Post: #1

N.C. Preacher Tells Parents to Crack Wrists, Punch Effeminate Children

Follow the link for a video of him preaching. I couldn't get it to embed in the thread.
http://www.advocate.com/society/religion...g-children



The words of a homophobic North Carolina preacher are reverberating around the Internet today, following a sermon in which he advocated physically assaulting toddlers with "limp wrists."

The words of a homophobic North Carolina preacher are reverberating around the Internet today, following a sermon in which he advocated physically assaulting toddlers with "limp wrists."

Sean Harris (pictured, left), the senior pastor at Berean Baptist Church in Fayetteville, is a strong supporter of North Carolina's proposed antigay Amendment One. In Sunday's sermon, Harris screams like a maniac about cracking limp wrists and punching young children who exhibit gender-variant behavior. Girls playing sports are OK, but they must attempt to look pretty, according to Harris. Listen to the audio, obtained by GoodAsYou.org.

Post: #2

Probably a closet case himself.

Post: #3

owwwww my wristies

Post: #4

I'll put down $1,000 at even odds that this loser is caught in a bathroom stall with some guy, with a male prostitute, or something simmilar within two years. These preachers never learn. Nobody thinks they're the man. People just think they're in the closet. Even if they're not.

As an aside:
"Homophobic" is a pretty stupid term. Most people classed as "homophobic" are not in any way afraid of homosexuals. They need to think of a more accurate term.

Post: #5

I haven't watched the vid since I'm on a bad connection, but I like what he said in the OP's post.

Basically getting boys to man up, which is sorely lacking today. Instead, parents shelter them producing the wishy washy eunuch's invading the populace today.

And, he says girls should dress pretty. HERE HERE! I'm all for that.

Post: #6

I grew up in Fayetteville and have actually been to that church.

I would also like to say that if you listen to him, he advocates:

1. making sure your boys grow up to be men.
2. making sure your girls are effeminate.

^isn't that what we want? Sure, he uses a good deal of hyperbole that he shouldn't have, and no one likes violence against children - but don't we agree that men should be manly and girls effeminate?

Post: #7

(05-02-2012 12:11 PM)Alpha Wrote:  I grew up in Fayetteville and have actually been to that church.

I would also like to say that if you listen to him, he advocates:

1. making sure your boys grow up to be men.
2. making sure your girls are effeminate.

^isn't that what we want? Sure, he uses a good deal of hyperbole that he shouldn't have, and no one likes violence against children - but don't we agree that men should be manly and girls effeminate?

Sure, but I don't see why we should care where they put their dicks into. If I was a parent the only thing I'd care about is their ability to take care of themselves and obtain happiness.

Post: #8

Different audiences need tailored messages to get through to them.

The traditional methods are taking your boys hunting, fishing, camping, enrolling them in sports like little league and football, and roughhousing with them around the house.

It's annoying that a Father roughhousing with his children is now considered "violence against children".

And didn't Roosh post that “Homophobia” is a liberal invention to shame straight men into embracing the gay lifestyle.”

Post: #9

I like his intentions, but his method's suck.

You don't need to hit your children to act how you want. If anything, they'll be more likely to be gay if they do not form a close emotional attachment with their father.


As someone who works with children, I can tell you a better approach to an effeminate son is to show him some pictures of hot babes, or encourage him to flirt with girls his own age.

Post: #10

I don't care about this guy's religion or any of that. All of that shits not important dealing with the topic he's talking about.

He had the balls to say stuff that most men in this country would piss a bitch about. For example, look at all the guys in the comments not even agreeing with his general message.

I think they are the first guys who need a good punch.

Post: #11

(05-02-2012 01:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  You don't need to hit your children to act how you want.

No, but you don't need to treat getting hit like its first degree murder, either. And never handling your children will fuck them up even worse.

Boys punch and kick and wrestle with each other all the time. Fathers and sons punch and kick and wrestle with each other too.

Roughhousing isn't child abuse. Roughhousing is play. It's exercise. And it's fun.

Is it possible for you to define "child abuse" in a way that leaves room for roughhousing and normal play? Because right now ninny-headed lawyers are trying to redefine our society into one without contact or touch. Which isn't stopping child abuse --look at all the welfare moms who abuse their children by holding their hands under full hot tap water because they know that isn't "hitting" and so won't endanger their government checks.

Post: #12

(05-02-2012 01:40 PM)Rosca Wrote:  I don't care about this guy's religion or any of that. All of that shits not important dealing with the topic he's talking about.

He had the balls to say stuff that most men in this country would piss a bitch about. For example, look at all the guys in the comments not even agreeing with his general message.

I think they are the first guys who need a good punch.

So if a person disagrees with you they need to be punched so they can have the "correct" way of thinking? Punching your children for something that they have little to no control over is an incredibly retarded idea. But if you want to fuck with their development and make them hate you or themselves, go ahead. I understand its hyperbole but punching your four year old son to teach him how to "man up" is a shit method.

And no, this guy doesn't have any balls for saying this. He said this inside his church, in front of a bunch of people agreeing with him. It's like saying feminists have balls when they say "women are oppressed" inside a feminist class. It'd be a different situation if he went on Good Morning America and shared his thoughts.

Post: #13

(05-02-2012 01:11 PM)Blackhawk Wrote:  It's annoying that a Father roughhousing with his children is now considered "violence against children".

By whom?

Post: #14

(05-02-2012 01:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  If anything, they'll be more likely to be gay if they do not form a close emotional attachment with their father.

*sigh* It is not possible to become a gay, you're either born gay/bi or you are not. When do you guys finally learn?

Post: #15

(05-02-2012 01:39 PM)Samseau Wrote:  I like his intentions, but his method's suck.

You don't need to hit your children to act how you want. If anything, they'll be more likely to be gay if they do not form a close emotional attachment with their father.


As someone who works with children, I can tell you a better approach to an effeminate son is to show him some pictures of hot babes, or encourage him to flirt with girls his own age.

It's funny you say that... I talk about shit like this with a Mexican friend of mine.

He says in Mexico if they suspect a kid may be gay they sit him down and make him watch porn

I'm not sure how true that is or if he's just fucking with me but its damn funny!!

Post: #16

(05-02-2012 03:00 PM)Asmodeus Wrote:  So if a person disagrees with you they need to be punched so they can have the "correct" way of thinking?

No, as adults they need to be punched to find it's not that big of a fucking deal. Take a martial art or boxing class. You'll get punched a lot. Somehow, despite your claim, you will not be developmentally stunted or hate your parents or yourself or have some other bullshit fictional psychological drama problem. In fact, you'll gain confidence and become more manly and athletic by having participated in a sport. More practically, you'll learn how to take a hit, find out it ain't that big of a deal, and get over your extreme paranoia and fear of being punched, and your exaggerated claims of the damage it does.

(05-02-2012 03:00 PM)Asmodeus Wrote:  Punching your children for something that they have little to no control over is an incredibly retarded idea.

Boys love to play Punch Bug. That's punching a child for something they have no control over. And I think everyone can admit, it is a retarded game. And you know what? They love it. Even girls love it.

Should you punch boys? Yes, you goddamn well should. Just don't punch them too hard, or too often.

But that's too gray of a rule for the no-touch ninny-heads to follow.

Post: #17

(05-02-2012 04:35 PM)Blackhawk Wrote:  

(05-02-2012 03:00 PM)Asmodeus Wrote:  So if a person disagrees with you they need to be punched so they can have the "correct" way of thinking?

No, as adults they need to be punched to find it's not that big of a fucking deal. Take a martial art or boxing class. You'll get punched a lot. Somehow, despite your claim, you will not be developmentally stunted or hate your parents or yourself or have some other bullshit fictional psychological drama problem. In fact, you'll gain confidence and become more manly and athletic by having participated in a sport. More practically, you'll learn how to take a hit, find out it ain't that big of a deal, and get over your extreme paranoia and fear of being punched, and your exaggerated claims of the damage it does.

(05-02-2012 03:00 PM)Asmodeus Wrote:  Punching your children for something that they have little to no control over is an incredibly retarded idea.

Boys love to play Punch Bug. That's punching a child for something they have no control over. And I think everyone can admit, it is a retarded game. And you know what? They love it. Even girls love it.

Should you punch boys? Yes, you goddamn well should. Just don't punch them too hard, or too often.

But that's too gray of a rule for the no-touch ninny-heads to follow.

Beating children for being gay/effeminate ≠ Roughhousing
Child punching a child ≠ Parent punching their child
Cute attempt at twisting my words.
To clarify though, I'm not against hitting children to prevent things that will cause them (or others) greater pain in the future, like them biting or lighting things on fire, but justifying striking a child because he is not your ideal is warped way of thinking.

Post: #18

I feel I should point out, if you listen to the audio, it's clear that he isn't talking about actually punching your kid in the face for being effeminate. Let's be a little more objective and listen to what he says and how he says, and not take the one-sided accusation of a liberal, homosexual endorsing outlet.

Post: #19

(05-02-2012 03:00 PM)Asmodeus Wrote:  

(05-02-2012 01:40 PM)Rosca Wrote:  I don't care about this guy's religion or any of that. All of that shits not important dealing with the topic he's talking about.

He had the balls to say stuff that most men in this country would piss a bitch about. For example, look at all the guys in the comments not even agreeing with his general message.

I think they are the first guys who need a good punch.

So if a person disagrees with you they need to be punched so they can have the "correct" way of thinking? Punching your children for something that they have little to no control over is an incredibly retarded idea. But if you want to fuck with their development and make them hate you or themselves, go ahead. I understand its hyperbole but punching your four year old son to teach him how to "man up" is a shit method.

He'll be alright.