Post: #26

(07-01-2017 07:54 PM)Rice Brah Wrote:  I wonder how many women the Bolshevik leaders banged. They had absolute power and used it to murder, torture, and dispossess tens of millions of people, all of which is well documented.

But the types of wild orgies with Russian women (willing or unwilling) they must have had? Not many history books talk about this.

https://archive.org/details/RedTerrorInRussia1918-1923

This book talks about how the Cheka (precursor to the NKVD, then KGB) secret police would round up people like nobles, capitalists, and White Army officers, then blackmail their wives and daughters into becoming sex slaves. After a while the prisoners would be killed anyway and often the women would commit suicide.

And somehow the Nazis are supposed to be worse than communists because they killed people using gas chambers instead of raping and torturing them.

Post: #27

LOL, I remember seeing this poster in Paris. I'm not really sure what it represents.

Post: #28

(07-03-2017 12:51 PM)Lunostrelki Wrote:  

(07-01-2017 07:54 PM)Rice Brah Wrote:  I wonder how many women the Bolshevik leaders banged. They had absolute power and used it to murder, torture, and dispossess tens of millions of people, all of which is well documented.

But the types of wild orgies with Russian women (willing or unwilling) they must have had? Not many history books talk about this.

https://archive.org/details/RedTerrorInRussia1918-1923

This book talks about how the Cheka (precursor to the NKVD, then KGB) secret police would round up people like nobles, capitalists, and White Army officers, then blackmail their wives and daughters into becoming sex slaves. After a while the prisoners would be killed anyway and often the women would commit suicide.

And somehow the Nazis are supposed to be worse than communists because they killed people using gas chambers instead of raping and torturing them.

Yes they rounded up and killed off nearly every member of the clergy and all Russian aristocrats, and when they quickly run out of those, they started rounding up any well-dressed person and on down to average people or plebes who looked at them the wrong way. Estonian historian Jüri Lina has documented this:





About the Nazis, you might want to revisit the thread on the holocaust. There were no Zykon B gas chambers at Treblinka, where the Nazis have supposedly killed up to 900,000 Jews by suffocating them with exhaust fumes from captured Soviet diesel tank engines. The only problem with this story is that diesel engine exhaust is not actually deadly, though it could give you a headache after a couple of hours (I guess they must have had some Aspirin on hand, given that the makers of Zyklon B also invented that).

Post: #29

Zyklon B was only used at Auschwitz, as anybody even vaguely versed in actual (read: academic and peer-reviewed) Holocaust literature will tell you.

There have been a few comments that Lenin was a German agent who intended on taking Russia out of the war. This is a myth. The February Revolution, political instability, and failure of the Kerensky Offensive all played much larger roles in the Russian withdrawal from World War I than Lenin's return alone did.

Post: #30

(07-03-2017 10:25 PM)Truth Teller Wrote:  Zyklon B was only used at Auschwitz, as anybody even vaguely versed in actual (read: academic and peer-reviewed) Holocaust literature will tell you.

There have been a few comments that Lenin was a German agent who intended on taking Russia out of the war. This is a myth. The February Revolution, political instability, and failure of the Kerensky Offensive all played much larger roles in the Russian withdrawal from World War I than Lenin's return alone did.

Very, very easy to say the following in hindsight :

Quote:The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.

However, if it was part of the plan back in 1871...

Post: #31

It's not hard to figure out the obsession with the Holocaust and Hitler, even though there were many autocrats and mass murderers in the 20th Century. Some of them were worse. The Holocaust is the one everyone talks about because it specifically targeted Jews.

The czar's government in Russia also murdered over a million people between 1900 and 1917. It certainly wasn't a tragedy that the czar and his family were executed. While it may seem heartless to murder children, that is what you have to do if your goal is to destroy a monarchy.

Post: #32

I just found a great source on the connection between Jacob Schiff and the Bolsheviks:

http://www.wildboar.net/multilingual/eas...otsky.html

"Jacob Schiff was head of the New York investment firm Kuhn, Loeb and Co. He was one of the principal backers of the Bolshevik revolution and personally financed Trotsky's trip from New York to Russia. He was a major contributor to Woodrow Wilson's presidential campaign and an advocate for passage of the Federal Reserve Act."

"President Woodrow Wilson was the fairy godmother, who provided Trotsky with a passport to return to Russia to 'carry forward' the revolution... At the same time careful State Department bureaucrats, concerned about such revolutionaries entering Russia, were unilaterally attempting to tighten up passport procedures."

Post: #33

Most do Not Want to talk about This

Post: #34

(07-04-2017 12:28 AM)puckerman Wrote:  It's not hard to figure out the obsession with the Holocaust and Hitler, even though there were many autocrats and mass murderers in the 20th Century. Some of them were worse. The Holocaust is the one everyone talks about because it specifically targeted Jews.

The czar's government in Russia also murdered over a million people between 1900 and 1917. It certainly wasn't a tragedy that the czar and his family were executed. While it may seem heartless to murder children, that is what you have to do if your goal is to destroy a monarchy.

I don't believe that he murdered 1 mio. the same way the communists did. Also before the revolution the Czar had already agreed to wide-ranging reforms and a British parliamentary system.

Even if the White Guards had won, then the Czar would have become at best a more engaged monarch similar to the German or British one.

Post: #35

(07-01-2017 06:48 PM)stugatz Wrote:  My father lived in Germany for a few years in the 1980s, and said (usually playfully and half-serious) that all of that nation's good stock had died in both world wars, and your average kraut was some pathetic scrawny guy barely above 5'5 who couldn't grow facial hair.

Concerning Hitler, I've struggled through about half of Mein Kampf (sadly, it's such a rambling book, even a good translation is tough to get through). Much of what Hitler says about the problems of democracy are spot on, and especially when it concerns European democracy. He also had plenty reason to be as angry as he was - World War I is even TODAY, in 2017, called the catastrophe that destroyed the West. Imagine how horrible it must have seemed around 100 years ago right as it ended.

Sure, the Jews influenced enough of European politics and wartime conflict to be seen as a major problem. I don't know what a "correct" way of dealing with this problem would have been, though, especially since I've only recently begun to question the official narrative of World War II. I can only say that the Holocaust was far from the worst atrocity ever carried out by man, and it should be seen as pretty telling that it's still focused on like it happened yesterday when the even worse atrocities carried out by Turkey in WWI or Rwanda in the 1990s are met with a hand wave and seen as angry sepia-toned people shooting each other.

Sometimes I wonder - if Hitler had never existed, who would the Democrats compare Republicans to every election season? Brutal military leaders like Caesar and Napoleon are REVERED today. It's almost like Hitler was tailor-made to be the perfect curse word.

Pol Pot. The great famines of China. Did it ever occur to you who owns the mainstream media / Hollywood? Who also has a powerful lobby in government? This is not that hard to figure out...

Post: #36

Jesus, we can't even we past one page before a thread derails and turns to a (((conspiracy))) thread.

Edit: I get that Jews are involved in many things behind the scenes and according to Borat, they are like cockroaches. There's a difference between jew bashing and talking about jews while staying on topic tho.

Post: #37

< Exactly - let us focus on the fact of how many whores and Lenin likely banged.

I would estimate that he banged 500. He would have banged 3000 if Viagra was available at the time of his height in power in Russia.

Post: #38

Taking Lenin out of the picture, the Tsar regime enabled its own downfall but it was forced to do so due to powerful historical forces.

Either it remained a large agrarian autocracy and did not modernise its military (and get conquered by more advanced European neighbours) or it modernised, which meant a literate, critical thinking urbanised and industrialised population (in turn sowing the seeds for revolutionary ideas to catch fire)

Post: #39

Everyone on this thread should watch the excellent David Cole videos about Aushwitz to realise that Zyklon B was only used there for de-lousing bedding.

http://youtu.be/RHzWo79dCHs

Post: #40

What is so appealing about communism that draws so many followers? Is it visions of a workers utopia where everyone is equal and there is wealth for all?

Post: #41

^^^^* yes

Post: #42

(07-04-2017 05:15 AM)Stanfield Wrote:  What is so appealing about communism that draws so many followers? Is it visions of a workers utopia where everyone is equal and there is wealth for all?

Yes - plus the globalists want to merge the communist system with parts of the capitalist one. So the globalists lie as hell about the true scope of evil that the communist system was.

That is why you have the Antifa and the social marxists being proud of socialist emblems, Che Guavera etc. Most young idiots now are being turned far left. The communists themselves used the term liberal as identical to marxist.

The Nazis are set up as the bigger criminals by far while in reality the communists were more deadly and dangerous than the Nazis. (they were deadly alright in their own right and I am not disputing that though)

Post: #43

(07-04-2017 01:54 AM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Jesus, we can't even we past one page before a thread derails and turns to a (((conspiracy))) thread.

Edit: I get that Jews are involved in many things behind the scenes and according to Borat, they are like cockroaches. There's a difference between jew bashing and talking about jews while staying on topic tho.

Agree. Bolsheviks were certainly Jewish influenced, but there is no Illuminati conspiracy here. The country was primed for revolution. If the Germans aided Lenin they were only looking for short term gain - no one could have foreseen how the events would unfold.

Post: #44

This thread is certainly going in wrong direction. Instead of politics and conspiracies we should discuss how many women Lenin banged and what game techniques did he use.

Post: #45

(07-04-2017 01:58 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  < Exactly - let us focus on the fact of how many whores and Lenin likely banged.

I would estimate that he banged 500. He would have banged 3000 if Viagra was available at the time of his height in power in Russia.

That's all? What's the point of being Tsar if Wilt Chamberlain is still dunking on you?

Post: #46

(07-04-2017 05:58 AM)Thomas Jackson Wrote:  

(07-04-2017 01:54 AM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Jesus, we can't even we past one page before a thread derails and turns to a (((conspiracy))) thread.

Edit: I get that Jews are involved in many things behind the scenes and according to Borat, they are like cockroaches. There's a difference between jew bashing and talking about jews while staying on topic tho.

Agree. Bolsheviks were certainly Jewish influenced, but there is no Illuminati conspiracy here. The country was primed for revolution. If the Germans aided Lenin they were only looking for short term gain - no one could have foreseen how the events would unfold.

Women like guys with power. Its pretty simple. I fail to see how Lenin banging 500+ girls is applicable to game today. Unless you happen to run a cult that can chop off heads on command.

Post: #47

(07-01-2017 01:01 PM)numanist Wrote:  What are your thoughts? Do you believe Lenin and Trotsky deserve to be vilified? Or do you believe they are wrongfully maligned by historical revisionists?

Hell freakin yes they deserve to be vilified for the evil incarnate they were. They may be dead physically; but their ideas, books, and philosophies live on from the grave and are the prevailing ideology of today's left wing death cult. And have been obviously for the last several decades leading up to where we are now. Everything....everything... we rail against here about today's culture and political climate stems directly from the minds of early Marxist thought leaders and the Bolshevik Revolution. Hardcore leftists look at the Bolshevik Revolution as the greatest event in all of human history as the first major push for an egalitarian workers paradise. Something they still strive for, only one day on an international scale. Roll your eyes if you wish, Marxism is political satanism. Working towards reversing the natural order which is coincidentally God's order laid out in the Bible.

Marxism and its Bolshevik foot soldiers are the true enemy of humanity. Islam second, but Marxism first. And oh how it would be so nice if right wing activists (like Tommy Robinson for example) would divert their energies in trying to expose these fucks instead of only bitching about Islam. I truly have more respect for, and would rather spend a day with Muslims than left wing atheists hell bent on destroying civilization. At least Muslims can be converted to Christianity if presented properly. Deal with Marxism and the modern day Bolsheviks first in your own country, get your nations' collective spines back and then deal with Islam as everything begins to naturally fall back into place. Anyone who espouses left wing ideas is a Bolshevik and guilty by association of partaking in crimes against humanity, our nations and our families. Whether they are even aware of it or not, are in denial about it or not, everyone from Wolf Blitzer, to Katy Perry, to John Lennon, to Bill Nye, to Richard Dawkins, Clinton, Obama, to your liberal sheep of a neighbor and everyone in between, they're all Bolshevik political activists. They need to be called out as such. Merely calling someone a simple leftist no longer is sufficient. Mark them. Label them for what and who they are truly are. Make it sting a bit and call them a Bolshie or a Bolo and let them know men are waking up to origins of their sinister suicidal political philosophy and where it's driving the world.

Regarding Lenin, women and dying from syphilis. I believe it. One need only look to his wife. Nadezhda Krupskaya. A committed Bolshevik herself, who, if she were alive today would be a blogger at Jezebel whilst wearing a vagina beanie at queer parades. Times change but humans do not. It's safe to assume Vlad and Nadezha's relationship was just like any leftist relationship you see today where the woman wears the pants and drags the boy along by a leash. If you go to wikipedia and read about her it briefly says "she liked his speeches but not his personality." It's common history now that there relationship was more political than anything. Supporting one another to advance the cause. Was there any love between them? Who knows. I do not believe any woman can truly love a man who holds left wing viewpoints as it is, at it's core, a manifestation of the female worldview. Weakness. And we all know women do not respect nor reward weakness. If she was a hardcore Bolshevik writing books with titles such as the "Emancipation for Women", it's safe to say, just like her sisters of today, she was an insufferable snarky ball buster.

Not much is written about Lenin's personality and who he was as a man. And we all obviously know in any relationship there has to be one masculine. If you are a masculine man, you attract a feminine woman. An effeminate male will attract masculine woman. But if Lenin died from syphilis because he resorted to P4P with nasty hookers, and was married to such a woman, it's safe to say Lenin had no game. hah. Away from political rallies and behind closed doors in his private life; I believe that, just like any leftist, Lenin was an inherently weak man whose goal in life was to project his insecurities onto the rest of society. Misery loves company. But with all that said, he still made his mark on history.

OP mentioned Mussolini in his post. Politics aside, Mussolini was a man's man in every sense of the word. Compare and contrast Lenin's wife with Mussolini's wife Rachele. A devoted housewife and mother of five children in harmony with her nature. Loyal to the end and completely in love with him for who he was as a man. Even when he had multiple mistresses and hundreds of casual flings throughout his life. Not for any expedient political opportunities like Lenins's wife to advance her own agenda. Rachele Mussolini; always in support of her husbands mission and to her family. Even fighting for him many years after his execution and visiting his grave up to her own death and wanting to be buried right next to him. How many girlfriends of leftwing fags can have that kind of devotion to their so called men?

A bit off topic but if anyone wants to read a great book, I recommend Mussolini's autobiography. He led a very interesting life.

Happy 4th.

Post: #48

Just one more brief veer back to Hitler and the Jews - has anyone watched that unwatchable piece of shit documentary Shoah? That nine-hour thing that just goes on and on and on and on and on and reviewers were afraid to say bad things about it? I just remembered this movie as one of the major things that made me start to question the Holocaust narrative, because I could hardly find one bad review.

I watched about about eight hours of it and just gave up. Some of the interviews are very interesting, but I could almost feel my body shutting down when I put in the last DVD. And I watched this over the course of a few days too.

Post: #49

(07-04-2017 10:47 PM)stugatz Wrote:  Just one more brief veer back to Hitler and the Jews - has anyone watched that unwatchable piece of shit documentary Shoah? That nine-hour thing that just goes on and on and on and on and on and reviewers were afraid to say bad things about it? I just remembered this movie as one of the major things that made me start to question the Holocaust narrative, because I could hardly find one bad review.

I watched about about eight hours of it and just gave up. Some of the interviews are very interesting, but I could almost feel my body shutting down when I put in the last DVD. And I watched this over the course of a few days too.

Shoah is not a particularly good piece of film in terms of keeping one's interest. It is exceptional in telling the events of the Holocaust from the perspectives of both the perpetrators and the victims.

Shoah's value is in its preservation of Holocaust testimony, rather than any particular cinematic value.

Post: #50

Lenin's SMV must have been off the charts. Even higher than Master Yoda's.

Wonder where Lenin would have fallen in the Looks vs. Game debate?