Post: #1

Is it me or Giselle has missed something?
http://goo.gl/Lu0DZ

Post: #2

I think it's you. She's still a gorgeous woman. (Edit: although she is 31 years old. I think that's what we're witnessing here. That and lack of make up.)

On a side note, did you see how many Super Bowl commercials had the younger Brazilian super model Adriana Lima? And Tom Brady lost the Superbowl. I am sure that fucked with her mind a bit.

Post: #3

She was never all the hype to me.
She's a model...she's suppose to be a good face with a thin frame body. At that age, you dont have to be Sherlock to know she's gonna start doing a little downhill. But she's still sexy.

That being said,I would still fuck the shit out of her while the kid in the corner.

Post: #4

Without makeup her face looks like a 6.

Post: #5

Models are never that pretty. They're chosen for their bodies not their faces. Case and point her body is banging for 31 but without makeup or Photochop she's average looking. I have a soft spot for pretty but average so I see no issue

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men

Post: #6

(02-21-2012 07:52 AM)Chad Daring Wrote:  Models are never that pretty. They're chosen for their bodies not their faces. Case and point her body is banging for 31 but without makeup or Photochop she's average looking. I have a soft spot for pretty but average so I see no issue

This is true. Girls with exaggerated features trigger something in our brain that isn't necessarily regular attraction but is still effective. Side-by-side, 9 out of 10 guys would pick Natalie Portman in her prime (only 5'2" or so) over one of these 6-foot models, yet they are the ones used for "modeling" things. It's some weird visual psychology.

Up close, or without the proper photographing, most of these models looks weird, long-ish, gaunt, and mannish. Certainly there are exceptions, but I'd say a significant majority.

Post: #7

Runway models are walking coat hangers

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men

Post: #8

The "fading shine" thing is really apparent if you're a fan of "How I Met Your Mother". The actress who plays Robin was really sexy in the first few years, but now.... not so much. Very sad.

Post: #9

wow, tough crowd!

if this is what you guys mean by a 6, then i'm stuck banging lowly 5's and 4's. giselle? a 6??

Post: #10

My understanding is that female models must be 5'9" (minimum) to about 5'11". I think they're chosen more for their ability to display clothes the way the designers want them shown rather than their raw (facial) physical beauty.

Post: #11

(02-21-2012 02:34 PM)Menace Wrote:  My understanding is that female models must be 5'9" (minimum) to about 5'11". I think they're chosen more for their ability to display clothes the way the designers want them shown rather than their raw (facial) physical beauty.

That's exactly it. Face does matter; it's very important as is attitude and being able to channel the right feeling / mood. Models have to have physical acting skills. Faces need not be traditionally pretty but they should be striking or have some quality that people recruiting them are looking for. Finally, models never appear without make-up so what they look like without make-up is not to their work.

Post: #12

Most fashion models have no hips. Gisele is a good example of this. Not saying I wouldn't do her, but I never thought she was anything special. Too bad that the fashion industry is run by gay dudes who prefer their women to look like rectangular-bodied boys.

Post: #13

Modeling is still a young girl's game. Even top models that are still earning pretty well get pushed off the runway. They can still do swimsuit/Victoria's Secret as long as the body stays tight. The smart ones transition that into something else that can make money (which Giselle has done). Cindy Crawford, Heidi Klum, Iman and any number of top models at one time crafted businesses around themselves, became the face of this or that (those deals aren't as age-dependent). They also find that actor, athlete, musician or businessman husband when they hit the mid-to-late 20s. The good thing is they are still tied up in their looks/bodies, so after popping out kids they keep it tight. Giselle has never been among the most pretty models, but a lot of runway is about finding unusual looking girls that don't always fit within the Hollywood beauty ideal (which is why a homely chick like Kate Moss could become a top model).

Post: #14

(02-21-2012 07:52 AM)Chad Daring Wrote:  Models are never that pretty.

Never?

Really?

Where are you hanging out where they have hotter girls?

Break it down.

Post: #15

Wait, what are we complaining about here?

Post: #16

really ?? this is what you guys find attractive ??

now I know for sure, you dudes are a different breed than me.

Post: #17

yeah dude she looks pretty bad in these pictures up here but a 6?

when she is dressed and done up, she is not a 6.

if she is a 6 in stylish clothes, great make up, great physical health, rich, all that....

then what is a normal-ish looking girl with little to no shitty make up, moderate health, shitty job...what do you rank her? a 3?

then where do the cigarette mustache bitches go? -10?

i like patrice oneal's system of 1-30 and you rank them by 1-10 - no chance, 11-19- alright and doable, 20-30 fucking hot

Post: #18

Giselle's body is far from my type but I side more with Chad here that sometimes girls with a qirky hot look are attractive to me. She is 31 and looks normal in the rough, many women have to paint and cake them selves up just to be a 6 out at night.
She must of been a damn ugly kid though. I've grown up with quirky tall girls that ended up doing heavy modeling, the real successful ones looked like dog meat in grade school. They ended up growing into their features and had that weird classic model look.

And yea Kate Moss is mad fugly, she wouldn't be able to give me wood.

Post: #19

@G

Porzikova isn't a runway model she's a glamour model, she did Playboy

Bundchen is a runway model, so yes I should've been more clear RUNWAY models aren't that attractive, because their face isn't whats important, its how their body portrays the clothing. Like I said, they're walking coat hangers.



Also this pic is from 2006, so she was in her mid 20s, Gisele seems to be one of those "depends on the lighting" types who's attractiveness varies A LOT

Chef In Jeans
A culinary website for men

Post: #20

Some of these models, though not traditionally pretty, can be sexy. I feel this way about actresses like Ellen Barkin, Gina Gershon and Vanessa Ferlito. There's nothing symmetrical about their features. They either have large or crooked mouths or noses. But I find something incredibly sexy about all of them. I run hot and cold on Naomi Campbell. Sometimes I think she's beautiful, while other times, depending on how she's done up (or not done up), I don't find her attractive at all. Giselle, while not exactly a dog, isn't really pretty to me. In some of the pics above, I find her a little too thin also. I know a lot of guys are into women built like that, but that isn't my ideal.

Post: #21

To be honest I'm not really into supermodels and all that shit, I'm more into curvy girls (and by curvy I mean flat stomach, big boobs and a nice ass, not fat girls). It seems as though you were fucking a corpse with those "models".

Post: #22

(02-23-2012 12:58 AM)Drudenhaus Wrote:  To be honest I'm not really into supermodels and all that shit, I'm more into curvy girls (and by curvy I mean flat stomach, big boobs and a nice ass, not fat girls). It seems as though you were fucking a corpse with those "models".

Where have you been banging all these fashion models?

Break it down.

Post: #23

Only on the Internet can guys be skeptical of top super models. I have never met any super model, but I suspect that they would have a profound effect on me, regardless of the lighting. Put Gisele next to any pretty much any girl in your city, and that girl will look like she from a different species.

Post: #24

(02-23-2012 11:33 AM)Menace Wrote:  Only on the Internet can guys be skeptical of top super models. I have never met any super model, but I suspect that they would have a profound effect on me, regardless of the lighting. Put Gisele next to any pretty much any girl in your city, and that girl will look like she from a different species.

Yeah, a ton of fronting on the internet.

We have had some great threads where people dissed Rhianna and Scarlet Johhanssen.

And people implied they "wouldn't even bang" those girls.

And implied that the girls they were getting on the regular were twice as hot.

Must be nice.

Then the same cat would start a thread about some topic like:

Was this Beta?

Post: #25

A lot of the runway models are overly skinny and the faces can be weird but there's plenty of nice ones.
I like tall women so prefer fashion to glamour models who tend to be short.

As for Giselle I think she's pretty tasty with a strong face,definitely an 8 for me.

But for top runway talent you can't beat Tatjana Patitz..Not as famous as all the other Supermodels from the 80's and 90's but my favourite out of all of them.
Her fashion spreads were real popular in my circle at school and the pages ended up rather crispy after I'd finished with them in my teens!
She's stunning with a great body made for boom bang a bang!
I love that cold Germanic Aryan beauty!