Post: #1

I was at work wasting a little time towards the end and decide to check out YouTube. I saw a Peter Schiff video posted that I hadn't seen before, and I thought I would check it out. It was ruined by some loud mouthed, disrespectful, entitled uber cunt that constantly interrupted and talked over him. I find this level of disrespect to be intolerable, and all too common. You speak and then you listen. You make a point and then wait for a counterpoint. It's basic civility. Take the test, and see how long you can listen to her.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3hc6LoAlu0

Post: #2

I made it 6 seconds..
The chick is hot..at what time does she start putting phallus on her primary organ of gustation?

I just wanna skip to that part

Post: #3

Chick is throwing shit at Peter Schiff like she was a chimpanzee. He makes the mistake of fighting to her frame and not letting her use her own momentum to hang herself.

This one is gonna fall off a cliff like a freight train around age 35.

Post: #4

Whoa! WTF! When did Maria B. hit the wall?

Post: #5

Unfortunately, this is the format that has become most popular on television. Let's get two or three people on split-screen, and let them shout over each other. The hosts and participants forget why they're on tv discussion a particular issue. They're there for US, not for themselves. They aren't there to raise their own profiles (though if they actually provide value, their profile WILL go up). They aren't there to try to compete against the others on the program, or to shout the other down or make them look bad. They're there to actually debate and discuss and issue, and to intelligently present why they think their view is the accurate one. We don't get that if everyone is talking at the same time.

My first issue with the chick is that she actually avoided the core issue. There will always be more elite colleges and universities that cost more. There will be others in the middle range. There will be others at the lower range, and then community colleges, trade schools etc. Everyone should be able to attend college if the want to, but not everyone can go to the most prestigious or expensive schools and incur ridiculous debt.

Post: #6

They do need to reform the the majority of what is taught at college, but everyone should have access to good education.

This is obvious. Access to education is a necessity as is having a Police dept, Fire Dept., Army, etc.

Same for healthcare, a place to live, and food.

Post: #7

She is using the English-Speaking Tourist routine there; They don't understand your point? TALK LOUDER.
Someone should punch her in the face.


As far as student loads go; the whole thing is a waste of time anyway because you're going to have a whole generation of people never paying back the loan unless the economy fixes itself quickly, which is unlikely to happen.

Post: #8

(07-13-2012 10:30 PM)Sourcecode Wrote:  I made it 6 seconds..
The chick is hot..at what time does she start putting phallus on her primary organ of gustation?

I just wanna skip to that part

Just go to 3:00 yo and thats when it starts.

That brunette girl I'd tap. Now for the blonde one? I unno, she probably wouldn't help pay for my tuition.

I just find it weird that she can't give the man his respect by waiting for him to say his argument. But then again shutting the fuck up is hard for American women.

Everything Else has turned me into a sexist guys.

Post: #9

(07-14-2012 03:17 PM)Timoteo Wrote:  Unfortunately, this is the format that has become most popular on television. Let's get two or three people on split-screen, and let them shout over each other. The hosts and participants forget why they're on tv discussion a particular issue. They're there for US, not for themselves. They aren't there to raise their own profiles (though if they actually provide value, their profile WILL go up). They aren't there to try to compete against the others on the program, or to shout the other down or make them look bad. They're there to actually debate and discuss and issue, and to intelligently present why they think their view is the accurate one. We don't get that if everyone is talking at the same time.

My first issue with the chick is that she actually avoided the core issue. There will always be more elite colleges and universities that cost more. There will be others in the middle range. There will be others at the lower range, and then community colleges, trade schools etc. Everyone should be able to attend college if the want to, but not everyone can go to the most prestigious or expensive schools and incur ridiculous debt.

I agree. This is a "vanilla" version of Jerry Springer. Also believe the networks line up the fight unfairly, to support their views, or at least get the bickering started. Obviously she wasn't near as educated on the subject as the other guy, and came off to me as intern. Did you notice how her eyes kept going high and to the right? I'd call that one staged.

Post: #10

For non-Americans, this is the "snotty girl" accent. It is not an actual regional accent in America. It is a media created accent that was created for comedic purposes for television comedies. It's as fake and fabricated as Klingon or Dothraki. In television you're always supposed to hate the girl who speaks with the snotty girl accent, because her character is always over-privileged, arrogant, and thinks she knows more than she actually does. They are never as good as their parents (is this her mother?), who always overpromote their children beyond their abilities. And when bad things happen to the snotty girl, you cheer.

Because everyone hates snotty people.

Diana G Carew's accent is literally copied off of a television show, probably to cover a baser Pittsburgh or New Jersey accent, but she's too stupid to understand she's copied the accent of the evil girl of the show. What next? As long as she's demonstrating how culturally clueless she is, maybe she will start dressing like Cruella de Vil from 101 Dalmatians as well?



As to what she says... some people you don't need to parody, you just need to quote them.

Post: #11

lulz, who of you wrote the top comment?