Forum homeLifestylesearch

The Bitcoin thread

馃搫 Rendered from the archive database (the original static capture of this page wasn't kept). Content is complete; styling is simplified.
Pages: 1 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 200
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-10 22:08:00 路 #3507
The below-linked article gives some discussion about ongoing exchange risks, and it is likely true that several folks are still attempting to figure out the impact and implications of those recent announcements in China regarding the 30 day suspension of BTC withdrawals... kind of irritating if you have your money on exchanges and then all of a sudden you cannot withdraw it, especially in it's BTC form.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/why-trust...or-bitcoin
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-10 22:13:00 路 #3508
(02-10-2017 10:08 PM)JayJuanGee Wrote:  The below-linked article gives some discussion about ongoing exchange risks, and it is likely true that several folks are still attempting to figure out the impact and implications of those recent announcements in China regarding the 30 day suspension of BTC withdrawals... kind of irritating if you have your money on exchanges and then all of a sudden you cannot withdraw it, especially in it's BTC form.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/why-trust...or-bitcoin


Also, the below link is somewhat related:

We have some evolution of competing platforms that attempt to change the exchange relationships, and so these variations on themes may take a while to figure out leading forms of transacting, how BTC prices are set and the extent to which any third party will be involved in the transactions.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/new-class...-it-to-pay
lowbudgetballer 路 2017-02-11 03:11:00 路 #3509
Liked this article.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/every-tim...old-it-off

This has happened twice recently.

'baller
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-11 05:18:00 路 #3510
(02-11-2017 03:11 AM)lowbudgetballer Wrote:  Liked this article.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/every-tim...old-it-off

This has happened twice recently.

'baller


I don't really have a problem with some of the ideas of these kinds of Chinese conspiracy articles, but frequently aren't these kinds of articles a bit oversimplifying and giving too much weight to the Chinese influence on bitcoin? whether they are talking about exchanges and the government/banking regs? or sometimes earlier talking about mining?

I see these kinds of chinese conspiracy theories a lot, and I take them with a quite a bit of a grain of salt. From my perspective, even though they are getting some of the facts correct and they do discuss how some other people are thinking, the reality of the matter is that bitcoin has a lot more going on in it and around it than merely Chinese activities.

There has also been quite a bit of discussion in this most recent chinese announcement, that it had a lot smaller effect than maybe was anticipated? I don't know. I do recall seeing 13k bitcoins dumped on Stamp in a couple of hours, and other exchanges had like kinds of ramping up of their dumping activities, and part of the surprise of the matter is that they were really able to drive prices down any further than they did with all of those dumps..

We are in interesting times, indeed.
_Cicero 路 2017-02-12 01:17:00 路 #3511
Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme. Anyone know the best way to short it?

The problem is there is zero marginal cost of entry into making a digital currency, and a bitcoin itself has no underlying value, like gold has. With dollars, you can pay your taxes.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-12 02:07:00 路 #3512
(02-12-2017 01:17 AM)_Cicero Wrote:  Bitcoin is a ponzi scheme. Anyone know the best way to short it?

The problem is there is zero marginal cost of entry into making a digital currency, and a bitcoin itself has no underlying value, like gold has. With dollars, you can pay your taxes.


Wow... it's been a while since we had some of you ponzi scheme nutters in here.

Regarding shorting, maybe Satoshi can chime in? I personally don't short, and the only exchange that I can think of is Bitfinex. There may be some others?

Regarding the substance of your claim:

1) zero marginal costs to entry: You seemingly do not understand or recognize the value of bitcoin and its various networks. There is bitcoin that was invented in about late 2008 and began to be mined in early 2009. The various networking effects of bitcoin have been building ever since. I think that in 2013 there were maybe 10 or 20 altcoins, and starting in 2014, there were 100, and then it became easier and easier to create alt coins. Today there are thousands of alt coins, and some of them are just copy cats of bitcoin and others try to improve on bitcoin and others try to improve upon bitcoin. Bitcoin has no real competitors from any of those alts - at least so far, even though a few of them have attempted to claim that they are a meaningful contender to bitcoin.

2) no underlying value like gold: We used to have these arguments quite frequently, but people are not really making those arguments as much as they used to. Peter Schiff used to make this argument a lot. Yes, gold is a physical item, which is both an advantage and a disadvantage, for example moving a million dollars of gold versus moving a million dollars of bitcoin. you can use other quantities of value for example, as well... but think about the comparisons.. wow. Based on your statements, since it appears that you do not really seem to understand some of the basic features of bitcoin, I don't really want to get into the intricacies of bitcoin's values but one summary of them is that bitcoin is one of the only phenomenons that meet this definition of an asset class that is vehicle for secure decentralized and immutable storage and transfer of value. Name one other asset class that competes with bitcoin under those terms, and therefore, bitcoin brings some features that no other asset has (there is value with that, hello?)

3) with dollars you can pay your taxes: Yes you can. You can do a lot with dollars, and you can earn more dollars by holding some bitcoins. The fact of the matter is that no one is suggesting to completely get into a world of bitcoins to the exclusion of dollars. You gotta find an allocation that is comfortable for you. I would suggest at least 1% of anyone's quasi-liquid investment assets in bitcoin as a hedge (mostly against the dollar, but can be a hedge against other investments as well). Sure you can do more than that or less than that. Actually, if you buy a little bit of bitcoin, maybe it would cause you to actively engage a little bit more with it and maybe come to understand it a little bit better.. and sure bring some more meaningful contributions to this post.. besides merely betting against it while seeming to not really understand some of the basics.
[email聽protected] /* */ 路 2017-02-12 02:47:00 路 #3513
bitcoin seems like a great investment to make. I just think I completely missed the boat during the Obama years when a coin was 5 dollars. Maybe if it going down to 200$ again I might consider buying.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-12 03:02:00 路 #3514
(02-12-2017 02:47 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  bitcoin seems like a great investment to make. I just think I completely missed the boat during the Obama years when a coin was 5 dollars. Maybe if it going down to 200$ again I might consider buying.


You may want to look into the matter a bit because with any asset there are cycles of prices and probabilities regarding how far the price might move in one direction or another.

So, one of the best ways to invest is using a kind of dollar cost averaging or even a method of buying on dips.

For example, let's say that you have approximately $10k that you are able to invest, and you have about $500 per month of a cash flow that you can invest.

You may chose some kind of strategy that you would invest 20% of your $10k now, and then maybe 20% for every $150 price drop.

Then with your $500 per month, you just invest about $100 per week no matter what is the price.

Of course, you have to figure out some strategy that is comfortable for you, and I think that the odds are pretty low that prices are going to go into the $200s.. maybe less than 5%...

Personally, I don't assign very high probabilities that bitcoin will go below $600 - but yeah, anything an happen in bitcoinlandia. Also, I don't think that you have missed the boat because we are likely still in fairly early adopter stages in bitcoin.

you also still have a certain percentage possibilities that bitcoin could go up the s curve (or up the hockey stick) and you could get appreciation of 2x or 5x or 50x or even more... Sure, the higher the exponential projection the lower the probability that it will happen, but if you place a 1% chance that bitcoin could reach $500k (that is 100x) in 5 years, then that means that today it's present value is about $5k? But, yeah, I am just throwing out some numbers that are largely speculation.. and merely for explanatory purposes.
_Cicero 路 2017-02-12 07:16:00 路 #3515
[/quote]

Wow... it's been a while since we had some of you ponzi scheme nutters in here.

[b]2) no underlying value like gold: ... Based on your statements, since it appears that you do not really seem to understand some of the basic features of bitcoin, I don't really want to get into the intricacies of bitcoin's values but one summary of them is that bitcoin is one of the only phenomenons that meet this definition of an asset class that is vehicle for secure decentralized and immutable storage and transfer of value. Name one other asset class that competes with bitcoin under those terms, and therefore, bitcoin brings some features that no other asset has (there is value with that, hello?)
[/quote]

Of course you "don't really want to get into the intricacies of bitcoin's values" because the only underlying value is that other people believe it has value. This is a bubble, like the Tulip Craze, stocks in the 1920s, the Nifty Fifty, the Tech bubble in the 1990s, housing bubble, etc. Note that these bubbles can persist for some time. The technological problem bitcoin solved is impressive, but other digital currencies can do what Bitcoin does. Clearly, there are a lot of "true believers" in it, which means that the price won't go to zero tomorrow, but eventually all these cryptocurrencies must go the way of Sexcoin. If the true value of Bitcoin is that more people know about it than they know about Litecoin, Ripple, or Monero, then it's going to be a volitile investment.

I'll check out Bitfinex, and google how to short...
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-12 11:22:00 路 #3516

Wow... it's been a while since we had some of you ponzi scheme nutters in here.

[b]2) no underlying value like gold: ... Based on your statements, since it appears that you do not really seem to understand some of the basic features of bitcoin, I don't really want to get into the intricacies of bitcoin's values but one summary of them is that bitcoin is one of the only phenomenons that meet this definition of an asset class that is vehicle for secure decentralized and immutable storage and transfer of value. Name one other asset class that competes with bitcoin under those terms, and therefore, bitcoin brings some features that no other asset has (there is value with that, hello?)
[/quote]

Of course you "don't really want to get into the intricacies of bitcoin's values" because the only underlying value is that other people believe it has value.
[/quote]

I don't want to get into the intricacies because I have already written in thousands of pages in this thread related to the topic or provided various links of information related to the topic.

Sure you can boil down almost any value to the fact that it has value based on people thinking that it has value, but there is more to it than that simplified boiling down.. including actual facts.. actual tangibilities, even though bitcoin itself is not a tangible and physical item it still is a tangible phenomenon that has been invented that is similar to the internet with a value component that has been attached and cannot be duplicated. that is one of the problems that satoshi solved in cryptology. In the past, whenever something digital had been created, such as a coin, it could be duplicated and inflated, but the combination of cryptology and peer to peer proof of work solves the duplication of coin problem... that part is an amazing new contribution of bitcoin and it has value in and of itself.. especially in this modern age of computers and in this modern age of mobility... and with world events as they are with governments having a war on cash while inflating their own cash systems, etc etc etc.



(02-12-2017 07:16 AM)_Cicero Wrote:  This is a bubble, like the Tulip Craze, stocks in the 1920s, the Nifty Fifty, the Tech bubble in the 1990s, housing bubble, etc. Note that these bubbles can persist for some time.

O.k. sure fair enough that bubbles can persist for "some time", and let's say that sometime is 1 week or 100 years, in the mean time, we can still invest in such a situation.

Even though I am conceding that bubbles can persist for a long time, I am not conceding that bitcoin is a bubble. But I am conceding that hypothetically if bitcoin were a bubble like you proclaim, it is possibly true that we might not know about it being a bubble until after the fact that it pops, and at that point we would be able to conclude that it was a bubble.

People can have varying views about the value of an asset, and I just don't think that there are sufficient facts to establish that bitcoin is a bubble based on a kind of ponzi scheme as you are suggesting... and so there is nothing wrong with having varying opinions and investing according to your view of the situation.

If you read any of my posts in this thread, you may gather that I have already disclosed quite a bit about my own investing approach which contains an underlying assumption that over time bitcoin is going to continue to go up in value.. but I do not really attempt to know or predict short term price movements so I attempt to protect myself from price movements in both directions. Therefore, I buy on the way down and I sell on the way up. So I have been tending to stack both fiat and bitcoin.

Accordingly, RVF guys should be able to chose the proportion of their funds in which they invest. My initial target was to invest 10% of my quasi-liquid assets into bitcoin, and it took me about a year to achieve my initial goal (which was about by the end of 2014); however, bitcoin prices remained somewhat surprised through 2015 in the $200 arena, so I continued to accumulate coins during this time with dollar cost averaging (nothing that would break the bank.. but enough that it continued to add value to my overall holdings). Those lower prices and my continuing to just put in "spare" money caused me to put in quite more than my initial target and I could not really justify selling either because my overall investment was quite bit more than the value if I had sold.. In other words I was about 60% in the red at the lowest point.

I think that due to bitcoin's price appreciation over the past 16 months or so, my holdings have gone from a bit over 10% to my liquid assets to more than 30% of my semi-liquid assets. My portfolio is also now 150% in the green.. so there was a considerable upturn in prices, so I continued to sell on the way up and to buy on the way down.

And yeah, I will concede that volatility can be stressful, even though upward volatility seems to be less stressful than downwards volatility, but there can still be personal investment strategies that attempt to safeguard and to individualize your strategy to your own finances, views and risk proclivities.


(02-12-2017 07:16 AM)_Cicero Wrote:  The technological problem bitcoin solved is impressive, but other digital currencies can do what Bitcoin does.

Yes, it is possible that some day, another crypto could surplant bitcoin's market lead, but the fact of the real world remains that systems are currently being extensively built upon bitcoin.. so yeah, if the some day does come, then anyone can hedge or move investments to that other crypto.

I am glad that you are conceding that there is something "impressive" about bitcoin, but I still think that you are undervaluing how difficult it is to replicate networking effects that bitcoin has achieved.

Here is a description of 7 network effects in bitcoin as described in an article by Trace Mayer.

http://www.thrivenotes.com/the-7-network...f-bitcoin/

1) Speculation
2) Merchant Adoption
3) Consumer Adoption
4) Security
5) Developer Mindshare
6) Financialization
7) Adoption as a World Reserve Currency

Of course you do not need all seven networking effects for something to have intrinsic value and to rise above being a "ponzi" scheme.



(02-12-2017 07:16 AM)_Cicero Wrote:  Clearly, there are a lot of "true believers" in it, which means that the price won't go to zero tomorrow, but eventually all these cryptocurrencies must go the way of Sexcoin.

Bitcoin is based on more than just true believers, but surely it does help to have some true believers, and your attempt to equate bitcoin with sexcoin seems to miss some of the nuances of value that are actually present with bitcoin rather than some imitation that just plays on an attractive theme but adds no real value in the same way that bitcoin does.



(02-12-2017 07:16 AM)_Cicero Wrote:  If the true value of Bitcoin is that more people know about it than they know about Litecoin, Ripple, or Monero, then it's going to be a volitile investment.

Of course, bitcoin is going to continue to be very volatile. It is a pretty small market cap. People know a lot more about bitcoin than they do about the other alts that you have named, and those alts are a lot newer than bitcoin, so their market share is much smaller and even more easy to manipulate. As bitcoin grows in market cap it will continue to be volatile, but I will concede that I would expect bitcoin to continue to be considerably volatile for at least another 100x increase in market cap (which may or may not happen), but as the market cap goes up volatility will go down, but there still remains a long way to go before volatility is anywhere near "low" levels in bitcoin.

Like I said, I attempt to protect myself from some of the volatility, but even I can get a bit stressed about some of the ongoing volatility that is expected to continue.



(02-12-2017 07:16 AM)_Cicero Wrote:  I'll check out Bitfinex, and google how to short...

If you are not a skilled shorter then you are likely to run into some troubles, and especially since you seem to compounding the matter by wanting to short something that you seem to not understand.

But, yeah, I don't really have any problem with people betting against bitcoin.

I think that more or less the easiest way would be that you buy some bitcoin and you send it to Bitfinex (of course after you open an account), and then you create your bet against bitcoin. You may have limits about how much you can bet, and as your account is established, you can increase your limits of how much you can bet.

I personally do not engage in leveraging bets of that sort because I never have enough confidence in either price direction.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-12 14:38:00 路 #3517
(02-12-2017 11:22 AM)JayJuanGee Wrote:  [edited out]

(02-12-2017 07:16 AM)_Cicero Wrote:  I'll check out Bitfinex, and google how to short...

If you are not a skilled shorter then you are likely to run into some troubles, and especially since you seem to compounding the matter by wanting to short something that you seem to not understand.

But, yeah, I don't really have any problem with people betting against bitcoin.

I think that more or less the easiest way would be that you buy some bitcoin and you send it to Bitfinex (of course after you open an account), and then you create your bet against bitcoin. You may have limits about how much you can bet, and as your account is established, you can increase your limits of how much you can bet.

I personally do not engage in leveraging bets of that sort because I never have enough confidence in either price direction.

Cicero:

I have been thinking a little bit more about this last point that we discussed, and I would like to reiterate that since I do not engage in margin trading, I do not really have too many skills in that direction, so there could be some methods to do it that do not involve having to buy bitcoin.. so for example, if an exchange allows margin trading, then you could also possibly send your dollars there to set up your bet against bitcoin.

One of the issues with bitcoin is that trading is not really very well developed, and it also falls under some unregulated areas - and maybe to some extent has not been accepted in the west. So, in that regards, some places that were allowing the shorting of bitcoin were in china (including Bitfinex); however, it seems to me that after Bitfinex was hacked in early August 2016, they actually discontinued offering some of their services to USA folks, including margin trading.

Here's one explanatory link.
https://support.bitfinex.com/hc/en-us/ar...on-Margin-

Some of these exchanges are afraid to offer some services to USA citizens or residents because in part they seem to be worried about getting targeted by various USA governmental regulations and/or prosecution by USA gov. Some services might find work arounds or they may become more willing to offer those kinds of services to USA folks if USA regulations become more clear (and/or allowable) on the topic.

There are some other exchanges in China that were balls deep into margin trading and zero fees for years (namely Okcoin, Huobi and BTCChina), but in the last month or so they have been discontinuing some of their practices, including the margin trading practices because they seem to be experiencing some scrutiny by banking and/or government institutions. Maybe they will resume in the future, but it does seem to be a kind of risky area, even for exchanges when they start to receive scrutiny.

Actually, I had heard about Bitmex as being an upcoming and credible exchange, and they are currently offering abilities to 100x your bets

https://www.bitmex.com/app/whatsDifferent

I am not really clear if Bitmex are open to USA customers in regards to all of their margin trading services, and since I am not personally interested in the topic, I cannot justify spending too much time researching into these kinds of matters, especially even when I am wondering the extent to which you, _Cicero, are seriously looking into the matter and contemplating actually acting on your statements to attempt to short bitcoin.

By the way, it would be interesting to hear about anyone's actual experiences in attempting to short bitcoin and what actual services they have used or attempted to use. Surely, a lot of us may have bought and then sold, but shorting is a bit of another animal that requires some different skills and some different strategies and practices. So, yeah it would be great to hear from anyone, including you, _Cicero, if you research further into the matter and actually attempt to put some of this into practice (in which you could make a lot of money if you are right and you play it right, but you could lose pretty well too if you are wrong or you employ inadequate strategies).
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-13 21:57:00 路 #3518
Here's an article listing exchanges that require very little identity verification.


https://news.bitcoin.com/four-bitcoin-ex...ification/

The site lists 1) Local Bitcoins, 2) Wall of coins, 3) Bitquick and 4) Bitsquare.

Personally, I also found BTC-e to be good in that regards, and I heard that some Bitcoin ATMs and Paxful were good, but I don't have personal experiences with those.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-13 21:59:00 路 #3519
Here's a recent review of Key Key, suggesting that it is better than Ledger Nano S.

http://bitcoinist.com/keepkey-wallet-rev...er-nano-s/
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-13 22:13:00 路 #3520
I personally believe that the new administrative is a bit unclear about what it wants in regards to the value of the dollar, and surely Trump has said that he wants the dollar to be weaker, but then again, he has walked back those kinds of statements from time to time when it comes to considering the ramifications of such.

The below article characterizes the current administration's currency stance in regards to China as passive-aggressive.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-13...-war-china

No matter how Trump's stance on currency is characterized, it seems to be a "work in progress" and a bit difficult to assess with any precision.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-15 11:45:00 路 #3521
In this reddit thread, they are claiming that Coinbase had gotten an additional 200k users in 2 days.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comment...new_users/

Could be the case. They do seem to be growing pretty fast and claiming 5.8 million users. Could be. Could be.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-15 15:36:00 路 #3522
Here's an article overviewing some of the new philippines regulations in regards to bitcoin

http://www.coindesk.com/will-new-regulat...ilippines/

I don't really have any strong opinions regarding whether the regulations are good or bad because there can be a bit of both going on when it comes to regulations.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-15 15:41:00 路 #3523
This increasing and ATH in trading volume may be a common theme in the future...

http://bitcoinist.com/china-p2p-bitcoin-...g-soaring/


Also, along the same lines, there is an new ATH in Bitcoin's 30-day moving average price, too.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-p...ghest-ever
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-15 15:44:00 路 #3524
(02-13-2017 09:59 PM)JayJuanGee Wrote:  Here's a recent review of Key Key, suggesting that it is better than Ledger Nano S.

http://bitcoinist.com/keepkey-wallet-rev...er-nano-s/

Here's another current wallet article that kind of relates to my above post:

http://bitcoinchaser.com/interview-trezor-satoshi-labs


And, this one has to do with password management:

https://blog.trezor.io/hide-your-trezor-....3psed8gdr

I am not currently using a hardware wallet, so I cannot speak personally on these hardware wallet points.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-15 15:50:00 路 #3525
Once in a while, we may have a post about mining and mining pools.

Here's a reddit discussion - asserting that Genesis is a mining pool scam... whether it is a scam or not, I am not sure, but it would not hurt to inform yourself of some of the issues if you are considering joining any mining pool.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comment...our_money/
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-15 16:22:00 路 #3526
Speculations can vary concerning which market is overvalued and which markets are undervalued. The below article (interview) suggests that maybe the stock market is overvalued at the moment.

https://www.investing.com/analysis/is-bi...-200175517


Some might assert that bitcoin is overvalued, but one of the difficulties with bitcoin is it remains a relatively newcomer to the space, and that newcomer status can cause extended periods of outperformance while it is finding its value and gaining market share, gaining utility and gaining users.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-16 07:19:00 路 #3527
I don't know what this means, exactly, but investing.com is currently listing bitcoin as a "strong buy"

https://www.investing.com/currencies/btc-usd-technical

Sure, these kinds of investing sites can have varying degrees of credibility, and I don't really know about recommendations.

i personally think that dollar cost averaging remains a decent strategy; however, if you currently do not have any coins, and you are considering getting into coins, then sometimes, you may have to consider whether it is a good idea to plunge in and to take a higher stake, merely because you feel like you need some stake in the game, just in case we are not going back down in prices in the near future (I mean, just in case we are going up from here).
Armogan 路 2017-02-16 20:31:00 路 #3528
Anyone have experience using cash back or high-reward credit cards to buy coin on Coinbase or other exchanges? Do these cards consider the purchases a cash advance? Any stories of the bank closing your account, etc. because of "high-risk purchases"?
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-16 20:47:00 路 #3529
(02-16-2017 08:31 PM)Armogan Wrote:  Anyone have experience using cash back or high-reward credit cards to buy coin on Coinbase or other exchanges? Do these cards consider the purchases a cash advance? Any stories of the bank closing your account, etc. because of "high-risk purchases"?

I believe that any purchases with credit cards are considered cash advances. i accidentally made such a transaction on circle (and I think that it is the same on Coinbase).

I think that a lot of those companies have (anti-money laudering) AML KYC (know your customer) requirements, and those practices have become more and more stringent, so yeah, your transactions could become flagged if you do them directly from your Coinbase account.

i would suggest sending to another location first, such as another exchange that does not have AML KYC and then sending to another wallet that you might control. A couple layers is better than direct, but even if you send directly to a wallet before doing the subsequent "questionable" transaction, you may create enough layers that your account will not be flagged. Sometimes the transaction is questionable based on the amount and other times it is questionable based on some other factor. Circle used to ask me where I was sending money in order that they would have it on record concerning my answer. i think that coinbase may do the same thing, and the better answers are either that you are sending it to another exchange or you are sending it to a address that you control. otherwise you are faced with telling them that it is for ___ purpose, which may not be in your interest to do.
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-17 08:43:00 路 #3530
JayJuanGee 路 2017-02-17 09:07:00 路 #3531
I don't really know whether Okcoin is in some kind of jeopardy or not, in accordance with what the below-linked article seems to be suggesting.

http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-investor...-in-court/
Pages: 1 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 200