Post: #1

That said, I'd probably do the blonde

Post: #2

Why don't just plain ugly people have these kinds of movements? At least they don't do it to themselves.

Post: #3

I get especially disgusted by fatties with cute faces. They throw away their looks simply because they can't control their appetite for junk food.

The analogy would be a guy with a 130+ IQ and an Ivy League degree who winds up living in the gutter because he can't control his drinking and gambling problems.

Why should society accept the first case, when we rightfully condemn the second?

Oh, right. Because they're women.

Post: #4

(10-13-2012 05:11 PM)scorpion Wrote:  I get especially disgusted by fatties with cute faces. They throw away their looks simply because they can't control their appetite for junk food.

The analogy would be a guy with a 130+ IQ and an Ivy League degree who winds up living in the gutter because he can't control his drinking and gambling problems.

Why should society accept the first case, when we rightfully condemn the second?

Oh, right. Because they're women.

i agree 100% its such a waste of potential. ugly women would kill for their faces but they choose to let their bodies go to shit and now everyone should accept them for it. chubby chasers are a small percentage of men and the rest of guys are repulsed by their jelly rolls

Post: #5

The picture is boner kill..

Post: #6

(10-13-2012 04:38 PM)Gaston Wrote:  That said, I'd probably do the blonde

The blonde actually looks OK except for the belly rolls... look at her legs compared to the brunette on the left. Here ankles are more or less normal. The brunette is a fatty -- the blonde looks like she could lose those fat rolls and look pretty good.

Post: #7

(10-13-2012 05:11 PM)scorpion Wrote:  I get especially disgusted by fatties with cute faces. They throw away their looks simply because they can't control their appetite for junk food.

The analogy would be a guy with a 130+ IQ and an Ivy League degree who winds up living in the gutter because he can't control his drinking and gambling problems.

Why should society accept the first case, when we rightfully condemn the second?

Oh, right. Because they're women.

I really believe many women (a) don't know how to eat and (b) don't exercise, including lifting weights. They load up on carbs and sweets, particularly chocolate, and just don't like to sweat.

What those women don't know is that if you are like this at say, 28, by the time you are 40, you are in trouble. You're thyroid isn't working as well as it should be. Your metabolism has slowed down tremendously, and every extra carb or sugar you consume goes right to the belly and hips. Women have higher fat percentages by nature, and the failure to control carbs and the avoidance of exercise just compounds it.

One of the married babes I am currently banging was a fatty in her 20s and 30s. She has completely turned herself around, doing intense yoga and pilates and eating clean. She is 41 and has made tremendous progress. But you can see, and feel, how she was once a blimp. I respect the hell out of her for trying so damn hard, and compliment her on her discipline, and fuck her like she is Helen of Troy. "I hated myself when I was fat," she says. Good for her.

Post: #8

(10-13-2012 11:26 PM)tenderman100 Wrote:  The blonde actually looks OK except for the belly rolls... look at her legs compared to the brunette on the left. Herr ankles are more or less normal. The brunette is a fatty

Interesting that you should mention that since the inside photos feature that same brunette with near-perfect lower legs, calves and ankles as opposed to the fat ones in the joint photo (unless it's somehow suddenly a different woman, but I don't think it is considering the same issue/spread, not to mention that the hand jewelery is the same).



So they are obviously lying (first to themselves and then to their audience) because it's a photoshop job somewhere in there.

Either they made her legs look fatter than they are in the joint photo which goes to show you that even a fat mag has to pander to the politics of the hour.

Or they made them look slimmer in the above single shot, in which case they just body shamed their own model in the article about body shaming.

Or a bit of both; perhaps making them a bit fatter in the joint photo, and a bit slimmer in the single photo.

Either way, one or the other appears to be the case since her calves here don't appear to be nearly as thin as they are in the above single shot.



And that's how deep the rabbit hole goes in America
(bears repeating, airbrushing the thickness of their own model's legs in an article about body shamming).

Post: #9

(10-13-2012 05:11 PM)scorpion Wrote:  I get especially disgusted by fatties with cute faces.

This one has strikingly gorgeous face...

but too bad for too many burritos.

Post: #10

Jesus their thighs are bigger than my torso/waist.

Post: #11

I like voluptuous girls. Problem is when they get to the age in the wrong side of 30 as to hen they start looking big like a house. Exceptions exist, but as we all age the pounds start packing. Women especially.

Post: #12

Cellulite appears to have been photoshopped off.

Post: #13

(10-14-2012 02:52 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  Cellulite appears to have been photoshopped off.

It's not a given that all or most fat chicks will have cellulite. Even thin women can have it. I think it's caused by the fat layer separating from the skin, creating a dimple. Some fat chicks are pretty solid and smooth-skinned, while I've seen some thinner chicks without tone and full of cellulite.

Post: #14

(10-14-2012 02:59 PM)Timoteo Wrote:  It's not a given that all or most fat chicks will have cellulite.

Yeah right, we have a group photo of five tubs of lard up there, and none of them have cellulite??? In the body shaming article, ahahaha

Post: #15

DAYUM, every single one of those bitches has gorgeous faces. I wish I could chop their heads off and attach them to the countless skinny butta-faces I see everywhere

Post: #16

I'd blast that blond. The rolls will disappear when she's flat on her back.

Post: #17

(10-14-2012 02:54 AM)Gaston Wrote:  http://www.kirilica.com.mk/userfiles/ima...-652-4.jpg

blonde looks totally fuckable in that pic

Post: #18

(10-14-2012 04:50 PM)cat_a_clysm Wrote:  blonde looks totally fuckable in that pic

"Ever since I was a teenager, my weight has fluctuated," says Ivory Kalber, 32, who sought treatment for binge eating in her early 20s and now counsels others who struggle with eating disorders. "But I feel much better about my body since I got help. I'm happy living my life at a size 12 or 14."

Now, which one of you players is already tapping that!?

Post: #19

(10-14-2012 06:09 PM)Gaston Wrote:  

(10-14-2012 04:50 PM)cat_a_clysm Wrote:  blonde looks totally fuckable in that pic

"Ever since I was a teenager, my weight has fluctuated," says Ivory Kalber, 32, who sought treatment for binge eating in her early 20s and now counsels others who struggle with eating disorders. "But I feel much better about my body since I got help. I'm happy living my life at a size 12 or 14."

If that picture is a remotely accurate depiction of what she looks like in real life, I would hit it without a moment's hesitation. However, she is an extreme outlier. Not many 32 yo size 12s look like that. Most chicks with her stats are blobs.

Post: #20

She really needs to eat right and exercise, it's a real shame