Post: #26

(07-10-2015 08:35 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 08:23 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  I'd rather take 5'2 ompa loopas over the Muslims migrating into Europe.

The men are 5'2." The women are around 4'11" at least judging from what I see in the Baltimore-DC area.

Central Americans not Mexicans. A lot of them around there and Mexicans arent usually that short. Central Americans are.

Post: #27

(07-10-2015 02:20 PM)Brian Shima Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 08:35 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 08:23 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  I'd rather take 5'2 ompa loopas over the Muslims migrating into Europe.

The men are 5'2." The women are around 4'11" at least judging from what I see in the Baltimore-DC area.

Central Americans not Mexicans. A lot of them around there and Mexicans arent usually that short. Central Americans are.

I used to live near MacArthur Park in Los Angeles and when I told a Mexican-American that my area was full of Mexicans he got visibly angry and said that that most of those people are from Honduras and El Salvador.

I’m 5’10”and I’m only a few inches taller than the average Mexican. I’ve worked with Mexicans who are taller than me. I tower over central Americans.

Post: #28

(07-10-2015 02:56 AM)Blick Mang Wrote:  We are not receiving the best from Mexico, we're receiving the worst in terms of criminality and general intelligence, all to the benefit of Spanish-blood Mexicans in positions of power. We are literally Mexico's trash bin.

(07-10-2015 09:04 AM)RexImperator Wrote:  I'm surprised that shooting in San Francsico hasn't been mentioned, or doesn't have a thread yet. Or was it mentioned in the Trump thread?

AP Wrote:

San Francisco status as 'sanctuary' criticized after slaying

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The killing of a woman at a sightseeing pier has brought criticism down on this liberal city because the Mexican man under arrest was in the U.S. illegally, had been deported five times and was out on the streets after San Francisco officials disregarded a request from immigration authorities to keep him locked up.

San Francisco is one of dozens of cities and counties across the country that do not fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities. The city goes so far as to promote itself as a "sanctuary" for people in the country illegally.

In a jailhouse interview with a TV station, Francisco Sanchez, the 45-year-old repeat drug offender arrested in the shooting Wednesday of Kathryn Steinle, appeared to confirm that he came to the city because of its status as a sanctuary.

Prosecutors on Monday charged Sanchez with murder as San Francisco Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi strongly defended his office's release of Sanchez and pointed the finger back at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

He said the federal agency should have issued an arrest warrant for Sanchez.

"ICE knew that he had been deported five times," Mirkarimi said. "You would have thought he met a threshold that he required a court order or a warrant. They did not do that."

The case has prompted a flurry of criticism from ICE officials, politicians and commenters on social media, all of whom portrayed the slaying as a preventable tragedy.

"Most of the blame should fall squarely on the shoulders of the San Francisco sheriff, because his department had custody of him and made the choice to let him go without notifying ICE," said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies, which wants tougher immigration enforcement.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte, the Virginia Republican who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, blamed sanctuary practices and the Obama administration, saying: "The tragic murder of Kate Steinle once again underscores the need to end these reckless policies."

Mayor Ed Lee issued a statement saying city policy was never intended to protect "repeat, serious and violent felons." He asked for federal and local agencies to review what happened.

California Attorney General Kamala Harris, a former San Francisco district attorney who is running for U.S. Senate, cautioned that when it comes to immigration, "our policy should not be informed by our collective outrage about one man's conduct."

Many other San Francisco politicians stayed quiet as mourners held a late morning vigil at Pier 14 on the downtown waterfront, where the 32-year-old Steinle was gunned down Wednesday, seemingly at random, during an evening stroll with her father and a family friend. She had recently moved to San Francisco.

While many cities have scaled back cooperation with ICE, few have gone as far as San Francisco.

For more than two decades, San Francisco has been considered a sanctuary for people in the U.S. illegally.

The city's sanctuary law prohibits city employees from helping federal authorities with immigration investigations or arrests unless required by law or warrant. That said, the ordinance does not prohibit local law enforcement from informing ICE that they've arrested someone in the country illegally for a felony offense or who has prior felony convictions.

In 2013, Mirkarimi's office started turning over fewer people under arrest to federal immigration authorities for deportation.

Mirkarimi on Monday stood behind the city's sanctuary law as a way to fight crime and promote trust. His office routinely ignores such federal immigration requests unless backed by an active warrant. He said ICE was aware of San Francisco's policy.

Earlier this year, Sanchez was released from federal prison — where he had served a sentence for re-entering the country after deportation — and turned over to the Sheriff's Department on an outstanding drug-related warrant. The San Francisco district attorney's office declined to prosecute what authorities said was a decade-old marijuana possession case, and Sanchez was freed on April 15.

Before he was set free, ICE had filed a so-called detainer with San Francisco authorities, asking to be informed if they intended to let him go, ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen said. But she said ICE was never notified.

"We're not asking local law enforcement to do our job," she said in a statement. "All we're asking is that they notify us when a serious foreign national criminal offender is being released to the street so we can arrange to take custody."

In the past 21 months, immigration authorities have issued more than 230,000 detainers, according to ICE. Since January 2014, law enforcement agencies around the country have failed to honor about 17,000 detainers, 61 percent of them in California, ICE said.

Sanchez has been deported five times, most recently in 2009, and has seven felony convictions, four involving drug charges, according to ICE.

From jail, Sanchez told a KGO-TV reporter in a mix of Spanish and English that he found the gun wrapped in a T-shirt while sitting on a bench at the pier.

"So I picked it up and ... it started to fire on its own," Sanchez said, adding that he heard three shots go off.

Asked if he came to San Francisco because of its sanctuary status, he said yes.

"I only want to say that if the court wants to find me guilty, I wouldn't get mad," Sanchez said during the interview, in which he appeared confused and spoke incoherently at times.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California supports sanctuary protections, saying people are more willing to cooperate with police if there's no fear of deportation.

Julia Harumi Mass, a senior staff attorney with the organization, called the details of this case exceptional and put the blame on ICE.

"It is still unclear why the federal government turned over someone who is known to be deportable to the city of San Francisco, knowing that San Francisco is one of the oldest sanctuary cities in the country," she said.

Post: #29

(07-10-2015 12:49 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 11:57 AM)Icepasian Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 11:17 AM)kaotic Wrote:  Well yeah...Mexico is our neighbor and California has spanish/mexican history so this is obvious as water is wet.

Many border states will be like this sooner or later.

It wouldn't have been obvious or inevitable if the government would have enforced its own immigration laws and refused to appease the illegal immigrants with occasional amnesty for decades. The problem was always our "compassion", which to be honest, is more akin to national co-dependence.

The irony of that statement.

Yeah I get it, we got CA, we made laws, we aren't enforcing our borders and laws. Which brings the not so bright illegals over here and bottoms out wages.

Did you forget what settlers did to the natives and Mexicans here ?

Don't forget named cities like Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, basically the countless missions setup.

People always forget the history of this country and what it was built on.

Who gives a shit? It's not theirs anymore and it shouldn't be given back to them.

Don't buy into guilt trips. It's absurd to feel bad over something past fellow countrymen did that improved our nation's situation significantly.

Ask yourself how many countries in the world, outside of Europe and America, feel guilty about their pasts?

Post: #30

The irony of the SF slaying is that Kathryn Steinle (Jewish? Definitely white at minimum) almost certainly supported blanket amnesty, diversity-is-great leftist boilerplate, along with her similarly self-hating, pathologically altruistic coastal liberal ilk.

I wonder why it is that only majority white nations engage in this level of self hatred and desire to be the world's charity. You'll never see east Asian countries import millions of impoverished third world detritus as a matter of national policy.

Post: #31

Quote:San Francisco is one of dozens of cities and counties across the country that do not fully cooperate with federal immigration authorities. The city goes so far as to promote itself as a "sanctuary" for people in the country illegally.

So it's outrageous if a clerk refuses to issue a marriage licence to homosexuals but it's fine if an entire city and all of its public authorities are refusing to deport or lock up a known criminal?

Post: #32

Imagine the outrage if several states and cities said they were going to stop enforcing all federal gun control laws.

The big government supporters would lose their collective minds.

Wasn't it just last week a lot of nerdy armchair left-wing Union triumphalists across the internet were making noise about how much they were glad the rebellious law-breaking treasonous Confederacy was brought to heel?

It seems they're okay with rebellion to the central power as long as it serves their goals.

Post: #33

Post: #34

(07-10-2015 02:56 AM)Blick Mang Wrote:  Mexico is a shitty place because it's filled with low-IQ Aztecs, while those with Spanish ancestry occupy positions of power in government and media and are simply pushing the native peasantry north for their own benefit. This goes back centuries; Mexico has historically been structured (legally, socially) in this order:

1. Castillans
2. Mestizos (mixed Spanish/native blood)
3. Natives / Aztec descendants

Just have a quick look at Mexican television and compare the appearance of anchors/personalities with immigrants entering the U.S. It's not slender mocha babes with big brown eyes filling up California, it's 5'2 oompa loompa shaped farm peasants. The "white" label was attached to Latinos before the 1970's immigration wave, when those entering the U.S. were typically wealthy, educated, and coming from the upper tiers of Mexican society. The description is outdated.

It's exactly this hypocrisy Donald Trump is pointing out. We are not receiving the best from Mexico, we're receiving the worst in terms of criminality and general intelligence, all to the benefit of Spanish-blood Mexicans in positions of power. We are literally Mexico's trash bin.

Jesus...this post and the amount of likes it got...

First off, those "low IQ Aztec oompa loompas" you talk about are probably Oaxacans. Oaxaca is pretty much the cultural heart of Mexico in terms of food, artwork, language, etc. You seem to be making some point like "Thank god the Spaniards came in and civilized those brute Aztecs and their low IQs." Gimme a break, I'll take Mexican culture over Spanish culture any day. Some of the most kind-hearted, warm, generous, and hospitable people I've ever met.

The vast majority of Oaxacans and Pueblans, those short "oompa loompas", come to the U.S. to work and to work hard.

The very nature of immigration is the bottom income class of society uprooting their existence to find a better one elsewhere. You think Germany is getting the cream of the crop of Turks? You think the Philipinnes sends their best to other countries?

L.A. gets plenty of rich asian immigrants, but so what? You think it's actually preferable that rich Chinese come in and buy tons of property and gain political influence in the U.S.? I'd rather immigrants be kept on the lower end of social and political influence.

Most immigrants pay taxes. Most immigrants earn a paycheck that have had income tax withheld. Any of you guys bitching about immigrants, well, start making babies to replenish the native population.

But if you want to talk about Mexico sending "their worst", in terms of gangs, murders, and rape, okay let's go there.

Where do you think Latino gangs get so much power? Where do cartels get so much power?

The U.S. is, by FAR, the biggest consumer of illegal drugs.

On top of that, do a little research into the relationship between the CIA and Mexican/Central American drug cartels. We've been supporting these crime lords for decades.

And finally, the War on Drugs itself. The War on Drugs is a billion dollar industry, benefiting private prisons, alcohol producers and distributors, and the DEA. In order for these groups to keep earning a paycheck, they NEED druglords, they NEED an enemy, they NEED dealers on the street. The ruling class doesn't give a shit about people getting high. They're more concerned with their cronies getting billions of dollars of taxpayer money.

So before you go on cheering for Trump and his buffoon comments, take a step back and look at our own complicity in the current situation. Something about making one's bed and lying in it...

Post: #35

(07-10-2015 12:49 PM)kaotic Wrote:  The irony of that statement.

Yeah I get it, we got CA, we made laws, we aren't enforcing our borders and laws. Which brings the not so bright illegals over here and bottoms out wages.

Did you forget what settlers did to the natives and Mexicans here ?

Don't forget named cities like Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, basically the countless missions setup.

People always forget the history of this country and what it was built on.

I don't see the irony. Just because Americans in the 1800s did it to Mexico doesn't mean we should allow it to happen here. There's no law in the universe saying I have to allow someone to punch me in the face if I punched them a year earlier.

Post: #36

(07-10-2015 02:39 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 12:49 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 11:57 AM)Icepasian Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 11:17 AM)kaotic Wrote:  Well yeah...Mexico is our neighbor and California has spanish/mexican history so this is obvious as water is wet.

Many border states will be like this sooner or later.

It wouldn't have been obvious or inevitable if the government would have enforced its own immigration laws and refused to appease the illegal immigrants with occasional amnesty for decades. The problem was always our "compassion", which to be honest, is more akin to national co-dependence.

The irony of that statement.

Yeah I get it, we got CA, we made laws, we aren't enforcing our borders and laws. Which brings the not so bright illegals over here and bottoms out wages.

Did you forget what settlers did to the natives and Mexicans here ?

Don't forget named cities like Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, basically the countless missions setup.

People always forget the history of this country and what it was built on.

Who gives a shit? It's not theirs anymore and it shouldn't be given back to them.

Don't buy into guilt trips. It's absurd to feel bad over something past fellow countrymen did that improved our nation's situation significantly.

Ask yourself how many countries in the world, outside of Europe and America, feel guilty about their pasts?

I'm not talking about guilt, I'm talking about history. Two different things. There is no emotion.

Read that second sentence I wrote, I fully know why need to stop illegal immigration, hell my family came here legally, I'm 1st gen American born.

Post: #37

(07-10-2015 03:07 PM)Veloce Wrote:  But if you want to talk about Mexico sending "their worst", in terms of gangs, murders, and rape, okay let's go there.

Where do you think Latino gangs get so much power? Where do cartels get so much power?

The U.S. is, by FAR, the biggest consumer of illegal drugs.

On top of that, do a little research into the relationship between the CIA and Mexican/Central American drug cartels. We've been supporting these crime lords for decades.

And finally, the War on Drugs itself. The War on Drugs is a billion dollar industry, benefiting private prisons, alcohol producers and distributors, and the DEA. In order for these groups to keep earning a paycheck, they NEED druglords, they NEED an enemy, they NEED dealers on the street. The ruling class doesn't give a shit about people getting high. They're more concerned with their cronies getting billions of dollars of taxpayer money.

So before you go on cheering for Trump and his buffoon comments, take a step back and look at our own complicity in the current situation. Something about making one's bed and lying in it...

You are absolutely right on this. The last two administrations have even given the cartels in Mexico guns and tried to play kingmaker down there. They've profited off the violence. All the while they keep drugs illegal here at home, push for more gun control, and want illegal immigrants to keep coming so they can grant them amnesty and get a lot of new voters.

It's really evil what the scum-sucking politicians are doing to all of us.

Post: #38

Veloce with all due respect to you as a senior member, I don't care why they come here, what work ethic they have, or what tribe they belong to. I care whether they enter legally, follow our laws, and whether they're making things better or worse for the people (of any color) already living in the country.

Post: #39

I think a lot of problems will be solved in 20 more years through education and medical advancement. These pissing matches we have now will be over.

We have to keep rising people out of the shit. It sucks, it is worth it though. We do have to stop too many coming over that I agree with.

As said, completely legalizing all drugs (steroids included) would solve so many problems in the Western Hemisphere as far as crime and violence it is obscene.

Obama didn't even have the nutsack in 08' to come out pro legalizing weed, he made fun of it. Hopefully the next president has more courage in this area.

Post: #40

(07-10-2015 02:39 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 12:49 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 11:57 AM)Icepasian Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 11:17 AM)kaotic Wrote:  Well yeah...Mexico is our neighbor and California has spanish/mexican history so this is obvious as water is wet.

Many border states will be like this sooner or later.

It wouldn't have been obvious or inevitable if the government would have enforced its own immigration laws and refused to appease the illegal immigrants with occasional amnesty for decades. The problem was always our "compassion", which to be honest, is more akin to national co-dependence.

The irony of that statement.

Yeah I get it, we got CA, we made laws, we aren't enforcing our borders and laws. Which brings the not so bright illegals over here and bottoms out wages.

Did you forget what settlers did to the natives and Mexicans here ?

Don't forget named cities like Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, basically the countless missions setup.

People always forget the history of this country and what it was built on.

Who gives a shit? It's not theirs anymore and it shouldn't be given back to them.

Don't buy into guilt trips.

Kaotic is right though. A lot of people either brush that off or don't want to hear it.

The original Californios, Tejanos and Arizonans were Mexican, people who were very wealthy I might add. People forget that during the San Francisco Gold Rush, Mexican Californios were the original miners digging for gold. Lots of Mexican Californios became wealthy and established themselves in California way before whites discovered San Fran. Once the whites got to California they lynched all the wealthy Mexicans pretty much out of envy because they were getting so rich. That whole region (the Southwest) is Mexican as hell which was part of the old Spanish empire. Almost all of the cities there have Spanish surnames.


I find it odd that American high schools don't teach the history of the southwest at greater length besides just taking it from Mexico. A region with rich history and culture should be taught more.

It wasn't Mexico's anymore after the war, but the people remained there (border jumped us not the other way around) as many Mexican Americans say. That's why it sort of shocking to a Hispanic in the southwest when someone tells them to "Go back to Mexico". Their response is usually "what the hell are you talking about? I'm home."

Post: #41

(07-10-2015 03:19 PM)Blick Mang Wrote:  Veloce with all due respect to you as a senior member, I don't care why they come here, what work ethic they have, or what tribe they belong to. I care whether they enter legally, follow our laws, and whether they're making things better or worse for the people (of any color) already living in the country.

Well then we're in at least partial agreement. I don't want my post above to be construed as that of a bleeding heart liberal defending the brown people. My post was only in response to some of the assertions you made, some of which I feel are extreme.

I'm all for immigration reform. That murderer in SF should have been kept out of the country the first time.

Post: #42

(07-10-2015 03:21 PM)MidWest Wrote:  It wasn't Mexico's anymore after the war, but the people remained there (border jumped us not the other way around) as many Mexican Americans say. That's why it sort of shocking to a Hispanic in the southwest when someone tells them to "Go back to Mexico". Their response is usually "what the hell are you talking about? I'm home."

The population of Alta California, which is a lot larger than the current state of California was only 85,000 just before the Mexican American War.



I don't see what the connection is between millions of modern day Mexicans to just 85,000 people over a vast area 150 years ago.

Alta California was only under Mexican rule from approx 1824 to 1848. That's less than 30 years.

Post: #43

(07-10-2015 04:03 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  I'd guess it happened a long time ago. There are illegals living 20 to a house! No way the census bureau counted them all.

The Census Bureau campaigned and had a awareness program for the 2010 Census to specifically target illegal immigrants.

They might have under counted the illegal population by a bit, but not by much:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/22...36095.html

Post: #44

(07-10-2015 03:02 PM)TheWastelander Wrote:  Imagine the outrage if several states and cities said they were going to stop enforcing all federal gun control laws.

The big government supporters would lose their collective minds.

Wasn't it just last week a lot of nerdy armchair left-wing Union triumphalists across the internet were making noise about how much they were glad the rebellious law-breaking treasonous Confederacy was brought to heel?

It seems they're okay with rebellion to the central power as long as it serves their goals.

Stay tuned to an ROK near you.

Post: #45

(07-10-2015 03:47 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 03:21 PM)MidWest Wrote:  It wasn't Mexico's anymore after the war, but the people remained there (border jumped us not the other way around) as many Mexican Americans say. That's why it sort of shocking to a Hispanic in the southwest when someone tells them to "Go back to Mexico". Their response is usually "what the hell are you talking about? I'm home."

The population of Alta California, which is a lot larger than the current state of California was only 85,000 just before the Mexican American War.



I don't see what the connection is between millions of modern day Mexicans to just 85,000 people over a vast area 150 years ago.

Alta California was only under Mexican rule from approx 1824 to 1848. That's less than 30 years.

Yes, but you have to remember also that America's population was around 15 million at the time too. In the southwest there were approximately 500,000 Mexicans living there at the time. Cultural ties, historical documents and traditions were already set.

Another thing is that the average American (for some strange reason) knows very little about the Mexican-American War of 1848. Where as in Mexico everyone knows that the U.S. took half of their territory. Every Mexican person in Mexico is taught since they are little about the Mexican-American War, its origins and its history. Also known as "The American Intervention" described by Mexican writer Octavio Paz as "one of the most unjust wars of conquest in history." In a lighter vein, some Mexicans jokingly say that, when the U.S. took half of Mexico’s territory, they took the half with the paved roads. Mexicans crossing the border pretty much say "well we are rightfully walking into our land"

Maybe the American elites should have brushed up on their history and thought twice before bringing in millions of people from the only country on earth with the claim that land was stolen from them by the U.S. Not very smart.


Also, I don't buy the narrative that because of Mexicans all of a sudden the country is "doomed". Mexicans have been living in California and Texas for a little under two centuries now and have the highest population of Hispanics than any other states and yet they managed to have the most prosperous state economies in the U.S. Both those states could be countries if they wanted too and still be in the G-8.

Post: #46

There's a time coming in America...I'd say about 20+ years from now.

When as a guy with "all American" looks (tall, blond, blue-eyed), you'll walk down the street and not see a SINGLE person that looks like you.

You won't even hear your language being spoken.

It's kinda fucked up. But there's nothing to be done about it And I won't be here to watch the decline...

Post: #47

(07-10-2015 05:14 PM)Chick Magnet Wrote:  There's a time coming in America...I'd say about 20+ years from now.

When as a guy with "all American" looks (tall, blond, blue-eyed), you'll walk down the street and not see a SINGLE person that looks like you.

You won't even hear your language being spoken.

It's kinda fucked up. But there's nothing to be done about it And I won't be here to watch the decline...

That's me every day. It sounds like you live in a pretty white and/or black area.

Post: #48

(07-10-2015 05:15 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 05:14 PM)Chick Magnet Wrote:  There's a time coming in America...I'd say about 20+ years from now.

When as a guy with "all American" looks (tall, blond, blue-eyed), you'll walk down the street and not see a SINGLE person that looks like you.

You won't even hear your language being spoken.

It's kinda fucked up. But there's nothing to be done about it And I won't be here to watch the decline...

That's me every day. It sounds like you live in a pretty white and/or black area.

Nah, south Florida. It's unrecognisable from when I was a kid.

Edit: Ah, I get your point. Yea, there are parts of the country where that's already the reality. But it hasn't really "sunk in" yet. When most people around the world think American, they think Chris Evans. That's no longer the reality. And in 20+ years, we'll be a tiny minority. It's just astonishing how fast it happened frankly.

Post: #49

(07-10-2015 05:14 PM)Chick Magnet Wrote:  There's a time coming in America...I'd say about 20+ years from now.

When as a guy with "all American" looks (tall, blond, blue-eyed), you'll walk down the street and not see a SINGLE person that looks like you.

You won't even hear your language being spoken.

It's kinda fucked up. But there's nothing to be done about it And I won't be here to watch the decline...

I don't think it will ever get that bad. English is still the overwhelming language spoken in the USA.

However, with more and more immigration coming from non-white countries to the USA, in the future white people will be a much smaller percentage of the total population.

Quote:Edit: Ah, I get your point. Yea, there are parts of the country where that's already the reality. But it hasn't really "sunk in" yet. When most people around the world think American, they think Chris Evans. That's no longer the reality. And in 20+ years, we'll be a tiny minority. It's just astonishing how fast it happened frankly.

Don't get carried away.

Whites won't be a tiny minority in 20+ years, but they will no longer be the majority of the USA population.

Post: #50

(07-10-2015 05:27 PM)Tex Pro Wrote:  

(07-10-2015 05:14 PM)Chick Magnet Wrote:  There's a time coming in America...I'd say about 20+ years from now.

When as a guy with "all American" looks (tall, blond, blue-eyed), you'll walk down the street and not see a SINGLE person that looks like you.

You won't even hear your language being spoken.

It's kinda fucked up. But there's nothing to be done about it And I won't be here to watch the decline...

I don't think it will ever get that bad. English is still the overwhelming language spoken in the USA.

However, with more and more immigration coming from non-white countries to the USA, in the future white people will be a much smaller percentage of the total population.

Quote:Edit: Ah, I get your point. Yea, there are parts of the country where that's already the reality. But it hasn't really "sunk in" yet. When most people around the world think American, they think Chris Evans. That's no longer the reality. And in 20+ years, we'll be a tiny minority. It's just astonishing how fast it happened frankly.

Don't get carried away.

Whites won't be a tiny minority in 20+ years, but they will no longer be the majority of the USA population.

You're going off official numbers.

Census workers don't go into neighbourhoods with Guatemalan gangs.

Vast swaths of the country are already minority-majority. It's just a matter of time before the trend spreads.

It's a demographic transition akin to what happened in the late Roman empire, with the Goths pouring into the Italian peninsula. And well, it didn't work out too well for the Romans...