Post: #1

Some russian guy has invented an app that removes make up from women's photos.

https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/makeapp-...17369?mt=8

https://forum.therightstuff.biz/topic/66...nds?page=1

https://www.bustle.com/p/makeapp-claims-...ds-5464556

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/...55866.html

https://www.allure.com/story/makeapp-mak...ontroversy

https://www.popsugar.co.uk/beauty/What-M...ogle.co.uk

https://www.buzzfeed.com/delaneystrunk/t....fgQ0VVX8D

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=57634

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology...ashot.html

http://uk.businessinsider.com/ashot-gabr...?r=US&IR=T

https://www.themarysue.com/sad-man-makes-sad-app/

https://www.teenvogue.com/story/makeapp-...ontroversy

https://www.infowars.com/problematic-mak...riggering/

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Haggening&src=typd

Post: #2

Finally. A powerful tool to deobjectify women!

I for one am certain they'll be thrilled.

I do so hope it comes with a statistic outlining precisely how much the filter has deobjectifyed the woman in question.

"The 37 year old woman in this picture has been 73 percent objectified."

"The 18 year old woman in this picture has been 11 percent objectified."

Post: #3

Dear Lord, make the next app one that tells us what they'll look like when they're 50.

Post: #4

...complete with cigarette and alcohol consumption sliders


edit: Oh God...



...this is going to be incredible.

Post: #5

(11-15-2017 08:10 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  ...this is going to be incredible.

The memes alone will make it all worth it. And it's already started.

Post: #6

Post: #7

The BI article is outstanding because although the female author criticizes the result for looking nothing like her, she won't show us a real picture without makeup.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/ashot-gabr...?r=US&IR=T

Post: #8

#proveitwrong

Post: #9

(11-15-2017 08:04 AM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  Dear Lord, make the next app one that tells us what they'll look like when they're 50.

They have mechanism for that already. It's called "Her mother."

Post: #10

Now this is some Russian collusion I can stand behind!

App should be named "Objective objectification".

This is what happens when you take that lipstick off that pig.

Post: #11

The irony is that feminists could, if they chose to, come up with all kinds of reasons why this app is actually a great idea. But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't.

Post: #12

(11-15-2017 11:06 AM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  The irony is that feminists could, if they chose to, come up with all kinds of reasons why this app is actually a great idea. But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't.

"But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't."

"For some reason" = Typical feminist jealousy of male ingenuity.

Did you read that post you liked at The Mary Sue? It's headline "Sad Man Makes Sad App to Stop All Those Evil Women Trying to Trick Him With Makeup." If that doesn't reek of jealous resentment, what does? What kind of person editorializes to that degree unless they have some serious emotional issues?

Post: #13

Compulsory for IG usage.

If this works well, it’ll help fight off thirst traps.

Post: #14

(11-15-2017 11:14 AM)MaceTyrell Wrote:  Compulsory for IG usage.

If this works well, it’ll help fight off thirst traps.

It won't.

Post: #15

This is Vivian Kane (author of the Mary Sue article). I'd call her a post-wall 5 with the assistance of makeup and hairstyle. Lose the makeup and she no longer passes the boner test.



So that's why she's triggered by this app.

Post: #16

(11-15-2017 11:11 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(11-15-2017 11:06 AM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  The irony is that feminists could, if they chose to, come up with all kinds of reasons why this app is actually a great idea. But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't.

"But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't."

"For some reason" = Typical feminist jealousy of male ingenuity.

Did you read that post you liked at The Mary Sue? It's headline "Sad Man Makes Sad App to Stop All Those Evil Women Trying to Trick Him With Makeup." If that doesn't reek of jealous resentment, what does? What kind of person editorializes to that degree unless they have some serious emotional issues?

Oh yes jealousy is part of it for sure, but what I had in mind was the fact that they don't like men being able to see what they're getting themselves into by knowing what a girl really looks like.

They could very easily make the point that because this app lets men know how a girl looks with and without make up, if he rejects her then that means he's superficial and to hell with him anyway because I know my worth and I want a man who will accept me as I really am so I want him to see how I really am.

It's like when they say that their n count doesn't matter and a man should accept them regardless, yet they don't want to say what the number is.

You'd think that strong independent feminists would want men to know everything about them that might reveal incompatibility so that they could move on to someone else who doesn't mind their n count or how they look without paint, but somehow they're not strong enough to do so.

"Hey I bet I can accept you just as you are. How many men have you had sex with and what do you look like without make up? I bet I don't mind, and let me prove it so you'll have no doubts whatsoever. I want you to have full peace of mind that I'm not one of those manospherians".

"NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"

Post: #17

10/10 thread title

Post: #18

(11-15-2017 12:03 PM)Buck Wild Wrote:  10/10 thread title

To be fair I didn't come up with it.

https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Haggening&src=typd

But I'm willing to graciously accept credit.

Post: #19

This app has already demystified two IG thots I followed.

I think they'll be getting my $0.99 when the trial is up.

Post: #20

(11-15-2017 11:22 AM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  

(11-15-2017 11:11 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(11-15-2017 11:06 AM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  The irony is that feminists could, if they chose to, come up with all kinds of reasons why this app is actually a great idea. But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't.

"But for some reason (which they don't want to mention) they don't."

"For some reason" = Typical feminist jealousy of male ingenuity.

Did you read that post you liked at The Mary Sue? It's headline "Sad Man Makes Sad App to Stop All Those Evil Women Trying to Trick Him With Makeup." If that doesn't reek of jealous resentment, what does? What kind of person editorializes to that degree unless they have some serious emotional issues?

Oh yes jealousy is part of it for sure, but what I had in mind was the fact that they don't like men being able to see what they're getting themselves into by knowing what a girl really looks like.

They could very easily make the point that because this app lets men know how a girl looks with and without make up, if he rejects her then that means he's superficial and to hell with him anyway because I know my worth and I want a man who will accept me as I really am so I want him to see how I really am.

It's like when they say that their n count doesn't matter and a man should accept them regardless, yet they don't want to say what the number is.

You'd think that strong independent feminists would want men to know everything about them that might reveal incompatibility so that they could move on to someone else who doesn't mind their n count or how they look without paint, but somehow they're not strong enough to do so.

"Hey I bet I can accept you just as you are. How many men have you had sex with and what do you look like without make up? I bet I don't mind, and let me prove it so you'll have no doubts whatsoever. I want you to have full peace of mind that I'm not one of those manospherians".

"NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"

Using that on the next girl who suggests exclusivity. Brilliant.

Post: #21

I lost count on the women that their blubber remolds after she takes her clothes off

Where's the clothes on clothes off APP?

It took me 20 minutes last week to remove pink lipstick from my arms and chest. Today's war paint has staying power...be careful out there guys if your spinning plates. (back scratches and now industrial strength lip gloss on your back/wang to check for)

I'll move this item into....hair weaves, fake body parts fake tans fake fingernails, high intensity teeth whitening, multi colour contact lenses, 4 inch heels

and still women won't work on their personality absolutely mind blowing

Post: #22

I didn't read all the articles in the OP, but this one is pretty pathetic too:

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology...ashot.html

First, she wastes no time doxxing him:

Quote:It probably comes as no surprise that the app was created by a man, [name]

And then, being the sly woman she is, she'll show him who's boss!

Quote:surely [name] wouldn’t mind if I tested it out, well, him. Why should only women be subjected to the MakeApp treatment?

But...this really doesn't apply since...well, guys don't wear make up? (Real men, at least).

Doesn't look like she received the results she wanted, so she'll try something even more damning. Adding make up to HIM!

Quote:Since it was there, I ran his Twitter photo through the “Add Makeup” option, too. The result is chic, if nontraditional: Brows are on point, eyes are nicely lined and highlighted, and the pink lip color pops. And it was certainly faster to get this result through an app than a trip to Sephora.

She then proceeds to take off the make up (that she added) 4x just to make him look like a zombie.

The whole article is basically a perfect example of female insecurity.

I'd run Heather through the app, but unfortunately her bravery ends when it requires a real picture of her to back up her 'bad ass' rhetoric.

Post: #23

I am having so much fun with his app. So much infact, I’m thinking of starting an IG just to post unmakeup-ed photos of these IG hoes.

Post: #24

Fan Fucking Tastic

CoSign 10/10 Thread Title WPIA (Would Post In Again)

Post: #25