Post: #51

I have no problems with women in combat or the military. For that matter, I have no problems with women in any traditional "male dominated" role, as long as they are treated as equals.

That means held to the same physical and mental standards as their male counterparts. No special tests for women recruits. Because wars, fires, science, etc - has no bias. If you can do a job, do that job, if you cant, then stay out.

If my big ass somehow passes out in the middle of a house fire and a "fire person" is coming in to get me, I want to be fully 100% sure that they can drag me out because they were trained to. The fact that a female firefighter was a "champion of her gender" by becoming a firewoman due to lower physical requirements will surely be a comfort to the families of the people she let die do to her lack of strength.

Post: #52

If this does end up happening then book it flight out. Even the most rigged and army minded societies only use the women as a last resort when literally the bayonets are at your door step. In that instance a female to protect her children and home will do some fuked up shit that even are most savage men would think twice of doing.

But the opposite of this. Letting your females jump into the front lines is some strait twilight zone stuff. No legit society with its head on strait would do this because it offers no good. You kill off your baby makers while weakening your forces.

America is a done deal if this goes through. This is the same warped crap Rome did while it went into the toilet. I always had the idea the females (either in power or highly feminized irrational societies) would start the next world war, but I could never imagine them fighting in it. As modern as I am I still understand that the contract of a man is to protect his homeland and tribe even if it means his life. No way women can internalize and accept that. No way.