Post: #26

Any publicity is good publicity. I'm sure this will generate more traffic towards the forum and other sites

Post: #27

(11-23-2015 07:49 PM)Roosh Wrote:  I talked with the producer, and based on this one-hour show, I'll be lucky to get 5 minutes of airtime. I don't think this will provide much entertainment value for us like Dr. Oz.

Don't worry, I'm sure we'll get at least one gif out of it

Post: #28

The BBC is annoying as fuck. It claims to pride itself on unbiased, objective reporting in exchange for compulsory license fees, but it is anything but. It has become one of the UK's biggest propaganda mills, all funded by UK citizens whether we like it or not. If you say "I don't watch fucking BBC, I don't want to watch your bullshit propaganda", but if you have any device which can access BBC content (which pretty much everyone does), then you're on the hook for it whether you watch it or not.

The biggest agendas of the UK govt are pushed by the BBC network of channels. Whatever the BBC reports on is blindly seen by the masses as important, and the more serious the reports claim the situation to be, the more public hysteria is generated. This leads to those fucking gay PC "events" to "raise awareness" for whatever the BBC has been talking about non-stop recently. It usually comes in waves. Sometimes the waves will last 3 weeks, sometimes 3 months. But during that time almost everyone (especially women who see the TV as some kind of oracle of what is important and correct vs what is to be ignored / incorrect) will be brainwashed, sometimes to the point of mass hysteria.

Apart from the waves of intense coverage of one particular set of propaganda, there is a constant undertone of "look at this disgusting man". Every single fucking day we hear about pedophiles and rapist. They exist but a tiny % of the total population. The way the BBC goes on about it every day you would think every man is a pedophile or a rapist. That's what they want you to think. The faux surprise on that black man's face when Roosh stated what was pretty much a fact nowadays show that he is just promoting the bullshit that the BBC pushes every day on the news. If he does programmes along the lines of their agenda, they will fund more series and the cycle goes on. The BBC3 is intended for a younger audience, so it's targeted at those who perhaps don't watch the 10pm news or the BBC news or BBC parliament channels.

If you're on TV, you can't say anything against the agenda of the BBC without serious consequences or at the very least being attacked by every other person on whatever show you were stupid enough to agree to appear on. It really isn't much different from the unspoken permissions and restrictions of propaganda machines present and past. The UK prides itself on being a better country than North Korea and maybe it is, but there is less difference between what the BBC does and what North Korean state media outlets do than you would think. Same applies to propaganda of the past. As much as the UK distances itself from Nazi Germany and its ferocious propaganda machine, the UK media, BBC right front and centre, is not so different.

I don't expect the women to wake up to the bullshit the BBC spews on a daily basis, because they are so easily influenced by social trends, popular media. I only hope enough men open their eyes to the fact that as many regular german people were convinced by a very powerful propaganda machine at the time, so these men in the UK today are being fed bullshit bullshit bullshit every single day by the BBC.

Roosh will probably be portrayed as a bitter, extreme misogynist and his ideas denounced as nonsense. The editing will be clever to support the goals of the programme which is to support the BBC agenda. When you get slandered/defamed by the programme make sure to create as much fuss as you can. The publicity will be good. Encourage people to peruse key articles on your website and tell them to decide for themselves, rather than forming opinions based on biased UK state media.

As a UK citizen I am pissed off enough at the toxic propaganda and that this country has gone to shit in so many ways partly because of it.

Then I consider the fact that I am forced to PAY for this bullshit, and rage increases tenfold. I don't want to sound bitter but if I wanted to pay to be indoctrinated I would take a flight to fucking North Korea.

The best quality story of the year was that our prime minister apparently got a blow job from a dead pig's head. Used the pig's head as a sort of fleshlight or something. That shows you the standard of accuracy we are looking at here.

Post: #29

More Questions about the BBC license:
How is it collected?
What happens if you stop paying? Can the collectors force themselves inside?
If they see a tv, but it doesn't receive tv (like only hooked up to a vcr or dvd only) do you still get charged?
This is just the strangest tax I've never heard of.
I wonder what would happen if you got your neighborhood to stop paying, or put flyers up all over to not pay.

Post: #30

I've never heard of Reggie Yates, and who made him the purveyor of all that is good?
Leechblocked all mainstream media sources on my computer. Negative social programming that we don't need.

Post: #31

(11-23-2015 11:07 PM)spokepoker Wrote:  More Questions about the BBC license:
How is it collected?
What happens if you stop paying? Can the collectors force themselves inside?
If they see a tv, but it doesn't receive tv (like only hooked up to a vcr or dvd only) do you still get charged?
This is just the strangest tax I've never heard of.
I wonder what would happen if you got your neighborhood to stop paying, or put flyers up all over to not pay.

It's collected for the BBC (state broadcaster) by a number of private companies.

http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/about/who-we-are-AB4

Quote:'TV Licensing' is a trade mark of the BBC and is used under licence by companies contracted by the BBC to administer the collection of the television licence fees and enforcement of the television licensing system.

The BBC is a public authority in respect of its television licensing functions and retains overall responsibility.
Responsibilities of TV Licensing contracted companies

Capita Business Services Ltd - Administration and enforcement of the TV Licence fee.
PayPoint Plc - Over-the-counter payment services in the UK mainland and in Northern Ireland.
Post Office - Over-the-counter payment services in the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands.
Proximity London Ltd - Marketing and printing services.
Hamas Media - Media services.

Notice what I've highlighted in bold - one of the contractors is aptly named after a terrorist organisation. I wish I was joking.

Every household is required by law to obtain a licence before watching any live broadcast by any means, including foreign commercial broadcasts via paid cable, internet or satellite: http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/check-if-you-need-one

If you stop paying, they'll send threatening letters for a few months and then send around some goons to intimidate you. They will try to convince you that you need a licence if you have a TV or any device which can be used to watch video on the internet, but that is not true; it's just one of their "recommendations". You only 'need' a licence to watch live broadcasts. From their website:

Quote:Do I need a TV Licence if I only ever watch on demand services (e.g. catch-up TV), DVDs or downloaded programmes?
No you don’t. As you’re not watching or recording live TV, you don’t need a licence.

The best course of action is to ignore the letters and avoid speaking to their goons; just say "remove yourself from this property". Also avoid giving them your name or confirming it. If they know your name, it will be easier for them to obtain a court order to search your property. Don't fill out their forms ("tell us you don't need a licence"). They only use them to collection information which they are not entitled to, and they'll start harassing you again in a year's time anyway.

They don't have permission to trespass, but many times they do. If they happen to see a TV and you've refused to let them inside, they'll try to get a court order allowing them inspect your property. If that happens they'll turn up with the Police, who may side with the goons even though the Police's role is only to "maintain the peace" in that situation, not to enforce the (private) court order. You have the right to refuse them entry, but if you use that right you'll probably be summoned to appear in court. In court you would only need to assert that you have a TV but that you don't use it to watch live broadcasts - which you cannot be fined for.

I agree that it's an extremely bizarre tax. Also bizarre is that the BBC's budget is $6 billion ($95 per capita), compared to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (which funds US state broadcasters including NPR, C-SPAN, PBS, etc.), which has a budget of only $445 million = $1.38 per capita. Socialist France pays only $47 per capita for its public broadcasting.

Post: #32

(11-22-2015 06:20 PM)Pareto Wrote:  The BBC aired a programme a few weeks ago called "Britains Biggest Sexists". Its first 10 minutes looked at the Pick Up Artist community and pretty much attempted to rip it a new one. As someone who was questioned for the show (not for the PUA segment), and saw it when it aired, it is heavily biased in favour of feminism (they censor out a lot of answers that go against the point they're making).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b06...p=p034jsj5

I expect Reggie's to follow the same suit and portray Roosh's tour in as bad a light as humanly possible

I thought Street Attractions come back was pretty good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDR0sHoBFS8

Post: #33

Not the operative word of the programme's title: "Extreme..."

Watch how 'extremism' and 'terrorism' are used interchangeably when the UK government rolls out yet more internet surveillance and more hatecrime laws in a vain attempt to arrest social meltdown.

Post: #34

(11-24-2015 01:16 AM)Green-On-GO Wrote:  

(11-22-2015 06:20 PM)Pareto Wrote:  The BBC aired a programme a few weeks ago called "Britains Biggest Sexists". Its first 10 minutes looked at the Pick Up Artist community and pretty much attempted to rip it a new one. As someone who was questioned for the show (not for the PUA segment), and saw it when it aired, it is heavily biased in favour of feminism (they censor out a lot of answers that go against the point they're making).

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b06...p=p034jsj5

I expect Reggie's to follow the same suit and portray Roosh's tour in as bad a light as humanly possible

I thought Street Attractions come back was pretty good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDR0sHoBFS8

Nearly fell off my chair laughing at 7:50...

   

Post: #35

I did not have a very dramatic experience when I quit paying the license fee, I simply went onto their website and removed myself and I think I checked some boxes and answered some questions about it and that was it. No goons, no follow up. Just stop paying these parasites.

Post: #36

In that Street Attraction video, at 5:15, I also laughed at how the (modern Western) dictionary definition of sexism is itself sexist.

"Sexism - discrimination on the basis of sex, especially the oppression of women by men"

Post: #37

(11-23-2015 02:34 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

So how is that about "being a man in the UK" while interviewing a transvestite and two foreigners?

The clip shows Roosh saying "you are all SEEN as potential rapists" and then some dude reacting as if "no surprise there". I think they might show him in a positive light.

Post: #38

(11-24-2015 01:15 PM)germanico Wrote:  

(11-23-2015 02:34 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

So how is that about "being a man in the UK" while interviewing a transvestite and two foreigners?

The clip shows Roosh saying "you are all SEEN as potential rapists" and then some dude reacting as if "no surprise there". I think they might show him in a positive light.

Hmm I saw it more as a look of "look how extreme this guy is", assuming you're talking about Reggie (the black guy)

Post: #39

(11-23-2015 02:39 PM)UroboricForms Wrote:  The staged "Really?!" look on his face at 0:17 says it all.

It's editing mate. There's no way he pulled that face at that exact moment - I was sat near him, he was laughing along with Roosh and the rest of us for a lot of it. Which is why the hit piece will be interesting, to say the least.

Post: #40

(11-24-2015 12:22 AM)369eyedea Wrote:  I've never heard of Reggie Yates, and who made him the purveyor of all that is good?

He's a nobody, just a well planted black face to show that the BBC is tolerant of all ethnic backgrounds and gives everyone including effeminate black wusses their chance to present super awesome documentaries about diversity and oppression of wymyns and gays and trannies and generally disgruntled neon haired freaks.

If you don't get hassled about your license fee, you're lucky. It can go as far as search warrants for a lot of people. If you're living in university dorms, they spam every single room individually with reminders, demands and threats. That alone is annoying enough to get a lot of people to cough up even though they never watch the fucking BBC. Pay-4-Propaganda is enshrined in law here so if you're not broken into at 6 in the morning you can get summoned to court in amongst all the pretty thieves drug addicts and small time local criminals. It sure is great to be a british man in 2015, you will see in the documentary when it's released

Post: #41

(11-25-2015 05:35 AM)ChickenLover9T9 Wrote:  

(11-24-2015 12:22 AM)369eyedea Wrote:  I've never heard of Reggie Yates, and who made him the purveyor of all that is good?

He's a nobody, just a well planted black face to show that the BBC is tolerant of all ethnic backgrounds and gives everyone including effeminate black wusses their chance to present super awesome documentaries about diversity and oppression of wymyns and gays and trannies and generally disgruntled neon haired freaks.

I think it's a bit harsh to say he's a nobody. He was a top DJ on one of the prime shows on Radio 1, and has moved in to TV. There are plenty that are far worse, (usually women) who literally must have just sucked so much dick.

Post: #42

This looks like the main part that made the show:





They muted applause after my fat joke, but otherwise I think it came out fine when considering this is the BBC.

Post: #43

(12-08-2015 05:37 AM)Roosh Wrote:  This looks like the main part that made the show:

They muted applause after my fat joke, but otherwise I think it came out fine when considering this is the BBC.

It's not a total hack job, but the message they're presenting through the editing is that you're a doomsayer who's telling men they're victims.

Which is unsurprisingly completely the opposite of the real message I got from the talk.


Excellent blurring of faces at least, I saw myself a couple of times but doubt anyone who didn't know would recognise me.

"I'd hate myself if I had that kind of attitude, if I were that weak." - Arnold

Post: #44

Reggie has nothing on Louis Theroux, who is the king of the "living with extremists" genre. All Reggie can do in that clip is look aloof, raise his eyebrows every so often and put a spin on the face-blurring aspect.

Post: #45

(12-08-2015 05:37 AM)Roosh Wrote:  This looks like the main part that made the show:





They muted applause after my fat joke, but otherwise I think it came out fine when considering this is the BBC.

Just one look at the comments shows the kind of audience they are pandering to. No matter what you said they would've edited it to make you look as bad as possible, however as you said it looks like it won't be as bad as it could be. You could walk away saying "considering this is the BBC" but man these guys really are cancer to the British middle-class, I do wish someone would have talked you out of letting these guys in.

To all Brit's who read this, if you have not done so already you should not be paying your TV license, don't fund these propaganda pushing cucks. Yes they will still be probably propped up by the government but at least it's a start.

Post: #46

(12-08-2015 05:37 AM)Roosh Wrote:  This looks like the main part that made the show:





They muted applause after my fat joke, but otherwise I think it came out fine when considering this is the BBC.

As tall as you are, the presenter manages to even heightmog you, which doesn't bode well for the journalism of this documentary. I mean, can you really expect a guy who could well pass for an NBA point guard to understand the plight of the common man in today's completely insane dating and social culture? It's brutal out there.

Post: #47

(12-08-2015 10:34 AM)civpro Wrote:  As tall as you are, the presenter manages to even heightmog you, which doesn't bode well for the journalism of this documentary. I mean, can you really expect a guy who could well pass for an NBA point guard to understand the plight of the common man in today's completely insane dating and social culture? It's brutal out there.

I was sure Reggie wasn't that tall - went back and found a picture I'd taken while they were doing the interview.


The camera "never" lies

"I'd hate myself if I had that kind of attitude, if I were that weak." - Arnold

Post: #48

This guy mean mugs you every time you say something he apparently doesn't agree with just like a woman would, instead of being logical, rational and understanding like a man should.

Post: #49

(12-08-2015 11:00 AM)Benoit Wrote:  

(12-08-2015 10:34 AM)civpro Wrote:  As tall as you are, the presenter manages to even heightmog you, which doesn't bode well for the journalism of this documentary. I mean, can you really expect a guy who could well pass for an NBA point guard to understand the plight of the common man in today's completely insane dating and social culture? It's brutal out there.

I was sure Reggie wasn't that tall - went back and found a picture I'd taken while they were doing the interview.


The camera "never" lies

Post: #50

(12-08-2015 11:00 AM)Benoit Wrote:  

That's funny because he is standing with a pretty strict posture while Roosh is very relaxed and slouched a bit