<![CDATA[Roosh V Forum - All Forums]]> / Fri, 24 May 2019 00:37:13 +0000 MyBB <![CDATA[Church game]]> /thread-73261.html Thu, 23 May 2019 18:21:37 -0400 /thread-73261.html
Haven’t attended church in quite a few years, but that’s all about to change. Use to go to after school events and ceremonies with a Mormon friend back in high school.

Didn’t seem like a bad place to meet quality women. Most of them are married now. Is it too late for a mid 20s guy to start attending to find a wife? All the good ones seem to have kids by now

Any insights y’all have would be fabulous!]]>

Haven’t attended church in quite a few years, but that’s all about to change. Use to go to after school events and ceremonies with a Mormon friend back in high school.

Didn’t seem like a bad place to meet quality women. Most of them are married now. Is it too late for a mid 20s guy to start attending to find a wife? All the good ones seem to have kids by now

Any insights y’all have would be fabulous!]]>
<![CDATA[Crypto in the IEO era]]> /thread-73260.html Thu, 23 May 2019 17:24:57 -0400 /thread-73260.html
I created this thread to restart some general discussion on ICOs, IEOs, trading and investing in crypto in this IEO era.

Have any of you guys had success with any of the new projects launching lately?

Personally, I've held off until now due to scars from the last bull run but just put a sizable proportion of my portfolio into Harmony, which should be a sure bet as it'll be a Binance IEO.

I also have some leftover presale investments from last year which are now promising IEOs but am more skeptical about how they will pan out.]]>

I created this thread to restart some general discussion on ICOs, IEOs, trading and investing in crypto in this IEO era.

Have any of you guys had success with any of the new projects launching lately?

Personally, I've held off until now due to scars from the last bull run but just put a sizable proportion of my portfolio into Harmony, which should be a sure bet as it'll be a Binance IEO.

I also have some leftover presale investments from last year which are now promising IEOs but am more skeptical about how they will pan out.]]>
<![CDATA[The Fornicators thread]]> /thread-73258.html Thu, 23 May 2019 15:45:44 -0400 /thread-73258.html
A final send-off is due.

God-pillers: Your opinion (and decisive forum infiltration victory) are noted but unwelcome here. This is a temp sanctuary for the heathen and unrepentant. Let us discuss our sinful ways in peace.]]>

A final send-off is due.

God-pillers: Your opinion (and decisive forum infiltration victory) are noted but unwelcome here. This is a temp sanctuary for the heathen and unrepentant. Let us discuss our sinful ways in peace.]]>
<![CDATA[NEW RULES: Casual sex and hooking up can no longer be discussed on the forum]]> /thread-73256.html Thu, 23 May 2019 12:15:58 -0400 /thread-73256.html recent turn to faith, my sense of morality is becoming based on the Bible. I've stopped a lot of behaviors that I've used to do and am in the process of making other changes. I've also realized that the majority of my published materials and online platforms lead men into sin or enable them to partake in sin. I no longer want this to occur, so I am implementing two new rules on the forum that are effective on June 1, 2019.

1 .You can no longer discuss fornication or pre-marital sexual activity

Things you can discuss:

-Meeting women with the intention of entering a relationship with them
-Attracting women
-Going on dates
-How to enter relationships
-Using technology to meet women
-How to maintain relationships
-Sexual activity while married

Things you can no longer discuss:

-Meeting women with the intention of fornicating with them
-How to bang
-Physical intimacy with women you're not married to beyond the act of kissing
-Maintaining relationships with multiple women (i.e. spinning plates)
-Cheating on significant others (adultery)
-Using technology to fornicate
-Discussion of travel destinations which are best for fornication
-Stories of sexual activity while not married
-Promoting masturbation, oral sex, anal sex, etc.

2. You can no longer use pornographic or vulgar language

-Refrain from using terms like "I fucked her" or "I want to fuck her." Do not describe sexual encounters or situations that are beyond the act of kissing unless you are married.
-Refrain from using profanity if a cleaner word would suffice.

These rules will cause great change to the forum

The above two rules will mostly apply to the Game and Travel subforums. I know that I may lose some of you because of these rules, but I can no longer help men lead a life of sin, because doing so is weighing on my conscious.

I created this forum in 2008 to help men fornicate, so I don't know if it's possible to "retrofit" it for another purpose, but it's worth a try. In the meanwhile, I will gradually lock threads that break these new rules if they become active. The fully updated rules that new members see is stickied in the Everything Else forum. It can be viewed here.]]>
recent turn to faith, my sense of morality is becoming based on the Bible. I've stopped a lot of behaviors that I've used to do and am in the process of making other changes. I've also realized that the majority of my published materials and online platforms lead men into sin or enable them to partake in sin. I no longer want this to occur, so I am implementing two new rules on the forum that are effective on June 1, 2019.

1 .You can no longer discuss fornication or pre-marital sexual activity

Things you can discuss:

-Meeting women with the intention of entering a relationship with them
-Attracting women
-Going on dates
-How to enter relationships
-Using technology to meet women
-How to maintain relationships
-Sexual activity while married

Things you can no longer discuss:

-Meeting women with the intention of fornicating with them
-How to bang
-Physical intimacy with women you're not married to beyond the act of kissing
-Maintaining relationships with multiple women (i.e. spinning plates)
-Cheating on significant others (adultery)
-Using technology to fornicate
-Discussion of travel destinations which are best for fornication
-Stories of sexual activity while not married
-Promoting masturbation, oral sex, anal sex, etc.

2. You can no longer use pornographic or vulgar language

-Refrain from using terms like "I fucked her" or "I want to fuck her." Do not describe sexual encounters or situations that are beyond the act of kissing unless you are married.
-Refrain from using profanity if a cleaner word would suffice.

These rules will cause great change to the forum

The above two rules will mostly apply to the Game and Travel subforums. I know that I may lose some of you because of these rules, but I can no longer help men lead a life of sin, because doing so is weighing on my conscious.

I created this forum in 2008 to help men fornicate, so I don't know if it's possible to "retrofit" it for another purpose, but it's worth a try. In the meanwhile, I will gradually lock threads that break these new rules if they become active. The fully updated rules that new members see is stickied in the Everything Else forum. It can be viewed here.]]>
<![CDATA[What is your highest number of approaches in the same day?]]> /thread-73255.html Thu, 23 May 2019 06:45:10 -0400 /thread-73255.html <![CDATA[Smartest way to reveal lies to LTR]]> /thread-73254.html Thu, 23 May 2019 05:13:40 -0400 /thread-73254.html
Here is the problem. As I have done with every girl all my life (I never took them seriously), I lied from the start about several key things: My name, age, occupation, nationality and background. I am confident I can keep these lies going as long as necessary. Obviously if I had known it was going to be a long term prospect I wouldn't have lied but I did so now I have to deal with it.

If it is going to lead toward marriage she has to find out the truth eventually. I am not keen to do any reveals until she is deeply pairbonded and I have her by the balls completely. Another problem obviously is that once it gets serious she will tell her family about me and it will be even harder to get out of the pickle, but telling her now before she is deeply pairbonded may be in itself a great risk.

However here is the crux of the matter: What is the smartest way to reveal these things to her? The most intelligent way to maximize damage control. I'm thinking perhaps I can wait until I propose to her and she is deeply pairbonded then make the reveals (come up with some excuses) and the positive/negative emotions will make her leaving me less likely. Another idea I had is to perhaps make the reveals gradually, plant seeds etc.

If you were in this situation and had to come up with a really really smart way of doing this to maximize the chances of a good outcome, what would it be?

EDIT: The motivation for these lies in the first place were prior convictions and history she could have found by googling me. They were necessary in order to be in this position in the first place, and I have used them from the start of my game career to great effect. A girl is more likely to overlook these things if deeply in love with you than on the first conversation (in short flings it doesn't matter, and I have even had LTRs that I wasn't going to marry where I kept the lies going for years). I am not so much worried about her criticizing my past convictions (a girl in love doesn't care about this), but it will be a huge shock to her my name and background were lies. That is why I need an intelligent way to make these reveals.]]>

Here is the problem. As I have done with every girl all my life (I never took them seriously), I lied from the start about several key things: My name, age, occupation, nationality and background. I am confident I can keep these lies going as long as necessary. Obviously if I had known it was going to be a long term prospect I wouldn't have lied but I did so now I have to deal with it.

If it is going to lead toward marriage she has to find out the truth eventually. I am not keen to do any reveals until she is deeply pairbonded and I have her by the balls completely. Another problem obviously is that once it gets serious she will tell her family about me and it will be even harder to get out of the pickle, but telling her now before she is deeply pairbonded may be in itself a great risk.

However here is the crux of the matter: What is the smartest way to reveal these things to her? The most intelligent way to maximize damage control. I'm thinking perhaps I can wait until I propose to her and she is deeply pairbonded then make the reveals (come up with some excuses) and the positive/negative emotions will make her leaving me less likely. Another idea I had is to perhaps make the reveals gradually, plant seeds etc.

If you were in this situation and had to come up with a really really smart way of doing this to maximize the chances of a good outcome, what would it be?

EDIT: The motivation for these lies in the first place were prior convictions and history she could have found by googling me. They were necessary in order to be in this position in the first place, and I have used them from the start of my game career to great effect. A girl is more likely to overlook these things if deeply in love with you than on the first conversation (in short flings it doesn't matter, and I have even had LTRs that I wasn't going to marry where I kept the lies going for years). I am not so much worried about her criticizing my past convictions (a girl in love doesn't care about this), but it will be a huge shock to her my name and background were lies. That is why I need an intelligent way to make these reveals.]]>
<![CDATA[Brisbane sucks]]> /thread-73253.html Thu, 23 May 2019 04:03:42 -0400 /thread-73253.html
So many of them have the attitude of 8's when they're 4's at best. I'm scratching my head trying to figure what's going on. Really disappointing, I planning on hitting up the Gold Coast tomorrow to see if things turn for the better.]]>

So many of them have the attitude of 8's when they're 4's at best. I'm scratching my head trying to figure what's going on. Really disappointing, I planning on hitting up the Gold Coast tomorrow to see if things turn for the better.]]>
<![CDATA[Strange Irony of Attraction: Very Good Looking Guys Treated Like Ugly Guys]]> /thread-73252.html Thu, 23 May 2019 00:55:56 -0400 /thread-73252.html
Ugly guys: women are repulsed, angered, they want to get away from these men, avoid them. These guys create extreme discomfort and a very strong emotional reaction overall.

Very good looking guys: oddly, when women are over-aroused, they exhibit a lot of the same behaviors and physiological responses at least superficially speaking. This is because many women are uncomfortable having a strong sexual response immediately, except in very specific situations.

In most situations: work, school, daytime chores, etc., most women want to maintain the facade that they are not feeling strong attraction towards a man. So when they are attracted, and the more strongly attracted, they harder they will fight their own physiological response.

As a result, they will often avoid very good looking men, try to get away from them, become angry, flustered, etc. I am often amused and sometimes embarrassed, seeing women lose control in all kinds of situations where I have done nothing besides show up.

What's annoying is that there are fewer restraints on women's behavior than ever. You can't tease them, you can't correct them. The best you can hope for is that their initial wave of anger blows over and then they are ready to hang out, become comfortable (enough) with you, acknowledge their own attraction until they are willing to submit sexually.

I just had to vent about this. Women are really getting more and more out of control, and it's astonishing that we don't really have any practical way of controlling them.]]>

Ugly guys: women are repulsed, angered, they want to get away from these men, avoid them. These guys create extreme discomfort and a very strong emotional reaction overall.

Very good looking guys: oddly, when women are over-aroused, they exhibit a lot of the same behaviors and physiological responses at least superficially speaking. This is because many women are uncomfortable having a strong sexual response immediately, except in very specific situations.

In most situations: work, school, daytime chores, etc., most women want to maintain the facade that they are not feeling strong attraction towards a man. So when they are attracted, and the more strongly attracted, they harder they will fight their own physiological response.

As a result, they will often avoid very good looking men, try to get away from them, become angry, flustered, etc. I am often amused and sometimes embarrassed, seeing women lose control in all kinds of situations where I have done nothing besides show up.

What's annoying is that there are fewer restraints on women's behavior than ever. You can't tease them, you can't correct them. The best you can hope for is that their initial wave of anger blows over and then they are ready to hang out, become comfortable (enough) with you, acknowledge their own attraction until they are willing to submit sexually.

I just had to vent about this. Women are really getting more and more out of control, and it's astonishing that we don't really have any practical way of controlling them.]]>
<![CDATA[Biological Leninism / Dysgenics in the "Real World"]]> /thread-73251.html Thu, 23 May 2019 00:01:36 -0400 /thread-73251.html




Some choice bits:
-study that illustrated links between T-levels, dominance, and smiling (the soy-boy "glory-hole grimace") [5:16]

-"left-wing beliefs are predicated on a lack of personal responsibility and self discipline..." (sums up the fat acceptance movement quite well)

-"...that's why there's hardly ever any left-wing gym bros" - brutal shiv, never though about it like that before [6:35]

-Paul cites the "clear correlation" between being ugly and being left-wing, he even cites a headline from the Guardian of all places that mentions this [6:08]

This pattern has turned into something too accurate to ignore, especially as humans are divided further and split up into their respective tribes/politico-value oriented groups. This is something I've been mulling over, as humans we are usually taught to "not judge a book by it's cover." While I'll treat anyone well regardless of looks until they show themselves to be a shithead, I think this is entrenched social programming to minimize hurt feelz and promote equality. Humans have zeroed in on visual cues for sussing out good mates over thousands of years; a human male can determine if a human female is fuckable in less than a second. The disgust reflex is just as fast. As the esteemed Heartiste (RIP) used to always say, "physiognomy is real."

An article I happened upon (possibly in one of Roosh's article dumps) delves into what the author calls "Biological Leninism." I would definitely recommend reading it, it's a three article series but I found it very interesting.
https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2017/...-leninism/

The author goes into how the Socialist(leftist) party grew in numbers and came to power. Some main points (bold/italics are mine):

Quote: Leninism is, of course, applied socialism. Socialism was huge before Leninism was even a thing, and that Marxism was and is still popular is not due only to Soviet patronage. Socialism works by hacking the Social Calculus Module that humans have in our brains. Remember, humans care deeply about status. Status is what drives human behavior. Everybody works to achieve more status, and to avoid losing status. Socialism of course sells egalitarianism. It tells people with low status that they can get some more. The Industrial Revolution had forced millions of peasants into the cities, and they all felt they had lost status in the process.

Quote:So these socialists come by and tell them they have this plan to make them gain status, big time. That was huge. Yes, sure, Christianity had also started promising the meek that they were morally higher than rich people; they’d all go to heaven unlike those perfid rich guys. But that didn’t translate into actual, real-world status. Socialism was promising actual goods. And so it became huge. It’s still huge.

Quote:Socialism works not only because it promises higher status to a lot of people. Socialism is catnip because it promises status to people who, deep down, know they shouldn’t have it. There is such a thing as natural law, the natural state of any normally functioning human society. Basic biology tells us people are different. Some are more intelligent, more attractive, more crafty and popular. Everybody knows, deep in their lizard brains, how human mating works: women are attracted to the top dogs. Being generous, all human societies default to a Pareto distribution where 20% of people are high-status, and everyone else just has to put up with their inferiority for life. That’s just how it works.

Some of this stuff is RooshForum 101

Quote:Socialism though promised to change that, and Marx showed they had a good plan. Lenin then put that plan to work in practice. What did Lenin do? Exterminate the natural aristocracy of Russia, and build a ruling class with a bunch of low-status people. Workers, peasants, Jews, Latvians, Ukrainians. Lenin went out of his way to recruit everyone who had a grudge against Imperial Russian society. And it worked, brilliantly. The Bolsheviks, a small party with little popular support, won the civil war, and became the awesome Soviet Union. The early Soviet Union promoted minorities, women, sexual deviants, atheists, cultists and every kind of weirdo. Everybody but intelligent, conservative Russians of good families.

Sound familiar?

When I was young I scoffed at the subject of history because I thought it was "boring old shit that didn't relate to me." I've gotten more into it as I matured and realized how fake and edited everything we are taught is.
(see also: the degeneracy of post-WWI Weimar Germany)

It's really starting to blow my mind how history is starting to repeat itself because we have grown so comfortable in our modern society and the majority of people just don't give a fuck. 'Bread and circus' and all that, or in today's age: "porn and corn."

I'm curious as to how the effects of the dysgenics (the study of factors producing the accumulation and perpetuation of defective or disadvantageous genes and traits in offspring of a particular population or species/ opposite of eugenics) of the human population will play out over time. I believe we are seeing a cladogenesis of the human species.

cladogenesis: “Cladogenesis is an evolutionary splitting event where a parent species splits into two distinct species, forming a clade”.
-from an interesting article: https://medium.com/@dontshootthemessenge...44f2fbabbd

*Generally speaking*, over time as attractive people mate with other attractive people and ugly people mate with other ugly people, this creates a split as attractive people become more attractive, and ugly people become more ugly as the desirable/undesirable genes proliferate within the two groups. Maybe this is why in old pictures from the Civil War and that time period, people generally weren't really attractive or really ugly, but just all kind of looked like regular people? I've wondered about this.

The article I linked above this paragraph maintains that the west has been subsiding dysgenics and funding the proliferation of undesirable traits through welfare over the last 80 or so years. Obviously whenever anyone brings up eugenics/selective breeding in regards to humans someone yells "HITLER!!!" I'll end this tangent here and wrap this up.

Apologies for the TL;DR, I didn't think it would be this long (that's what she said).

I thought I'd throw some of these ideas out here because I thought it'd make for some interesting discussion. I'm not a scientist and this isn't hard science so there might be some errors in there, feel free to correct me on that. Thanks for reading my rambling screed and I look forward to reading any replies/personal anecdotes/refutations if anyone feels so inclined.
-BBC]]>





Some choice bits:
-study that illustrated links between T-levels, dominance, and smiling (the soy-boy "glory-hole grimace") [5:16]

-"left-wing beliefs are predicated on a lack of personal responsibility and self discipline..." (sums up the fat acceptance movement quite well)

-"...that's why there's hardly ever any left-wing gym bros" - brutal shiv, never though about it like that before [6:35]

-Paul cites the "clear correlation" between being ugly and being left-wing, he even cites a headline from the Guardian of all places that mentions this [6:08]

This pattern has turned into something too accurate to ignore, especially as humans are divided further and split up into their respective tribes/politico-value oriented groups. This is something I've been mulling over, as humans we are usually taught to "not judge a book by it's cover." While I'll treat anyone well regardless of looks until they show themselves to be a shithead, I think this is entrenched social programming to minimize hurt feelz and promote equality. Humans have zeroed in on visual cues for sussing out good mates over thousands of years; a human male can determine if a human female is fuckable in less than a second. The disgust reflex is just as fast. As the esteemed Heartiste (RIP) used to always say, "physiognomy is real."

An article I happened upon (possibly in one of Roosh's article dumps) delves into what the author calls "Biological Leninism." I would definitely recommend reading it, it's a three article series but I found it very interesting.
https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2017/...-leninism/

The author goes into how the Socialist(leftist) party grew in numbers and came to power. Some main points (bold/italics are mine):

Quote: Leninism is, of course, applied socialism. Socialism was huge before Leninism was even a thing, and that Marxism was and is still popular is not due only to Soviet patronage. Socialism works by hacking the Social Calculus Module that humans have in our brains. Remember, humans care deeply about status. Status is what drives human behavior. Everybody works to achieve more status, and to avoid losing status. Socialism of course sells egalitarianism. It tells people with low status that they can get some more. The Industrial Revolution had forced millions of peasants into the cities, and they all felt they had lost status in the process.

Quote:So these socialists come by and tell them they have this plan to make them gain status, big time. That was huge. Yes, sure, Christianity had also started promising the meek that they were morally higher than rich people; they’d all go to heaven unlike those perfid rich guys. But that didn’t translate into actual, real-world status. Socialism was promising actual goods. And so it became huge. It’s still huge.

Quote:Socialism works not only because it promises higher status to a lot of people. Socialism is catnip because it promises status to people who, deep down, know they shouldn’t have it. There is such a thing as natural law, the natural state of any normally functioning human society. Basic biology tells us people are different. Some are more intelligent, more attractive, more crafty and popular. Everybody knows, deep in their lizard brains, how human mating works: women are attracted to the top dogs. Being generous, all human societies default to a Pareto distribution where 20% of people are high-status, and everyone else just has to put up with their inferiority for life. That’s just how it works.

Some of this stuff is RooshForum 101

Quote:Socialism though promised to change that, and Marx showed they had a good plan. Lenin then put that plan to work in practice. What did Lenin do? Exterminate the natural aristocracy of Russia, and build a ruling class with a bunch of low-status people. Workers, peasants, Jews, Latvians, Ukrainians. Lenin went out of his way to recruit everyone who had a grudge against Imperial Russian society. And it worked, brilliantly. The Bolsheviks, a small party with little popular support, won the civil war, and became the awesome Soviet Union. The early Soviet Union promoted minorities, women, sexual deviants, atheists, cultists and every kind of weirdo. Everybody but intelligent, conservative Russians of good families.

Sound familiar?

When I was young I scoffed at the subject of history because I thought it was "boring old shit that didn't relate to me." I've gotten more into it as I matured and realized how fake and edited everything we are taught is.
(see also: the degeneracy of post-WWI Weimar Germany)

It's really starting to blow my mind how history is starting to repeat itself because we have grown so comfortable in our modern society and the majority of people just don't give a fuck. 'Bread and circus' and all that, or in today's age: "porn and corn."

I'm curious as to how the effects of the dysgenics (the study of factors producing the accumulation and perpetuation of defective or disadvantageous genes and traits in offspring of a particular population or species/ opposite of eugenics) of the human population will play out over time. I believe we are seeing a cladogenesis of the human species.

cladogenesis: “Cladogenesis is an evolutionary splitting event where a parent species splits into two distinct species, forming a clade”.
-from an interesting article: https://medium.com/@dontshootthemessenge...44f2fbabbd

*Generally speaking*, over time as attractive people mate with other attractive people and ugly people mate with other ugly people, this creates a split as attractive people become more attractive, and ugly people become more ugly as the desirable/undesirable genes proliferate within the two groups. Maybe this is why in old pictures from the Civil War and that time period, people generally weren't really attractive or really ugly, but just all kind of looked like regular people? I've wondered about this.

The article I linked above this paragraph maintains that the west has been subsiding dysgenics and funding the proliferation of undesirable traits through welfare over the last 80 or so years. Obviously whenever anyone brings up eugenics/selective breeding in regards to humans someone yells "HITLER!!!" I'll end this tangent here and wrap this up.

Apologies for the TL;DR, I didn't think it would be this long (that's what she said).

I thought I'd throw some of these ideas out here because I thought it'd make for some interesting discussion. I'm not a scientist and this isn't hard science so there might be some errors in there, feel free to correct me on that. Thanks for reading my rambling screed and I look forward to reading any replies/personal anecdotes/refutations if anyone feels so inclined.
-BBC]]>
<![CDATA[How have you guys got all your accounts set up online]]> /thread-73249.html Wed, 22 May 2019 21:27:37 -0400 /thread-73249.html
The reason I ask is because I essentially just want to have:

- one main email account registered with all the most important things I do i.e. work, retirement fund, tax, bills etc.

- one separate email not linked to the above gmail account (as far as I can see - gmail doesn't let you create different burner accounts - they make you create all new emails under your same account, which is very big brotherish) for social media and everything else. I want it to be on a separate account to the current account I have with Google

- I'm also going to deactivate my current Facebook profile and make a new one ... I've had my current account since it first started, and it feels like Facebook just has too much data on me with that account + I've got just too much crap on that account. I want to start with a fresh one (I only use Facebook right now to keep in contact with some friends and for work purposes anyway)

The reasons I'm doing this are that all my most important friends and family know my personal number, and I'll tell the most important ones my personal email and how to contact me via social media
I really just want there to be as little footprint online as possible unless it's for necessary things. I also want to protect my privacy a little better in the future with a setup like above

I will be signing up for a protonmail next week, but can you use that for social media, or do Youtube, Facebook, twitter, Instagram etc only allow gmail accounts on their sign ups? Is there a way you can easily create a burner type new gmail whole account if that's the case?

Looking for the best way to do this multi layered approach - any advice would be appreciated.]]>

The reason I ask is because I essentially just want to have:

- one main email account registered with all the most important things I do i.e. work, retirement fund, tax, bills etc.

- one separate email not linked to the above gmail account (as far as I can see - gmail doesn't let you create different burner accounts - they make you create all new emails under your same account, which is very big brotherish) for social media and everything else. I want it to be on a separate account to the current account I have with Google

- I'm also going to deactivate my current Facebook profile and make a new one ... I've had my current account since it first started, and it feels like Facebook just has too much data on me with that account + I've got just too much crap on that account. I want to start with a fresh one (I only use Facebook right now to keep in contact with some friends and for work purposes anyway)

The reasons I'm doing this are that all my most important friends and family know my personal number, and I'll tell the most important ones my personal email and how to contact me via social media
I really just want there to be as little footprint online as possible unless it's for necessary things. I also want to protect my privacy a little better in the future with a setup like above

I will be signing up for a protonmail next week, but can you use that for social media, or do Youtube, Facebook, twitter, Instagram etc only allow gmail accounts on their sign ups? Is there a way you can easily create a burner type new gmail whole account if that's the case?

Looking for the best way to do this multi layered approach - any advice would be appreciated.]]>
<![CDATA[Do you have a gaming "persona"?]]> /thread-73248.html Wed, 22 May 2019 21:12:01 -0400 /thread-73248.html
I wouldn't say I'm completely different but I'm definitely more laid back/confident during a date/talking to a girl who shows interest compared to my normal self.

I even get more nervous/anxious during normal social interactions like networking events compared to a cold approach or a date.

Does anyone else feel like they have a gaming "persona"?]]>

I wouldn't say I'm completely different but I'm definitely more laid back/confident during a date/talking to a girl who shows interest compared to my normal self.

I even get more nervous/anxious during normal social interactions like networking events compared to a cold approach or a date.

Does anyone else feel like they have a gaming "persona"?]]>
<![CDATA[The Stationery Thread]]> /thread-73247.html Wed, 22 May 2019 21:10:11 -0400 /thread-73247.html
What are your guys' recommendations for pens, mechanical pencils, notebooks etc.?

We could start with pens/fountain pens. I'm a big fan of the Uni Jetstream and that's what I am using at the moment.]]>

What are your guys' recommendations for pens, mechanical pencils, notebooks etc.?

We could start with pens/fountain pens. I'm a big fan of the Uni Jetstream and that's what I am using at the moment.]]>
<![CDATA[Fractured: Family, friends and relationships lost over politics]]> /thread-73246.html Wed, 22 May 2019 20:21:35 -0400 /thread-73246.html
- How many people in your family, social circle and even love life have gone insane over politics, ruining your relations with them?
- Is political insanity becoming more common today?
- How do you handle a person behaving like this?
- Does anyone affected ever get better and return to normal?


To be clear, this thread is not about the people you simply don't have much in common anymore because you lift/travel/date/earn very well while they're stuck in mediocrity - this thread is about shunning, hatred or violence caused by the SJW madness of the clown world we live in.

(Yesterday 06:59 AM)Syberpunk Wrote:  
(05-21-2019 11:33 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  It saddens me that my little sister is now a rabid leftist who has been totally brainwashed by the school system.

She was such a bubbly, happy kid and I helped my parents raise her. The worst part is how the political bullshit they teach her in school has deprived her of the wonders and innocence of being a kid. All she talks about now is “white privileged” and “the future is female”.


Yet I don’t blame her. She’s a young, impressionable mind. I blame the fuckers that put all this nonsense in her head and ruined her.

I want my little sister back. The one I used to play with and cradled in my arms when she cried. Now what I see is an angry, negative young girl with a corrupted mind.

In a just society, I should be able to sue these bastards for what they did to her.

My heart ached reading this, I'm sorry Tiger.

I have (had) a younger brother that the conversion happened to Tiger
, we'd fight when younger (as brothers often do) but as I reached 18 and he was 16, we got along like a house on fire and he was always gregarious and making good conversation with you. I used to help with his homework and he struggled so hard with dyslexia, I was often nearly in tears because I couldn't help him, my parents were like saints getting him all the help that was available, now he is out of university in community work and he's bastard to everybody around him including my parents and a true blood democratic socialism kind of guy, I don't feel a flicker of pity anymore, only a remorse for what was.

The relationship went up and up in our teenage years, then plummuted head first into the dirt.

It feels like a death.

When you look into his eyes, its like there is nothing there and its eerie, sizing you up to see what he can get from you, how you may be of use. It's almost demonic, everybody tenses up when he is the room (yeah we all go beta), I shouldn't have to hold frame against the prick, what way is this to carry on with family? It's like the sympathy gene, making sure people are at ease with you gene, tuned off in university.

Then doesn't call his parents for months.

I'd have to liked to go the parallel universe where we still got along and he didn't take an interest in youth politics in school, if future him, has potential nieces and nephews of mine, we could know that we'd always be family and have each others back. But we won't. I could forgive, but how could I trust him now that I know what he is willing to do?

Silly stupid bastard.

(Yesterday 06:29 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  Welcome to the club. My younger sister was one of those sassy funny girls - one of the few women with humor. Most of that humor left her as she entered the far-left media workforce. But since it's Europe, then a lot of society is not fully on board with cultural marxism, so she pulled back a bit from it. Still - the person that she was is gone and she is filled to the brim with automatic NPC reactions. At the worst time the family had to avoid all kinds of trigger words, but it did not help, because anything could set her off - even a sex-joke between husband and wife was a micro-triggering sexual harrassment.

(05-18-2019 04:15 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  So my wife's best friend that she had known since high school suddenly had an outburst and blocked her over Alabama's abortion law (disclaimer: neither of them are American or living in USA). It went like this:

Friend (after more than a month of not writing or calling due to being "busy"): Since you're pro-life, what do you think about the Alabama law and its ban on abortion even in cases of rape?
Wife: Hey there, I hope you've been well. I support that law because (scientific/legal reasons).
Friend: I reject your reasons because everyone has their own truth. You're brainwashed by white people. Don't you even watch NowThis videos that show how black people are being slaughtered in America?
Wife: I don't watch them, but what does that have to do with abortion?
Friend: You're so bigoted. You're a Nazi. I can't believe it.
Wife: (no response)
Friend: I can't associate with someone like you. Goodbye. I'm blocking you now.

I know that someone who is willing to attack and hate someone over something on the other side of the world that has no effect on anyone makes for a very poor friend anyway, but it's still sad. Seriously, what the fuck? It's absolutely horrifying how communism brainwashes people into lashing out even at their family and closest friends just because they politely disagree with their totalitarian views.

[Image: giphy.webp]

I've once had an aunt from staying in my house who burst out of her room in rage, screaming at me that I was "racist and supporting Hitler" because she saw that I had liked one Trump's post on Facebook. Later she complained to my parents about me going to church and was outraged that "they were even allowing it" and that "my wife has brainwashed me with Christianity". Despite all of that, she had no problem with calling me later to tell me that it's really important to vote for a certain progressive candidate in local elections (where she doesn't even live, by the way) and to just please do her a favor and vote for it.

My dad has gotten worse with age and routinely harangues the rest of my family with endless rants about fascism, nazism, evils of religion, conservatism and whatever the SJW topic of the day is. I don't live with them anymore, but mom tells me that in the morning he turns on the radio news/talk shows and gets progressively more worked up until he goes off and starts ranting about "her friends being too conservative" or "not caring about what's happening in society".

A cousin of mine who hasn't talked to me in over 5 years once got in touch to tell me that he's seen that I'm "not educated enough about feminism" and that he wants to teach me "why attending feminist events to fight violence against women is important".

All together, these cases remind me of how Communist dictatorships used to encourage people to report their family members to NKVD for having impure or counter-revolutionary attitudes. It's always been normal for people to become alienated and shun each other because of property disputes, vice, jealousy, infidelity, abuse or similar - but politics? How did it come to this?

Did people really get this alienated over politics before? Or was it perhaps even worse, with people actually killing each other in endless civil wars and what we're experiencing is just a temporary period of calm?

[Image: forever-alone-snow-owl.gif]

Share more of your stories below.

Honk honk.]]>

- How many people in your family, social circle and even love life have gone insane over politics, ruining your relations with them?
- Is political insanity becoming more common today?
- How do you handle a person behaving like this?
- Does anyone affected ever get better and return to normal?


To be clear, this thread is not about the people you simply don't have much in common anymore because you lift/travel/date/earn very well while they're stuck in mediocrity - this thread is about shunning, hatred or violence caused by the SJW madness of the clown world we live in.

(Yesterday 06:59 AM)Syberpunk Wrote:  
(05-21-2019 11:33 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  It saddens me that my little sister is now a rabid leftist who has been totally brainwashed by the school system.

She was such a bubbly, happy kid and I helped my parents raise her. The worst part is how the political bullshit they teach her in school has deprived her of the wonders and innocence of being a kid. All she talks about now is “white privileged” and “the future is female”.


Yet I don’t blame her. She’s a young, impressionable mind. I blame the fuckers that put all this nonsense in her head and ruined her.

I want my little sister back. The one I used to play with and cradled in my arms when she cried. Now what I see is an angry, negative young girl with a corrupted mind.

In a just society, I should be able to sue these bastards for what they did to her.

My heart ached reading this, I'm sorry Tiger.

I have (had) a younger brother that the conversion happened to Tiger
, we'd fight when younger (as brothers often do) but as I reached 18 and he was 16, we got along like a house on fire and he was always gregarious and making good conversation with you. I used to help with his homework and he struggled so hard with dyslexia, I was often nearly in tears because I couldn't help him, my parents were like saints getting him all the help that was available, now he is out of university in community work and he's bastard to everybody around him including my parents and a true blood democratic socialism kind of guy, I don't feel a flicker of pity anymore, only a remorse for what was.

The relationship went up and up in our teenage years, then plummuted head first into the dirt.

It feels like a death.

When you look into his eyes, its like there is nothing there and its eerie, sizing you up to see what he can get from you, how you may be of use. It's almost demonic, everybody tenses up when he is the room (yeah we all go beta), I shouldn't have to hold frame against the prick, what way is this to carry on with family? It's like the sympathy gene, making sure people are at ease with you gene, tuned off in university.

Then doesn't call his parents for months.

I'd have to liked to go the parallel universe where we still got along and he didn't take an interest in youth politics in school, if future him, has potential nieces and nephews of mine, we could know that we'd always be family and have each others back. But we won't. I could forgive, but how could I trust him now that I know what he is willing to do?

Silly stupid bastard.

(Yesterday 06:29 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  Welcome to the club. My younger sister was one of those sassy funny girls - one of the few women with humor. Most of that humor left her as she entered the far-left media workforce. But since it's Europe, then a lot of society is not fully on board with cultural marxism, so she pulled back a bit from it. Still - the person that she was is gone and she is filled to the brim with automatic NPC reactions. At the worst time the family had to avoid all kinds of trigger words, but it did not help, because anything could set her off - even a sex-joke between husband and wife was a micro-triggering sexual harrassment.

(05-18-2019 04:15 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  So my wife's best friend that she had known since high school suddenly had an outburst and blocked her over Alabama's abortion law (disclaimer: neither of them are American or living in USA). It went like this:

Friend (after more than a month of not writing or calling due to being "busy"): Since you're pro-life, what do you think about the Alabama law and its ban on abortion even in cases of rape?
Wife: Hey there, I hope you've been well. I support that law because (scientific/legal reasons).
Friend: I reject your reasons because everyone has their own truth. You're brainwashed by white people. Don't you even watch NowThis videos that show how black people are being slaughtered in America?
Wife: I don't watch them, but what does that have to do with abortion?
Friend: You're so bigoted. You're a Nazi. I can't believe it.
Wife: (no response)
Friend: I can't associate with someone like you. Goodbye. I'm blocking you now.

I know that someone who is willing to attack and hate someone over something on the other side of the world that has no effect on anyone makes for a very poor friend anyway, but it's still sad. Seriously, what the fuck? It's absolutely horrifying how communism brainwashes people into lashing out even at their family and closest friends just because they politely disagree with their totalitarian views.

[Image: giphy.webp]

I've once had an aunt from staying in my house who burst out of her room in rage, screaming at me that I was "racist and supporting Hitler" because she saw that I had liked one Trump's post on Facebook. Later she complained to my parents about me going to church and was outraged that "they were even allowing it" and that "my wife has brainwashed me with Christianity". Despite all of that, she had no problem with calling me later to tell me that it's really important to vote for a certain progressive candidate in local elections (where she doesn't even live, by the way) and to just please do her a favor and vote for it.

My dad has gotten worse with age and routinely harangues the rest of my family with endless rants about fascism, nazism, evils of religion, conservatism and whatever the SJW topic of the day is. I don't live with them anymore, but mom tells me that in the morning he turns on the radio news/talk shows and gets progressively more worked up until he goes off and starts ranting about "her friends being too conservative" or "not caring about what's happening in society".

A cousin of mine who hasn't talked to me in over 5 years once got in touch to tell me that he's seen that I'm "not educated enough about feminism" and that he wants to teach me "why attending feminist events to fight violence against women is important".

All together, these cases remind me of how Communist dictatorships used to encourage people to report their family members to NKVD for having impure or counter-revolutionary attitudes. It's always been normal for people to become alienated and shun each other because of property disputes, vice, jealousy, infidelity, abuse or similar - but politics? How did it come to this?

Did people really get this alienated over politics before? Or was it perhaps even worse, with people actually killing each other in endless civil wars and what we're experiencing is just a temporary period of calm?

[Image: forever-alone-snow-owl.gif]

Share more of your stories below.

Honk honk.]]>
<![CDATA[Business Card Close]]> /thread-73245.html Wed, 22 May 2019 18:26:27 -0400 /thread-73245.html
Often, I will be bullshitting with and getting IOI's from some young ho, but cant seem to work into asking for digits. It's more that it will mess up the vibe (fun, teasing, elderly game, I'm 50) than worried about rejection.

Im thinking something along the lines of "Panty Peelers Bedtime Stories LTD" or some other ridiculous thing like that.

I'm guessing Instagram or Facebook would be the preferred contact.

Any thoughts ? Possible credentials I could add ?

Thanks
Panty Peeler]]>

Often, I will be bullshitting with and getting IOI's from some young ho, but cant seem to work into asking for digits. It's more that it will mess up the vibe (fun, teasing, elderly game, I'm 50) than worried about rejection.

Im thinking something along the lines of "Panty Peelers Bedtime Stories LTD" or some other ridiculous thing like that.

I'm guessing Instagram or Facebook would be the preferred contact.

Any thoughts ? Possible credentials I could add ?

Thanks
Panty Peeler]]>
<![CDATA[Controlled Spontaniety - how govts manipulate public opinion post terror attacks]]> /thread-73244.html Wed, 22 May 2019 17:16:46 -0400 /thread-73244.html




https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mind-...r-planning



]]>





https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mind-...r-planning



]]>
<![CDATA[The Hidden Tribes of America]]> /thread-73242.html Wed, 22 May 2019 14:25:31 -0400 /thread-73242.html
- Progressive Activists
- Traditional Liberals
- Passive Liberals
- Politically Disengaged
- Moderates
- Traditional Conservatives
- Devoted Conservatives

The factors that were examined to determine the distinctions between each group religious adherence, trust in institutions to effect change vs the need for radical reform, the level of political engagement, belief in self reliance vs outside circumstances for personal success.

Something that struck me was how progressive activists were the second smallest group in terms of raw numbers but how they have a disproportionate amount of influence in driving debates in the US. One of their traits is that they are "highly engaged with social media". I wonder if a lot of the black pill mood that has fallen over this forum is that people like us tend to be very internet based as well and hence, we get exposed a lot to the the craziness (10 year old drag queens) than the typical person doesn't see

https://hiddentribes.us/profiles]]>

- Progressive Activists
- Traditional Liberals
- Passive Liberals
- Politically Disengaged
- Moderates
- Traditional Conservatives
- Devoted Conservatives

The factors that were examined to determine the distinctions between each group religious adherence, trust in institutions to effect change vs the need for radical reform, the level of political engagement, belief in self reliance vs outside circumstances for personal success.

Something that struck me was how progressive activists were the second smallest group in terms of raw numbers but how they have a disproportionate amount of influence in driving debates in the US. One of their traits is that they are "highly engaged with social media". I wonder if a lot of the black pill mood that has fallen over this forum is that people like us tend to be very internet based as well and hence, we get exposed a lot to the the craziness (10 year old drag queens) than the typical person doesn't see

https://hiddentribes.us/profiles]]>
<![CDATA[STD Testing Women in the Third World]]> /thread-73241.html Wed, 22 May 2019 10:23:47 -0400 /thread-73241.html
I feel like it would be a good idea to make all girls get tested before I smash. Obviously I know that AIDS isnt visible for the first 3 months and the viral load is contagious even when undetected in that first period, so the plan isn't fool proof but it definitely lowers my chances.

What do you guys think about the idea? Do you see it feasible to test the girls before the smash? How would you go about it?

I would just say I do it to all the girls with a strong frame, or say I'm a researcher or whatever. If they ask me to be tested I can tell them I do it every week or something.

Anyways, would like to hear your thoughts.]]>

I feel like it would be a good idea to make all girls get tested before I smash. Obviously I know that AIDS isnt visible for the first 3 months and the viral load is contagious even when undetected in that first period, so the plan isn't fool proof but it definitely lowers my chances.

What do you guys think about the idea? Do you see it feasible to test the girls before the smash? How would you go about it?

I would just say I do it to all the girls with a strong frame, or say I'm a researcher or whatever. If they ask me to be tested I can tell them I do it every week or something.

Anyways, would like to hear your thoughts.]]>
<![CDATA[approaching chicks formula]]> /thread-73240.html Wed, 22 May 2019 06:57:14 -0400 /thread-73240.html
thats my formula for approaching.]]>

thats my formula for approaching.]]>
<![CDATA[How to mentally deal with rude daygame rejections]]> /thread-73239.html Wed, 22 May 2019 03:23:23 -0400 /thread-73239.html
However at times I'll do an approach where the girl completely ignores me, walks away, or just looks straight ahead without acknowledging me. Although the majority of my approaches do not go like this, when it does happen it hurts me hard to the core.

Does anyone have any advice on how to mentally handle these kinds of rejections such that I can put it behind me and continue a productive daygame session when it happens.]]>

However at times I'll do an approach where the girl completely ignores me, walks away, or just looks straight ahead without acknowledging me. Although the majority of my approaches do not go like this, when it does happen it hurts me hard to the core.

Does anyone have any advice on how to mentally handle these kinds of rejections such that I can put it behind me and continue a productive daygame session when it happens.]]>
<![CDATA[Which side business to start?]]> /thread-73238.html Tue, 21 May 2019 13:09:20 -0400 /thread-73238.html
Although I'm mostly interested in enjoying the moment, I also want to make some money and start a side business which I can continue after I go back home.

I have a computer engineer degree, and worked 3 years in software related companies.

Which kind of business or service should I start?

Do you guys think android app development is a legit first start?]]>

Although I'm mostly interested in enjoying the moment, I also want to make some money and start a side business which I can continue after I go back home.

I have a computer engineer degree, and worked 3 years in software related companies.

Which kind of business or service should I start?

Do you guys think android app development is a legit first start?]]>