Post: #1

I keep coming across hamster-heavy articles by feminists. Most don't warrant their own thread, but should still be shared with fellow hamster watchers. Sometimes they're posted in Everything Else, but a separate thread is better. Think of it as the media equivalent to the Online Hamster Thread; if you see a mainstream media article or a particularly ridiculous jizzabel piece, but don't want overload the forum with yet another thread preaching to the choir, post your links and observations here.

I'll go first with this piece by an embittered feminist who argues that femininity is a negative attribute. The article has all the favourites about how men can't deal with 'strong' women because their masculinity is threatened by strong women. No, Miss Brand, we just don't like ball-busting bitches who misappropriate and misunderstand masculine traits.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-...style.html



And here's the author who was so embittered by the married bliss of the newlyweds:

Post: #2

Quote:Men who prefer their ladies to be feminine do not really like being confronted with an opinionated, highly qualified, gutsy woman in the work place.

Face is, no one likes a bitch anymore than someone likes a douche-bag. You're a repulsive human being, and no self-respecting alpha is gonna put up with your abuse.

Quote:One day he returned from work looking pensive. He said he had been driven to a meeting by a female colleague and they had stopped for petrol. He had got out of her car but she had stopped him, asking what he was doing. He said, 'my father told me, never let a woman pump her own petrol'. She had looked at him squarely and said, 'look, I'm sure you mean well, but I'm afraid it's attitudes like that that are stopping a women becoming president of the United States'. So I say balls to femininity - I want to grow a pair as big as Gillard's.

Pretty unabashed statement which reveals feminism to be nothing more than a power grab.

Post: #3

The problem is chicks like this continue to see it as impossible that femininity and strength can coexist in the same body. They believe they can't exhibit strength without behaving like a cunt, and assume that THIS is how men have always exhibited strength. They refuse to acknowledge the fundamental differences in the genders. She is redefining the meaning of feminine to suit her own agenda. And if you really want to support your argument, find a better example than a man pumping a woman's gas. A man's father raised him to be courteous, and you're bashing him for it?

Post: #4

This is the video she's referring to by the Australian politician who is criticising the leader of the opposition for being 'misogynist' when in fact it was one of her own political allies who proposed something that would have hurt women (can't find out what the policy was).





Note how her argument is about her being 'offended'; she reframes the debate to a personal, emotional level. She makes a few legitimate political points, but all couched in vague talk of offence being caused by fairly innocuous things this guy has said. She asks us to take it at face value that his comments were wrong and offensive.

Eliminating any offence has become a flagship cause for feminists. Feminists have gone from fighting for real causes to fighting to ban people from offending them.

It's the kind of passive politics of self-proclaimed victims I wrote about yesterday: /thread-16580-...#pid284933

Post: #5

At least one generation of girls were not taught the awesome strength of femininity. Sucks to be them.

Post: #6

I worry that a certain type of man, who prefers his women feminine, is holding us back.

Haha. I wonder when someone will clue her in on an odd little secret -- Nearly ALL men prefer feminine women. I would say all, but there might be some outliers that prefer fat brutes.

Post: #7

what feminists fail to understand is that having a manish temperament is not attractive and will likely never be attractive to men. btw she is HUGE at least 200lbs plus how many men are willing to date women that fat?

these fat feminist bitches want guys to accept them for who they are no matter how fat or manish they may be. the fact is unlike women men have to be aroused to have sex. the thought of seeing that fat bitch naked would make limp even the hardest boner.

Post: #8

(10-11-2012 05:22 PM)bacon Wrote:  what feminists fail to understand is that having a manish temperament is not attractive and will likely never be attractive to men. btw she is HUGE at least 200lbs plus how many men are willing to date women that fat?

these fat feminist bitches want guys to accept them for who they are no matter how fat or manish they may be. the fact is unlike women men have to be aroused to have sex. the thought of seeing that fat bitch naked would make limp even the hardest boner.

Women will tell you that they don't exist to please men, yet will complain about not being able to find a decent man. They'll tell you they don't need a man, yet complain that men don't act like men anymore. They fail to add 2 and 2. They don't have a man because they don't do what's necessary to attract one. Your behavior and looks act as repellants, yet you want a man to push past that for...what exactly?

Post: #9

(10-11-2012 05:22 PM)bacon Wrote:  unlike women men have to be aroused to have sex.

You like fucking dry pussy?