Post: #1

Of course, right on time....

http://jezebel.com/5928584/why-most-mass...pular=true

Post: #2

Every time I'm linked to an article from Jezebel, I feel the need to bash my head repeatedly against the computer desk. The stupidity that site represents is astonishing.

Post: #3

Hugo Schwyzer is a hack.

Post: #4

(07-25-2012 04:16 PM)UgSlayer Wrote:  Hugo Schwyzer is a hack.

The ultimate white knight faggot, and a hypocrite to boot, Schwyzer should be executed for treason against men.

Post: #5

From Ted Kaczynski's Manifesto:

Quote:Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit it to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (...) Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. (...) He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful. Words like "self-confidence," "self-reliance," "initiative", "enterprise," "optimism," etc. play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone's needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his own ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

Post: #6

forehead? That's a five-head. Dude's also a wuss-ass vegan.

A City College history professor. So already, he's a shitty professor that can't get a job at a real university. So much for being privileged.

His parents made money in property development. And now it appears he's a child-man without ambition, burning down the trust fund while wasting his life in pointless, trivial pursuits like running a chinchilla rescue mission. Now he's just an old gray haired guy with crows feet, his youth wasted, stuck teaching at a school where 80% of the students never graduate.

Post: #7

(07-25-2012 04:42 PM)Blackhawk Wrote:  forehead? That's a five-head. Dude's also a wuss-ass vegan. And runs a chinchilla rescue mission.

A City College professor. So already, he's a shitty professor that can't get a job at a real university. So much for being privileged.

Dude used his position of power as a professor to bang his feminist whore students... then he would turn around and say he's sorry for doing it so he could get more frontpage on shitty sites like Jizzebel and then bang more feminists.


His game is tight, and so transparent for us Red-Pill men to see, so on one hand I can respect his style.

But on the other hand, he's directly attacking guys like us in order to make his own life better. It's rare for me to get mad, but if I ran across this guy I would go out of my way to humiliate him.

Post: #8

I thought all white males were privileged according to feminism.

I knew a girl who used to drill that point into all dudes' heads. Poor, supporting their family, drug addicted parents, male feminists, hell even disabled kids. To quote "I have it harder in life because I'm a woman"
Her family is worth millions, she attends a world class university has thousands in jewelry, makeup, clothes. Multiple cars and houses, yet she still thinks she is a victim, that a white male born to a welfare receiving meth addicted single mother is privileged.

Post: #9

(07-25-2012 04:46 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Dude used his position of power as a professor to bang his feminist whore students... then he would turn around and say he's sorry for doing it so he could get more frontpage on shitty sites like Jizzebel and then bang more feminists.


His game is tight, and so transparent for us Red-Pill men to see, so on one hand I can respect his style.

But on the other hand, he's directly attacking guys like us in order to make his own life better. It's rare for me to get mad, but if I ran across this guy I would go out of my way to humiliate him.

I put him in the category of Pat Robertson.

He's a total baller who knows he's lying and profits (in Hugo's case, by banging "empowered women") from his lies.

So he's a weird case.

Yes, he attacks guys like us. But he is actually a guy like us.

Very paradoxical.

Post: #10

(07-25-2012 06:15 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(07-25-2012 04:46 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Dude used his position of power as a professor to bang his feminist whore students... then he would turn around and say he's sorry for doing it so he could get more frontpage on shitty sites like Jizzebel and then bang more feminists.


His game is tight, and so transparent for us Red-Pill men to see, so on one hand I can respect his style.

But on the other hand, he's directly attacking guys like us in order to make his own life better. It's rare for me to get mad, but if I ran across this guy I would go out of my way to humiliate him.

I put him in the category of Pat Robertson.

He's a total baller who knows he's lying and profits (in Hugo's case, by banging "empowered women") from his lies.

So he's a weird case.

Yes, he attacks guys like us. But he is actually a guy like us.

Very paradoxical.

It's a needless megaphone AMOG move.

We AMOG each other in clubs all the time. This guy is AMOG'ing all of us with one swoop.

Post: #11

The fact that he is so highly regarded in the circles he is proves that the hamster runs strongest in feminists.

The guy used his position of power to fuck his students (awesome)
The guy has another guy raising his child (good for him)
The guy has tricked feminists and leftists into thinking he's a good guy (clever)

But the guy is a hypocrite and the shit he writes seems almost like satire it's so bad.

Post: #12

FWIW:

I wrote a Tweet expressing the same ideas as Samseau and MikeCF: That this guy has tight game but is a hypocrite if one who can be respected at some level for said innovative game.

He Favorited my Tweet!

Combined with the lack of a reTweet or response, I think this is an implicit admission of "guilty as charged" if there ever was one. In this context UgSlayer's observation that "the shit he writes seems almost like satire it's so bad" starts to make a lot more sense as it quite simply *is* satire. If a random physicist can effortlessly troll all over the PoMo-sphere, an intelligent history major with good prose like Schwyzer will face no problems whatsoever.

Post: #13

(07-25-2012 04:42 PM)Blackhawk Wrote:  forehead? That's a five-head. Dude's also a wuss-ass vegan.

A City College history professor. So already, he's a shitty professor that can't get a job at a real university. So much for being privileged.

His parents made money in property development. And now it appears he's a child-man without ambition, burning down the trust fund while wasting his life in pointless, trivial pursuits like running a chinchilla rescue mission. Now he's just an old gray haired guy with crows feet, his youth wasted, stuck teaching at a school where 80% of the students never graduate.

Closet homo.

Post: #14

(07-25-2012 07:37 PM)kolovrat Wrote:  FWIW:

I wrote a Tweet expressing the same ideas as Samseau and MikeCF: That this guy has tight game but is a hypocrite if one who can be respected at some level for said innovative game.

He Favorited my Tweet!

Combined with the lack of a reTweet or response, I think this is an implicit admission of "guilty as charged" if there ever was one. In this context UgSlayer's observation that "the shit he writes seems almost like satire it's so bad" starts to make a lot more sense as it quite simply *is* satire. If a random physicist can effortlessly troll all over the PoMo-sphere, an intelligent history major with good prose like Schwyzer will face no problems whatsoever.

link to the tweet?

Post: #15

^ Don't feel like outing myself on the forum today. (I tweet and blog under my own name...) There's nothing more to it than I've said. Just what I described, plus Huge Schwyzer at the bottom being listed as having Favorited it.

Post: #16

(07-25-2012 07:59 PM)kolovrat Wrote:  ^ Don't feel like outing myself on the forum today. (I tweet and blog under my own name...) There's nothing more to it than I've said. Just what I described, plus Huge Schwyzer at the bottom being listed as having Favorited it.

understandable. wanted to keep it in my back pocket any time some feminist brought up what a great advocate for women's rights he is.

He is probably just a major troll laughing at everyone on his drive home.

Post: #17

I am reminded of Bill Clinton: always on the side of the femcunts and kissed their ass. But he was getting his knob slobbed all around the world.

Some men just want to watch the world burn.

Post: #18

(07-25-2012 04:37 PM)Icarus Wrote:  From Ted Kaczynski's Manifesto:

Quote:Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit it to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (...) Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. (...) He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful. Words like "self-confidence," "self-reliance," "initiative", "enterprise," "optimism," etc. play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone's needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his own ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

It's kind of disturbing reading that manifesto and finding out that half the things I rant about to friends and family are in complete agreement with the unabomber.

Post: #19

(07-26-2012 03:00 AM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  It's kind of disturbing reading that manifesto and finding out that half the things I rant about to friends and family are in complete agreement with the unabomber.

He's a brilliant man. He diagnosed the illnesses of modern society better than anyone else. Unfortunately, his choice of "treatment" was completely misguided: not only did it not treat anything, but it also made his cause lose credibility.

Post: #20

(07-26-2012 03:46 AM)Icarus Wrote:  

(07-26-2012 03:00 AM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  It's kind of disturbing reading that manifesto and finding out that half the things I rant about to friends and family are in complete agreement with the unabomber.

He's a brilliant man. He diagnosed the illnesses of modern society better than anyone else. Unfortunately, his choice of "treatment" was completely misguided: not only did it not treat anything, but it also made his cause lose credibility.

Yeah, odd that he thought forcing the media to publish the manifesto would have any effect. They just downplayed it as a madman's rant so no one read it.

Post: #21

Here's some more gold nuggets from our bestest buds on the Internet.

http://jezebel.com/5927828/disturbing-ja...-sexy-cute

There's really nothing left to add there. It kind of refutes the very essence of Jezebel.

Post: #22

Meanwhile:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/26/nyregi...ce.html?hp
You can't make this stuff up.

Post: #23

(07-26-2012 04:26 AM)kolovrat Wrote:  Here's some more gold nuggets from our bestest buds on the Internet.

http://jezebel.com/5927828/disturbing-ja...-sexy-cute

There's really nothing left to add there. It kind of refutes the very essence of Jezebel.

Killers make ginas tingle.

Post: #24

(07-26-2012 04:26 AM)kolovrat Wrote:  Here's some more gold nuggets from our bestest buds on the Internet.

http://jezebel.com/5927828/disturbing-ja...-sexy-cute

There's really nothing left to add there. It kind of refutes the very essence of Jezebel.

That didn't take long. I knew it was coming, but damn, the bodies aren't even cold in the ground yet, bitches!

Post: #25

Quote:It's kind of disturbing reading that manifesto and finding out that half the things I rant about to friends and family are in complete agreement with the unabomber.

Just separate the ideas from his personal behavior. Just being he killed people doesn't mean he can't be right in some things.