----------------------------------------

Quote:Illegal immigrant sex attacker dodges deportation after saying he's a SYRIAN REFUGEE

AN illegal immigrant who attacked and sexually molested a woman within days of smuggling himself into Britain looks set to avoid deportation by claiming he is a SYRIAN REFUGEE.


Despite authorities suspecting he is lying about his nationality, as well as his "frightening" criminal record, the predatory pervert will soon be free to walk the streets again.

His case makes a mockery of the British justice system and demonstrates how it is now almost impossible to deport foreign criminals due to overbearing human rights laws.


A court heard how Abdulrahman Abunasir continues to claim he is a Syrian refugee, despite the fact he allegedly told French authorities who detained him previously that he was Palestinian.

Experts who put the sex attacker through a language analysis test concluded there was a "very high degree of certainty that he was from Egypt" and confirmed he could not answer even the most basic questions about his supposed homeland.


Judges at the High Court said Abunasir can't be kept locked up forever


But shockingly he cannot be deported because there is no way of determining with 100% certainty that he does not come from Syria, which is being torn apart by a brutal civil war.

Judges and probation officers say the pervert is too dangerous to be released in case he attacks other women. Instead he is being held at an immigration detention centre at a cost of more than £40,000 a year to the taxpayer.


Officials said Abunasir could not answer even basic questions about Syria


Theresa May has promised to deport more foreign criminals



In my judgment the risk of reoffending cannot be said to be low

Judge Clive Heaton


Jonathan Isaby, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “Taxpayers will be incensed if foreign criminals are using the desperate refugee crisis to try and avoid deportation.

“On the whole, the system for removing offenders must be dramatically improved. It’s not right that British taxpayers are picking up the tab for foreign criminals to stay here.”

Abunasir submitted his claim for asylum whilst serving an 18-month prison sentence for a horrific random sex attack.

After just nine months behind bars the sex attacker was moved to a secure immigration centre, at which point the Government began attempts to deport him.


As a result he has spent almost two years at the centre, with the bill for his incarceration already topping £80,000.

He even tried to SUE Britain for unlawful detention in the hope of securing a megabucks payout, but his claims was rejected by High Court judges.

In making their ruling the justices also warned that the Government cannot keep Abunasir behind bars forever, raising the "frightening" prospect of him taking to the streets once more.



The immigrant attacked and molested a woman outside a cafe in London in 2013 as she walked to her boyfriend's home.

After approaching the woman Abunasir became aggressive and started to manhandle her before sexually assaulting her.

A judge was told he was "petrified she was going to be raped" and only narrowly managed to escape from his clutches during the late-night assault.

During the High Court hearing, Judge Clive Heaton said: "This was clearly a very serious and frightening sexual offence, committed against a young woman, while she was on her own in the street, by a man unknown to her and who had been in the country in all probability less than a fortnight.

"In my judgment the risk of reoffending cannot be said to be low. He has shown little respect for the law here by his criminal offending, unlawful entry to the UK, failure to present himself as an asylum seeker, and obstruction of his lawful removal."



Critics said the case shows why the Government needs to improve how it deports foreign criminals.

Lord Alex Carlile QC, the former anti-terrorism laws reviewer, said: “It’s regrettable that a sex offender who has committed a very serious offence cannot be removed. As long as this case continues, there is a high cost to the taxpayer.”

A Home Office spokesman said: “Foreign nationals who abuse our hospitality by committing crimes in the UK should be in no doubt of our determination to deport them.”

When I copy and past the articles, or segments of them, I tend to try to remove some of the junk. Look at how blatant these links are, in a article about a rapist migrant with a long rap sheet:


Migrant woman praying


A migrant woman waits for permission to move towards the train station ar a refugee camp near The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [EPA]


Migrant woman praying


Syrian child crying


Young child wraps up warm


Migrants keep warm Serbia


Migrants cross the border


Migrant child


Medical tent migrants


Migrants wait for food supplies


MIgrants crossing border


Migrant crossing border


Migrant crossing border


Migrant family waiting patiently


Migrant boy posing


woman tries to crawl between police at border


Hundreds migrants swarm


resting migrant family Austria


Resting after crossing the border


Migrants queing for food and supplies in Damascus


A Syrian man carries a girl as he stands on the rubble of houses that were destroyed


Two migrant children sleep near the town of Gevgelija, The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia


Syrian children look at seized weapons in fear


A man rides his bicycle through devasting scenes of war torn Syria


A woman walks through the devastated town of Homs, Syria


A car drives through the town of Kobani which has been reduced to rubble


Smoke from the detonation of the temple of Baalshamin


Three German girls welcome migrants with a heart warming sign in Frankfurt


A toddler wears a sign on their clothes as tribute to migrants


Miriam, a young migrant girl smiles as she is given a doll upon arrival in Munich


Two men wait patiently for permission to move to a new refugee camp


Syrian army soldiers carry their comrades


A young boy crawls under a fence to board a train in Gevgelija, Macedonia


A young girl receives food and pamphlets during a street preaching event


A Syrian boy carries his sister to safety after she was hit by airstrikes


A young Syrian migrant kneels on the floor of a bus station


A woman stands alone after crossing the Macedonian-Greek border


A little girl and her mother wait to board a train in Gevgelija, Macedonia


Refugees cross into Hungary via a barbed wire fence


A migrant clutches a picture of Angela Merkel


Migrant families huddle around a fire for warmth


Volunteers on hand to provide fresh water for arriving migrants in Salzberg


Volunteers pass out food and supplies to arriving migrants in Dortmund



Talk about propaganda. I cut out some of the links before coming across this huge list buried in the paste. It's crazy how almost every link is about women and children, but at best they seem to make up 15 or so percent in a few videos and most don't seem to be cracking above 5 percent.

(10-29-2015 01:19 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  why would God punish Europeans when most of the younger ones are probably hipster socialists who proclaim to hate money and corporations anyways? isn't that what god wants?
it's not like your average millennial is working 80 hours a week at an investment bank, skipping church so he can research derivatives to get a fat bonus. Most of them don't even have a plan or career path to make money and protest 'evil corporations' who do. I thought their lack of drive to get rich was some type of virtue?

and their liberal altruism, although very stupid, nonetheless follows 'love others as I have loved you' since they want to donate all their paychecks and taxdollars given away to dysfunctional muslim hordes.
Although stupid and obnoxious, I have seen many secular young liberals are nonetheless peaceful hipsters yet you think they need punishment from a god?

No liberalism and by extension communism does not follow the golden rule.

Liberal altruism at its root seems to be a good thing however it is all rooted in "envy". Wanting something that someone else has of which you didn't earn violates the golden rule. Using the government to take it by force without your consent also constitutes stealing which is another ding against it.

It could be argued that taxes are a form of theft as well. But you'd have to avoid using the services the government provides so you don't "steal" as well. This starts getting very grey. However when it comes to socialism then the grey becomes clear.

Lack of drive isn't a virtue nor is being lazy in the eyes of Christ.

(10-29-2015 01:36 PM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

(10-29-2015 12:02 PM)Troll King Wrote:  A little Finland girl takes down and stops two black 'refugees' while trying to shoplift.






Also, WB.

Here is another WB Finnish girl who stops an invader from stealing, can't seem to imbed facebook vids:

https://www.facebook.com/saku.kytola/vid...670148817/

That's actually the same girl in both videos.

Good to know. That is even more impressive. Cute Finnish girl kicking invader ass right and left.

Those soulmates aren't very strong are they?

(10-29-2015 05:43 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Just became aware of that part of the agenda - German intellectuals already wrote books about it:


http://antaios.de/buecher-anderer-verlag...profitiert





It's in German, but here the gist:

+ GDP gets a boost as foreseen due to increase of debt
+ The pharma industry alone expects 13 billion of revenue increase in Germany and Austria alone due the migrant flow into the EU. The EU taxpayers will pick up the bill. Many refugees have sicknesses you hardly see in Europe.
+ the real profiteers of the refugee crisis are not the few smugglers and boat salesmen in Turkey - the entire refugee industry [b]employs 2.4 MILLION PEOPLE IN GERMANY ALONE! [/b]
+ THIS ASYLUM/REFUGEE INDUSTRY HAS A TURNOVER OF 140 BILLION EURO IN GERMANY ALONE!
+ Direct profiteers will be the real estate owners, politicians (as they are well connected and cash flows to them as well), refugee services, expansion of state structures
+ One example is the formerly Christian Caritas which has become a for-profit company that gets 95 EUROS PER DAY FOR EVERY REFUGEE IN AUSTRIA - that's 3000 EUROS/ 4000$ PER MONTH PER REFUGEE! For that money you can find quarters in the Hilton in Eastern Europe and even have catering paid. Caritas in addition gets hundreds of millions by the Christian people of Europe who keep on giving as they see scenes of crying children on the TV. They don't know that organizations like that do it for profit.
+ the author also adds that almost 100% of the help is done by the state, by Christian and marxist idealists, but nothing is forthcoming from the 2000 mosques in Germany! 2000 mosques and millions of Muslim believers, but no one aiding the newcomers! That should tell you something about the inherent mentality. They let the infidel dogs do the work - like here Austrian soldiers being employed as cleaning ladies for refugees https://www.unzensuriert.at/content/0019...Asylwerber

So yes - GDP will be going up, debt up, taxes up, productive parts of the economy supporting unproductive parts, but it's akin to a GDP boost of destroying infrastructure and rebuilding it every year. It only works via debt expansion, few profit from it and in the end the entire system collapses.

The author foresees the usual stuff - the poor being squeezed out first, riots, more poverty, bloodshed. And that is just the economic aspect of it all. There is of course the Jihad as well - the authors just focused on the crazy refugee industry alone.

The you tube video is interesting even though I don't understand everything. What did it say about the Rothschild and Barclays banks?


Big finance and big pharma at it again. I doubt that there are any libertarian chaos capitalists who also see themselves as patriots left now.

It appears that the US is trying to blackmail the UK into staying in the EU:

US warns Britain: If you leave EU you face barriers to trading with America

Quote:The United States is not keen on pursuing a separate free trade deal with Britain if it leaves the European Union, the US trade representative, Michael Froman, said – the first public comments from a senior US official on the matter.

Voters are due to decide by the end of 2017 whether the UK should remain in the EU, and opinion polls show rising support for leaving the bloc.

Froman’s comments on Wednesday undermine a key economic argument deployed by proponents of exit, who say Britain would prosper on its own and be able to secure bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) with trading partners.

The US is Britain’s biggest export market after the EU, buying more than $54bn (£35bn) in goods from the UK in 2014.

“I think it’s absolutely clear that Britain has a greater voice at the trade table being part of the EU, being part of a larger economic entity,” Froman told Reuters, adding that EU membership gives Britain more leverage in negotiations.

“We’re not particularly in the market for FTAs with individual countries. We’re building platforms … that other countries can join over time.”

If Britain left the EU, Froman said, it would face the same tariffs and trade barriers as other countries outside the US free trade network.

“We have no FTA with the UK so they would be subject to the same tariffs – and other trade-related measures – as China, or Brazil or India,” he said.

Washington has just sealed a trade deal with 11 other Pacific nations and wants to wrap up negotiations with the EU on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) by the end of next year.

The US is Britain’s second-largest export market for vehicles outside the EU.

If Britain is not part of the EU and therefore not part of TTIP, British cars exported to the US, such as those made by Jaguar Land Rover, would face a 2.5% tariff and could be at a disadvantage to German and Italian-made competitors.

British exports of fuel and chocolate could also be at a disadvantage if TTIP abolishes tariffs on those products.

I think this is shameful, given the historical links between the UK and the US. It appears that the US doesn't want the UK to be able to defend its own borders and economy from EU bullshit.

(10-29-2015 02:53 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  I think this is shameful, given the historical links between the UK and the US. It appears that the US doesn't want the UK to be able to defend its own borders and economy from EU bullshit.

Quote:US Trojan horse: NSA scandal shows Europe would be better off without Britain

The muted British reaction to what is a truly outrageous scandal, is proof, if indeed any further proof were needed, of what Britain's main role in the EU is: to act as a Trojan horse to defend and further the interests of the government of the United States of America.

The great French leader Charles de Gaulle twice vetoed Britain's application to join the EEC (European Economic Community), (the forerunner to today’s EU) not because he was anti-British but because he feared that allowing Britain to join would tantamount to letting America in. In January 1963, he famously declared that allowing Britain to join would lead to a “colossal Atlantic community dependent on and led by America, which would soon absorb the European Community.”

The irony is that the UK political elite today is far more slavishly pro-US than our leaders were in the 1960s. Back then British Prime Ministers did stand up to America from time to time, even though we were still paying back war-debt to the US. Labour’s Harold Wilson refused to send British troops to Vietnam. The Conservative Edward Heath defied pressure from the US to stay neutral during the 1973 Yom Kippur War between the Arab states and Israel and imposed an arms embargo on all combatants. In sharp contrast with today’s Conservative party leadership, Heath refused to allow US intelligence gathering from British bases in Cyprus.

Today, however, Britain’s leaders are totally subservient to Washington.

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/nsa-revelatio...ction-832/

This isn't really anything new, though it does quote a source that has been used here but I don't think it was quoted in this thread specifically (hard to remember with these large threads):

Quote:Europe's Muslim Migrants Bring Sex Pathologies in Tow

The body of a 20-year-old Syrian woman, "Rokstan M.," was unearthed from a shallow grave in the small Saxon town of Dessau last week. Her father and brothers stabbed her to death on her mother's orders, after she was gang-raped by three men. The rape left her "unclean" and the mother allegedly demanded the killing to restore the family's honor. German police are seeking the father and brothers.

That by itself is not newsworthy. What is newsworthy is that this affair did not appear in any of Germany's major daily newspapers or websites. The tabloid Bild-Zeitung ran the story, along with the regional press, while the arbiters of enlightened opinion buried it. Der Spiegel, the country's biggest news site, and the Frankfurter Algemeine Zeitung, the newspaper of record, made no mention.

The case of Rokstan M. is heart-rending. She had found work in Germany as a translator for the government, but she knew her family would track her down and kill her. "I am awaiting death. But I am too young to die," she had written on a social media profile. Her story deserves a line or two in the quality press. But it's one of many that German leaders want to ignore.

Political leaders in Germany—which may absorb 1.5 million migrants this year—are struggling to respond to reports of a sex crime epidemic among newly-arrived Muslims. Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere urged Germans not to believe rumors of widespread rape at refugee centers, while Germany's police union chief Rainer Wendt warned, "There is a lot of glossing over going on. But this doesn't represent reality." Wendt added, "It is understandable that there is the desire to calm things down politically."



Germany's elite knows perfectly well that the migrants bring social pathologies, because they have already seen the world's worst sex crime epidemic unfold in Scandinavia. Sweden now has the highest incidence of reported rape outside of a few African countries, and nearly ten times the rate of its European peers—and all this has happened in the past ten years. Sweden ranks near the top of the World Economic Forum's Gender Gap Index, yet it has become the most dangerous country for women outside of Africa, with an incidence of rape ten times that of its European peers. Sweden's political leaders not only refuse to take action, but have made it a criminal offense to talk about it.

Even in liberated, feminist, gender-neutral Sweden, there is something more horrible than rape, something horrible enough to persuade the political elite to sacrifice the physical and mental health of tens of thousands of Swedish women. That is the horror of social disintegration in the Muslim world. Sweden opened its borders to refugees twenty years before the migrant flood arrived on Germany's doorstep, and the foreign born rose from 9% of the population in 1990 to 15.4% in 2012. Foreigners have a higher birth rate, so the percentage is higher including second-generation immigrants.



There have been protests, to be sure, and nationalist parties like the Sweden Democrats have gained support on an anti-immigration platform, but Sweden will remain supine as its social fabric unravels. So, I expect, will Germany. Europe is transfixed by the horror unfolding from Libya to Afghanistan, as one of the world's major civilizations unravels in real time. In its moment of agony, the Muslim world's most potent weapon is its own weakness. The human cost of the collapse of Libya, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria is horrendous, but it is small thus far compared to the horrors that would attend instability in Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Bangladesh. The West can't bear to look at it.


The incidence of rape in Sweden has tripled in the past ten years as the country became Europe's premier destination for Muslim immigrants. Writing for the Gatestone Institute, Ingrid Carlqvist and Lars Hedegaard observe,

Quote:Since 2000, there has only been one research report on immigrant crime. It was done in 2006 by Ann-Christine Hjelm from Karlstads University. It emerged that in 2002, 85% of those sentenced to at least two years in prison for rape in 2002 were foreign born or second-generation immigrants.

A 1996 report by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention reached the conclusion that immigrants from North Africa (Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia) were 23 times as likely to commit rape as Swedish men. The figures for men from Iraq, Bulgaria and Romania were, respectively, 20, 18 and 18. Men from the rest of Africa were 16 times more prone to commit rape; and men from Iran, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia, 10 times as prone as Swedish men.

A new trend reached Sweden with full force over the past few decades: gang rape — virtually unknown before in Swedish criminal history. The number of gang rapes increased spectacularly between 1995 and 2006. Since then no studies of them have been undertaken.

Sweden not only stands by while a large number of its women are raped, but outlaws public discussion of the causes. Michael Hess, a Social-Democratic politician, was condemned by a Swedish court under a law forbidding denigration of ethnic groups. for writing in 2014, "There is a strong connection between rapes in Sweden and the number of immigrants from MENA countries [Middle East and North Africa]."


David P. Goldman is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and the Wax Family Fellow at the Middle East Forum.

   
   

Found a blog about Muslim Statistics and saw this post:

Quote:Sweden: 77% of rapes committed by 2% Muslim male population – Gov data

Posted on March 19, 2015 by Admin 39 Comments


The total Muslim population in Sweden is estimated at 4.4% (2013 figures). Out of that 4.4% and in deducting the women and children, we can roughly guesstimate that around 2% are male. The foreign rape figures at 77.6% Muslim has been anonymously confirmed by Swedish polish in a phone conversation. The actual figure could be higher. These percentages do not include Muslims with Swedish citizenship contained within rapes in the figures categorized under “Swedish nationals”.

   

Staggering rape and assault rape statistics from Sweden from 1985-89 and 1997-2001. Rape committed by Swedish born rapists (blue) were 22.4%. Foreign rapists represent 77.6% of all figures divided into ‘normal’ representation (pink, red and orange) at 5,070; over representation (red) at 3,752 rape cases; unregistered migrants (orange) at 653 rape cases. Note that the blue bracket of Swedish rapists include foreign born persons with Swedish citizenship as the statistics are only counted on citizenship, and not nationality.


Sweden’s growing rape incidents

[Google translate from Affes.wordpress.com]

When I have “rape” in the title will increase visits to your blog dramatically. Rape upset, and rightly so, that’s a disgusting crime which affects both women and men in depth. If a connection is made to immigrants over the presentation of rape crimes, it becomes very explosive. What we know of course our rulers and authorities. Therefore, they do everything for us in the dark. It is rarely direct lies. It would be too risky. Effective propaganda is all about creating uncertainty. Insecure people are passive.

One way to create uncertainty is failing to investigate and find out the facts. Or, as in this case: facts and findings are available, but they are not released to the public.

The only major study that has been made regarding immigrants overrepresented in rape where the results became public, the investigation is in BRÅ-raport 1996:2, which covers the years 1985-1989.

Here I have started from the report’s estimate in Table 24 (p. 74). The pie chart on the right you can see that even then (1985-1989) were persons of Swedish background in the minority of 39 percent.

These things I have counted on the 2011 conditions, see the chart at the top of the post. People of Swedish descent account for 22.4 percent. The reason that Swedes have such a high percentage is that I have taken account of the new sexual offenses law which came 2005th Without it, the Swedes percentage was less.1 Non registered percentage I have made known to remain at 10 percent. It may be a conservative estimate. Increased the percentage would of course Swedes percentage decrease.

Who exactly are committing these rapes?

The BRÅ report from 1996 reported over-representation of immigrants of different types of crime are divided on which countries / geographical areas, people came from. According to the National Council is the data set for including rape too thin (p. 61):

“As for murder, manslaughter, rape, other sexual offenses, robbery and burglary are the values ​​of brottsparticipation too small to be able to draw conclusions from them.”

   
Total national rape statistics: Swedish born rapists (39%), migrants (38%), migrant children (13%) and unregistered migrants (10%). Immigrants are responsible for 62% of the entire country’s rape crimes.

Rape figures for the years 1985-1989 was on a completely different level than today. Broken down by individual countries, the material becomes even thinner. It is possible to draw some conclusions, but to draw any firm conclusions needed more data.

Nearly ten years later in 2005 will follow up report. Instead of more data so we can start to draw conclusions do we make this announcement (p. 44):

“BRÅ’s last study was done fairly detailed analysis of the foreign-born and ‘immigrants’ children’ over-representation of each crime divided on which countries / geographical areas, people came from. BRÅ has this time decided that such a detailed analysis is not meaningful.”

I can agree with. BRÅ’s “analysis” is rarely meaningful. However, a detailed account of the results desired.

It is not that BRÅ did not bother to produce values ​​for the countries of origin. They have obviously taken up all the results. It is after they have seen the results, they judge that there is “meaningful” to account for them. In other words, do the investigators on the BRÅ just how it is with the immigrants’ countries of origin for various categories of crime. Responsible ministers, both then and now, of course have been informed. Thomas Bodström (s), Beatrice Ask (m), Mona Sahlin (s), Erik Ullenhag (fp), Barbro Holmberg (s), Tobias Billström (m) and others.

The Liberal Party’s spokesman on refugee and integration issues Mauricio Rojas wrote on DN-debate a few days before the report was released in 2005:

“The sensitive issue, the report explains the concern probably also the slow process of publication of the report presented on Wednesday. The main statistical results have been calculated and analyzed for a long time, but the report’s publication has been delayed because new investigations and treatments deemed necessary depending on the substance of controversial nature.”

One who “examined” the material was a Polish former surveyors … * cough *

Among all the “treatments” was therefore to simply delete all the results of the criminal suspects’ countries of origin in relation to specific types of crime such as rape. An apparent cover-up. More than 2000 individual amounts reported in the first report is missing from “monitoring”.

BRÅ chooses words to conceal results they obtain in their investigations. Studies of the Swedish people pay through their taxes. To get an idea, we simply use the values ​​that emerged from the first report. It is certainly old numbers, but for the sake, they need not be misleading. Mauricio Rojas met with investigators nearly a year before the 2005 publication of the report:

“Last spring, I met two of those responsible for the report generation, among them the late January Ahlberg, who was also author of the report from 1996. It was a meeting that bore witness to a real nervousness that the publication of the new report led in some environments.

During the call, Ahlberg noted that the new report’s findings essentially confirmed the results of the previous report.”

If the new report’s findings essentially confirmed the findings of the previous report, the old figures to be pretty reliable.

Below(2), an evaluation for 2011 based on the information in BRÅ-report 1996:2 Table 2.3 (p. 107).

   

For the three columns that stand out: Rest of Europe, West Asia and Africa, it is to some extent that they represent large groups of immigrant population. But that’s not the whole explanation. The foreign born from Africa, for example, only 1500 more in population than the foreign born from Europe (yes, you read that right. In the age group 15-54 is the foreign-born Africans are more than the foreign-born from the Nordic countries). Although both groups are almost equal populations are held in Africa is much higher than that of the Nordic countries. It depends on Africans’ over-representation.

For Western Asia, it is mainly Iraq who pulls up the stack. The Iraqis are a major group in Sweden, and they happen to have the second highest over-representation of rape. Only North Africa has a higher value.

Could it possibly have been the result of this style as investigators on National Council came up with 2005? Results confirmed the initial report and made it possible to begin to draw conclusions. The conclusions, if they had been published, might have made people react. Reactions that might have made immigration a matter of choice in parliamentary elections a year later.

This we may never know, but one thing we know for certain: Survey results are available, but they are not released to the public.

Calculation

An account of how I did the estimates can be found here.

1. Eftersom I took into account changes in sexual offenses Act 2005 came more rapes in Swedes stack. A large part of the “Swedish” rape is therefore of less severe kind. Such as before the change in legislation was headlined as sexual coercion.

2. All the charts I post in this topic is about estimates. Even those from BRÅ. No one has or will ever be fully cognizant of how crime is distributed. Simply because all crimes are not solved. The number of crimes in the bars is very accurate because I have chosen to convert percentages to the number of crimes, to make things a bit more substantial.

Swedish politicians demands using machine guns to protect Sweden's borders.

https://www.rt.com/news/314969-sweden-re...chine-gun/

Quote:“Denmark and Germany are trying to decrease the number of asylum seekers, but not Sweden! They clearly want to go to Sweden. And no one can meet them on the Oresund Bridge with a machine gun!” she wrote on her Facebook page.

Of course after such a statement her political career is as good as over.

Quote:“I very much apologize for what I've done and I want to take it back. It was a temporary insanity,” she reportedly said. “I was in a bad mood and angry. I never express myself in that way, it was wrong. I do not want to discuss it anymore.”

Of course it's the opposite - it's the temporary return to sanity. Of course you should meet invading armies with machine guns, tanks, artillery, navy and the airforce. Whether they come armed, "peaceful", out of need or whatever the reason - it all does not matter. If your own home and order, your very existence is threatened then you cannot take in anyone at all!

If they still demand entry then they are to be given the choice between a machine gun or a trip home. That's what any sane country does and there is nothing negative about it. The West does not owe 3 billion developing country poor entry - by that decision eliminating the high safe living standard of the West.

That politician will be duly punished for her temporary sanity.

(10-29-2015 01:36 PM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

(10-29-2015 12:02 PM)Troll King Wrote:  A little Finland girl takes down and stops two black 'refugees' while trying to shoplift.






Also, WB.

Here is another WB Finnish girl who stops an invader from stealing, can't seem to imbed facebook vids:

https://www.facebook.com/saku.kytola/vid...670148817/

That's actually the same girl in both videos.

The Finnish people continue to set an example for Europe to follow.

I always hear positive things about Finland.

Quote:Suspect In Germany Confesses To Killing 4-Year-Old Migrant Boy

Just heard about this story on NPR.

The ONLY thing they talked about on NPR in relation to the migrant invasion is this story.

Not a word about rapes, burning camps, rioting, violence, not a single word.

I like listening to NPR. You have to expose yourself to enemy propaganda.

"Don't Bang Sweden" was created just from this thread.

Is The Spiegel no longer allowing comments on articles about the invasion? My German isn't great, but I think that's what this says:

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/bu...60264.html

Quote:Liebe Leserinnen und Leser,
im Unterschied zu vielen anderen Artikeln auf SPIEGEL ONLINE finden Sie unter diesem Text kein Forum. Leider erreichen uns zum Thema Flüchtlinge so viele unangemessene, beleidigende oder justiziable Forumsbeiträge, dass eine gewissenhafte Moderation nach den Regeln unserer Netiquette kaum mehr möglich ist. Deshalb gibt es nur unter ausgewählten Artikeln zu diesem Thema ein Forum. Wir bitten um Verständnis.

I had been practicing my German trying to read the articles over there and it was always nice to see the opposing view in the comments.

Toe the party line or you will be silenced!

(10-29-2015 07:04 PM)uptownguy Wrote:  Is The Spiegel no longer allowing comments on articles about the invasion? My German isn't great, but I think that's what this says:

http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/bu...60264.html

Quote:Liebe Leserinnen und Leser,
im Unterschied zu vielen anderen Artikeln auf SPIEGEL ONLINE finden Sie unter diesem Text kein Forum. Leider erreichen uns zum Thema Flüchtlinge so viele unangemessene, beleidigende oder justiziable Forumsbeiträge, dass eine gewissenhafte Moderation nach den Regeln unserer Netiquette kaum mehr möglich ist. Deshalb gibt es nur unter ausgewählten Artikeln zu diesem Thema ein Forum. Wir bitten um Verständnis.

I had been practicing my German trying to read the articles over there and it was always nice to see the opposing view in the comments.

Toe the party line or you will be silenced!

Haven't practiced my German in a long while but basically the English translation would be:

"Dear readers [they use both gendered nouns, lol],

Contrary to many other Spiegel Online articles you will not find a 'comment section' under this article. Unfortunately, articles on the theme of immigrants attract so many inappropriate, offensive, or litigable comments that conscientious moderation according to our Netiquette rules is hardly possible. Therefore, only select articles on this theme will have a comment section. We ask for your understanding."

(10-29-2015 08:48 AM)Troll King Wrote:  I saw this over on r/European with the translation in the comments:

Although I'm definitely happy to finally see someone from the Church speaking out against this invasion and go against the party line instituted by the Pope, who seems just too happy to invite the enemies of his faith into his house (not that Europe is his house, it's just a figure of speech), he just couldn't help it, so this invasion is a punishment from God because Europeans "worship money, power, and the forbidden delights". Right, this is the only moment in human history that people have seek money, power and sex, and only Europeans are guilty of that. As a non believer I obviously think this justification is silly and I hope even the followers of the faith would think the same.

(10-29-2015 01:36 PM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

(10-29-2015 12:02 PM)Troll King Wrote:  A little Finland girl takes down and stops two black 'refugees' while trying to shoplift.






Also, WB.

Here is another WB Finnish girl who stops an invader from stealing, can't seem to imbed facebook vids:

https://www.facebook.com/saku.kytola/vid...670148817/

That's actually the same girl in both videos.

Best comment from one of the videos:

"She has more balls than the whole swedish army."

I have to agreee with that.

Also, would bang, would impregnate multiple times and would raise a little anti invasion army with her.

(10-29-2015 08:13 PM)Mr. Brightside Wrote:  

(10-29-2015 07:04 PM)uptownguy Wrote:  Toe the party line or you will be silenced!

Haven't practiced my German in a long while but basically the English translation would be:

"Dear readers [they use both gendered nouns, lol],

Contrary to many other Spiegel Online articles you will not find a 'comment section' under this article. Unfortunately, articles on the theme of immigrants attract so many inappropriate, offensive, or litigable comments that conscientious moderation according to our Netiquette rules is hardly possible. Therefore, only select articles on this theme will have a comment section. We ask for your understanding."

Yeap, nothing new, the thought police needs to censor conversation and free exchange of ideas.

Kind of an ironic meme there, because Jerry Seinfeld's mom was a Syrian refugee.

I believe Finns, due to their ancestral environment, are more aggressive than Europeans usually are. So, Teutatis, raising an army with a Finnish girl is viable.

(10-30-2015 12:56 AM)Eskhander Wrote:  I believe Finns, due to their ancestral environment, are more aggressive than Europeans usually are. So, Teutatis, raising an army with a Finnish girl is viable.

I think the proximity of Russia/ Soviet Union helps too. The traditional and national consciousness of central and eastern Europe was unwittingly preserved by the Soviet occupation and the threat of the same thing happening to Finland seems to have cultivated its national pride.

Conquering European Christendom has been a goal of the Satanists/Globalists/whatever you want to call them for a long time. The reason its gotten so brazen recently is the shoe is about to drop in the world economy. Shit's about to get real. The bankers/politicans I guess want to give the people something to fight at instead of them.


Even before this "crisis" (its not a crisis its an invasion helped facilitated by traitors at the helms of state in the USA and Europe) I remember a couple of years ago and walking around Berlin and walking into a German restaurant with the feeling that the German restaurant was a ethnic German outpost in an Turkish country.

I don't trust any demographic statistics, and can tell you for a fact that if the native European populations win this war it will be through total war scorched earth ethnic cleansing starting out as a minority after a complete economic meltdown with the reason for their victory being because of the military taking the side of the nationalists.



At this point the die has been cast. Even up until a few months ago bloodshed could have been averted with mass deporations. Not anymore. The Muhamadens are too entrenched.

The reason blood will be assured is that Muslims don't work. They just go on welfare and every once in a while do a little bit of work in a family business. That's fine when your a minority, but when your half the population at a point where Europe is already in way too much debt up to their knees, there is nothing else left but war.

Don't believe me? Look at the Middle East. Yes, there has been foreign intervention, but Muslims haven't stopped been peaceful since their religion was started, going to Europe won't change that.




The main driver of this invasion is Barack Obama. The Muslims got lucky to have a sympathizer in the country that basically runs Europe, but that's only going to last 1 more year. Even Hillary isn't as fucking crazy as Obama, she just wants power and she's sick or something. I don't think she really cares about Europe in the way that Obama hates European people and Christians in general because of some racial thing he feels. Hillary mainly dislikes Americans.



So, basically Europe will see war. Their total pussification after world war 2 is basically going to cause a war on the continent even more bloody and racial in nature than the last.

Preparing for war brings peace. Europeans didn't do this, they became vassals to the US, then the EU, and now, after snobbishly mocking the 2nd Amendment since the 60s finally realize there is a world beyond their bubble that is cruel, and reality driven,

Basically this migrant invasion is like the South Park Episode where Reality finally gets into the party. Many Europeans are still trying to kill reality, but reality is what it is. I used to not believe Vox Day's predictions, but his uncanny ability to see through the mass conditioning of the world media and make good predictions concerning human behavior have left me with no other conclusion that the only possible result of these migrations is terribly bloody ethnic warfare with the result being anyones guess.


My guess is early victories for the invaders with decisive nativist victories in the end, but how long this conflict will go on is anyones guess. 5-500 years, who knows, but my guess is that it will start in my lifetime and end in my childrens.

So gear up if your European or even American. The shitshow is about to start and who the hell knows what's going to happen, except that the regular guy will bear the biggest brunt. So don't be a regular guy. Be a leader, a fighter, a recluse even, but don't be the average schmuck.

(10-30-2015 02:21 AM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  So, basically Europe will see war. Their total pussification after world war 2 is basically going to cause a war on the continent even more bloody and racial in nature than the last.
..
My guess is early victories for the invaders with decisive nativist victories in the end, but how long this conflict will go on is anyones guess. 5-500 years, who knows, but my guess is that it will start in my lifetime and end in my childrens.

So gear up if your European or even American. The shitshow is about to start and who the hell knows what's going to happen, except that the regular guy will bear the biggest brunt. So don't be a regular guy. Be a leader, a fighter, a recluse even, but don't be the average schmuck.

I think that this is a probability, but it's tens of millions of invaders too early to do it well. We don't know exactly what the elite is planning ahead, but total war against all practicing Muslims is a potential end. Essentially it's what Israel is waiting for. The only thing that is holding them from completely wiping out all Arabs from the area is just the reaction of the international community (of course also their own people who are not so much into mass-murder).

However if there is enough bloodshed, chaos, poverty, then both the Europeans and the Isrealis will be united. And if you think that the Chinese will just keep out of the conflict, then you are mistaken. They will take the side of the White West and Israel. Depending on how ethical that war goes, then it won't last 100 years. In our times you can even kill 1 billion people conventionally within a few years (plenty of military tech that NATO & Russia has is not used - energy projections, plasma guns, microwave weapons, electromagnetic pulse bombs that shut down all unprotected electronics (Russia alone has that stuff and could use it against the Ukraine if they really waged an all-out war).

But that scenario sounds unlikely to me - I think rising chaos, terrorism, daily attacks, rape statistics beyond African ones, rising poverty - this can go on for long and an Orwellian Big Brother state just clamps down on everyone. That makes more sense - oppress everyone despite the fact that it's only the elite and the new barbarians who are causing all the problems.

The problem I have with a global Muslims vs Everyone war is that the Muslims are way too weak. Even if Iran and Pakistan launch all their nukes and millions in the West die, then they would be wiped out within 1-5 years with little resistance. It's all fine and well speaking of how "terribly effective" ISIS is and Afghanistan or Iraq are so hard to control. That is all off-the book if you march in and kill everyone. Then populate the area with Israelis, Chinese, Indians or Europeans and live peacefully on. That would barely strain the modern military of NATO/Russia/China. That's why I don't think that such a war is likely - even if 200 million Muslims live in Europe in 2050 and are causing hell for the locals.

Of course I would never want such a thing to happen, but it should be clear to all those posturing oh so superior militant Islamists that they are in fact no real enemy neither to the West or to the Far East (also I might add - their actual terrorist cells likely are completely infested with global secret service operatives - any big terrorist attack is literally impossible to do without the knowledge of those services).

A good clean war is the better but less likely option in Europe. Decades of unrest, economic chaos and increasingly Orwellian government is more likely. I'd prepare myself to dig in or get out if I were European.

(10-30-2015 06:47 AM)RawGod Wrote:  A good clean war is the better but less likely option in Europe. Decades of unrest, economic chaos and increasingly Orwellian government is more likely. I'd prepare myself to dig in or get out if I were European.

Sadly, war is anything but good or clean.

G

There is another possible work around to avoid an all out war against the invaders. I would think the native population would have to bring in politicians that are for deporting all of the invaders, and then most of them(the migrant invaders) just get deported back to the Mideast and Africa.

(10-30-2015 07:56 AM)eradicator Wrote:  There is another possible work around to avoid an all out war against the invaders. I would think the native population would have to bring in politicians that are for deporting all of the invaders, and then most of them(the migrant invaders) just get deported back to the Mideast and Africa.

Currently what people can do is raise awareness in their environment, get armed, vote far right and prepare for even worse times.