Post: #1

I think I heard this on a Tariq Nasheed podcast. Basically, assume that your average prospect (18-30, rating 5-9) is getting some around twice a month, regardless of their relationship status. It's a general rule of thumb rather than a scientific thing. So when you are gaming a new woman, take it for granted that they got laid within the last week or two and will get laid again within a week or two with or without you.

It's not mindblowing, but a good insight into a woman's reality. Sex is not scarce, but quality men are.

Post: #2

On average, most women are getting laid more than most men. There's also plenty of women who have a standard for them self and don't tend to bang random guys (maybe an ex). The pool is skewed for men because there is a minority of men getting most of those lays.

It doesn't take rocket surgery to figure this all out. Sex comes easy for the average looking woman, all SHE has to do is go outside say yes to penis. A guy needs game.

Post: #3

Many years ago I have read somewhere that in a long-distance relationship one should meet at least every two or three weeks or it will not work.

Well that fits nicely with what you write.

Post: #4

I've always found that women usually bang around once per month, not every two weeks. This is because they get horny when ovulating, and that's when they go out searching for cocks.

This is something I've also observed firsthand, as I will go out to a club for months straight and see the same women magically appear 4 weeks later.

Post: #5

(08-11-2012 08:05 AM)Samseau Wrote:  I've always found that women usually bang around once per month, not every two weeks. This is because they get horny when ovulating, and that's when they go out searching for cocks.

This is something I've also observed firsthand, as I will go out to a club for months straight and see the same women magically appear 4 weeks later.

Most of the booty calls I get are during ovulation time. I will know my game has gotten better when I can break through this glass hymen.

Post: #6

(08-11-2012 08:43 AM)soup Wrote:  

(08-11-2012 08:05 AM)Samseau Wrote:  I've always found that women usually bang around once per month, not every two weeks. This is because they get horny when ovulating, and that's when they go out searching for cocks.

This is something I've also observed firsthand, as I will go out to a club for months straight and see the same women magically appear 4 weeks later.

Most of the booty calls I get are during ovulation time. I will know my game has gotten better when I can break through this glass hymen.

You'll know our beta brethren aren't doing their job when you're getting "wanna come over?" texts not just on the weekends either, but during the week.

Post: #7

is the horny period related to ovulating just that one day or a few days?

Post: #8

I guess this could be correct as a general rule, but for me I am always puzzled when women tell me how long it's been since the last had sex.

I have many female friends that gets laid at least once a week. Then there's really good looking ones that go months without anything.

The last 6 months I've had a lot of luck with finding quality girls that hasn't had sex in a while.

Post: #9

(08-11-2012 05:58 AM)Gmac Wrote:  On average, most women are getting laid more than most men. There's also plenty of women who have a standard for them self and don't tend to bang random guys (maybe an ex). The pool is skewed for men because there is a minority of men getting most of those lays.

It doesn't take rocket surgery to figure this all out. Sex comes easy for the average looking woman, all SHE has to do is go outside say yes to penis. A guy needs game.

The tragic exception to this rule is that when you're in a long term committed relationship with a girl, and this is widely known in circles you run in, you can get lays as easily as a girl even without game.

There's also a couple months' window after a breakup where you can get lays easily, but the effect diminishes quickly.

Post: #10

(08-11-2012 05:58 AM)Gmac Wrote:  On average, most women are getting laid more than most men. There's also plenty of women who have a standard for them self and don't tend to bang random guys (maybe an ex). The pool is skewed for men because there is a minority of men getting most of those lays.

It doesn't take rocket surgery to figure this all out. Sex comes easy for the average looking woman, all SHE has to do is go outside say yes to penis. A guy needs game.

I can't remember where I read this, but I remember reading that the average 22 yr. old female has sex TWICE as often as the average 22 yr. old man, which automatically means a small percentage of males are enjoying the lion's share of the pussy.

For me, the important question has always been, am I a man of rare percentage enjoying his own poosy paradise?

Post: #11

(08-11-2012 05:58 AM)Gmac Wrote:  On average, most women are getting laid more than most men. There's also plenty of women who have a standard for them self and don't tend to bang random guys (maybe an ex). The pool is skewed for men because there is a minority of men getting most of those lays.

It doesn't take rocket surgery to figure this all out. Sex comes easy for the average looking woman, all SHE has to do is go outside say yes to penis. A guy needs game.

Barring gay sex, women have exactly the same "average" amount sex as men. Their Median number may be different (for men it's feast or famine), but the average will always be the same.

Post: #12

(08-12-2012 04:48 PM)DarkTriad Wrote:  

(08-11-2012 05:58 AM)Gmac Wrote:  On average, most women are getting laid more than most men. There's also plenty of women who have a standard for them self and don't tend to bang random guys (maybe an ex). The pool is skewed for men because there is a minority of men getting most of those lays.

It doesn't take rocket surgery to figure this all out. Sex comes easy for the average looking woman, all SHE has to do is go outside say yes to penis. A guy needs game.

Barring gay sex, women have exactly the same "average" amount sex as men. Their Median number may be different (for men it's feast or famine), but the average will always be the same.

Incorrect.

Post: #13

(08-12-2012 04:48 PM)DarkTriad Wrote:  

(08-11-2012 05:58 AM)Gmac Wrote:  On average, most women are getting laid more than most men. There's also plenty of women who have a standard for them self and don't tend to bang random guys (maybe an ex). The pool is skewed for men because there is a minority of men getting most of those lays.

It doesn't take rocket surgery to figure this all out. Sex comes easy for the average looking woman, all SHE has to do is go outside say yes to penis. A guy needs game.

Barring gay sex, women have exactly the same "average" amount sex as men. Their Median number may be different (for men it's feast or famine), but the average will always be the same.

Alpha's monopolize sex

Post: #14

(08-13-2012 10:38 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(08-12-2012 04:48 PM)DarkTriad Wrote:  

(08-11-2012 05:58 AM)Gmac Wrote:  On average, most women are getting laid more than most men. There's also plenty of women who have a standard for them self and don't tend to bang random guys (maybe an ex). The pool is skewed for men because there is a minority of men getting most of those lays.

It doesn't take rocket surgery to figure this all out. Sex comes easy for the average looking woman, all SHE has to do is go outside say yes to penis. A guy needs game.

Barring gay sex, women have exactly the same "average" amount sex as men. Their Median number may be different (for men it's feast or famine), but the average will always be the same.

Alpha's monopolize sex

Not everywhere.

One approximation to male-to-female ratio for intercourse is STD rates. In the US twice as many women have STDs as men, ie. two girls per guy. Is that representative for the whole population, across age-groups and ethnicities?

In Denmark, data points in the opposite direction. All the boys are banging the same sluts. This fits with my eye-ball impression as well. Twice as many guys have STDs as girls.

Or is it because men in the US are better at getting treated, as are Danish women?

In anycase... once every two weeks is "optimistic".

If she's hot and slutty, yeah... but a lot of girls (and I go for the sweet ones) will go months without a man. This drives them insane, in addition to the peer pressure they experience to "slut it up". I'd say after 3months with no cocka, a girl is ready to explode and will fuck just about anything, including exboyfriend she dumped.

Post: #15

How can any half-decent woman go months without sex? With all the dick offered on a daily basis.

Post: #16

(08-13-2012 10:52 AM)ElJefe Wrote:  Not everywhere.

One approximation to male-to-female ratio for intercourse is STD rates. In the US twice as many women have STDs as men, ie. two girls per guy. Is that representative for the whole population, across age-groups and ethnicities?

Nope

Quote:In Denmark, data points in the opposite direction. All the boys are banging the same sluts. This fits with my eye-ball impression as well. Twice as many guys have STDs as girls.

Still not representative

Quote:Or is it because men in the US are better at getting treated, as are Danish women?

STD Rates can't be used to determine anything except how slutty certain groups of people are. Just because more men or women have an STD means nothing.


STD's have many other factors that play into transmission:

1. Gay sex (maybe danish gays are ultra promiscuous) will inflate male STD numbers.

2. Certain diseases are more susceptible for women over men and vice-versa.

3. Certain races are more promiscuous than other races.

4. Certain cultures/groups might have better condom use than others.


STD rates don't show you who the alpha males are, they don't show you if alpha's are transmitting them disproportionately or not, and they don't show you if alphas are monopolizing sex.

Post: #17

(08-12-2012 04:55 PM)Gmac Wrote:  

(08-12-2012 04:48 PM)DarkTriad Wrote:  

(08-11-2012 05:58 AM)Gmac Wrote:  On average, most women are getting laid more than most men. There's also plenty of women who have a standard for them self and don't tend to bang random guys (maybe an ex). The pool is skewed for men because there is a minority of men getting most of those lays.

It doesn't take rocket surgery to figure this all out. Sex comes easy for the average looking woman, all SHE has to do is go outside say yes to penis. A guy needs game.

Barring gay sex, women have exactly the same "average" amount sex as men. Their Median number may be different (for men it's feast or famine), but the average will always be the same.

Incorrect.

Do you want to check your math?

If Hugh Hefner is a the Playboy mansion with seven Bunnies. He bangs a different one every night. He has six other guys working as chaffeurs, security etc. that aren't having sex at all.

The average for both men and women at the mansion is once per day.

The Median number is zero (most of the guys aren't having any sex).

The Mode (most typical number for men) is also zero.

But the Median and the Mode aren't the some same as the Average, and pretending that they are leads to sloppy thinking and mistakes.

*looks in mirror and gives self wedgie*

Post: #18

^Your mathematical model is flawed, you're using the extremes as your average

Post: #19

(08-11-2012 12:56 PM)lurker123123 Wrote:  is the horny period related to ovulating just that one day or a few days?

Three days for most chicks.

Post: #20

(08-13-2012 02:41 PM)Enfant_Terrible Wrote:  ^Your mathematical model is flawed, you're using the extremes as your average

Seven acts of sex divided by seven men makes an average of one sex act per man,regardless of whether hugh hefner is the only guy getting laid.

Seven acts of sex divided by seven women makes an average of one sex act per woman.

Dark triad is correct.

Post: #21

(08-13-2012 02:51 PM)Agent_008 Wrote:  

(08-13-2012 02:41 PM)Enfant_Terrible Wrote:  ^Your mathematical model is flawed, you're using the extremes as your average

Seven acts of sex divided by seven men makes an average of one sex act per man,regardless of whether hugh hefner is the only guy getting laid.

Seven acts of sex divided by seven women makes an average of one sex act per woman.

Dark triad is correct.

Your calculations are correct but Dark Triad's model / representation is flawed. He used examples of people who get the most sex and averaged how much sex they get. He also assumed that they get sex every night which in reality is likely not the case.

If Dark Triad really wants a more accurate representation he needs to take a significant sample of heterosexual people, track down how often they get sex every 2 weeks, THEN you average it between and within the sexes. This will better prove or disprove that women get laid more often every 2 weeks.

Otherwise, it's just pulling stats out of the ass.

Post: #22

(08-13-2012 12:38 PM)Samseau Wrote:  3. Certain races are more promiscuous than other races.

This is something that I consistently hear in the manosphere, but I don't buy it. The lower down in socio-economic status you go, the more promiscuous women you'll fine. Some races are over-represented at the lower levels of SES. It has nothing to do with race per se.

Post: #23

Quote:This is something that I consistently hear in the manosphere, but I don't buy it. The lower down in socio-economic status you go, the more promiscuous women you'll fine. Some races are over-represented at the lower levels of SES. It has nothing to do with race per se.

From the CDC

   


Notice how there are many more cases for blacks, hispanics, or native americans... yet in terms of poverty there are more poor whites than blacks, hispanics, or native americans in America.

Post: #24

(08-13-2012 03:25 PM)j r Wrote:  

(08-13-2012 12:38 PM)Samseau Wrote:  3. Certain races are more promiscuous than other races.

This is something that I consistently hear in the manosphere, but I don't buy it. The lower down in socio-economic status you go, the more promiscuous women you'll fine. Some races are over-represented at the lower levels of SES. It has nothing to do with race per se.

Girls with lower socio-economic status (Ghetto Girls) are not only banging guys from their socio-economic status
but also guys from a higher socio-economic status. They're always trying to improve their station in life ...hypergamy.

Post: #25

(08-13-2012 02:41 PM)Enfant_Terrible Wrote:  ^Your mathematical model is flawed, you're using the extremes as your average

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

That's because mathematical averages are SUPPOSED to include the extremes. That's why they invented concepts like Median and Mode so you could acurately model "Typical" guys in situations where the "average" was being skewed by outliers.

Equal numbers of men and women (barring gay sex) will always yield the same "average" number of sexual encounters. It's a tautology.

Thinking about this clearly helps keep people from falling into self defeating fallacies - it isn't some phantom out there bumping up women's averages, it's a real flesh and blood guy....what do I have to do to become that guy?

tlr - There are no Phantom Penises flying around bumping up women's numbers but not mens. Every time a woman get plowed with a penis, that penis is attached to a living breathing human being that also gets his number bumped. Do what it takes to make that it's your penis..