Post: #76

Have there been any non-white Trump supporters who've been physically attacked?

I haven't seen any, but I haven't been looking as closely as I might have.

Post: #77

(11-17-2016 01:17 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  Have there been any non-white Trump supporters who've been physically attacked?

I haven't seen any, but I haven't been looking as closely as I might have.

Non-white Trump supporters either don't admit it openly, associate with likeminded people or they are harder to attack by minorities and violent scum, because they are a "oppressed" minority. So a black guy walking around in a Trump shirt and hat will get away with much much more than a white guy. It makes perfect sense in terms of SJW-logic. Some black guys may give him shit, but if he is eloquent enough, then he will pull through so long as they don't mob up on him.

So essentially you will get very little of those attacks on non-Whites.

Post: #78

(11-17-2016 01:11 PM)kaotic Wrote:  "This thread isn't about race"

-Reads title-

-Reads thread-

Come on now, this thread went in the exact direction I expected.

I agree we should absolutely catalog the scumbags who do this, but I agree the title definitely is just a tad bit baity.

Explain in clear terms what is inaccurate about the thread title, if you please.

Post: #79

(11-17-2016 01:17 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  Have there been any non-white Trump supporters who've been physically attacked?

I haven't seen any, but I haven't been looking as closely as I might have.

Wasnt the black homeless woman who was protecting Donalds new star attacked physically? I know in the video it looks like she may have taken a dive, but she had her property ripped out of her hands and she was shoved/her basket thrown down.

The thread title would be better without the white people reference. If it said mostly white people that would be more accurate and less race baity.

Post: #80

(11-17-2016 01:38 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

(11-17-2016 01:11 PM)kaotic Wrote:  "This thread isn't about race"

-Reads title-

-Reads thread-

Come on now, this thread went in the exact direction I expected.

I agree we should absolutely catalog the scumbags who do this, but I agree the title definitely is just a tad bit baity.

Explain in clear terms what is inaccurate about the thread title, if you please.

Quote:Attacks On Trump Supporters And White People Thread

I didn't say it's inaccurate - I said it was a poorly worded title.

That is my opinion.

There's no point in going into long winded race flame debate about this, it's been debated already in this thread.

Next.

Post: #81

This rioting and violence stuff exposes their comical stupidity something epic.

So they don't like the result of the election. They're not willing to settle the question of who should be in power with the ballot box.

So before the ballot box, how was that question settled?

If my understanding of pre-democratic history is right, you generally murder the other faction until the piles of their bodies are high enough that they get demoralized and submit to your rule.

And what do they think would happen if Trump's presidency was actually denied? With him backed by half the country, and all the pro 2nd-amendment armed-to-the-teeth types? Those hood morons and campus freaks think they'd prevail?

They keep calling Trump, the democratically elected president, the 'fascist'. It's precisely them and their actions that constitute the biggest risk of precipitating a civil war ending in fascism.

There is no liberalism without the ballot box, you dumb fucks. It's the best friend you ever had. Better repent lest you do yourselves in.

Post: #82

(11-17-2016 01:38 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

(11-17-2016 01:11 PM)kaotic Wrote:  "This thread isn't about race"

-Reads title-

-Reads thread-

Come on now, this thread went in the exact direction I expected.

I agree we should absolutely catalog the scumbags who do this, but I agree the title definitely is just a tad bit baity.

Explain in clear terms what is inaccurate about the thread title, if you please.

Maybe it hurts his feelings. Because cataloging attacks on white people is 'wacist'.

Let's just hypothetically say I would have put up the following thread titles:

"Attacks On Koreans And Other Asians"

"Police Brutality Against African Americans and Latinos"

Crickets... nobody would bother or dare to criticize such headlines. We read them all the time and it's the politically correct thing to do. But as soon as you bring white into the mix it becomes racist and is being attacked. Because white people have been labeled personae non gratae - in particular white men. Because if I posted something along the lines of:

"Migrant Attacks Against White Women"

That's different - the pussy pass kicks in right away. You know like with breast cancer everyone gets all worked up about despite the fact that prostate cancer is more prevalent statistically speaking.

But hey, this is good. Because it actually exposes deeply established cognitive biases against white people. The social reality is that white people, despite being near the top of the IQ and productivity pyramid (after Asians), have become second class citizens. Just like the post WW2 Germans we are supposed to repent for the sins of our forefathers and somehow are morally inferior in the eyes of the average SWJ, journalist, politician, etc.

Another example: How about I'll walk over to a group of black guys and say something along the lines of "How are you niggers doing"? I'll better be heavily armed and ready to fight off the fists which will be instantly coming my way.

On the other hand how many times have we seen black people ridicule whites (and Asians), calling us 'crackers', 'white boy', 'flour', etc. Check this out for more context - black dude gets interviewed by Kimmel and says something along the lines of 'white people are kind of scary'. Say WHAT?

Can you guys imagine had any of us white boys said 'black people are kind of scary' - ON CAMERA? This is how established white bashing - verbal and physical - has now become. It's not the fault of the black community by the way, we all say nasty things about each other. No it's the fault of the WHITE community for letting it pass unanswered. If some black dude can call me 'cracker' I'll be responding with 'nigger' without compunction.

Yeah, I know this is going to piss some of you guys off. But it's time we dragged this bullshit out in the open. If you have constructive/intelligent counter arguments against any of the above then please go ahead, I'm all ears.

Post: #83

(11-17-2016 01:51 PM)kaotic Wrote:  I didn't say it's inaccurate - I said it was a poorly worded title.

That is my opinion.

There's no point in going into long winded race flame debate about this, it's been debated already in this thread.

Next.

Actually I disagree kaotic, it is VERY MUCH worth getting into as it touches the heart of the entire issue. I don't know what color your skin is but no matter what shade I wonder why my subject line offended you or rubbed you the wrong way? I very much would appreciate if you could meditate on it and share what exactly you felt when you read it.

See my previous comment above, there is a reason to why I'm asking. There is nothing sensationalistic or divisive in how I worded it. Every single word has a purpose in defining the theme of this thread. So it must be the theme itself that offends you. Is it so difficult for you to embrace the fact that white people are being attacked and that perpetrators should be brought to justice?

Post: #84

Do we have an "attacks on black people" thread though?

It's baity. Should've just left it at "attacks on Trump supporters". Most of them will probably be white, but not all. Needn't tack your other political concerns on the side of the title to bait discussion in that direction. White people are legitimately treated as having less rights than other groups overall, but there are other better places to discuss that.

Post: #85

(11-17-2016 01:51 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(11-17-2016 01:38 PM)weambulance Wrote:  

(11-17-2016 01:11 PM)kaotic Wrote:  "This thread isn't about race"

-Reads title-

-Reads thread-

Come on now, this thread went in the exact direction I expected.

I agree we should absolutely catalog the scumbags who do this, but I agree the title definitely is just a tad bit baity.

Explain in clear terms what is inaccurate about the thread title, if you please.

Quote:Attacks On Trump Supporters And White People Thread

I didn't say it's inaccurate - I said it was a poorly worded title.

That is my opinion.

There's no point in going into long winded race flame debate about this, it's been debated already in this thread.

Next.

Mhm. You're right, it was already debated but you decided to bring it back up days later. Now it's off the table when someone challenges you? Make up your mind.

It's a perfectly correct title; if it's accurate and not misleading how can it be poorly worded? It describes what's happening! White people, including children who cannot vote, are being attacked explicitly because they "supported Trump" whether they actually did or not.

People who have a problem with this thread--if it is not a problem with the content being inaccurate or misleading--clearly have a problem with the content itself, and those who say so feel that the rest of us should as well. If it's distasteful to you, feel free to stay out rather than come along with sniping attacks.

I'm not trying to pick on you but I'm sick of this sort of shit. Drive by moral superiority, besides adding nothing to the conversation, is utterly ridiculous.

Post: #86

"Wasnt the black homeless woman who was protecting Donalds new star attacked physically? I know in the video it looks like she may have taken a dive, but she had her property ripped out of her hands and she was shoved/her basket thrown down."

That's a good point. I was thinking mostly in terms of post-election, where it seems to be entirely white people who are being attacked, but that would certainly qualify. I wonder what ever happened to her. Did she get all her money?

Post: #87

(11-17-2016 02:08 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  Do we have an "attacks on black people" thread though?

It's baity. Should've just left it at "attacks on Trump supporters". Most of them will probably be white, but not all. Needn't tack your other political concerns on the side of the title to bait discussion in that direction. White people are legitimately treated as having less rights than other groups overall, but there are other better places to discuss that.

Sorry man but that's a bullshit argument. If black people were being attacked explicitly because "black = Trump supporter", I would be perfectly fine with a thread like that.

What some people here are missing is there are two different motivations for the attacks. Some people actually are Trump supporters who advertise that fact and get attacked. Others are white people who get attacked because white = Trump supporter even if they didn't support him. Why on earth would I ignore the second group? Just because it's a race thing? Where does that sort of self censorship end, pray tell?

Post: #88

(11-17-2016 11:18 AM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(11-17-2016 09:34 AM)Renzy Wrote:  “We are feeling very left out of the process,” said Michelle Dubovitsky, 17, a senior. “We feel our political voice has not been heard, and we are the future of this country.”

Because you're fucking 17, and you're not allowed to vote yet.

Exactly, and once young folks start looking for work and are experiencing the real world outside of academia voting patterns quickly revert toward the center. As the old saying goes: "If You Are Not a Liberal at 25, You Have No Heart. If You Are Not a Conservative at 35 You Have No Brain."

Post: #89

Anyway, there was a story in Breitbart yesterday about a black guy who got shot in an altercation that involved him joking that he voted for Mr. Trump.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidenti...ted-trump/

Quote:A man on a first date was shot outside a bar in Atlanta after he jokingly said he voted for President-elect Donald Trump.
Mitchell Mormon, Jr., 32, was shot dead outside Church Bar after he got into an argument with another man who pulled out a gun, WSB reported.

Shaunita Walker, 25, stated that the alleged shooter said something disrespectful to her as she went back to the bar. When Mormon found out, he confronted the man, and the two got into an argument.

Walker said that during the argument, Mormon jokingly told the man that he voted for Trump.

The argument continued as the alleged shooter went around the corner and returned with a gun and shot Mormon.

“When I heard the first shot and it went into my arm, I just grabbed my arm and began to scream,” Walker said. “And then I heard two more shots and I saw (Mormon) on the ground.”

Police said they found Walker and Mormon shot when they responded to the scene at 466 Edgewood Ave. Both were taken to Grady Hospital, where Mormon later died.

Walker is recovering out-of-state, WSB reported.

Investigators released surveillance video of several people standing outside a bar, including two people authorities hope to identify as part of the shooting: a Hispanic man wearing a white jacket and a white male in a hooded sweatshirt carrying a backpack, the New York Post reported.

Walker said she does not think the comment about Trump affected the outcome of the shooting, claiming that the gunman was a menace from the beginning.

She asked the public for help in getting the suspect off the street.

“Please, if anybody know[s] anything, please, this was so senseless,” she said. “This was so horrible.”

I didn't add it here when I first saw it because the girl he was with said she didn't think that had anything to do with the actual shooting. The fight was already happening. But hey, maybe it did? Who knows.

To add, I read elsewhere that the shooter was supposedly hispanic.

Post: #90

Roosh was slandered in the UK 'metro' newspaper the other day. I think it's probably grounds to sue. Along with every other paper/site who have done so. Perhaps it's not worth the hassle (money), but it would be glorious if he could get damages from at least one of these establishment rags.

Post: #91

(11-17-2016 02:10 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  "Wasnt the black homeless woman who was protecting Donalds new star attacked physically? I know in the video it looks like she may have taken a dive, but she had her property ripped out of her hands and she was shoved/her basket thrown down."

That's a good point. I was thinking mostly in terms of post-election, where it seems to be entirely white people who are being attacked, but that would certainly qualify. I wonder what ever happened to her. Did she get all her money?

Yes, correct. She was black while protecting Trump's star on Hollywood Blvd. - so clearly a Trump supporter and that is why she was being attacked. But a white dude being pulled out of his car and beaten up for being a Trump supporter *without volunteering anything about his political affiliation* is a perfect example of why the title is worded correctly. He was assumed to be a Trump voter because he was driving whilst being white. And you know - white people are all Trump voters and hate people of color.

This by the way is the true legacy of the SJW movement: MORE RACISM.

Post: #92

(11-17-2016 02:17 PM)Teedub Wrote:  Roosh was slandered in the UK 'metro' newspaper the other day. I think it's probably grounds to sue. Along with every other paper/site who have done so. Perhaps it's not worth the hassle (money), but it would be glorious if he could get damages from at least one of these establishment rags.

Could be very much worth the hassle. Remember Hulk Hogan and Gawker?

It would take only one single successful case and a newspaper having to close its doors for this shit to be stopped in its tracks. Any lawyers here who would be willing to help out Roosh?

Post: #93

Hurt my feelings ? What are we 12 ?

It didn't offend me, I didn't get "triggered", I simply stated that it was poorly worded.

So please stop with the passive aggressive remarks because someone criticized your thread (albeit with sarcasm in the context).

You didn't write "Attack on White Trump Supporters" you said "Attacks On Trump Supporters And White People Thread"

To me that was poorly worded, it was literally about the wording lol.

I don't like any baity thread titles like

"Cops beat black man"

"White women raped in Cologne"

etc etc

It takes away from the actual SUBJECT of Police Brutality and Immigration Crises.

Now this isn't taking away from your standard white male being the whipping boy of the western world.

We all know this is a fact, we've seen it countless times in this forum.

We've already acknowledge the double standard of "X" race can't be racist to whites.


To me "Attack on Trump supporters" brings more eyes to main focus on the problem - SJW, Marxists, and Professional Protestors.

tacking on "And White People Thread" just doesn't make sense to me.


There's no meditating or shaming that needs to be done to me.

Secondly, once again, I never said or denied that white people were being attacked, I've stated before that these scumbags indeed need to be catalog.


EDIT:

Quote:What some people here are missing is there are two different motivations for the attacks. Some people actually are Trump supporters who advertise that fact and get attacked. Others are white people who get attacked because white = Trump supporter even if they didn't support him. Why on earth would I ignore the second group? Just because it's a race thing? Where does that sort of self censorship end, pray tell"

And that's the explanation I needed.

So you're differentiating between:

Trump supporters getting attacked

and

White people getting attacked for being white.

That clearly makes more sense.

Post: #94

(11-17-2016 02:23 PM)kaotic Wrote:  Hurt my feelings ? What are we 12 ?

It didn't offend me, I didn't get "triggered", I simply stated that it was poorly worded.

So please stop with the passive aggressive remarks because someone criticized your thread (albeit with sarcasm in the context).

You didn't write "Attack on White Trump Supporters" you said "Attacks On Trump Supporters And White People Thread"

To me that was poorly worded.

I don't like any baity thread titles like

"Cops beat black man"

"White women raped in Cologne"

etc etc

It takes away from the actual SUBJECT of Police Brutality and Immigration Crises.

Now this isn't taking away from your standard white male being the whipping boy of the western world.

We all know this is a fact, we've seen it countless times in this forum.

We've already acknowledge the double standard of "X" race can't be racist to whites.


To me "Attack on Trump supporters" brings more eyes to main focus on the problem - SJW, Marxists, and Professional Protestors.

tacking on "And White People Thread" just doesn't make sense to me.


There's no meditating or shaming that needs to be done to me.

Secondly, once again, I never said or denied that white people were being attacked, I've stated before that these scumbags indeed need to be catalog.

You are aware that the inverse happens all the time in the MSM? Recent examples:

Washington Post

USA Today

Harvard Crimson - love that one: 'justice for black women week'. Can you imagine a 'justice for white men' week over there? LOL

BlackMattersUS - I'm looking forward to filing WhiteMattersUS - let's see how long before it gets labeled as the new KKK newsletter.

Do you think they are 'poorly worded' as well? Did you express that in the comment sections?

Shall I continue? ;-)

Post: #95

DELETE

Post: #96

(11-17-2016 02:17 PM)Teedub Wrote:  Roosh was slandered in the UK 'metro' newspaper the other day. I think it's probably grounds to sue. Along with every other paper/site who have done so. Perhaps it's not worth the hassle (money), but it would be glorious if he could get damages from at least one of these establishment rags.

Link?

Post: #97

And we believe and accept the MSM here apparently ?

We all scoffed and laughed at that BS they put out, we know exactly they were race baiting.

Post: #98

Guys - please - no reason to whip up a beef-storm about it.

The thread could have been titled better for sure, but I don't think that it was a deliberate race-baiting attempt, just a perception that most violent attacks will be on whites. Also by the measure of it - it seems that quite a few were done by Antifa radical whites after the election.

This is not a race issue, though we know where the media & establishment are pointing their guns at. And we know that president Obama is increasing the racial divide ever more with inflammatory comments.

But we don't have to continue that crap into the forum here. We have way more in common with each other than with the rioters and protesters - no matter our race or background.

I expect the attacks by the way to ebb off anyway as soon as President Trump is in office and people realize that SWAT teams are not executing gay people on the streets - heh.

Post: #99

(11-17-2016 02:13 PM)weambulance Wrote:  What some people here are missing is there are two different motivations for the attacks. Some people actually are Trump supporters who advertise that fact and get attacked. Others are white people who get attacked because white = Trump supporter even if they didn't support him. Why on earth would I ignore the second group? Just because it's a race thing? Where does that sort of self censorship end, pray tell?

Then it was just a plain racially motivated attack. They saw Trump as a threat because he was white and lashed out in response by attacking some random white folk. Is this the place to discuss that stuff?

And it's not censorship, its segmentation. This is not a free speech zone, never has been, and the host and his mods have demonstrated this consistently. Otherwise our subject-matter jurisdiction will drift towards places that weren't the reason we came here. There are simply better places to discuss that stuff than stirring the pot here.

Post: #100

(11-17-2016 02:40 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  whip up a beef-storm

Fun fact: there is a twitter account by that name picturing an actual beef storm

https://twitter.com/beef_storm