Kid Twist
True Player
    
Posts: 2,365
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 30
|
RE: I had a hair transplant done
(02-18-2019 12:49 PM)Vincent Chase Wrote: If you're around the age of 30-35, then having a good set of her for the next 15-20 years in your prime should be your primary concern. I'm less concerned about it when I'll be in my 50s and 60s. 20 years from now you'd hope there would be better solutions such as clonining anyway.
Yes it is a short term solution. A short term solution to the years of your life which matter. If i'm a bit bald in my 60s I don't give a fuck if I'm looking fucking great in my 30s and 40s.
VC and I have chatted about this, it is fairly obvious but must be emphasized. If you have the money, and the only thing that makes you look "older" is your hairline or thinning, because you work out and do everything else right, how do you not guarantee that you are seen as a 30 year old for 15-20 more? I have a good friend who never got anything done but is almost 65, he hasn't lost much hair, but worked out forever and he still gets people thinking he's like 38. Now, anyone with sense would guess he'd be minimally mid 40s but the point is that he looks good, and the average man doesn't --- age inflation helping us who take care of ourselves.
If people think that the 40s is old-prime but that you are still "old" around here, that means having decent hair from late 30s to 50s is KEY, and worth every penny.
My $.02 again
Get your passport ready!
(This post was last modified: 02-19-2019 07:07 PM by Kid Twist.)
|
|
| 02-19-2019 07:06 PM |
|
The following 2 users Like Kid Twist's post:2 users Like Kid Twist's post
lonewolf1992, Vincent Chase
|
Sidney Crosby
True Player
    
Posts: 2,222
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 13
|
RE: I had a hair transplant done
(02-19-2019 07:06 PM)Kid Twist Wrote: (02-18-2019 12:49 PM)Vincent Chase Wrote: If you're around the age of 30-35, then having a good set of her for the next 15-20 years in your prime should be your primary concern. I'm less concerned about it when I'll be in my 50s and 60s. 20 years from now you'd hope there would be better solutions such as clonining anyway.
Yes it is a short term solution. A short term solution to the years of your life which matter. If i'm a bit bald in my 60s I don't give a fuck if I'm looking fucking great in my 30s and 40s.
VC and I have chatted about this, it is fairly obvious but must be emphasized. If you have the money, and the only thing that makes you look "older" is your hairline or thinning, because you work out and do everything else right, how do you not guarantee that you are seen as a 30 year old for 15-20 more? I have a good friend who never got anything done but is almost 65, he hasn't lost much hair, but worked out forever and he still gets people thinking he's like 38. Now, anyone with sense would guess he'd be minimally mid 40s but the point is that he looks good, and the average man doesn't --- age inflation helping us who take care of ourselves.
If people think that the 40s is old-prime but that you are still "old" around here, that means having decent hair from late 30s to 50s is KEY, and worth every penny.
My $.02 again
It's true that anyone with a good head or hair looks way younger. A lot of the actors whether they've had surgeries or wear rugs could pass for 10-15 years younger.
|
|
| 02-19-2019 08:20 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Sidney Crosby's post:1 user Likes Sidney Crosby's post
Kid Twist
|