Post: #1

I came to check out RooshV again (think I forgot about stumbling across it before) because of this March 13th 2012 video this lady made about him:





In it she mocks the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) for labeling him as a misogynist simply for making pick-up guides.

It appears that many major media sources also called out the SPLC for their ridiculous feminazi-pressured viewpoints:

http://radicalhub.com/2011/10/04/radical...t-century/
http://reason.com/blog/2012/03/09/the-so...r-is-now-w

http://www.businessinsider.com/civil-rig...sex-2012-3
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/11/hbc-90001573
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/10...35174.html
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/293...-krikorian
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/in...r-on-women
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/in...-the-sites

I guess I was wondering about Roosh and his fans' opinion on this. Is the SPLC misogyny-labelling a bad thing because of the condemnation, or is it potentially a good thing because of the free press and advertising it has resulted in?

I think it attracts the curious who can then make up their own minds for themselves based on the writings.

IMO the concept of a 'hate fuck' for particular people is not misogynistic. I think one could only take bang guides as being misogynistic if EVERY instance of sex with woman was hateful in nature. That we go out of our way to specify a 'hate' fuck implies that those not labelled with the adjective 'hate' are not considered to be inherently hateful.

Post: #2

Duplicate thread:

/thread-18217.html