the reputations of those below them as the former has more to lose.

This is just a glimpse of the kind of world that feminism is creating whether it intends to or not.

Post: #11

I'm going to wager that a lot of players on here have seen men get torn up by false rape allegations.